Información de la revista
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
282
Consensus Document
Acceso a texto completo
Pruebas no corregidas. Disponible online el 7 de enero de 2025
Consensus Statement From the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) Psoriasis Working Group (SWG) and Pediatric Working Group (PWG) on the Management of Pediatric Psoriasis
Documento de consenso del Grupo Español de Psoriasis (GPS) y del grupo Español de Dermatología Pediátrica (GEDP) de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) sobre el manejo de la psoriasis pediátrica
Visitas
282
A. Vicentea,
Autor para correspondencia
asuncion.vicente@sjd.es

Corresponding author.
, A. Pérez-Ferriolsb, A. Batallac,d, L. García-Fernandeze, B. Pérezf, N. Eirisg, R. de Lucash, P. De La Cuevai, J.M. Carrascosaj
a Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain
b Departamento de Dermatología, Consorci Hospital General Universitari de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
c Departamento de Dermatología, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
d Grupo de Investigación DIPO, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria Galicia Sur (IIS Galicia Sur), SERGAS-UVIGO, Galicia, Spain
e Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario San Juan, Alicante, Spain
f Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario Morales Meseguer, Murcia, Spain
g Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Virgen Macarena, Sevilla, Spain
h Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain
i Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
j Departamento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Germans Trias I Pujol Research Institute (IGTP), Universitat Autònoma de Barcelona, Badalona, Barcelona, Spain
Ver más
Contenido relacionado
A. Vicente, A. Pérez-Ferriols, A. Batalla, L. García-Fernandez, B. Pérez, N. Eiris, R. de Lucas, P. De La Cueva, J.M. Carrascosa
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Tablas (16)
Table 1. Available treatments for pediatric psoriasis.
Table 2. Characteristics and differences in the management of pediatric psoriasis vs adult psoriasis.
Table 3. Main characteristics of tools for assessing the severity of psoriasis in children and adolescents.
Table 4. Considerations on establishing therapeutic goals in pediatric psoriasis.
Table 5. Main characteristics of safety, efficacy, and use of topical therapies.
Table 6. Guidelines on the use of systemic drugs in pediatric psoriasis.
Table 7. Practical recommendations on the use of topical therapies in pediatric psoriasis.
Table 8. Guide on the use of topical corticosteroids based on localization and patient age according to the Fingertip Unit (FTU).a
Table 9. Guide on the use of salicylic acid based on patient age and localization.
Table 10. Efficacy of systemic treatments in pediatric psoriasis.
Table 11. Vaccination recommendations for children with psoriasis on immunosuppressive therapies.
Table 12. Guide on the use of phototherapy/heliotherapy in pediatric psoriasis patients.
Table 13. Summary of the main comorbidities, their impact on patient or treatments, and practical recommendations for prevention and management.
Table 14. Recommendations for screening pediatric comorbidities in dermatology consultations.
Table 15. Definition of metabolic syndrome in pediatric patients.
Table 16. Risk management with the use of different therapeutic options for pediatric patients with moderate-severe psoriasis.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Material adicional (1)
Abstract
Justification and objectives

The Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) Psoriasis and Pediatric Working Groups (PSW and PWG) have developed a set of recommendations for the management of pediatric psoriasis based on the best available evidence and experts’ opinion.

Methodology

The methodology of nominal groups was followed, with help from a scoping review. A coordinator was designated, and a group of experts was selected based on their experience and knowledge on the management of psoriasis. The coordinator defined both the objectives and the key points of the document. Then, with help from a documentalist, a systematic literature review was conducted across Medline, Embase and Cochrane Library until May 2023. Systematic literature reviews, meta-analyses, and observational studies were included. National and international clinical practice guidelines and consensus documents were reviewed. With this information, the coordinator proposed preliminary recommendations that were discussed and modified in a nominal group meeting with all experts. After several review processes, which included an external review, the final document was generated.

Results

Practical recommendations on the evaluation and management of patients with pediatric psoriasis are presented in association with other AEDV documents. The evaluation of the pediatric patient, the definition of the therapeutic objectives, the criteria for indication and selection of treatment are addressed. Practical issues such as therapeutic failure, response maintenance, comorbidity and risk management are also included.

Keywords:
Pediatric psoriasis
Topical treatment
Systemic treatment
Consensus
Resumen
Justificación y objetivos

Los Grupos de Psoriasis y Dermatología Pediátrica (GPS y GEDP) de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (AEDV) han generado recomendaciones para el tratamiento de la psoriasis pediátrica, basadas en la mejor evidencia disponible y la experiencia de expertos.

Metodología

Se siguió la metodología de grupos nominales, con la ayuda de una revisión sistemática de la literatura (RSL). Tras designar una coordinadora, se seleccionó un grupo de integrantes en función de su experiencia y conocimiento en la psoriasis pediátrica. La coordinadora definió los objetivos y los puntos clave del documento, y con la ayuda de una documentalista, se realizó una RSL en Medline, Embase y Cochrane Library (hasta mayo de 2023). Se seleccionaron revisiones sistemáticas, metaanálisis, ensayos clínicos, así como estudios observacionales. Se revisaron otras guías de práctica clínica y documentos de consenso nacionales e internacionales. Con esta información, la coordinadora generó una serie de recomendaciones preliminares que fueron evaluadas y modificadas en una reunión de grupo nominal. Tras varios procesos de revisión y una evaluación externa se redactó el documento definitivo.

Resultados

Se presentan en el documento recomendaciones prácticas, en línea con otros documentos de la AEDV, sobre la evaluación y el manejo de los pacientes con psoriasis pediátrica. Se aborda la valoración del paciente pediátrico, la definición de los objetivos terapéuticos en estos pacientes, así como los criterios de indicación y selección del tratamiento. Se incluyen, asimismo, cuestiones prácticas como el fracaso terapéutico, el mantenimiento de la respuesta, la comorbilidad o la gestión del riesgo.

Palabras clave:
Psoriasis pediátrica
Tratamiento tópico
Tratamiento sistémico
Consenso
Texto completo
Introduction

Psoriasis is one of the most common dermatological conditions among the pediatric population, significantly impacting children's quality of life and development—often to a greater extent than other chronic conditions such as epilepsy or diabetes.1–4 European studies have reported a psoriasis prevalence of 0.18% up to 0.55% in children aged 0–9 years and 0.83% up to 1.37% in those aged 10–19 years.1,5,6 Onset most commonly occurs during adolescence and tends to follow a relapsing course.1,7 Pediatric psoriasis, like its adult counterpart, is a multisystemic disease often associated with comorbidities such as psoriatic arthritis (PsA), obesity, depression, and metabolic syndrome.8

Although pediatric psoriasis shares the same clinical subtypes as adult psoriasis, the lesions can differ in distribution and morphology. Similarly, the clinical symptoms and impact of pediatric psoriasis may vary depending on the patient's age.

Currently, alongside phototherapy, a wide range of pharmacological treatments is available for pediatric psoriasis, including topical and systemic therapies as well as biologic therapies.

The Psoriasis and Pediatric Dermatology Working Groups (GPS and GEPD) of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV), together with other published clinical practice guidelines on the management of adult psoriasis, developed recommendations for the specific pharmacological management of pediatric psoriasis (ages 0–18 years). Non-pharmacological treatments (e.g., exercise, heliotherapy, psychological support, multidisciplinary care), though equally important in the comprehensive management of children with psoriasis, are outside the scope of this document.

The main goal of this consensus document is to provide dermatologists with a reference tool to support therapeutic decision-making and facilitate the selection of the best available treatment for pediatric psoriatic patients, including special locations. The document also aims to standardize and consolidate proposals implemented in clinical practice by pediatric psoriasis experts in Spain, based on the best available evidence and expert opinion.

This document is particularly relevant given the lack of specific guidelines for this age group in our setting and studies highlighting that many pediatric psoriatic patients are undertreated due to a lack of knowledge or apprehension.9,10 Of note, patient age should not restrict access to any drugs.

The recommendations address the assessment of psoriasis severity in pediatric patients and its practical implications, the indications for available treatments, therapeutic goals, and response to treatment, always considering the unique characteristics (physiology, pharmacokinetics, family structure, etc.) of this population vs adults.

Furthermore, these recommendations can aid other health care professionals involved in managing these patients, such as primary care physicians, rheumatologists, nurses, pediatricians, and health care administrators.

MethodologyStudy design

This consensus document was initiated by AEDV GPS and GEPD. The consensus was developed using a nominal group methodology supported by a systematic literature review (SLR). The project fully complied with the principles established in the Declaration of Helsinki on medical research involving human subjects and complied with applicable Good Clinical Practice regulations.

Participant selection and document development

First, a coordinator was appointed, and a group of dermatologists was selected based on their expertise in pediatric psoriasis. During the initial nominal group meeting, experts, with methodological support, defined the objectives, scope, audience, and sections of the document. They also decided to conduct a SLR to analyze the safety and efficacy profile of pharmacological treatments and phototherapy for pediatric psoriasis (Tables 1–3 of the annex in the supplementary data). The SLR was conducted with the help of a professional documentalist who developed search strategies using Medical Subject Headings (MeSH) and free-text terms across major bibliographic databases (Medline, Embase, and the Cochrane Library) up until May 2023. Quality SLRs, meta-analyses, randomized clinical trials (RCTs), and observational studies were included. Two independent reviewers selected the studies and extracted the data.

The results of the SLR and other national and international consensus documents8,11–15 formed the basis for drafting preliminary recommendations and text.

These were discussed during a second nominal group meeting, where the final recommendations were generated. After several review processes, including external review by GPS members, the final document was drafted.

Results

Alongside phototherapy, pharmacological treatments for pediatric psoriasis include topical and systemic therapies (Table 1). However, currently, phototherapy and biologic therapies are the only treatments approved for pediatric psoriasis.

Table 1.

Available treatments for pediatric psoriasis.

Topical therapies  Systemic therapies  Phototherapy 
Corticosteroids (very high, high, intermediate, low potency)  Acitretin   
Calcipotriol  Methotrexate   
Betamethasone/calcipotriol  Cyclosporine   
Calcineurin inhibitors  Etanercept   
Anthralin  Adalimumab   
Salicylic acid  Ixekizumab  Broadband UVB 
Coal tar  Ustekinumab  Narrowband UVB 
  Secukinumab  Psoralen+ultraviolet A (PUVA) 
    Excimer laser 
General principles in the management of pediatric psoriasis

Table 1 lists the treatments available for pediatric psoriasis.

Characteristics of pediatric psoriasis

As with adult psoriasis, the selection/prioritization of treatments must consider various drug-related factors, patient, environment, psoriasis per se, the health care system and its organization.16,17

Pediatric psoriasis also has several characteristics different from adult psoriasis regarding:

  • Clinical features of psoriasis (distribution, morphology, symptoms, impact).

  • Pediatric-specific factors (anatomophysiological, psychological, familial, educational, and social context).

  • Disease assessment by the dermatologist and indications for drug use.

  • Parental or caregiver involvement in disease assessment and therapeutic decision-making.

Table 2 illustrates the main differences between pediatric and adult psoriasis.

Table 2.

Characteristics and differences in the management of pediatric psoriasis vs adult psoriasis.

Psoriasis  Pediatric population  Evaluation and management of psoriasis 
In children<2 years, diaper area psoriasis is the most common form; in children and adolescents, plaque psoriasis is the most common form  Anatomophysiological characteristics:• Larger body surface area• Lower body mass• High surface/volume ratio• Higher percentage of water in total body weight, especially in younger children• Specific absorption, distribution, metabolism, and elimination characteristics  Lack of specific or adapted tools 
Smaller lesions and finer scaling  Specific family, educational, and social structure Stage of life when the individual develops not only physically but also in terms of functional complexity (autonomy, personality, etc.), acquires academic knowledge, and learns to live in society  Domains for assessing severity or quality of life differ 
Greater tendency to develop on the face and flexural surfaces  Different coping with the disease and considerations regarding treatments (management of uncertainty, fear of needles, etc.)  Limited evidence on the safety and efficacy of interventions 
Greater symmetry  Dependence on Parents or Caregivers  Indications in product monographs 
Lesions may adopt an annular or serpiginous morphology    Involvement of parents or caregivers 
Isomorphic or Koebner phenomenon is common    Lack of specific or adapted tools 
Nail involvement is less frequent, especially in younger children     
Pruritus is a common symptom     

From a disease perspective, while the types and locations of pediatric psoriasis are similar to those in adults, there are notable differences. For instance, in children younger than 2 years, diaper-area psoriasis is the most common on,18 whereas plaque psoriasis is more prevalent in children and adolescents.19,20 Guttate psoriasis is the second most common type.21 Nail involvement occurs in up to 40% of cases but is less common vs adults.22 Additionally, pediatric psoriasis lesions tend to be smaller, exhibit finer scaling vs adults,20 and are more symmetrical.23 They also more frequently develop on the face and flexor surfaces.20 Pruritus is a common symptom that significantly disrupts daily life and sleep.7,24–26As with adults, the impact of the disease on children can be profound, extending to their environment. Children with psoriasis may experience disruptions in educational, physical, psychological, emotional, familial, and social well-being.2–4

Managing pediatric patients requires a holistic approach, considering skin involvement, comorbidities, and other individual factors.27,28 The final decision on which drug should be prescribed rests with the dermatologist's clinical judgment. After evaluating the above-mentioned variables and applying them to the individual patient, the dermatologist will make a justified decision in collaboration with the patient's parents or guardians. Patient age should not limit access to therapeutic options.

Assessment of severity in pediatric psoriasis

Assessing disease severity is of paramount importance for setting therapeutic goals, making treatment decisions, and monitoring response. In the pediatric population, severity is evaluated similarly to adults,16,17 while accounting for specific characteristics of pediatric psoriasis. Moderate-to-severe psoriasis is defined as follows:

  • Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI)10, Body Surface Area (BSA)10, Physician's Global Assessment (PGA)3, or Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI)10

  • Special locations

  • Severe forms (erythrodermic and pustular psoriasis)

  • Presence of PsA

  • Failure of topical treatments

In addition to these criteria, other factors influencing disease severity, such as its impact on academic performance, should also be considered. Collaboration with parents or guardians is often necessary, particularly for younger children, to accurately assess disease severity.

However, in the pediatric population, it is necessary to address several issues related to the severity indices used in adults (Table 3). The PASI and BSA and their cutoff points are not formally validated and/or adapted for children. Additionally, they may present certain limitations due to differences in body composition between children and adults. For this reason, a standard method of measuring BSA in children has been proposed using the “rule of nines,” adjusted for regional and age-related body proportions29. The CDLQI, on the other hand, is a validated 10-question survey to assess quality of life in patients aged 4 up to 16 years, derived from the adult Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)30, which includes variables such as itching, sleep, hygiene, impact on relationships and activities, and treatment efficacy. It is available both as text and in animated vignette format30,31. While it measures quality of life, it can serve as a surrogate index of disease severity. For patients aged 16 and older, the adult DLQI can be used. The Simplified Psoriasis Index (PSI) is a validated index for children that not only evaluates the severity of skin lesions but also includes the psychosocial burden and previous treatments used32. However, it is not widely used.

Table 3.

Main characteristics of tools for assessing the severity of psoriasis in children and adolescents.

Tool  Limitations of use in children and adolescents  Validation in pediatric population  Reference 
PASI  Different body proportions compared to adults  NO  – 
BSA  Different body proportions compared to adults  NO  – 
CDLQI  Difficulty for the child to understand/express/complete the items asked  4–16 years  30 
PGA  –  NO  – 
PSI  –  4–17 years  32 

PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; BSA, Body Surface Area; CDLQI, Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index; PGA, Physician's Global Assessment; PSI, Simplified Psoriasis Index.

These indices are difficult to apply in children under 4 years of age, in whom the PGA may serve as a valid alternative to assess disease severity. In very complex cases, even an individual visual analog scale (VAS) could greatly aid in evaluating severity.

Despite the limitations noted with severity indices, based on expert experience, these indices are considered perfectly generalizable to the pediatric population, using the same cutoff points established for adults.

As outlined in other GPS documents, in addition to disease severity, associated symptoms, quality-of-life impact, psychosocial and educational development of the child, as well as the opinions of parents or caregivers, should be considered in therapeutic decision-making.16,17

Therapeutic goals

Regarding the establishment of therapeutic goals (Table 4), as in adults,33 the aim should always be excellence (complete skin clearance and absence of symptoms and disease impact on the patient). This goal is particularly critical in children because they are in a vital stage of development and are likely to live with psoriasis for many years. Thus, tight disease control from the moment of diagnosis is crucial.

Table 4.

Considerations on establishing therapeutic goals in pediatric psoriasis.

Consideration  Details 
1. The therapeutic goal must:  • Be individualized• Be adapted to the characteristics of the disease• Be adapted to the characteristics of the pediatric patient• Be established independently of the type of medication• Weigh the impact on safety, quality of life, and efficiency that attempting to achieve complete disease clearance may have• Consider the peculiarities of severity assessment in pediatric patients 
2. When establishing the therapeutic goal, it is recommended to differentiate between:  • Optimal goal• Clinically adequate goal 
3. The optimal goals should include:  • Achieving a PASI100 response, absolute PASI 0, or complete clearance• Absence of psoriasis-related clinical signs• Absence of psoriasis impact on the physical, psychological, emotional, educational, familial, and social spheres 
4. The clinically adequate goals should include:  • Achieving a PASI90 response, absolute PASI3, BSA<3, and PGA 0–1 (in special locations, PGA1)• Minimizing the impact on quality of life and child development• Achieving minimal disease activity (MDA) 
5. In specific patients or situations (multiple previous failures, toxicity issues, etc.), other less demanding therapeutic goals may be considered clinically adequate, such as PASI75 or absolute PASI5

PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; BSA, Body Surface Area; CDLQI, Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index; PGA, Physician's Global Assessment.

However, several pediatric patients, despite responding, do not achieve this therapeutic goal.33 Consequently, individualized less demanding therapeutic goals may be acceptable (e.g., in patients refractory to multiple therapies, due to toxicity issues, etc.).

On the other hand, as previously mentioned, everything must be customized to the pediatric patient context. Collaboration with parents or caregivers is fundamental.

In the pediatric context, it is particularly important to explain the characteristics, as well as disease progression, therapeutic options, and expectations in detail, considering the need for informed consent for certain drugs.

Criteria for selecting topical, systemic, and phototherapy treatments

Once psoriasis severity has been determined, treatment selection and prioritization should consider factors related to (1) type of psoriasis, (2) the patient (age and comorbidities), (3) the drug (available evidence, administration route, onset speed, convenience, etc.), (4) preferences of the patient and family, (5) health care system organization.16,17

The child's idiosyncrasies and environment should also be considered. It is essential to evaluate whether a specific treatment is the most suitable or whether it could negatively impact various aspects of the child's daily life.34 Negative impacts include missing school for treatment or laboratory tests, stigma, cosmetic unacceptability of topical treatments, or phobia of needles causing stress and anxiety.

Regulatory aspects described in drug fact sheets must also be considered (Tables 5 and 6).

Table 5.

Main characteristics of safety, efficacy, and use of topical therapies.

Topical treatment  Induction  Maintenance  Evidence level  Recommended use by age 
High or very high potency corticosteroids  ++/+++  Medium  - Very high potency corticosteroids• Clobetasol: children>2 years- High potency corticosteroids• Fluticasone: propionate children >1 year• Hydrocortisone aceponate: all ages• Mometasone: furoate children>2 years 
Medium potency corticosteroids  +/++  Medium–low  - Beclometasone: children>1 year- Betamethasone: valerate children>12 years- Fluocinolone: children>1 year- Hydrocortisone butyrate propionate: all ages- Methylprednisolone: children>4 months- Prednicarbate: children>2 years 
Low potency corticosteroids  Medium–low  - Hydrocortisone: all ages 
Calcipotriol  ++  +/++  Medium  - Children>6 years- Maximum dose: 50mg/week for 6–12 years; 75mg/week for >12 years 
Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate  ++/+++  Medium–low  - At the doctor's discretion 
Antraline  Low  - At the doctor's discretion 
Salicylic acid  −/?  Low  - All ages- Caution or avoid in children under 2 years 
Tar  Low  - At the doctor's discretion 
Calcineurin inhibitors  +/++  Low  - Tacrolimus: children>2 years- Pimecrolimus: >3 months 

+++: Very (effective, safe, adherent, preferred by the patient); ++: Quite (effective, safe, adherent, preferred by the patient); +: Somewhat (effective, safe, adherent, preferred by the patient); −/+: Doubtful (effective, safe, adherent, preferred by the patient); −: Not (effective, safe, adherent, preferred by the patient); ?: Unknown.

Table 6.

Guidelines on the use of systemic drugs in pediatric psoriasis.

Drug  Technical data  Dosage 
MTX  - Outside approved indication- Not recommended for children <3 years  Oral/parenteral:• Initial dose: 10–15mg/m2/week or 0.2mg/kg/week, up titrate to 20mg/m2/week or 0.7mg/kg/week, based on response• Maximum dose: 25mg/week• If dose is increased, more frequent follow-up recommended• Folate: 1–5mg/day except on MTX day 
CsA  - Outside approved indication  Oral:• Initial dose: 2.5mg/kg/day• If no satisfactory response after 2 weeks, gradually up tritate to a maximum of 5mg/kg/day• Discontinue if no response after 1 month at maximum dose• If psoriasis control is achieved, reduce to minimum effective dose• Intermittent courses recommendedParenteral:• Dilute the dose in 0.9% saline or glucose solution2.5mg/mL and administer as intermittent IV infusion over 2–6 hours 
Acitretin  - Outside approved indication- Not recommended for children and adolescents unless, in the physician's judgment, the benefits significantly outweigh the risks  Oral:• Initial dose: 0.3–0.5mg/kg• Up titrate to 1mg/kg, based on response• If psoriasis control, can down titrate to 0.2mg/kg. After remission, continue for 2 months at this dose, then discontinue 
ETN  - Children6 years with severe plaque psoriasis who are refractory/intolerant to other systemic therapies or phototherapy  Subcutaneous:• Initial dose: 0.8mg/kg/week (maximum 50mg per dose) for up to 24 weeks• Discontinue if no response after 12 weeks• If reinitiating ETN, follow the same guidelines 
ADA  - Children4 years with severe plaque psoriasis refractory or inappropriate for topical treatment and phototherapy  Subcutaneous:• 15–30kg: Initial dose: 20mg, followed by 20mg every other week, starting 1 week after the initial dose• ≥30kg: Initial dose: 40mg, followed by 40mg every other week, starting 1 week after the initial dose• If unresponsive 16 weeks, evaluate continuation or discontinuation 
SEC  - Children6 years with moderate or severe plaque psoriasis candidates for systemic treatments  Subcutaneous:• Weeks 0, 1, 2, 3, and 4, then monthly• <25kg: 75mg• 25 to < 50kg: 75mg• ≥50kg: 150mg (can up titrate to 300mg) 
UST  - Children6 years with moderate or severe plaque psoriasis refractory/intolerant to other systemic therapies or phototherapy  Subcutaneous:• Week 0, week 4, then every 12 weeks• <60kg: 0.75mg/kg• ≥60 to ≤100kg: 45mg• >100kg: 90mg 
IXE  - Children6 years and weight25kg with moderate or severe plaque psoriasis candidates for systemic treatments  Subcutaneous:• 25–50kg: Week 0: 80mg, then 40mg every 4 weeks• >50kg: Week 0: 160mg (2 injections of 80mg), then 80mg every 4 weeks 

MTX: Methotrexate; CsA: Cyclosporine; ETN: Etanercept; mg: milligrams; m2: square meter; week: week; kg: kilogram; mL: milliliter.

Evaluation of treatment response and definition of therapeutic failure

To define therapeutic failure, the same considerations as in adults16,17 are used, adapted to the particularities of the pediatric population. Therapeutic failure is defined as:

  • Failure to achieve the proposed therapeutic goal: primary therapeutic failure.

  • Loss of the proposed therapeutic goal: secondary therapeutic failure.

  • Achievement of the therapeutic goal at the expense of significant toxicity, requiring treatment discontinuation: safety failure.

  • The treatment negatively impacts the patient's quality of life.

The timeframe for defining therapeutic failure depends on the type of treatment used.

Finally, it is crucial to evaluate the patient's adherence to treatment before determining the presence of definitive therapeutic failure.

Evidence and use of available treatments in pediatric psoriasisTopical treatments

Topical treatments, except for topical corticosteroids, are not indicated in the drug fact sheet for pediatric psoriasis. However, they are widely used in the routine clinical practice for both mild and severe psoriasis as coadjuvant therapy (Table 5). Although specific RCTs are lacking, their safety and efficacy profile and have been analyzed in multiple observational studies, both in the short- and long-term.35–48

Although there are no head-to-head comparative studies, indirect data suggest that corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, and the combination of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate11 seem to be more effective than other topical treatments for pediatric plaque psoriasis (both mild and severe forms).

Topical corticosteroids

Evidence on the safety and efficacy profile comes from moderate-to-low quality observational studies (Table 5). Plaque improvement/resolution after 8–12 weeks of use is estimated at 72.7%, with greater efficacy at higher corticosteroid potency.35–37

The safety profile is acceptable and similar to that of adults, with irritation and itching at the application site being the most common adverse events.36 Systemic adverse events are very rare.

High/very high-potency topical corticosteroids should be used with caution and for the shortest periods of time possible. Dermatologists should monitor patients closely, tailoring this monitoring to the characteristics of each child.

Experts recommend explaining to parents/caregivers and older children the amount and method of application and the possibility of rebound effects if discontinued abruptly (especially for more potent corticosteroids).49,50Tables 5 and 7 provide indications and recommendations, and Table 8 outlines a usage guide based on the lesion location and patient age.

Table 7.

Practical recommendations on the use of topical therapies in pediatric psoriasis.

Topical therapy  Recommendations 
Topical corticosteroids  - Avoid high-potency and especially very high-potency corticosteroids on the face, folds, genital area, and diaper area. If used, apply for very short periods. Low-potency corticosteroids are preferred in these cases.- Generally, use for short treatment periods.- Preferably apply once a day for 1–2 weeks, gradually reducing until discontinued. 
Calcipotriol  - Preferably use once a day for at least two weeks (to assess effectiveness). Typically, treatments last 1–2 months.- Generally, avoid use if lesions are extensive (BSA>30%).- Can be used as a corticosteroid-sparing treatment. 
Calcipotriol/Betamethasone dipropionate  - Particularly consider for scalp psoriasis.- Preferably use once a day for 4 weeks. 
Calcineurin inhibitors  - Particularly consider for psoriasis in sensitive areas (face, folds, genital area).- Preferably use twice a day for short periods, and intermittently if used for extended periods.- Can be used as a corticosteroid-sparing treatment. 
Anthralin  - Particularly consider for thick plaques and few lesions. 
Tar  - Particularly consider for thick plaques and few lesions. 
Salicylic acid  - No clear evidence on its effectiveness. 
Table 8.

Guide on the use of topical corticosteroids based on localization and patient age according to the Fingertip Unit (FTU).a

Localization  3–6 months  1–2 years  3–5 years  6–10 years  >10 years 
Face and neck  1.5  1.5  2.5 
Chest and abdomen  3.5 
Back  1.5  3.5 
Arm and hand  1.5  2.5 
Hand and fingersb  –  –  –  – 
Leg and Foot  1.5  4.5 

A FTU is described as “the amount of cream/ointment squeezed from a tube with a 5mm diameter nozzle, applied from the distal fold of the palmar surface of the index fingertip, approximately 0.5g.

a

Fingertip Unit=fingertip unit.

b

Both sides of the hands.

Adapted from Long CC et al.51
Calcipotriol

An RCT in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis found that twice-daily topical calcipotriol for more than 8 weeks was significantly superior to placebo in reducing redness and scaling and achieving a higher percentage of PGA 0/1 according to physicians.38 However, there were no significant differences in PASI changes (baseline vs post-treatment), lesion thickness or extent reduction, or PGA 0/1 according to patients.38 Adverse events were generally mild, with skin irritation being the most common of all.38 Observational studies have shown improvement/resolution rates of 57.2% up to 100% with topical calcipotriol, with good cosmetic acceptance and a favorable safety profile.11,35–37,42,52

Topical calcipotriol can act as a corticosteroid-sparing agent and may also be applied to sensitive skin to minimize the risk of local side effects associated with topical corticosteroids.

Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate

This combination, in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis, used as a standard 4-week regimen once a day with subsequent dose titration, significantly improved PASI, an effect sustained for up to 48 weeks.48 It also improved CDLQI, PGA, BSA, pain, and itching, with a favorable safety profile.48 Other observational studies report plaque improvement/resolution rates of 32.1% up to 80% with its use.35–37

Topical calcineurin inhibitors

Evidence for these drugs in pediatric plaque psoriasis is limited, but they appear to be effective, with lesion improvement/resolution rates exceeding 50%.35,53 Their main adverse effects include pruritus and local irritation, and they may increase the risk of skin infections and acne.53

Anthralin

Several observational studies have evaluated the efficacy and safety of anthralin in short treatments lasting approximately 8–12 weeks for moderate-to-severe pediatric plaque psoriasis.35,46,54,55 Improvements in PASI of 69.3%, lesion improvement/resolution rates ranging from 3.7% to 81%, and positive changes in CDLQI have been documented. The reported adverse reaction was irritation.

Salicylic acid

Topical treatment with salicylic acid has not demonstrated clear efficacy in observational studies, and evidence for its use is limited.35–37

The topical use of salicylic acid carries a low risk of systemic chronic or acute intoxication, with symptoms such as oral discomfort, headache, dizziness, tinnitus, nausea, or hyperventilation.56–58 These symptoms may occur after topical treatment over large body areas (>20%)57,59,60 especially in children under 12 years and in patients with renal or hepatic failure.56,60,61 Therefore, caution is advised when prescribing salicylic acid (Table 9).

Table 9.

Guide on the use of salicylic acid based on patient age and localization.

Age  Concentration  Body surface area  Duration 
0–2 years  Caution (1–1.5%)  Caution (< 0.5%)  Caution 
3–6 years  1.5–2%  <10%  1–3 days 
7–14 years  2–3%  <20%  1–3 days 
>14 years  5%  ≤20%  1–3 days 
Tar

Tar is often used in combination with phototherapy for the management of pediatric plaque psoriasis.62 Evidence on its use as monotherapy is limited, but it may be effective.35 Although tar has a good safety profile, it is cosmetically unsatisfactory.

Systemic treatment

Systemic treatment is indicated for moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis.

Several systemic therapies have demonstrated efficacy in pediatric plaque psoriasis, but currently, only biologic therapies have regulatory approval.

Of note, methotrexate (MTX), acitretin, and cyclosporine (CsA) are not indicated for individuals under 18 years old according to regulatory clincal practice guidelines.

Table 10 illustrates the efficacy of systemic treatments, and Table 6 provides a usage guide. Risk management and monitoring of these therapies are shown in Table 11.

Table 10.

Efficacy of systemic treatments in pediatric psoriasis.

Drug  PASI75  PASI90  PASI100  PGA 0/1  CDLQI 0/1  Survival  Level of evidence 
MTX36,39,40,63–73  Week 4: 4%Week 12: 4.3–80.6%Week 16: 32.4%Week 24: 33.3%Week 28: 16.5%Week 36: 40%Week 48: 28.6%  Week 12: 0–47.2%Week 16: 22%Week 24: 23.8%Week 28: 17.8%Week 36: 20%Week 48: 40%  Week 16: 3%  Week 4: 8.1%Week 8: 18.1%Week 16: 40.5%  –  1 year: 21.1–77.5%2 years: 6.8%3 years: 3.4–50.3%5 years: 35.9%  Moderate 
CsA36,64,68,69  Week 24: 25%  Week 24: 15%  –  –  –  1 year: 15.1%2 years: 6.5%3 years: 0%  Moderate–low 
Acitretin36,64,68,69  Week 36: 21.3%  Week 36: 26.2%  –  –  –  1 year: 36.3%2 years: 13.3%3 years: 13.3%  Low 
ETN67,74–81  Week 12: 54.7–63.4%Week 24: 63.4–65.2%Week 36: 67–68%Week 52: 52.1–68.3%Week 96: 61% 5 years: 70%  Week 12: 27.4–40%Week 36: 40.4–41%Week 52: 51.2%Week 96: 30% 5 years: 40%  Week 12: 17.1–53%Week 52: 22%  Week 12: 52.6–53%Week 24: 48%Week 36: 52.1–56%Week 52: 21.7–56.1%Week 96: 47% 5 years: 50%  –  1 year: 41.3–70%2 years: 32–53%5 years: 9–30%  High 
ADA66,67,70,81  Week 4: 15.4–23.7%Week 8: 38.5–47.4%Week 16: 43.6–57.9%Week 52: 47.2–86.1%  Week 16: 13–29%Week 52: 33.3–66.7%  Week 16: 10–18%Week 52: 22.2–41.7%  Week 4: 20.5–28.9%Week 8: 35.9–44.7%Week 16: 41–60.5%Week 52: 50–75%  –  1 year: 38.6–77%2 years: 15–67%5 years: 2–48%  High 
SEC75  Week 12: 77.5–80%Week 24: 87.5–92.5%Week 52: 87.5–94.4%  Week 12: 67.5–72.5%Week 52: 75–81.3%  Week 12: 27.5–30%Week 52: 40–62%  Week 12: 60–70%Week 24: 75–87.5%Week 52: 72.5–87.5%  Week 12: 44.7–50%Week 52: 60.6–66.7%  –  High 
UST67,81,82  Week 12: 78.4–80.6%Week 52: maintained  Week 12: 54.1–61.1%Week 52: maintained  –  Week 12: 67.6–69.4%Week 52: maintained  Week 12: 38.7–56.7%Week 52: 50–58.6%  1 year: 37–85%2 years: 13–78%5 years: 3–65%  High 
IXE80,83  Week 12: 89%Week 48: 90%Week 60: 90%Week 108: 91.7%  Week 12: 78%Week 48: 83%Week 60: 83.3%Week 108: 79%  Week 12: 50%Week 48: 55%Week 60: 53.2%Week 108: 55.1%  Week 12: 81%Week 48: 81%Week 60: 80%Week 108: 78.3%  Week 12: 64%Week 48: 76%  –  High 

MTX: methotrexate; CsA: cyclosporine; ETN: etanercept; ADA: adalimumab; SEC: secukinumab; UST: ustekinumab; IXE: ixekizumab; PASI: Psoriasis Area Severity Index; PGA: Physician Global Assessment; CDLQI: Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index.

Table 11.

Vaccination recommendations for children with psoriasis on immunosuppressive therapies.

Recommendations  Details 
1. All vaccination decisions should be made in consultation with the child's pediatrician.
2. Vaccines should be administered before starting immunosuppressive treatment whenever possible.
3. Avoid vaccinations during a flare-up of the disease.
4. Vaccines should not be delayed without an objective justification.
5. Vaccines containing inactivated microorganisms (pneumococcus, hepatitis A and B, flu, meningococcus A, B, C, W, Y) can be administered.
6. Vaccines with live viruses (measles, mumps, rubella):  • Should not be used 4 weeks before starting immunosuppressive treatment until 3 months after discontinuing it (6 months for ADA).• For children older than 12 months not vaccinated vs chickenpox (and who have not had it) or the MMR vaccine, vaccination should be given before starting treatment.• Contraindicated in children on high-dose immunosuppressive therapy.• A booster dose may be given to patients on low-dose MTX (<15mg/m2/week). 
7. Human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine:  • 3 doses are recommended for children on immunosuppressive therapy.• It is also recommended for males, even if not included in their vaccination schedule. 
8. It is recommended that the tetanus dose at age 14 should be given with Tdpa (low antigenic load).
9. In patients vaccinated 2 weeks prior to starting immunosuppressive treatment or during treatment, revaccination may be required 3–12 months after discontinuation.
10. Review the vaccination schedule for family members.
11. If traveling to countries with a risk of infectious diseases, visit an international vaccination center.
Methotrexate

MTX is the most widely used classic systemic drug for the management of pediatric psoriasis.36,39,40,64–66,68–73, It can be administered orally or parenterally on a weekly basis. Typically used as monotherapy, it may be combined with biologic therapies in highly individualized cases.73Tables 6 and 10 describe its main characteristics.

Several SLRs have described the efficacy of MTX (at various doses and regimens) in treatments lasting 6 weeks to 4 years36,68,69 finding up to a 90% significant improvement/clearance rate in pediatric plaque psoriasis. A RCT reported the following outcomes for MTX (0.1–0.4mg/kg/week) at 16 weeks: PASI75 32.4%, PGA 0/1 40.5%, PASI90 22%, PASI100 3%, CDLQI −5.0, and Pediatric Quality of Life Inventory (PedsQL) 1.9.66 The rate of adverse events was 76%, with severe adverse events occurring in 5%.66 Data at 52 weeks confirmed the results observed at 16 weeks.70 Observational studies up to 5 years align with these findings.65,71 MTX also improves quality of life40,65 and is highly effective in children with associated PsA.84 MTX survival rates are estimated at 77.5%, 50.3% and 35.9% at 1, 3, and 5 years, respectively (significantly lower vs those achieved with biologics).72

The safety profile of MTX is very similar to that described in adults.39,64,65,71

Cyclosporine

CsA is another classic systemic drug used in pediatric psoriasis, particularly for special locations and severe forms. It is typically administered orally, though parenteral use is possible.

SLRs and observational studies report PASI75 and PASI90 response rates of 25% and 15%, respectively after 24 weeks of treatment, with a safety profile similar to that of adults.36,39,64,68,69

Acitretin

This retinoid has been studied in pediatric patients with pustular psoriasis, generalized guttate psoriasis, erythrodermic psoriasis, and specific locations.36,68,69 However, evidence for its use in plaque psoriasis is limited.36,68,69

Although no serious safety concerns have been reported in published studies, retinoids may cause significant musculoskeletal adverse events with chronic high-dose use.85,86 Specifically, they have been associated with premature epiphyseal closure, hyperostosis, anterior spinal ligament calcification, periosteal bone formation, and decreased bone mineral density.85,86 Additionally, acitretin is teratogenic.87

Biologic therapies

Biologics approved for moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis include etanercept (ETN), adalimumab (ADA), ustekinumab (UST), secukinumab (SEC), and ixekizumab (IXE). These therapies are the only ones supported by high-quality clinical trials and short- to mid- to long-term data (Table 10). Their indications and monitoring requirements are based on these findings.

Given their safety and efficacy profiles in pediatric patients, biologics are increasingly considered first-line systemic therapies.

ETN has shown significant superiority over placebo in pediatric psoriatic patients (≥4 years) with ≥10% BSA.77 At 12 weeks, ETN achieved PASI75 in 57%, PASI90 in 27%, and PGA 0/1 in 53%. This improvement persisted at week 36, with PASI75 in 65–68%, PASI90 in 38–41%, and PGA 0/1 in 53% up to 56%.77 Results were sustained at 2 (PASI75 61%, PASI90 30%, PGA 0/1 47%)78 and 5 years (PASI75 70%, PASI90 40%, PGA 0/1 50%).79 ETN also significantly improves quality of life.76–79 Although the efficacy of ETN is consistent across age groups it is lower in overweight/obese patients vs those with normal weight.79 ETN was generally well tolerated, with infections being the most common adverse events and severe adverse events being a rare finding.76–79

On the other hand, ADA has shown efficacy in children (≥4 years) with severe plaque psoriasis.66,70 ADA at 0.4mg/kg and 0.8mg/kg doses achieved the following outcomes at 16 weeks: PASI75 43.6% and 57.9%, PASI90 13% and 29%, PASI100 10% and 18%, PGA 0/1 41.0% and 60.5%, and CDLQI −4.9 and −6.6.66 ADA at 0.8mg/kg was significantly superior to MTX in PASI75 and PedsQL but showed no differences in PGA 0/1, PASI90, PASI100, and CDLQI. The relates of adverse event were 77% and 68%, respectively, with severe adverse events in 13% and 3%.66 Infections were the most common adverse events.66 Data at 52 weeks confirmed observations from 16 weeks.70

A RCT evaluated SEC at low (75/75/150mg), higher doses (75/150/300mg), and ETN 0.8mg/kg (max. 50mg) in children (≥6 years), nearly 100% of whom had plaque psoriasis with a PASI20.75 At 12 weeks, both doses of SEC were significantly superior to placebo, with approximately 30% of patients achieving PASI100 with SEC. Compared to ETN, both SEC doses were significantly superior in achieving PASI90 and Investigator's Global Assessment (IGA) 0/1, but no differences were observed in PASI75 or PASI100 between groups at 12 weeks.75 At 24 weeks, data for low-dose SEC vs high-dose SEC vs ETN were as follows: IGA 0/1, 87.5% vs 75% vs 48%; PASI75, 92.5% vs 87.5% vs 63.4%. At 52 weeks, results were PASI90, 75–81.3% vs 77.8–80% vs 51.2%; PASI100, 40–62% vs 47.5–55.6% vs 22%; IGA 0/1, 72.5–87.5% vs 72.5–75% vs 56.1%; and CDLQI 0/1, 66% vs 66.7% vs 44.4%.75 The safety profile of SEC was similar to that of other biologic therapies. Most adverse events reported were mild and transient, with infections being the most common one.75 Another open-label, phase III RCT without a comparator group showed similar results at 24 weeks.88

The CADMUS Study analyzed UST in adolescents (12–17 years) with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis over 52 weeks. UST was administered at its standard and half-doses and compared to a placebo. At 12 weeks, both UST regimens were significantly superior, with up to 61% of patients achieving PASI9082. Similarly, ay 52 weeks, 50% and 58.6% of patients receiving medium and standard doses of UST achieved CDLQI 0/1. This study found no differences in clinical efficacy based on weight (<60kg, 60–100kg) or serum UST concentrations (within each dose group). UST was well-tolerated, with most adverse events being mild and transient, the most common being infections82.

Regarding IXE, the IXORA-PEDS trial analyzed children (≥6 years) with various types of moderate-to-severe psoriasis, comparing IXE with placebo and ETN.80 Compared with placebo, at 12 weeks, IXE was significantly superior in terms of PASI75, PASI90, PASI100, PGA 0/1, and CDLQI/DLQI 0/1, among other outcomes.80 Compared with ETN in patients with severe psoriasis, at 12 weeks, IXE was significantly superior in achieving PASI90, PASI100, and PGA 0. However, there were no differences in PASI75 or PGA 0/1.80 By week 48, 90% of patients had achieved PASI75; 83%, PASI90; 55%, PASI100; and 76%, CDLQI/DLQI 0/1.80 At week 60, the rates of patients achieving PASI75, PASI90, and PASI100 were 90%, 83.3%, and 53.2%, respectively. By week 108, these rates were 91.7%, 79%, and 55.1%. Safety data at weeks 12 and 108 indicated that IXE was generally well-tolerated. The rate of serious adverse events was low (7.7% at week 108), with infections being the most common.80,89

Phototherapy

Phototherapy is indicated for children8 years with moderate-to-severe psoriasis (refer to Table 12 for guidelines). However, access to phototherapy can be limited due to logistical constraints in certain hospitals.

Table 12.

Guide on the use of phototherapy/heliotherapy in pediatric psoriasis patients.

Type  Dosage  Other considerations 
UVB  - From 8 years old.- Depending on skin type, initial dose:• 0.2–0.6J/cm2 NBUVB• 0.02–0.06J/cm2 BSUVB- Subsequent doses can be up titrated by up to 25%.  - Non-affected areas, especially the face and genital areas, must be covered.- Typically, 20–30 cycles are needed (3–5/week).- No additional UV exposure on treatment days.- Using emollient on lesions before treatment may enhance the effectiveness of NBUVB. 
UVA  - Not recommended.  - Limited clinical efficacy as monotherapy. 
Topical PUVA  - Not recommended.  – 
Systemic PUVA  - Contraindicated.  – 

UVB: ultraviolet B light; NBUVB: narrowband ultraviolet B light; UVA: ultraviolet A light; PUVA: psoralen and ultraviolet A light therapy; J: Joule; cm: centimeter.

A 2021 a SLR and meta-analysis focused on narrow-band ultraviolet B (UVB) phototherapy, including 10 prospective and retrospective observational studies with nearly 300 pediatric psoriatic patients treated with a mean 17–57 sessions90. An overall efficacy rate of 80% was estimated, defined as excellent or good response if lesion clearance was ≥75%. However, no association was ever found between efficacy and cumulative or maximum mean doses in the review90. Erythema was the most common adverse event.

Treatment strategies in pediatric psoriasisMild pediatric psoriasis

For the management of mild pediatric psoriasis, first-line therapies include topical therapy or phototherapy/heliotherapy, barring contraindications.

It is important to remember that, except for corticosteroids, topical treatments do not have an approved indication in their product labels.

The selection of a treatment should follow the previously discussed criteria. At this point, experts also emphasize the importance of collaborating with and considering the opinion of the patient's parents or guardians/caregivers.

Many authors consider corticosteroids as the topical treatment of choice.13 If a topical corticosteroid is prescribed, its potency should be adapted to the extent and site of application. Medium- and high-potency corticosteroids are generally preferred, except on the face, folds (including the genital area), and diaper area, where low-potency corticosteroids are recommended. Due to the risk of adverse events, topical corticosteroids should be used at the lowest effective dose and never for long periods of time, especially high-potency corticosteroids. Patients requiring long-term treatment should transition to other types of drugs. For example, topical corticosteroids are recommended once daily for 1–2 weeks, followed by gradual tapering over 2–6 weeks until discontinuation.13–15

For scalp psoriasis, the combination of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate in a single formulation may also be considered.35,48 The recommended quantities of calcipotriol must not be exceeded, taking into account the body surface area to be treated; therefore, it is not a suitable option for extensive psoriasis.91 Calcineurin inhibitors are useful for facial and flexural psoriasis.41 Anthralin and tar preparations can be considered for patients with limited thick plaques.91

Phototherapy/heliotherapy may be considered for patients with more extensive lesions and palmoplantar psoriasis.90

These therapies should be administered until the therapeutic goal has been achieved.

Moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis

For patients with moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis:

  • For mild psoriatic patients who do not achieve therapeutic goals with topical treatments or phototherapy/heliotherapy, adherence and treatment compliance should first be evaluated before confirming therapeutic failure.

  • If no contraindications exist, classic systemic therapies and biologic therapy as monotherapy are the treatments of choice.

  • Biologic therapies, which have demonstrated safe and effective in clinical trials and have been specifically approved for moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis, should be considered the first choice.

  • Topical therapies should always be considered as coadjuvant therapy for both classic systemic treatments and biologics, at least, at the initiation of systemic therapy while waiting for its effects. They can also be used for residual lesions.

  • Phototherapy may be considered (e.g., for patients with extensive lesions) as monotherapy or coadjuvant therapy to systemic treatment.

  • Combination therapy with a classic systemic drug and a biologic can be considered in very selected cases (e.g., to reduce or minimize the risk and impact of immunogenicity).

Poor adherence or improper use of topical therapies is common in pediatric psoriasis.92 Various causes have been described, such as corticophobia, fear of adverse events, low cosmetic acceptance, lack of understanding/knowledge about the mode of application, forgetfulness, etc. Therefore, adherence and compliance should be evaluated before confirming therapeutic failure, and possible errors should be corrected if found. In such cases, the doctor-patient relationship, including interaction with parents or guardians, is fundamental. Effective verbal and non-verbal communication, active listening, and collaboration contribute to an optimal relationship and improve adherence to treatments.92 It is also essential to inform, explain, and educate both patients and their parents or guardians about medication use to improve outcomes.92

For moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis, systemic therapy selection should follow previously defined criteria. It is important to adhere to the product label indications (which vary by drug, age, or weight of the patient) and consider the quality of the available evidence.38,66,70,75–80,82,83,93–95 In this regard, biologic therapies, along with acitretin, are the only treatments approved for moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis. In terms of evidence, biologic therapies have shown high skin clearance rates in high-quality studies, which are sustained over time. Therefore, and in line with the most recent international consensus documents,13 biologics are considered first-line therapy.

As in adults, in pediatric psoriatic patients, topical treatments can be used as coadjuvant therapy. Their use is recommended at the initiation of systemic therapy due to their rapid action, while awaiting the effect of the main treatment, and later for residual lesions.

Lastly, phototherapy90 and the combination of a classic systemic drug, such as MTX, with a biologic therapy may also be considered in very selected cases.

Topical treatments

  • Corticosteroids are often considered the topical treatment of choice. Potency should be tailored based on the area and extent of the application. Medium-to-high potency corticosteroids are generally preferred, except on the face, folds (including genital areas), and diaper area, where low-potency corticosteroids are recommended.

  • Corticosteroids should be prescribed at the minimal effective dose, avoiding prolonged use, especially with higher-potency formulations. After an initial period (1–2 weeks), tapering is advised over 2–6 weeks before discontinuation.

  • For scalp psoriasis, the combination of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate in a single formulation can be considered. Usage should adhere to recommended limits, taking into account the treatment area, and is not suitable for extensive psoriasis.

  • Calcineurin inhibitors are useful for facial and fold psoriasis. Anthralin and tar preparations can be considered for thick and limited plaques.

  • Phototherapy/heliotherapy may be appropriate for more extensive lesions and palmoplantar psoriasis.

These treatments should continue until therapeutic goals are achieved.

Moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis

For moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis:

  • Step-up Treatment: In patients with mild psoriasis who do not respond to topical or phototherapy/heliotherapy, adherence and proper application should be reviewed before concluding treatment failure.

  • Systemic and Biologic Monotherapy: Systemic therapies or biologics are first-line options if there are no contraindications. Biologic therapies are prioritized as they have demonstrated efficacy and safety in clinical trials and are approved specifically for moderate-to-severe pediatric psoriasis.

  • Adjunctive Topical Therapy: Topical treatments should be considered as adjuncts to systemic or biologic therapy, particularly at treatment initiation or for residual lesions.

  • Phototherapy: May be an option for patients with extensive lesions, either as monotherapy or in combination with systemic treatment.

  • Combination Therapy: A systemic drug like MTX and a biologic can be considered in select cases to mitigate risks and enhance efficacy.

Certain issues arise when applying adult severity indices to pediatric populations (Table 3)

For example, PASI and BSA thresholds have not been formally validated or adapted for children. These indices may have limitations due to differences in body composition between children and adults.

To address this, the “rule of nines” has been proposed to standardize BSA measurements in children by adjusting regional body proportions and age.29 The CDLQI, on the other hand, is a validated 10-question survey to evaluate quality of life in patients aged 4–16 years, derived from the adult Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI).30 It considers variables such as itching, sleep, hygiene, social impact, activities, and treatment efficacy and is available in both text and illustrated formats.30,31 Although it measures quality of life, it can also serve as a surrogate marker for disease severity. From age 16, the DLQI can be used as in adults.

The Simplified Psoriasis Index (PSI) is another validated index for children that evaluates lesion severity, psychosocial impairment, and prior treatments.32 However, its use remains limited.

For children under four years old, these indices are often impractical. In such cases, the PGA may serve as a valid alternative for assessing disease severity. In complex cases, an individual approach using tools such as a visual analog scale (VAS) may also prove helpful.

Adaptability to pediatrics

Despite these limitations, based on expert experience, these indices are considered broadly applicable to pediatric patients using the same thresholds as in adults.

As highlighted in other GPS documents, beyond severity, other factors to consider in therapeutic decisions include associated symptoms, quality-of-life impact, psychosocial and educational development, and the perspectives of parents or caregivers.16,17

Therapeutic goals

When setting therapeutic goals (Table 4), as in adults,33 the aim should always be excellence (complete skin clearance and absence of symptoms or disease impact). This goal is particularly critical in children, given their developmental stage and the likelihood of living with psoriasis for many years. Achieving tight control of the disease from diagnosis is therefore essential. However, some pediatric patients may not achieve this goal despite treatment.33 In such cases, less stringent targets may be acceptable on an individual basis (e.g., in refractory patients or those with toxicity concerns).

Adapting to the pediatric context

As previously noted, all decisions must be tailored to the pediatric patient's context. Collaboration with parents or guardians is critical. In pediatric care, it is especially important to thoroughly explain the disease's characteristics and progression, therapeutic options and expectations, and the need for informed consent for specific medications.

Criteria for selecting topical, systemic, and phototherapy treatments

Once the severity of psoriasis has been determined, the selection and prioritization of treatments should consider several factors related to:

  • 1.

    The type of psoriasis.

  • 2.

    The patient (age and comorbidities).

  • 3.

    The medication (available evidence, administration route, onset of effect, convenience, etc.).

  • 4.

    Patient and family preferences.

  • 5.

    The health care system and its organization.16,17

Additionally, the child's idiosyncrasies and environment must be taken into account. It is essential to analyze whether a particular treatment is the most appropriate for each specific case or whether it might negatively impact various aspects of the child's daily life.34 When evaluating potential negative impacts on quality of life, factors to consider include whether the treatment causes school absences due to therapy or lab tests, the presence of stigma, whether topical treatments are cosmetically acceptable, or whether the child has developed needle phobia or experiences stress and anxiety from injections.

Regulatory characteristics as described in the drug data sheets should also be considered (see Tables 5 and 6).

Evaluation of treatment response and definition of therapeutic failure

The criteria for defining therapeutic failure are the same as those for adults16,17 but adapted to the pediatric population's specificities. Therapeutic failure is defined as follows:

  • Primary therapeutic failure: Failure to achieve the proposed therapeutic goal.

  • Secondary therapeutic failure: Loss of the therapeutic goal after it has been achieved.

  • Safety failure: The therapeutic goal is reached, but significant toxicity necessitates discontinuation of treatment.

  • Negative impact on quality of life: The treatment adversely affects the patient's quality of life.

The timeframes for establishing therapeutic failure depend on the type of treatment used. It is also important to emphasize the need to assess patient adherence to treatment before concluding definitive therapeutic failure.

  • 1.

    Evidence and use of available treatments in pediatric psoriasis

  • 2.

    Topical treatment

With the exception of topical corticosteroids, topical treatments are not officially indicated for pediatric psoriasis. Nonetheless, they are widely used in clinical practice for both mild psoriasis and more severe cases as adjunctive therapy (Table 5). While they lack high-quality randomized controlled trials (RCTs), their efficacy and safety have been demonstrated in numerous observational studies, both short- and long-term.35–48

Although no head-to-head comparative studies exist, indirect data suggest that corticosteroids, vitamin D analogs, and the combination of calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate in a single product11 appear more effective than other topical treatments for pediatric plaque psoriasis (both mild and severe forms).

Topical corticosteroids

Evidence for the efficacy and safety of topical corticosteroids comes from observational studies of moderate to low quality (Table 5). Their use over 8–12 weeks has been associated with a 72.7% improvement or resolution of plaques, with greater efficacy linked to higher potency corticosteroids.35–37

The safety profile is acceptable and similar to that in adults, with irritation and pruritus at the application site being the most common adverse events.36 Systemic adverse events are very rare.

High- or very-high-potency topical corticosteroids should be used cautiously and for the shortest duration possible. Patients should be closely monitored by a dermatologist, with follow-up tailored to the child's characteristics.

Experts recommend providing detailed information to parents, guardians, and older children about the proper quantity and method of application, as well as the risk of rebound effects if potent corticosteroids are abruptly discontinued.49,50Tables 5 and 7 present various recommendations, and Table 8 provides a usage guide based on the location and age of the patient.

Calcipotriol

An 8-week RCT in pediatric patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis found that twice-daily topical calcipotriol significantly outperformed placebo in reducing redness and scaling and achieved a higher proportion of patients with a Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) of 0/1 according to the physician's assessment.38 However, no significant differences were observed in PASI score changes (baseline vs end of treatment), lesion thickness or extent, or the proportion of patients with a patient-reported PGA of 0/1.38 Adverse events were generally mild, with skin irritation being the most frequent.38

Observational studies report improvement or resolution rates of 57.2–100% with topical calcipotriol, along with good cosmetic acceptability and a favorable safety profile.11,35–37,42,52

Topical calcipotriol may also act as a corticosteroid-sparing agent and can be applied to sensitive skin areas to minimize local side effects of topical corticosteroids.

Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate

Adherence challenges: Poor adherence to topical treatments is common in pediatric psoriasis due to factors such as corticophobia, fear of adverse effects, cosmetic issues, misunderstandings about usage, and forgetfulness. Before declaring treatment failure, adherence should be reassessed, and errors corrected. A strong physician-patient relationship, effective communication, active listening, and collaboration with parents or caregivers are crucial to improving adherence and treatment outcomes.

Special sites and severe forms

Management strategies for psoriasis in specific sites or severe forms of the disease should follow similar principles, prioritizing approved therapies and considering tailored combinations of systemic and topical treatments.

Pediatric psoriasis in special locations ad severe forms of psoriasis

Although limited, we describe below the available evidence on the efficacy of pharmacological therapies and phototherapy in special locations (Table 4 of the annex of the supplementary data) and severe forms of pediatric psoriasis. Psoriasis in special locations is considered moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Of note, the severity of pediatric psoriasis is also influenced by its functional or psychological impact (e.g., school absenteeism, stigma, etc.) or its impact on the patient's quality of life.

Scalp psoriasis

It is estimated that between 10% up to 48% of pediatric psoriatic patients experience scalp involvement, either in isolation or associated with other lesions.91–96

Regarding treatment evidence, data from the IXORA-PEDS study conducted on 171 children demonstrated that IXE achieved PASI100 response in 47% of patients at 12 weeks, 76% at 48 weeks, 73.4% at 60 weeks, and 90% at 108 weeks.80,83 Similarly, data from the Child-Capture registry and other observational studies showed that the combination of calcipotriol and betamethasone improved outcomes in pediatric patients with scalp psoriasis.45,89,97 Published studies reported an improvement in the PSI of 19.2% at 6 weeks, increasing up to 29.5% at 12 weeks, with sustained efficacy at week 48.45 The percentages of IGA 0/1 achieved with the combination ranged from 55% up to 85% at 8 weeks.89,97 Further evidence is required for other therapies.

Facial psoriasis

Facial lesions are more common in children than in adults, affecting up to 50% of cases and being the only clinical sign in, approximately, 4% of patients.91,96

Topical therapies, particularly tacrolimus, calcitriol, and corticosteroids, have shown efficacy in generally low-quality studies, at least, in the short-to-mid term.36,37,41 The application of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment twice daily for 6 months resulted in significant clinical improvement, though relapses were frequent shortly after treatment discontinuation41. Further evidence is needed for other therapies.

Flexural psoriasis including genital psoriasis

Up to 10% of pediatric psoriatic patients may experience flexural psoriasis.91,96

Several SLRs and observational studies have shown that some topical treatments may be effective in the short-to-mid term with an acceptable safety profile, although the evidence level is generally low.35,80 The application of tacrolimus 0.1% ointment twice daily for 6 months produced significant lesion improvement in flexural psoriasis. After 30 days of treatment, 88% of patients experienced excellent improvement from baseline, and 12% achieved complete remission of symptoms. However, relapses were frequent after discontinuation.41 Topical corticosteroids and calcitriol have also demonstrated efficacy.35,37 Isolated cases have reported effectiveness with tar-based treatments.35 However, current evidence does not support the efficacy of salicylic acid for pediatric genital psoriasis.35 In a high-quality RCT with 171 children, IXE achieved 85% genital psoriasis clearance at 12 weeks vs 36% with placebo (p<0.001). Moreover, in the IXE arm, genital psoriasis clearance rates were 90% and 88.9% at 48 and 60 weeks, respectively.80,83 Further evidence is needed for other therapies.

Palmoplantar psoriasis

Palmoplantar psoriasis is relatively uncommon in pediatric patients.

Evidence on pharmacological treatments for pediatric palmoplantar psoriasis is limited.

Evidence on pharmacological treatments for pediatric palmoplantar psoriasis is very limited. In the IXORA-PEDS RCT with IXE, 69% of patients achieved a PASI 0 at 12 weeks, 74% at 48 weeks, 81.8% at 60 weeks, and 90% at 108 weeks.80,83 Small observational studies have demonstrated the efficacy of phototherapy in this location.98,99 Cases suggesting that acitretin and phototherapy could be effective have been reported too.90,100 Further evidence is needed to support the efficacy of other therapies.

Guttate psoriasis

Guttate psoriasis is the second most common form of pediatric psoriasis.91.96

Many of the results discussed for plaque psoriasis could potentially be extrapolated to guttate psoriasis.36,69 More specifically, phototherapy has shown good outcomes in a small RCT with 20 pediatric patients and other observational studies.90,93 Further evidence is needed to support the efficacy of other therapies.

Nail psoriasis

Although less common than in adults, nail involvement has been documented in 7% up to 40% of pediatric psoriatic patients.91,96

The impact of various therapies on nail involvement has been scarcely studied. A RCT with IXE found no statistically significant differences in the Nail Psoriasis Severity Index (NAPSI) at 12 weeks vs placebo. However, at 48, 60, and 108 weeks, 50%, 65.3%, and 68.1% of patients, respectively, achieved NAPSI0.80,83 Further evidence is needed for other therapies.

Pustular psoriasis

This severe form of psoriasis is rare in children and even less common in adults.91–96

Acitretin—monotherapy or in combination with phototherapy—may be effective with an acceptable safety profile in patients with pustular and erythrodermic psoriasis.36,68,69 Nine months of treatment reported PASI75 and PASI90 responses in 21.3% and 26.2% of patients, respectively.64 Small case series have also shown that MTX, CsA, phototherapy, and ETN may be effective.68 Further evidence is needed for other therapies.

Erythrodermic psoriasis

Erythrodermic psoriasis is considered a severe form of psoriasis in children.

Although evidence quality is low, acitretin and CsA may be effective in these patients.36,64,68,69,101,102 Further evidence is needed for other therapies.

Comorbidities

In relation to the prevention and presence of comorbidities in pediatric psoriatic patients:

  • The presence of comorbidities is a common finding and can impact the child and even interfere with the indication, safety or efficacy of treatments. Therefore, comorbidities are a topic of special relevance in the management of patients with pediatric psoriasis.

  • It is the responsibility of the dermatologist to screen for comorbidities.

  • Comorbidity screening should be performed regularly, considering the patient's medical history and physical examination. When deemed appropriate, additional tests will be requested.

  • If a comorbidity is suspected, the patient will be referred to the corresponding health professional depending on local organizational characteristics.

  • If necessary, multidisciplinary care will be provided with shared decision-making between the dermatologist and other specialists/health professionals.

  • If necessary, inform, explain, and educate patients and parents or guardians/caregivers about the possibility of comorbidities emerging and the need to prevent many of them.

  • It is the responsibility of everyone involved in the management of patients with pediatric psoriasis to promote health and prevention.

Psoriasis is a multisystem inflammatory disease. Both adults and children can present comorbidities that may impact their health, quality of life, educational, and psychosocial development or interfere with the safety and efficacy of treatments.18 It has been described that in children with psoriasis, the risk of presenting comorbidities is twice as high vs children without the disease.103 Although evidence is limited, the appearance of comorbidities could be more frequent in children with more severe disease.104 Among the most frequent and/or impactful are obesity, depression, or PsA.105

In line with other international consensus documents,8 regular screening of comorbidities is recommended, at least, for the most frequent ones or those that may have a greater impact on the patient and/or treatments.

On the other hand, experts are aware of the lack of time and logistical resources (e.g., pediatric-specific materials) in some consultations to address comorbidity in the routine clinical practice (both screening and prevention). To simplify and facilitate this work, we present Tables 13 and 14, which illustrate the characteristics and impact of the main comorbidities and show a series of recommendations for their prevention, screening, and other practical considerations.

Table 13.

Summary of the main comorbidities, their impact on patient or treatments, and practical recommendations for prevention and management.

Comorbidity  Characteristics  Impact on patient or treatments  Practical recommendations for prevention and management 
Obesity  - Prevalence 4% up to 20.2%- Increased risk  - Impact on health and quality of life- Decreased efficacy of ETN with higher weight (especially in obese individuals) (class effect cannot be ruled out)  - Provide information and general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle- Refer to primary care or another specialist for management 
HTN  - Prevalence unknown- Increased risk  - Impact on health and quality of life- Not associated with changes in treatment response or safety  - Provide information and general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle- Refer to primary care or another specialist for control 
T2DM  - Prevalence unknown- Increased risk, especially in obese patients  - Impact on health and quality of life- No evidence indicating it affects treatment response  - Provide information and general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle- Refer to primary care or another specialist for management 
Metabolic syndrome  - Prevalence unknown- Increased risk, especially in severe psoriasis and obese patients  - Impact on health and quality of life- Decreased efficacy of ETN with higher weight (especially in obese individuals) (class effect cannot be ruled out)  - Provide information and general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle- Refer to primary care or another specialist for weight control 
PsA  - Prevalence 0.7–1.2%- 2 peaks of onset, 2–3 years and 10–12 years  - Impact on health, quality of life, and growth- Some drugs have different indications for psoriasis and arthritis- Efficacy and indications of some medications differ depending on the type of involvement (skin or joint)  - Early diagnosis is essential to prevent irreversible joint damage- Therapeutic decisions should be made in consultation with a rheumatologist 
Depression, anxiety  - High prevalence in all age groups- Increased risk, especially in severe forms  - Impact on health and quality of life- Not associated with changes in treatment response or safety, but may affect adherence  - Essential to evaluate psychiatric comorbidities, regardless of age- Refer to primary care or another specialist for management 
IBD  - Prevalence unknown- Uncommon before puberty- Increased risk  - Impact on health, quality of life, and growth- Efficacy and indications of some medications differ depending on the type of involvement (skin or digestive)  - Early diagnosis is essential- Therapeutic decisions should be made in consultation with gastroenterologists 
NAFLD  - Prevalence unknown- Rare before 10 years old  - Impact on health and quality of life  - Provide information and general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle- Refer to primary care or another specialist for management 

HTN: hypertension; ETN: etanercept; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; T2DM; type 2 diabetes mellitus; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease.

Table 14.

Recommendations for screening pediatric comorbidities in dermatology consultations.

Comorbidity  Clinical questions  Examination/complementary tests  Frequency 
Overweight and obesity  –  - Weight and height to calculate BMI (adjusted for age and sex)  - At least once a year- From age 2 onwards 
HTN  –  - BP (adjusted for age and sex)  - At least once a year- From age 3 onwards 
DM  - Have any of the following appeared: increased thirst, frequent urination, extreme hunger, involuntary weight loss, fatigue, irritability, fruity-smelling breath?  - Blood glucose, oral glucose tolerance test, HbA1c  - At least once a year- From age 10 or onset of puberty- In obese patients- In overweight patients with DM risk factors (family history, maternal gestational diabetes, polycystic ovary syndrome, acanthosis nigricans, etc.) 
Metabolic syndrome  –  - Blood glucose, HDL cholesterol, TG, abdominal circumference, BP (adjusted for age and sex)  - At least once a year- From age 10 or onset of puberty 
PsA  - Has the child had pain in any joint or even inflammation?- Does the child have morning stiffness, difficulty starting to move when waking up, moves like a robot, lasting more than 20 minutes?- Is there a family history of arthritis?  - Palpate the entheses (Achilles tendon, knees) and the joints, mainly the hands, to check for pain or swelling (joint pain in children is harder to objectify)- Growth evaluation (adjusted for age and sex)  - At least once a year- From age 2 onwards 
Depression, anxiety, substance abuse  - Have you noticed the child being sad, avoiding social interactions, having very marked irritability, behavior or personality changes, including changes in eating habits or sleep problems?- Difficulty concentrating, changes in academic performance?- Do you suspect or know if the child smokes or consumes alcohol?    - Evaluation of depression and anxiety once a year, regardless of age- Evaluation of substance abuse once a year, starting at age 11 
IBD  - Does your child have episodes of abdominal pain, chronic diarrhea?- Has your child lost weight inexplicably?- Is there a family history of IBD?  - Growth evaluation (adjusted for age and sex)  - At least once a year- From age 14 onwards 
NAFLD  –  - Acanthosis nigricans, increased abdominal circumference, hepatomegaly- Liver profile  - At least once a year- From age 10 or onset of puberty 

BP: blood pressure; BMI: body mass index; HTN: hypertension; PsA: psoriatic arthritis; DM: diabetes mellitus; HDL: high-density protein; TG: triglycerides; NAFLD: Non-Alcoholic Fatty Liver Disease; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease.

Overweight and obesity

Overweight is defined as a body mass index (BMI)85th percentile but <95th percentile (for age and sex), and obesity as BMI95th percentile (for age and sex).

The prevalence of overweight and obesity varies greatly depending on the study, but in general, it is very high in pediatric psoriasis. It has been reported that up to 17.6% of patients with pediatric psoriasis are overweight and 4% up to 20.2% are obese.105,106 The risk of a child with psoriasis having obesity is 4.29 times higher than a child without the disease, and this risk increases with the severity of psoriasis.106 Obesity in pediatric psoriatic patients tends to be central and generally develops around 8 years of age.11 The impact on the child's health—it is a cardiovascular risk factor—and quality of life is significant and can negatively affect health outcomes in adulthood. Moreover, it has been found that the efficacy of ETN is lower in overweight/obese patients vs children with a normal weight.79

Obesity is considered particularly relevant among the comorbidities of children with psoriasis, and therefore, regular screening should be conducted. Additionally, information about the impact of this comorbidity should be provided, along with general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle to prevent it.

Hypertension

The prevalence of hypertension (HTN) is poorly studied in pediatric psoriasis, but some studies have found a specific association.107,108 Like obesity, HTN can impact the child's health and future health as an adult.

It is recommended to follow the approved guidelines for HTN screening in children and adolescents109 and provide information on the impact of this comorbidity along with general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle to prevent it.

Type 2 diabetes mellitus

Although the prevalence of diabetes mellitus (DM) is poorly analyzed in pediatric psoriasis, studies have found an association between pediatric psoriasis and insulin resistance and T2DM, especially in obese patients.108,110 This disease and its treatments can have a very negative impact on the health and quality of life of pediatric patients.

It is recommended to follow the approved guidelines for DM screening in children and adolescents,111 and provide information on the impact of this comorbidity along with general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle to prevent it.

Metabolic syndrome

Metabolic syndrome includes a group of cardiovascular risk factors, with various definitions, most of which apply to children from 10 years of age. One of the most widely used definitions is shown in Table 15.112

Table 15.

Definition of metabolic syndrome in pediatric patients.

Metabolic syndrome is defined by the presence of ≥3 of the following
1. Hypertriglyceridemia  TG150mg/dL 
2. Low HDL cholesterol  HDL<40mg/dL 
3. High fasting glucose  Glucose100mg/dL 
4. Central obesity (abdominal circumference)  ≥75th percentile (for age and sex) 
5. HTN  ≥90th percentile (for age and sex) 

TG: triglycerides; mg: milligrams; dL: deciliters; HDL: high-density lipoprotein; HTN: hypertension.

a Abdominal circumference in children is measured with a non-elastic measuring tape, with the child standing, feet together, arms at the sides, and the abdomen relaxed. The tape is placed around the abdomen at the level of the navel, midway between the last rib and the iliac crest, without pressing, while the child takes a deep breath, and the measurement is taken during exhalation.115

Although prevalence data is scarce, different studies suggest an increased risk of metabolic syndrome in pediatric patients with psoriasis vs children without this disease.113 Like the previously described comorbidities, it has an important impact on the child's health and can affect their health as an adult.

One of the criteria included in the definition is central obesity. Fat distribution significantly influences the development of the metabolic complications of obesity.114 Abdominal circumference has been recognized as the best clinical indicator of visceral fat accumulation,115 and various studies have shown that it is a more appropriate measure for metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk.116

It is recommended to follow the guidelines outlined in the previous comorbidities and provide information on the impact of this comorbidity, along with general recommendations for a healthy lifestyle to prevent it.

Psoriatic arthritis

The prevalence of PsA is lower in children vs adults with psoriasis, with an estimated prevalence of 0.7% in all children with psoriasis, increasing up to 1.2% by the time they reach 18 years old.117 Although PsA can appear in children of any age, there are 22 peaks of onset: one at 2–3 years and another at 10–12 years.118 Disability and the impact on the child's quality of life can be very significant.104 Moreover, although many of the drugs used for both diseases are the same, their efficacy may differ depending on the type of involvement.

Pediatric patients with PsA exhibit symptoms of inflammatory arthritis, such as pain, swelling, and joint stiffness at rest or upon waking. Younger children with PsA, especially girls, tend to have oligoarticular disease and/or dactylitis. Older children, particularly boys, often present enthesitis and axial involvement.8,118,119

Based on this information, it is essential to conduct regular screening and, if diagnosis is confirmed, to adopt a multidisciplinary approach to the patient.

Depression, anxiety, and substance abuse

It is estimated that up to 70% of pediatric psoriatic patients experience some psychological-psychiatric issues, which can appear at any age.120 More specifically, it has been described that pediatric psoriatic patients have a 25% up to 30% increased risk of developing depression and/or anxiety vs children without psoriasis.121

The impact of psoriasis on the mental health of children is equal to or even greater than that of diabetes, epilepsy, or atopic dermatitis.122 A qualitative study showed that 65% of children experienced some form of stigmatization or even bullying due to psoriasis.25 Others have shown that psoriasis in children can lead to mood changes, low self-esteem, social isolation, and risk behaviors.123

In adult patients, a strong correlation between psoriasis and the use of alcohol and tobacco has been found. Although this may also occur in adolescents and young adults with psoriasis, there is currently insufficient data to prove it.

However, given the prevalence of mental health problems and substance use in this population, the recommendations for mental health screening124 should be followed.

Inflammatory bowel disease

Various studies have shown that the risk of inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) in children with psoriasis is 3–4 times higher than in children without psoriasis.1,8,125 Although it can appear at any age, it is uncommon before puberty.126 Like PsA, its impact on the child and treatments can be significant, so it should be regularly ruled out.

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease

Non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) is a term that includes both simple steatosis and non-alcoholic steatohepatitis. It is characterized by excessive accumulation of liver fat not due to an autoimmune, metabolic, or infectious process. Its prevalence in pediatric psoriatic patients is not well known. In the general population, the prevalence of NAFLD increases with age, being exceptional in children<3 years old and rare in children<10 years old.127 The symptoms associated with NAFLD are nonspecific, such as fatigue or abdominal pain. This disease is associated with acanthosis nigricans (present in 33% up to 50% of cases), increased abdominal circumference, and hepatomegaly (in up to 50% of cases).

Due to the association of NAFLD with overweight, obesity, and insulin resistance, regular screening for this condition in pediatric patients is recommended.

Drugs in the study phaseApremilast

A phase II RCT analyzed the use of apremilast 20–30mg twice a day (depending on age and weight) in children aged 6–17 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.128 On week 16 of treatment, the mean changes in PASI for adolescents with 20mg apremilast were −69.6, and with 30mg apremilast, −66.5. In children on 20mg apremilast, the changes in PASI at week 16 were −79.3. The drug was generally well tolerated. The data being presented from phase III studies with apremilast (NCT03701763, NCT06088199, NCT04175613) are consistent with these results.

Guselkumab

Currently, a phase III RCT (NCT03451851) is evaluating the safety and efficacy of subcutaneous guselkumab vs ETN and placebo in pediatric patients aged 6–18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Risankizumab

A phase III RCT (NCT04435600) is in the pipeline evaluating subcutaneous risankizumab vs UST for pediatric participants aged 6–17 years with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Tildrakizumab

A phase III RCT is ongoing with tildrakizumab (NCT03997786), placebo, and active control in children aged 6 to <18 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.

Brodalumab

An open study is analyzing the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of brodalumab in children aged 6–17 years with severe plaque psoriasis (NCT03240809).

Bimekizumab

A study is underway to evaluate the safety, efficacy, and pharmacokinetics of 2 doses of bimekizumab in adolescents with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (NCT04718896).

Tofacitinib

A recent open study including 47 patients with pediatric psoriasis showed significant improvement in efficacy and quality of life with tofacitinib. At week 12, 55.32% of patients achieved PASI75, and 70.21% reached PASI75 at week 36.129 No severe adverse events were observed.

Netakimab

A phase III RCT is currently underway to evaluate the safety, efficacy, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of netakimab in children (6–18 years) with plaque psoriasis (NCT06640517).

Deucravacitinib

Data on other Janus kinase (JAK) inhibitors, specifically tyrosine kinase 2 (TYK2) inhibitors such as deucravacitinib, are still being tested in children (phase III RCT NCT04772079).

Risk managementFollow-up

Although it depends on the type of treatment, adverse events from topical treatments are not very common37 and are generally mild (though they vary depending on the drug), especially when following the guidelines provided in the drug prescribing information. Systemic adverse events from these therapies are rare, and monitoring is primarily clinical (Table 16).

Table 16.

Risk management with the use of different therapeutic options for pediatric patients with moderate-severe psoriasis.

Drug  Pre-treatment  During treatment  Most common AEs/discontinuation 
Topical Treatments  Clinical aspects:- Rule out active skin infection, systemic infections with skin involvement (e.g., varicella, herpes), rosacea, atrophic skin diseases- Check vaccination status  Clinical aspects:- Monitor for the appearance of infections- Check adherence  Depending on topical treatment:- Corticosteroids: stretch marks, atrophy, acne- Vitamin D analogs: irritation, pain- Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate: irritation- Anthralin: irritation, clothing pigmentation, skin pigmentation- Salicylic acid: irritation, risk of poisoning in young children- Tar: irritation, pigmentation, bad odor- Calcineurin inhibitors: irritation, burning 
MTX  Clinical aspects:- Rule out active infection (including TB), cytopenia, relevant comorbidities- Check vaccination status laboratory tests:- Complete blood count (CBC), general biochemistry- Serology for hepatitis A, B, C, HIV, varicella, TB screening- Consider other actions based on epidemiological situation and patient characteristics- Consider contraception in female adolescents  Clinical aspects:- Monitor for infections, cytopenia, liver disease- Check adherence laboratory tests:- CBC, liver biochemistry in 1 month, 1–2 months after up titration, then every 4–6 months if prior results are normal and dose is stable  Most Frequent AEs (≥1/100 to <1/10):- Nausea, vomiting, loss of appetite, mouth ulcers, elevated liver enzymes Discontinuation:- If liver enzymes increase>3× normal, UNL. If reintroduced, do so once liver function normalizes and down titrate by 20%- Moderate–severe infections- Surgery 
CsA  Clinical aspects:- Rule out active infection (including TB), cytopenia, relevant comorbidities- Check vaccination status laboratory tests:- CBC, general biochemistry- Serology for Hepatitis A, B, C, HIV, varicella, TB screening- Consider other actions based on epidemiological situation and patient characteristics- Consider contraception in female adolescents  Clinical aspects:- Monitor for infections, cytopenia- Blood pressure monitoring- Check adherence laboratory tests:- Renal function monitoring (serum creatinine) and adjust dose with plasma concentration determination. Then monitor every 3–6 months for blood pressure, renal function, liver function, and lipid profile  Most frequent AEs (≥1/100 to <1/10):- GI discomfort, headache, acne, increased facial and body hair, agitation Discontinuation:- If liver enzymes increase >3× normal, UNL. If reintroduced, do so once liver function normalizes and down titrate by 20%- Development of hypertension- Hyperlipidemia- Moderate-severe infections- Surgery 
Acitretin  Laboratory tests:- CBC, general biochemistry- Serology for hepatitis A, B, C- Consider contraception in female adolescents  Clinical aspects:- Check adherence- Musculoskeletal development and clinical (including growth percentiles) laboratory tests:- CBC, liver biochemistry, lipid profile in 1 month, 1–2 months after dose increase, then every 4–6 months if prior results are normal and dose is stable  Most common AEs (≥1/100 to <1/10):- Pruritus, skin fragility, myalgias, mucocutaneous effects associated with retinoid use discontinuation:- Hyperlipidemia- Moderate–severe infections- Surgery- Consider contraception in female adolescents up to three years after discontinuation of acitretin 
Anti-TNFα  Clinical aspects:- Rule out active infection (including TB), cytopenia, demyelinating disease, relevant comorbidities- Rule out recent contact with TB patients- Check vaccination status laboratory tests:- CBC, general biochemistry- Serology for hepatitis A, B, C, HIV, varicella, TB screening- Consider other actions based on epidemiological situation and patient characteristics- Consider contraception in female adolescents  Clinical aspects:- Monitor for infections (including TB), cytopenia, liver disease- Check adherence laboratory tests:- CBC and general biochemistry 4–6 months after starting treatment, and then based on patient characteristics  Most common AEs (≥1/100 to <1/10):- Infections (mainly respiratory)- Leukopenia- Lipid elevation- Headache- Nausea, vomiting- Elevated liver enzymes- Injection site reactions- Musculoskeletal pain Discontinuation:- If cancer, demyelinating disease, optic neuritis, severe cytopenia, interstitial pneumonia, or other severe drug-related severe AEs- Moderate–severe infections- Surgery 
IL-17 inhibitors (Secukinumab, Ixekizumab)  Clinical aspects:- Rule out active infection (including TB), cytopenia (especially neutrophil levels), relevant comorbidities- Rule out recent contact with TB patients- Not recommended in patients with IBD- Assess risk-benefit in patients with a history of depression and/or suicidal ideation or behavior- Check vaccination status laboratory tests:- CBC, general biochemistry- Serology for hepatitis A, B, C, HIV, varicella, TB screening- Consider other actions based on epidemiological situation and patient characteristics- Consider contraception in female adolescents  Clinical aspects:- Monitor for infections (including TB), cytopenia, liver disease- Check adherence laboratory tests:- CBC and general biochemistry 4–6 months after starting treatment, and then based on patient characteristics  Most common AEs (≥1/100 to <1/10):- Infections: Candida, influenza, tinea, herpes simplex, athlete's foot- Headache- Oro-pharyngeal pain- Rhinorrhea- GI disorders: diarrhea and nausea- Musculoskeletal disorders- General disorders: fatigue, injection site reactions, including erythema, pain, pruritus, bruising, and bleeding Discontinuation:- If cancer, severe cytopenia, or other severe drug-related severe AEs- Moderate–severe infections- Surgery 
IL-12/23 Inhibitor (Ustekinumab)  Clinical aspects:- Rule out active infection (including TB), cytopenia, relevant comorbidities- Rule out recent contact with TB patients- Check vaccination status laboratory tests:- CBC, general biochemistry- Serology for Hepatitis A, B, C, HIV, varicella, TB screening- Consider other actions based on epidemiological situation and patient characteristics- Consider contraception in female adolescents  Clinical aspects:- Monitor for infections (including TB), cytopenia, liver disease- Check adherence Laboratory Tests:- CBC and general biochemistry 4–6 months after starting treatment, and then based on patient characteristics  Most common AEs (≥1/100 to <1/10):- Infections: respiratory, gastroenteritis, herpes simplex, tinea, nasopharyngitis, sinusitis- Headache- Diarrhea, nausea, vomiting- Arthralgia, back pain, myalgias- Oro-pharyngeal pain- Pruritus- Fatigue- Erythema and pain at the injection site discontinuation:- If severe cytopenia or other severe drug-related severe AEs- Moderate-severe infections- Surgery 

AEs: adverse events; UNL: upper normal limit; IBD: inflammatory bowel disease; TB: tuberculosis; TNF: tumor necrosis factor; HIV: human immunodeficiency virus.

Of note, regarding the use of topical corticosteroids, children—especially younger ones—have thinner skin and a proportionally larger skin surface area, making the risk of systemic absorption of these drugs higher than in adults. Therefore, the appropriate corticosteroid (lower potency) should be selected, and application over large areas and for prolonged periods should be avoided.

On the other hand, classic systemic treatments and biological therapies generally present a safety profile similar to that observed in adults,36 so the recommended follow-up is very similar (Table 11). One of the most common adverse events with these therapies is respiratory infections, which are also very common in healthy children. Pediatric infections are caused by different germs than in adults, and the clinical presentations are also particular. Therefore, in case of fever or infection, it is important to conduct a medical evaluation. For mild infections, it is not mandatory to discontinue treatment, but for moderate and severe infections, it is recommended to suspend treatment until clinical improvement.

Vaccination

Children with pediatric psoriasis, especially those on classic systemic treatments and biological therapies, may be at a higher risk of infections. Therefore, updating the child's vaccination schedule, as well as that of their close contacts, is considered essential.

In general, the vaccines recommended according to the current vaccination schedule of each region should be administered, with some specifications in line with recommendations issued for pediatric patients who are immunocompromised due to other diseases and immunosuppressive treatments (Table 11).

Conclusions

Psoriasis is one of the most common dermatological diseases in the pediatric population. As it happens in adults, there are various therapeutic modalities available for its treatment. However, this subgroup of the population presents differential characteristics related to the disease per se, the impact on the child/adolescent, as well as in pharmacological management that should be taken into consideration.

This consensus document provides dermatologists with a consultation and support guide for making therapeutic decisions for pediatric psoriasis patients, all based on the best available evidence and expert opinion to this date.

Funding

This project was funded by the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV).

Conflicts of interest

A. Pérez-Ferriols received payments or fees for conferences, presentations, lectures, manuscript drafting, or educational events from Ampersand Integral Projects, Organon Salud, Takeda Pharmaceutical, Hispanic Osteoporosis Foundation, Iberian Imed Institute Foundation, Clover Solutions, Permanyer Advertising; expert opinion fees from Laboratorios Viñas; support for attending meetings and/or travel from Lilly, Jansen.

A. Batalla received payments for his participation in clinical trials for: Sanofi, Amgen, Abbvie, Leo Pharma, Lilly, Pfizer, Novartis, Kymab, Galderma.

A. Vicente received consultancy fees from Abbvie, Amgen, Amryt, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Lilly, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi Genzyme. B. Pérez received consultancy fees from UCB, Janssen, and Lilly, and payments or fees for conferences, presentations, lectures, manuscript drafting, or educational events from UCB, Janssen, and Lilly.

J.M. Carrascosa received grants or contracts from Janssen, Novartis, and Almirall; consultancy fees from Abbvie, Novartis, Leo Pharma, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB, BI, Lilly, and Almirall; payments or fees for conferences, presentations, lectures, manuscript drafting, or educational events from Abbvie, Novartis, Leo Pharma, Sanofi, Janssen, UCB, BI, Lilly, and Almirall. L. García-Fernández received consultancy fees from Abbvie; payments or fees for conferences, presentations, lectures, manuscript writing, or educational events from Abbvie. N. Eiris received consultancy fees from Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Lilly, UCB, Almirall, and Leo Pharma.

P. De la Cueva received consultancy fees from Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer, Celgene, Janssen, Leo Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB. R. de Lucas declared no conflicts of interest whatsoever.

Appendix B
Supplementary data

The followings are the supplementary data to this article:

References
[1]
M. Augustin, G. Glaeske, M.A. Radtke, E. Christophers, K. Reich, I. Schäfer.
Epidemiology and comorbidity of psoriasis in children.
Br J Dermatol, 162 (2010), pp. 633-636
[2]
A.E. Mitchell.
Bidirectional relationships between psychological health and dermatological conditions in children.
Psychol Res Behav Manag, 11 (2018), pp. 289-298
[3]
P.E. Beattie, M.S. Lewis-Jones.
A comparative study of impairment of quality of life in children with skin disease and children with other chronic childhood diseases.
Br J Dermatol, 155 (2006), pp. 145-151
[4]
A.P. Manzoni, R.L. Pereira, R.Z. Townsend, M.B. Weber, A.R. Nagatomi, T.F. Cestari.
Assessment of the quality of life of pediatric patients with the major chronic childhood skin diseases.
An Bras Dermatol, 87 (2012), pp. 361-368
[5]
J.M. Gelfand, R. Weinstein, S.B. Porter, A.L. Neimann, J.A. Berlin, D.J. Margolis.
Prevalence and treatment of psoriasis in the United Kingdom: a population-based study.
Arch Dermatol, 141 (2005), pp. 1537-1541
[6]
D. Matusiewicz, A. Koerber, D. Schadendorf, J. Wasem, A. Neumann.
Childhood psoriasis – an analysis of German health insurance data.
Pediatr Dermatol, 31 (2014), pp. 8-13
[7]
S.P. Raychaudhuri, J. Gross.
A comparative study of pediatric onset psoriasis with adult onset psoriasis.
Pediatr Dermatol, 17 (2000), pp. 174-178
[8]
E. Osier, A.S. Wang, M.M. Tollefson, K.M. Cordoro, S.R. Daniels, A. Eichenfield, et al.
Pediatric psoriasis comorbidity screening guidelines.
JAMA Dermatol, 153 (2017), pp. 698-704
[9]
M.M.B. Seyger, M. Augustin, M. Sticherling, T. Bachhuber, J. Fang, J. Hetherington, et al.
Physician-reported clinical unmet needs burden and treatment patterns of paediatric psoriasis patients: a US and EU real-world evidence study.
Acta Derm Venereol, 102 (2022), pp. adv00660
[10]
A.A. Hebert, J. Browning, P.C. Kwong, A.M. Duarte, H.N. Price, E. Siegfried.
Managing pediatric psoriasis: update on treatments and challenges-a review.
J Dermatolog Treat, 33 (2022), pp. 2433-2442
[11]
A. Menter, K.M. Cordoro, D.M.R. Davis, D. Kroshinsky, A.S. Paller, A.W. Armstrong, et al.
Joint American Academy of Dermatology-National Psoriasis Foundation guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis in pediatric patients.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 82 (2020), pp. 161-201
[12]
A.B. Fortina, F. Bardazzi, S. Berti, C. Carnevale, V. Di Lernia, M. El Hachem, et al.
Treatment of severe psoriasis in children: recommendations of an Italian expert group.
Eur J Pediatr, 176 (2017), pp. 1339-1354
[13]
K. Peris, A.B. Fortina, L. Bianchi, G. Fabbrocini, P. Gisondi, A. Balato, et al.
Update on the management of pediatric psoriasis: an Italian consensus.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 12 (2022), pp. 1753-1775
[14]
L. Eisert, M. Augustin, S. Bach, M. Dittmann, R. Eiler, R. Fölster-Holst, et al.
S2k guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis in children and adolescents – short version. Part 2.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, 17 (2019), pp. 959-973
[15]
L. Eisert, M. Augustin, S. Bach, M. Dittmann, R. Eiler, R. Fölster-Holst, et al.
S2k guidelines for the treatment of psoriasis in children and adolescents - short version. Part 1.
J Dtsch Dermatol Ges, 17 (2019), pp. 856-870
[16]
J.M. Carrascosa, L. Puig, I. Belinchón Romero, L. Salgado-Boquete, E. Del Alcázar, J.J. Andrés Lencina, et al.
Practical update of the Recommendations Published by the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (GPS) on the Treatment of Psoriasis with Biologic Therapy. Part 1. Concepts and general management of psoriasis with biologic therapy.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 113 (2022), pp. 261-277
[17]
J.M. Carrascosa, L. Puig, I.B. Romero, L. Salgado-Boquete, E. Del Alcázar, J.J.A. Lencina, et al.
Practical Update of the Guidelines Published by the Psoriasis Group of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (GPs) on the Treatment of Psoriasis With Biologic Agents: Part 2 – Management of special populations patients with comorbid conditions, and risk.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 113 (2022), pp. 583-609
[18]
A. Morris, M. Rogers, G. Fischer, K. Williams.
Childhood psoriasis: a clinical review of 1262 cases.
Pediatr Dermatol, 18 (2001), pp. 188-198
[19]
L.Y. Chiam, M.E. De Jager, Y.C. Giam, E.M. De Jong, P.C. Van de Kerkhof, M.M. Seyger.
Juvenile psoriasis in European and Asian children: similarities and differences.
Br J Dermatol, 164 (2011), pp. 1101-1103
[20]
M. Seyhan, B.K. Coşkun, H. Sağlam, H. Ozcan, Y. Karincaoğlu.
Psoriasis in childhood and adolescence: evaluation of demographic and clinical features.
Pediatr Int, 48 (2006), pp. 525-530
[21]
K.N. Shah.
Diagnosis and treatment of pediatric psoriasis: current and future.
Am J Clin Dermatol, 14 (2013), pp. 195-213
[22]
K. Mercy, M. Kwasny, K.M. Cordoro, A. Menter, W.L. Tom, N. Korman, et al.
Clinical manifestations of pediatric psoriasis: results of a multicenter study in the United States.
Pediatr Dermatol, 30 (2013), pp. 424-428
[23]
S. Benoit, H. Hamm.
Childhood psoriasis.
Clin Dermatol, 25 (2007), pp. 555-562
[24]
H. Randa, J.J. Lomholt, L. Skov, R. Zachariae.
Health-related quality of life in adolescents with psoriasis: an interview-based study.
Br J Dermatol, 178 (2018), pp. 1404-1411
[25]
M.E.A. De Jager, E. De Jong, A.W.M. Evers, P.C.M. Van De Kerkhof, M.M.B. Seyger.
The burden of childhood psoriasis.
Pediatr Dermatol, 28 (2011), pp. 736-737
[26]
M.A. Gupta, F.C. Simpson, A.K. Gupta.
Psoriasis and sleep disorders: a systematic review.
Sleep Med Rev, 29 (2016), pp. 63-75
[27]
S.B. Kaushik, M.G. Lebwohl.
Psoriasis: which therapy for which patient: psoriasis comorbidities and preferred systemic agents.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 80 (2019), pp. 27-40
[28]
S.B. Kaushik, M.G. Lebwohl.
Psoriasis: which therapy for which patient: focus on special populations and chronic infections.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 80 (2019), pp. 43-53
[29]
Dermatology AAo. Measure 410. Psoriasis: clinical response to oral systemic or biologic medications 2016. Available from: https://qpp.cms.gov/docs/QPP_quality_measure_specifications/Claims-Registry-Measures/2017_Measure_410_Claims.pdf [accessed 1.4.24].
[30]
M.S. Salek, S. Jung, L.A. Brincat-Ruffini, L. MacFarlane, M.S. Lewis-Jones, M.K. Basra, et al.
Clinical experience and psychometric properties of the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI), 1995–2012.
Br J Dermatol, 169 (2013), pp. 734-759
[31]
S.A. Holme, I. Man, J.L. Sharpe, P.J. Dykes, M.S. Lewis-Jones, A.Y. Finlay.
The Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index: validation of the cartoon version.
Br J Dermatol, 148 (2003), pp. 285-290
[32]
M.J. van Geel, M.E. Otero, E.M. de Jong, P.C. van de Kerkhof, M.M. Seyger.
Validation of the Simplified Psoriasis Index in Dutch children and adolescents with plaque psoriasis.
Br J Dermatol, 176 (2017), pp. 771-776
[33]
J.M. Carrascosa, L. Puig, I. Belinchón Romero, L. Salgado-Boquete, E. del Alcázar, J.J. Andrés Lencina, et al.
Actualización práctica de las recomendaciones del Grupo de Psoriasis de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología (GPS) para el tratamiento de la psoriasis con terapia biológica Parte 1. «Conceptos y manejo general de la psoriasis con terapia biológica».
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 113 (2022), pp. 261-277
[34]
J. McLenon, M.A.M. Rogers.
The fear of needles: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
J Adv Nurs, 75 (2019), pp. 30-42
[35]
K.M. Beck, E.J. Yang, I.M. Sanchez, W. Liao.
Treatment of genital psoriasis: a systematic review.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 8 (2018), pp. 509-525
[36]
M.E.A. de Jager, E.M.G.J. de Jong, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, M.M.B. Seyger.
Efficacy and safety of treatments for childhood psoriasis: a systematic literature review.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 62 (2010), pp. 1013-1030
[37]
G. Kravvas, K. Gholam.
Use of topical therapies for pediatric psoriasis: a systematic review.
Pediatr Dermatol, 35 (2018), pp. 296-302
[38]
A.P. Oranje, D. Marcoux, A. Svensson, J. Prendiville, B. Krafchik, J. Toole, et al.
Topical calcipotriol in childhood psoriasis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 36 (1997), pp. 203-208
[39]
I. Bronckers, M.M.B. Seyger, D.P. West, I. Lara-Corrales, M. Tollefson, W.L. Tom, et al.
Safety of systemic agents for the treatment of pediatric psoriasis.
JAMA Dermatol, 153 (2017), pp. 1147-1157
[40]
F.M. Bruins, I.M.G.J. Bronckers, H.M.M. Groenewoud, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, E.M.G.J. de Jong, M.M.B. Seyger.
Association between quality of life and improvement in psoriasis severity and extent in pediatric patients.
JAMA Dermatol, 156 (2020), pp. 72-78
[41]
A. Brune, D.W. Miller, P. Lin, D. Cotrim-Russi, A.S. Paller.
Tacrolimus ointment is effective for psoriasis on the face and intertriginous areas in pediatric patients.
Pediatr Dermatol, 24 (2007), pp. 76-80
[42]
C.R. Darley, W.J. Cunliffe, C.M. Green, P.E. Hutchinson, M.R. Klaber, N. Downes.
Safety and efficacy of calcipotriol ointment (Dovonex) in treating children with psoriasis vulgaris.
Br J Dermatol, 135 (1996), pp. 390-393
[43]
P. Mhusakunchai, L. Techasatian.
An association of pediatric psoriasis with metabolic syndrome in Thai children: 20 years retrospective study.
Psoriasis (Auckl), 11 (2021), pp. 75-82
[44]
A.M. Oostveen, M.E.A. de Jager, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, A.R.T. Donders, E.M.G.J. de Jong, M.M.B. Seyger.
The influence of treatments in daily clinical practice on the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index in juvenile psoriasis: a longitudinal study from the Child-CAPTURE patient registry.
Br J Dermatol, 167 (2012), pp. 145-149
[45]
A.M. Oostveen, E.M.G.J. de Jong, A.R.T. Donders, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, M.M.B. Seyger.
Treatment of paediatric scalp psoriasis with calcipotriene/betamethasone dipropionate scalp formulation: effectiveness, safety and influence on children's quality of life in daily practice.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 29 (2015), pp. 1193-1197
[46]
A.M. Oostveen, C.A. Beulens, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, E.M.G.J. de Jong, M.M.B. Seyger.
The effectiveness and safety of short-contact dithranol therapy in paediatric psoriasis: a prospective comparison of regular day care and day care with telemedicine.
Br J Dermatol, 170 (2014), pp. 454-457
[47]
G. Saggese, G. Federico, R. Battini.
Topical application of 1,25-dihydroxyvitamin D3 (calcitriol) is an effective and reliable therapy to cure skin lesions in psoriatic children.
Eur J Pediatr, 152 (1993), pp. 389-392
[48]
M.J. van Geel, K. Mul, A.M. Oostveen, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, E.M.G.J. de Jong, M.M.B. Seyger.
Calcipotriol/betamethasone dipropionate ointment in mild-to-moderate paediatric psoriasis: long-term daily clinical practice data in a prospective cohort.
Br J Dermatol, 171 (2014), pp. 363-369
[49]
J.E. Frangos, A.B. Kimball.
Clobetasol propionate emollient formulation foam in the treatment of corticosteroid-responsive dermatoses.
Expert Opin Pharmacother, 9 (2008), pp. 2001-2007
[50]
G. Herz, G. Blum, S. Yawalkar.
Halobetasol propionate cream by day and halobetasol propionate ointment at night for the treatment of pediatric patients with chronic, localized plaque psoriasis and atopic dermatitis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 25 (1991), pp. 1166-1169
[51]
C.C. Long, C.M. Mills, A.Y. Finlay.
A practical guide to topical therapy in children.
Br J Dermatol, 138 (1998), pp. 293-296
[52]
J. Lavaud, E. Mahe.
Proactive treatment in childhood psoriasis.
Ann Dermatol Venereol, 147 (2020), pp. 29-35
[53]
L. Bakos, R.M. Bakos.
Focal acne during topical tacrolimus therapy for vitiligo.
Arch Dermatol, 143 (2007), pp. 1223-1224
[54]
M.E. de Jager, P.C. van de Kerkhof, E.M. de Jong, M.M. Seyger.
Dithranol therapy in childhood psoriasis: unjustifiably on the verge of falling into oblivion.
Dermatology, 220 (2010), pp. 329-332
[55]
E. Lie, M. Choi, S.P. Wang, L.F. Eichenfield.
Topical management of pediatric psoriasis: a review of new developments and existing therapies.
Paediatr Drugs, 26 (2024), pp. 9-18
[56]
K.M. Cordoro.
Topical therapy for the management of childhood psoriasis: Part I.
Skin Therapy Lett, 13 (2008), pp. 1-3
[57]
A. Menter, N.J. Korman, C.A. Elmets, S.R. Feldman, J.M. Gelfand, K.B. Gordon, et al.
Guidelines of care for the management of psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis: section 4. Guidelines of care for the management and treatment of psoriasis with traditional systemic agents.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 61 (2009), pp. 451-485
[58]
K.L. Akamine, C.J. Gustafson, B.A. Yentzer, B.L. Edison, B.A. Green, S.A. Davis, et al.
A double-blind, randomized clinical trial of 20% alpha/poly hydroxy acid cream to reduce scaling of lesions associated with moderate, chronic plaque psoriasis.
J Drugs Dermatol, 12 (2013), pp. 855-859
[59]
P.M. Witman.
Topical therapies for localized psoriasis.
May Clin Proc, 76 (2001), pp. 943-949
[60]
Childhood psoriasis: often favorable outcome.
Prescrire Int, 18 (2009), pp. 275
[61]
M. Lebwohl.
The role of salicylic acid in the treatment of psoriasis.
Int J Dermatol, 38 (1999), pp. 16-24
[62]
L. Borska, C. Andrys, J. Krejsek, V. Palicka, M. Chmelarova, K. Hamakova, et al.
Oxidative damage to nucleic acids and benzo(a)pyrene-7,8-diol-9,10-epoxide-DNA adducts and chromosomal aberration in children with psoriasis repeatedly exposed to crude coal tar ointment and UV radiation.
Oxid Med Cell Longev, 2014 (2014), pp. 302528
[63]
M. Schiff, T. Takeuchi, R. Fleischmann, C.L. Gaich, A.M. DeLozier, D. Schlichting, et al.
Patient-reported outcomes of baricitinib in patients with rheumatoid arthritis and no or limited prior disease-modifying antirheumatic drug treatment.
Arthritis Res Ther, 19 (2017), pp. 208
[64]
T. Ergun, D. Seckin Gencosmanoglu, E. Alpsoy, E. Bulbul-Baskan, M.H. Saricam, A. Salman, et al.
Efficacy, safety and drug survival of conventional agents in pediatric psoriasis: a multicenter, cohort study.
J Dermatol, 44 (2017), pp. 630-634
[65]
Z. Wang, Y. Chen, X. Xiang, Y. Gu, M. Zhao, Y. Liu, et al.
Systemic methotrexate treatment in 42 children with severe plaque psoriasis: a retrospective study in China.
Dermatology, 238 (2022), pp. 919-927
[66]
K. Papp, D. Thaçi, D. Marcoux, L. Weibel, S. Philipp, P.D. Ghislain, et al.
Efficacy and safety of adalimumab every other week versus methotrexate once weekly in children and adolescents with severe chronic plaque psoriasis: a randomised, double-blind, phase 3 trial.
[67]
J. Wan, D.B. Shin, J.M. Gelfand.
Treatment utilization and drug survival of systemic medications among commercially insured children with psoriasis.
Pediatr Dermatol, 38 (2021), pp. 1169-1177
[68]
C.J. Posso-De Los Rios, E. Pope, I. Lara-Corrales.
A systematic review of systemic medications for pustular psoriasis in pediatrics.
Pediatr Dermatol, 31 (2014), pp. 430-439
[69]
M.J. van Geel, K. Mul, M.E.A. de Jager, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, E.M.G.J. de Jong, M.M.B. Seyger.
Systemic treatments in paediatric psoriasis: a systematic evidence-based update.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 29 (2015), pp. 425-437
[70]
D. Thaçi, K. Papp, D. Marcoux, L. Weibel, A. Pinter, P.D. Ghislain, et al.
Sustained long-term efficacy and safety of adalimumab in paediatric patients with severe chronic plaque psoriasis from a randomized, double-blind, phase III study.
Br J Dermatol, 181 (2019), pp. 1177-1189
[71]
M.J. van Geel, A.M. Oostveen, E.P.A.H. Hoppenreijs, J.C.M. Hendriks, P.C.M. van de Kerkhof, E.M.G.J. de Jong, et al.
Methotrexate in pediatric plaque-type psoriasis: long-term daily clinical practice results from the Child-CAPTURE registry.
J Dermatolog Treat, 26 (2015), pp. 406-412
[72]
I. Bronckers, A.S. Paller, D.P. West, I. Lara-Corrales, M.M. Tollefson, W.L. Tom, et al.
A comparison of psoriasis severity in pediatric patients treated with methotrexate vs biologic agents.
JAMA Dermatol, 156 (2020), pp. 384-392
[73]
N. Aslam, H. Saleem, S. Murtazaliev, S.J. Quazi, S. Khan.
FDA approved biologics: can etanercept and ustekinumab be considered a first-line systemic therapy for pediatric/adolescents in moderate to severe psoriasis? A systematic review.
Cureus, 12 (2020), pp. e9812
[74]
V. Di Lernia, C. Guarneri, L. Stingeni, P. Gisondi, D. Bonamonte, P.G. Calzavara Pinton, et al.
Effectiveness of etanercept in children with plaque psoriasis in real practice: a one-year multicenter retrospective study.
J Dermatolog Treat, 29 (2018), pp. 217-219
[75]
C. Bodemer, A. Kaszuba, K. Kingo, A. Tsianakas, A. Morita, E. Rivas, et al.
Secukinumab demonstrates high efficacy and a favourable safety profile in paediatric patients with severe chronic plaque psoriasis: 52-week results from a Phase 3 double-blind randomized, controlled trial.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 35 (2021), pp. 938-947
[76]
R.G. Langley, A.S. Paller, A.A. Hebert, K. Creamer, H.H. Weng, A. Jahreis, et al.
Patient-reported outcomes in pediatric patients with psoriasis undergoing etanercept treatment: 12-week results from a phase III randomized controlled trial.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 64 (2011), pp. 64-70
[77]
A.S. Paller, E.C. Siegfried, R.G. Langley, A.B. Gottlieb, D. Pariser, I. Landells, et al.
Etanercept treatment for children and adolescents with plaque psoriasis.
N Engl J Med, 358 (2008), pp. 241-251
[78]
A.S. Paller, E.C. Siegfried, L.F. Eichenfield, D. Pariser, R.G. Langley, K. Creamer, et al.
Long-term etanercept in pediatric patients with plaque psoriasis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 63 (2010), pp. 762-768
[79]
A.S. Paller, E.C. Siegfried, D.M. Pariser, K.C. Rice, M. Trivedi, J. Iles, et al.
Long-term safety and efficacy of etanercept in children and adolescents with plaque psoriasis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 74 (2016), pp. 280-287.e1–3
[80]
A.S. Paller, M.M.B. Seyger, G. Alejandro Magariños, J. Bagel, A. Pinter, J. Cather, et al.
Efficacy and safety of ixekizumab in a phase III, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled study in paediatric patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis (IXORA-PEDS).
Br J Dermatol, 183 (2020), pp. 231-241
[81]
C. Phan, A. Beauchet, A.C. Burztejn, M. Severino-Freire, S. Barbarot, C. Girard, et al.
Biological treatments for paediatric psoriasis: a retrospective observational study on biological drug survival in daily practice in childhood psoriasis.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 33 (2019), pp. 1984-1992
[82]
I. Landells, C. Marano, M.C. Hsu, S. Li, Y. Zhu, L.F. Eichenfield, et al.
Ustekinumab in adolescent patients age 12–17 years with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: results of the randomized phase 3 CADMUS study.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 73 (2015), pp. 594-603
[83]
A.S. Paller, M.M.B. Seyger, G.A. Magariños, A. Pinter, J.C. Cather, C. Rodriguez-Capriles, et al.
Long-term efficacy and safety of up to 108 weeks of ixekizumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: the IXORA-PEDS randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Dermatol, 158 (2022), pp. 533-541
[84]
R. Bakry, M.A. Klein, G. Horneff.
Oral or parenteral methotrexate for the treatment of polyarticular juvenile idiopathic arthritis.
Eur J Rheumatol, 9 (2022), pp. 197-205
[85]
G. Nesher, J. Zuckner.
Rheumatologic complications of vitamin A and retinoids.
Semin Arthritis Rheum, 24 (1995), pp. 291-296
[86]
C.P. Halverstam, J. Zeichner, M. Lebwohl.
Lack of significant skeletal changes after long-term, low-dose retinoid therapy: case report and review of the literature.
J Cutan Med Surg, 10 (2006), pp. 291-299
[87]
W.A. Shroukh, D.T. Steinke, S.C. Willis.
Risk management of teratogenic medicines: a systematic review.
Birth Defects Res, 112 (2020), pp. 1755-1786
[88]
N. Magnolo, K. Kingo, V. Laquer, J. Browning, A. Reich, J.C. Szepietowski, et al.
A phase 3 open-label, randomized multicenter study to evaluate efficacy and safety of secukinumab in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: 24-week results.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 86 (2022), pp. 122-130
[89]
M. Gooderham, J.M. Debarre, J. Keddy-Grant, Z. Xu, M. Kurvits, M. Goodfield.
Safety and efficacy of calcipotriol plus betamethasone dipropionate gel in the treatment of scalp psoriasis in adolescents 12–17 years of age.
Br J Dermatol, 171 (2014), pp. 1470-1477
[90]
E. Kim, G. Lee, G. Fischer.
Use of narrowband ultraviolet B (NBUVB) in paediatric psoriasis: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis.
Aust J Dermatol, 62 (2021), pp. 124-129
[91]
A. Vicente.
Psoriasis en la infancia.
An Pediatr Contin, 12 (2014), pp. 348-354
[92]
K.A. Kelly, A. Ewulu, V.K. Emmerich, C.E. Heron, S.R. Feldman.
Refractory pediatric psoriasis and atopic dermatitis: the importance of therapeutical adherence and biological management.
Biomedicines, 9 (2021), pp. 958
[93]
V.K. Jain, A. Bansal, K. Aggarwal, K. Jain.
Enhanced response of childhood psoriasis to narrow-band UV-B phototherapy with preirradiation use of mineral oil.
Pediatr Dermatol, 25 (2008), pp. 559-564
[94]
I. Landells, A.S. Paller, D. Pariser, G. Kricorian, J. Foehl, C. Molta, et al.
Efficacy and safety of etanercept in children and adolescents aged > or =8 years with severe plaque psoriasis.
Eur J Dermatol, 20 (2010), pp. 323-328
[95]
E.C. Siegfried, L.F. Eichenfield, A.S. Paller, D. Pariser, K. Creamer, G. Kricorian.
Intermittent etanercept therapy in pediatric patients with psoriasis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 63 (2010), pp. 769-774
[96]
S. Dogra, I. Kaur.
Childhood psoriasis.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 76 (2010), pp. 357-365
[97]
L.F. Eichenfield, C. Ganslandt, M. Kurvits, J. Schlessinger.
Safety and efficacy of calcipotriene plus betamethasone dipropionate topical suspension in the treatment of extensive scalp psoriasis in adolescents ages 12–17 years.
Pediatr Dermatol, 32 (2015), pp. 28-35
[98]
S. Ersoy-Evans, A. Altaykan, S. Sahin, F. Kölemen.
Phototherapy in childhood.
Pediatr Dermatol, 25 (2008), pp. 599-605
[99]
I.B. Walters, L.H. Burack, T.R. Coven, P. Gilleaudeau, J.G. Krueger.
Suberythemogenic narrow-band UVB is markedly more effective than conventional UVB in treatment of psoriasis vulgaris.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 40 (1999), pp. 893-900
[100]
P. Chen, C. Li, R. Xue, H. Chen, X. Tian, K. Zeng, et al.
Efficacy and safety of acitretin monotherapy in children with pustular psoriasis: results from 15 cases and a literature review.
J Dermatolog Treat, 29 (2018), pp. 353-363
[101]
E. Bulbul Baskan, S. Yazici, S. Tunali, H. Saricaoglu.
Clinical experience with systemic cyclosporine A treatment in severe childhood psoriasis.
J Dermatolog Treat, 27 (2016), pp. 328-331
[102]
S. Dogra, R. Mahajan, T. Narang, S. Handa.
Systemic cyclosporine treatment in severe childhood psoriasis: a retrospective chart review.
J Dermatolog Treat, 28 (2017), pp. 18-20
[103]
C.I. Wootton, R. Murphy.
Psoriasis in children: should we be worried about comorbidities?.
Br J Dermatol, 168 (2013), pp. 661-663
[104]
T.C. Meneghetti, T.M.H. Padilha, V.F. Azevedo, M.N.L. Cat, B.M.S. Sarolli, V.O. de Carvalho.
The musculoskeletal impairment negatively impacts the quality of life of children and adolescents with psoriasis.
Adv Rheumatol, 60 (2020), pp. 33
[105]
E. Edson-Heredia, S. Anderson, J. Guo, B. Zhu, W.N. Malatestinic, L. Wine-Lee, et al.
Real-world claims analyses of comorbidity burden, treatment pattern healthcare resource utilization, and costs in pediatric psoriasis.
Adv Ther, 38 (2021), pp. 3948-3961
[106]
A.S. Paller, K. Mercy, M.J. Kwasny, S.E. Choon, K.M. Cordoro, G. Girolomoni, et al.
Association of pediatric psoriasis severity with excess and central adiposity: an international cross-sectional study.
JAMA Dermatol, 149 (2013), pp. 166-176
[107]
I.M. Michalek, B. Loring, S.M. John.
A systematic review of worldwide epidemiology of psoriasis.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 31 (2017), pp. 205-212
[108]
L. Kwa, M.C. Kwa, J.I. Silverberg.
Cardiovascular comorbidities of pediatric psoriasis among hospitalized children in the United States.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 77 (2017), pp. 1023-1029
[109]
J. Álvarez, F. Aguilar, E. Lurbe.
La medida de la presión arterial en niños y adolescentes: elemento clave en la evaluación de la hipertensión arterial.
An Pediatr (Barc), 96 (2022), pp. 536.e1-536.e7
[110]
L. Di Costanzo, V. Fattorusso, E. Mozzillo, A. Patrì, R. Di Caprio, E. De Nitto, et al.
Psoriasis in children with type 1 diabetes: a new comorbidity to be considered?.
Acta Diabetol, 54 (2017), pp. 803-804
[111]
P. Ros, R. Barrio.
Diabetes tipo 2 en la infancia y adolescencia.
An Pediatr Contin, 7 (2009), pp. 127-135
[112]
P. Zimmet, G. Alberti, F. Kaufman, N. Tajima, M. Silink, S. Arslanian, et al.
The metabolic syndrome in children and adolescents.
Lancet, 369 (2007), pp. 2059-2061
[113]
A.M. Goldminz, C.D. Buzney, N. Kim, S.C. Au, D.E. Levine, A.C. Wang, et al.
Prevalence of the metabolic syndrome in children with psoriatic disease.
Pediatr Dermatol, 30 (2013), pp. 700-705
[114]
M.E. Piché, P. Poirier, I. Lemieux, J.P. Després.
Overview of epidemiology and contribution of obesity and body fat distribution to cardiovascular disease: an update.
Prog Cardiovasc Dis, 61 (2018), pp. 103-113
[115]
B. Xi, X. Zong, R. Kelishadi, M. Litwin, Y.M. Hong, B.K. Poh, et al.
International waist circumference percentile cutoffs for central obesity in children and adolescents aged 6–18 years.
J Clin Endocrinol Metab, 105 (2020), pp. e1569-e1583
[116]
S.B. van Dijk, T. Takken, E.C. Prinsen, H. Wittink.
Different anthropometric adiposity measures and their association with cardiovascular disease risk factors: a meta-analysis.
Neth Heart J, 20 (2012), pp. 208-218
[117]
A. Ogdie, P. Weiss.
The epidemiology of psoriatic arthritis.
Rheum Dis Clin North Am, 41 (2015), pp. 545-568
[118]
M.L. Stoll, M. Punaro.
Psoriatic juvenile idiopathic arthritis: a tale of two subgroups.
Curr Opin Rheumatol, 23 (2011), pp. 437-443
[119]
D. Lewkowicz, A.B. Gottlieb.
Pediatric psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis.
Dermatol Ther, 17 (2004), pp. 364-375
[120]
T. Kara, Z. Topkarcı, S. Yılmaz, İ. Akaltun, B. Erdoğan.
Pediatric patients with psoriasis and psychiatric disorders: premorbidity and comorbidity in a case-control study.
J Dermatolog Treat, 30 (2019), pp. 129-134
[121]
A.B. Kimball, E.Q. Wu, A. Guérin, A.P. Yu, M. Tsaneva, S.R. Gupta, et al.
Risks of developing psychiatric disorders in pediatric patients with psoriasis.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 67 (2012), pp. 651-657.e1-2
[122]
M.E. de Jager, P.C. van de Kerkhof, E.M. de Jong, M.M. Seyger.
A cross-sectional study using the Children's Dermatology Life Quality Index (CDLQI) in childhood psoriasis: negative effect on quality of life and moderate correlation of CDLQI with severity scores.
Br J Dermatol, 163 (2010), pp. 1099-1101
[123]
K.A. Kelly, E.A. Balogh, S.G. Kaplan, S.R. Feldman.
Skin disease in children: effects on quality of life, stigmatization, bullying, and suicide risk in pediatric acne, atopic dermatitis, and psoriasis patients.
Children (Basel), 8 (2021), pp. 1057
[124]
J.F. Hagan, J.S. Shaw, P.M. Duncan, American Academy of Pediatrics.
Bright futures: guidelines for health supervision of infants, children, and adolescents.
4th ed., Bright Futures/American Academy of Pediatrics, (2017),
[125]
M. Augustin, M.A. Radtke, G. Glaeske, K. Reich, E. Christophers, I. Schaefer, et al.
Epidemiology and comorbidity in children with psoriasis and atopic eczema.
Dermatology, 231 (2015), pp. 35-40
[126]
O. Abramson, M. Durant, W. Mow, A. Finley, P. Kodali, A. Wong, et al.
Incidence, prevalence, and time trends of pediatric inflammatory bowel disease in Northern California, 1996–2006.
J Pediatr, 157 (2010), pp. 233-239.e1
[127]
E.L. Anderson, L.D. Howe, H.E. Jones, J.P. Higgins, D.A. Lawlor, A. Fraser.
The prevalence of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease in children and adolescents: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
PLOS ONE, 10 (2015), pp. e0140908
[128]
A.S. Paller, Y. Hong, E.M. Becker, R. de Lucas, M. Paris, W. Zhang, et al.
Pharmacokinetics and safety of apremilast in pediatric patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: results from a phase 2 open-label study.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 82 (2020), pp. 389-397
[129]
N. AlMutairi, T. Nour.
Tofacitinib in pediatric psoriasis: an open-label trial to study its safety and efficacy in children.
Dermatology, 236 (2020), pp. 191-198
Copyright © 2024. AEDV
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
Material suplementario
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?