Información de la revista
Vol. 104. Núm. 9.
Páginas 807-814 (noviembre 2013)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
5317
Vol. 104. Núm. 9.
Páginas 807-814 (noviembre 2013)
Original
Acceso a texto completo
Demographic characteristics and health-related quality of life of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis: The VACAP study
Características demográficas y calidad de vida relacionada con la salud en pacientes con psoriasis moderada a grave: Estudio vacap
Visitas
5317
E. Daudéna,
Autor para correspondencia
estebandauden@medynet.com

Corresponding author.
, R.M. Pujolb, J.L. Sánchez-Carazoc, J. Toribiod, F. Vanaclochae, L. Puigf, M. Yébenesg, E. Sabaterg, M.A. Casadog, M.T. Calotoh, B. Aragónh, on behalf of the VACAP Study Investigators 1
a Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain
b Hospital del Mar, Barcelona, Spain
c Hospital General de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
d C.H.U. Santiago (Hospital Gil Casares), Santiago de Compostela, Spain
e Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain
f Sant Pau, Barcelona, Spain
g Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research Iberia, Madrid, Spain
h Merck Sharp & Dohme, Outcomes Research Unit, Madrid, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (2)
Tablas (4)
Table 1. Demographic data.
Table 2. Clinical data.
Table 3. Results of the indices and questionnaires.a
Table 4. Multivariate linear regression analysis.
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Material adicional (1)
Abstract
Background

Psoriasis is associated with a deterioration in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) of affected patients. The aim of this study was to assess the HRQoL of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis.

Methods

A prospective observational study (the VACAP Study) was carried out in 123 centers in Spain with 1217 patients. Patients were evaluated at baseline (visit 1 [V1]) and again four months later (visit 2 [V2]). The severity of psoriasis was determined using the following indices: (i) Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) (score range 0–72, higher score indicates more severe disease), (ii) the body surface area (BSA) affected, and (iii) the Physicians Global Assessment (PGA) (range 1–7, higher score indicates more severe disease). Four questionnaires were used for the assessment of the HRQoL: (i) the Short-Form 36 quality-of-life questionnaire (SF-36) (score range 0–100, higher score indicates better HRQoL); (ii) Euroqol (EQ-5D) (range from 1 to 3, lower score indicates better HRQoL); (iii) Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI) (ranges 0–30; from best to worst HRQoL); and (iv) Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI) (ranges 0–45; higher score indicates better HRQoL).

Results

The mean (SD) age of the patients was 45.11 (13.92) years at V1. The mean age at the onset of psoriasis was 26.08 (14.19) years. The majority of patients were female (61%) and were employed (68%). The mean PASI score was 13.24 (9.50) at V1 and 5.07 (6.03) at V2 (P<.001). Scores from the generic HRQoL questionnaires (EQ-5D, SF-36) showed significant improvement between visits in all dimensions measured (P<.001). The disease-specific questionnaires also revealed overall improvements in quality of life over time: the DLQI mean total score was 8.97 (7.28) at V1 and 4.76 (5.72) at V2 (P<.001), and the PDI mean total score was 9.24 (8.76) V1 and 4.88 (6.65) at V2 (P<.001). Multivariate analysis using PDI as the dependent variable showed that the principal factors related to HRQoL were severity of psoriasis as measured by PASI (P<.001), and gender (P=.048).

Conclusions

The principal factor related to HRQoL in patients with psoriasis is the severity of the disease.

Keywords:
Psoriasis
Quality of life
Short-Form 36
EuroQol-5D
Dermatology Life Quality Index
Psoriasis Disability Index
Resumen
Antecedentes

La psoriasis se asocia a un deterioro de la Calidad de Vida Relacionada con la Salud (CVRS) de los pacientes. El objetivo de este estudio fue valorar la CVRS en pacientes con psoriasis moderada a grave.

Métodos

Se llevó a cabo un estudio prospectivo observacional (Estudio VACAP) sobre 1217 pacientes distribuidos en 123 centros de España. Los pacientes fueron evaluados al inicio del estudio (visita 1 [V1]) y de nuevo 4 meses más tarde (visita 2 [V2]). Para determinar la gravedad de la psoriasis se emplearon los siguientes índices: a) el índice de gravedad y de área de la psoriasis (Psoriasis Area and Severity Index [PASI]) (valores entre 0-72, las puntuaciones más altas indican una mayor gravedad de la enfermedad); b) el índice de superficie corporal afectada (Body Surface Area [BSA]), y c) la evaluación general efectuada por el médico (Physicians Global Assessment [PGA]) (intervalo entre 1–7: los valores más altos son indicativos de una enfermedad más grave). Para evaluar la CVRS se utilizaron 4 tipos de cuestionarios: a) el Cuestionario de Calidad de Vida SF-36 (SF-36) (escala entre 0–100, los valores más altos indican una mejor CVRS); b) el EuroQol (EQ-5D) (intervalo comprendido entre 1–3, cuanto más bajos sean los resultados obtenidos mejor es la CVRS); c) el Índice de Calidad de Vida en Dermatología (Dermatology Life Quality Index [DLQI]) (intervalo entre 0–30; de mejor a peor CVRS); y d) el Índice de Discapacidad de la Psoriasis (Psoriasis Disability Index [PDI]) (escala de puntuación entre 0–45, los datos más altos muestran una mejor CVRS).

Resultados

La edad media de los pacientes (desviación estándar [DS]) en la V1 fue de 45,11 (13,92) años. La edad media de inicio de la psoriasis fue de 26,08 (14,19) años. La mayoría de los pacientes eran mujeres (61%) y trabajadoras (68%). El valor medio del PASI fue de 13,24 (9,59) en la V1 y de 5,07 (6,03) en la V2 (p<0,001). Las puntuaciones de los cuestionarios de CVRS genéricos (EQ-5D, SF-36) mejoraron significativamente en todas las dimensiones evaluadas entre las 2 visitas (p<0,001). Los cuestionarios específicos de enfermedad también revelaron la mejoría general de la calidad de vida a lo largo del tiempo: la puntuación media total del DLQI fue de 8,97 (7,28) en la V1 y de 4,76 (5,72) en la V2 (p<0,001), y los valores medios totales del PDI fueron de 9,24 (8,76) en la V1 y 4,88 (6,65) en la V2 (p<0,001). El análisis multivariado, siendo el PDI la variable dependiente, mostró que los principales factores relacionados con la CVRS eran la gravedad de la psoriasis, medida por PASI, (p<0,001) y el sexo (p=0,048).

Conclusiones

El principal factor relacionado con la CVRS en pacientes con psoriasis es la gravedad de la enfermedad.

Palabras clave:
Psoriasis
Calidad de vida
Short-Form 36
EuroQol-5D
Índice de Calidad de Vida en Dermatología
Índice de Discapacidad de la Psoriasis
Texto completo
Introduction

The prevalence of psoriasis varies between 0% and 11.8%.1,2 The difference in these estimates reflects, to a large extent, the different methods used to obtain the data. For example, the prevalence reported in population-based studies is between 0.2% and 4.8%. The variability of environmental and genetic factors in different countries also has a significant effect on prevalence. The average prevalence in Europe is around 2% and, in Spain, it has been estimated to be 1.4%.3

The impairment in the health-related quality of life (HRQoL) in psoriasis patients is well documented4–7 and may be more marked than in other chronic diseases.8–11 To improve the HRQoL of a psoriasis patient, it is important to determine which aspects of the patient's life are impaired. The generic HRQoL questionnaires are suitable for this purpose. One of the most commonly used generic instruments is the Short-Form 36 (SF-36) quality-of-life questionnaire.12–16 The EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D) is also widely used because of its simplicity of administration and good psychometric properties.17–19 Questionnaires that focus on specific pathologies can also be particularly useful. For example, the Dermatologic Life Quality Index (DLQI)20–22 is a valuable tool for assessing quality of life in patients with dermatological disorders, while the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI)23–25 assesses the effects of specific aspects of the disease on patients. These questionnaires evaluate the impact of the disease on the lives of patients with psoriasis and highlight aspects of daily life that are significantly affected by the disease. The results of these questionnaires are critical for the clinical management of psoriasis.

The objective of the present study was to describe the demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis and to assess the impact of psoriasis and its treatment on patients’ quality of life.

MethodsStudy design

This was a multicenter prospective observational study carried out in 123 centers throughout Spain (the Evaluation of the Health-Related Quality of Life and Use of Resources in Patients with Moderate-to-Severe Plaque Psoriasis in Spain [VACAP] Study). The study was approved by the ethics committee of Hospital La Princesa in Madrid, Spain. Patients were recruited consecutively at each of the participating centers. The recruitment period was from August 9, 2007, to December 21, 2007, and written informed consent was obtained from all patients prior to their participation in the study. All patients were seen at 2 visits. Demographic data and clinical characteristics, including disease severity and HRQoL variables, were gathered at the first visit, and disease severity and HRQoL were re-evaluated at the 4-month follow-up visit.

Patients

A total of 1217 patients were recruited. The inclusion criteria were age 18 years or older and a diagnosis of moderate-to-severe psoriasis. Patients with psoriatic arthritis and those participating in other clinical trials were excluded. For the purpose of this study, 4 criteria were established for the diagnosis of moderate-to-severe psoriasis: (a) a Psoriasis Area and Severity Index (PASI) score equal to or greater than 10, (b) a Physician Global Assessment (PGA) score of 5 or higher, (c) affected body surface area (BSA) greater than 10%, and (d) any clinical indication for systemic treatment.

Assessment of demographic and clinical characteristics of patients with psoriasis

The following demographic data were recorded: age, weight, educational level, employment status, and smoking history. Psoriasis severity was assessed using 3 different tools: PASI,2,8 PGA, and affected BSA. The PASI evaluates the severity of the psoriasis and the surface area affected.

HRQoL assessment

HRQoL assessment was carried out using 4 different questionnaires: the Dermatology Quality of Life Index (DLQI),20–22 the Psoriasis Disability Index (PDI),23–25 the EuroQol questionnaire (EQ-5D),17–19 and the Short-Form 36 (SF-36).12–16

The DLQI evaluates the impact of dermatological illnesses and their treatment on the well-being of affected patients. It consists of 10 items organized into 6 dimensions: symptoms and feelings, daily activities, leisure, work and school, personal relationships, and treatment. Each item has 4 response options scored from 0 to 3, giving a maximum score of 30. Higher scores indicate a poorer HRQoL.

The PDI questionnaire is composed of 15 items that assess daily activities, work or school, personal relationships, leisure, and the effects of psoriasis treatment; the items refer only to the month prior to administration of the questionnaire. Items are scored from 0 to 3, with a maximum score of 45. Higher scores correspond to a poorer quality of life.

The Short-Form 36 (SF-36) is composed of 36 items that represent 8 different HRQoL dimensions. Two summary scores are obtained: a physical component summary and a mental component summary. The scores range from 0 to 100, with higher scores indicating better health.

The EQ-5D is an instrument designed to measure general health status. It consists of 5 items rated on a 3-point scale with possible responses ranging from “No Problem” to “Extreme Problem” or “Unable to do.” The questionnaire includes a visual analogue scale (a printed picture of a thermometer) on which patients indicate their evaluation of their overall HRQoL. This visual analogue scale is scored from 0 (worst HRQoL) to 100 (best HRQoL).

Statistical analysis

A database was constructed with the information obtained from the first and second visits. Quantitative data from the questionnaires and scales were analyzed to determine the mean, variance, standard deviation, minimum, maximum, median, 95% confidence interval, and 5% trimmed mean. For qualitative data, the frequency distributions and percentages of the responses were calculated. Means were compared using the t test or nonparametric Mann–Whitney U test, and comparisons of frequency distributions were performed with the Pearson χ2 test or Fisher exact test when a 2×2 contingency table was applicable. The level of statistical significance was set at α=0.05. Lineal regression analysis was used to evaluate the relationship between demographic and clinical characteristics and the HRQoL. The dependent variable was the difference in the PDI between the first and second visits. Independent variables were included in a stepwise, algorithmic manner in the model, with a probability to enter of 0.05 and a probability to leave of 0.10. Categorical variables were transformed into dummy variables. Missing values were excluded from the analyses.

All statistical analyses were performed with the Predictive Analytics Software version 18.0 (PASW Statistics® 18.0).

ResultsDemographic and clinical characteristics

The mean (SD) age of the patients was 45.1 (13.9) years (15.3% were over 60 years) and 60.8% were men. The mean age of the patients at disease onset was 26.08 (14.19) years, and 76.7% were between 18 and 40 years of age at the time of disease onset. At the time of the study, 68.1% of patients were working and 15.2% were retired (1.5% had retired because of their psoriasis). The demographic characteristics are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Demographic data.

Variable  Value 
Age, y mean (SD)  45.11 (13.92) 
Age distribution  % 
18–30  15.5 
31–40  26.0 
41–50  24.2 
51–60  18.9 
>60  15.5 
Gender  % 
Male  60.8 
Female  39.2 
Weight, kg mean (SD)  76.82 (15.92) 
Smoking status  % 
Nonsmokers  40.0 
Smokers  36.6 
Ex-smokers  23.4 
Educational level  % 
No formal education  4.1 
Primary education  39.8 
Secondary education  34.1 
University education  22.0 
Work status  % 
Employed  68.1 
Unemployed  6.5 
Housewife  10.2 
Retired  13.7 
Retired due to the psoriasis  1.5 

Based on the assessment of a dermatologist at the first visit, 60.8% of patients were considered to have moderate psoriasis and 39.2% to have severe psoriasis. The mean weight of the patients was 76.8 (15.9) kg, 36.2% were smokers, and 49.6% had relatives with psoriasis, of whom 65.4% were first-degree relatives. The mean number of exacerbations of psoriasis in the previous year was 2.4 (1.9), and 10.5% of patients had chronic rash. The most commonly affected areas were the trunk and upper limbs (83.8% and 90.4%, respectively). In 46.3% of patients there were comorbid conditions associated with the psoriasis, the most frequent of which were metabolic diseases (32.7%), neurological and mental disorders (32.0%), cardiovascular diseases (28.1%), and autoimmune diseases (20.8%). The clinical data of patients participating in the study are summarized in Table 2.

Table 2.

Clinical data.

Variable  Value 
Age at onset of psoriasis mean (SD)  26.08 (14.19) 
Age range at onset of psoriasis  % 
18–30  55.2 
31–40  21.5 
41–50  13.5 
51–60  7.0 
>61  2.8 
No. of exacerbations in the previous year mean (SD)  2.42 (1.94) 
No. of exacerbations per patient  % 
None  4.3 
1–2  54.4 
3–4  22.9 
>4  7.9 
Chronic  10.5 
Relatives with psoriasis  % 
Overall study population  50.4 
First-degree relatives  65.4 
Second-degree relatives  34.6 
Patients on treatment between 1st and 2nd visit, %  80.1 
Treatments between 1stand 2ndvisit  % 
Topical  53.6 
Biological  36.1 
Systemic  27.6 
Phototherapy  14.1 
Others  17.5 
Patients with comorbidities, %  46.3 
Comorbidities  % 
Immune disease  20.8 
Cancer  6.4 
Cardiovascular disease  28.1 
Dermatological disease  2.5 
Infectious disease  12.4 
Hematological disease  2.7 
Metabolic disease  32.7 
Mental and neurological disease  32.0 
Rheumatic and joint disease  4.4 
Renal impairment  3.7 
Respiratory disease  7.6 
Others  8.2 
Area affected by psoriasis  % 
Whole body  4.8 
Head and neck  59.8 
Trunk  83.8 
Upper extremities  90.4 
Lower extremities  45.9 
Severity of psoriasis

The mean PASI score at the first visit was 13.24 (9.50), and this fell to 5.07 (6.03) at the second visit. In all, 730 patients (60.0%) achieved PASI50 on their second visit, and 500 patients (41.1%) achieved PASI75. The mean PGA score decreased from 4.93 (1.32) at baseline to 3.27 (1.53) at the second visit. On the basis of the BSA criteria for assessing the severity of psoriasis, 89.2% of patients were in the moderate-to-severe psoriasis range at the first visit, and this fell to 51.8% at the second visit. These results are summarized in Table 3.

Table 3.

Results of the indices and questionnaires.a

  First visit  Second visit  P value 
PASI  13.24 (9.50)  5.07 (6.03)  <.001 
PGA  4.93 (1.33)  3.27 (1.53)  <.001 
BSA, %
Mild  10.8  48.2  <.001 
Moderate  41.1  37.2   
Severe  47.6  14.6   
Short-Form 36
Physical functioning  83.67 (21.44)  86.79 (19.53)  <.001 
Role-physical  78.02 (25.97)  83.58 (22.48)  <.001 
Bodily pain  67.08 (29.35)  73.56 (27.96)  <.001 
General health  56.25 (21.46)  59.19 (21.05)  <.001 
Vitality  58.95 (21.34)  62.70 (20.34)  <.001 
Social functioning  76.14 (25.82)  83.80 (22.09)  <.001 
Role emotional  81.33 (23.63)  86.47 (20.26)  <.001 
Mental health  65.00 (21.72)  68.60 (19.96)  <.001 
Physical component summary  49.43 (8.83)  50.81 (8.34)  <.001 
Mental component summary  45.35 (11.96)  48.07 (10.33)  <.001 
EQ-5D
Mobility  1.21 (0.42)  1.15 (0.36)  <.001 
Self-care  1.11 (0.33)  1.07 (0.26)  <.001 
Usual activities  1.29 (0.47)  1.20 (0.43)  <.001 
Pain/discomfort  1.57 (0.58)  1.42 (0.56)  <.001 
Anxiety/depression  1.48 (0.60)  1.35 (0.55)  <.001 
Visual analogue scale  64.41 (18.00)  72.44 (17.88)  <.001 
DLQI
Global Score  8.97 (7.28)  4.76 (5.72)  <.001 
Symptoms and feelings  2.74 (1.81)  1.60 (1.59)  <.001 
Daily activities  1.75 (1.74)  0.91 (1.35)  <.001 
Leisure  1.58 (1.79)  0.80 (1.33)  <.001 
Work/school  0.78 (1.01)  0.36 (0.73)  <.001 
Personal relationships  1.15 (1.62)  0.57 (1.14)  <.001 
Treatment  1.03 (1.01)  0.55 (0.81)  <.001 
PDI
Total score  9.24 (8.76)  4.88 (6.66)  <.001 
Daily activities  4.43 (3.77)  2.39 (3.02)  <.001 
Work/school  1.39 (2.04)  0.69 (1.45)  <.001 
Personal relationships  0.97 (1.42)  0.50 (1.03)  <.001 
Leisure  1.96 (2.46)  1.03 (1.76)  <.001 
Treatment  0.53 (0.77)  0.29 (0.57)  <.001 
a

Data presented as mean (SD) except for BSA presented as percentage.

During the previous year, 95.6% of the patients had received treatment for psoriasis; 35.7% had received biological therapies.

Health-related quality of life

The SF-36 dimensions with the best mean scores at the first visit were physical functioning (83.67 [21.44]), followed by role-emotional (81.33 [23.63]), and role-physical (78.02 [25.97]). The dimensions that showed the greatest improvement between visits were social functioning (increase from 76.14 [25.82] to 83.80 [22.09]), role-physical (increase from 78.02 [25.97] to 83.58 [22.48]), and bodily pain (increase from 67.08 [29.35] to 73.56 [27.96]). These changes were statistically significant (P<.001).

The EQ-5D dimensions with the lowest scores at the first visit were pain (1.57 [0.58]) and anxiety/depression (1.42 [0.56]). The dimensions that showed the greatest improvement at the second visit were pain (1.48 [0.60]) and anxiety/depression (1.35 [0.55]).

The DLQI score fell from 8.97 (7.28) at baseline to 4.76 (5.72) at the second visit. This improvement was reflected in all dimensions, and all the changes were statistically significant (P<.001). The changes in the PDI score were also statistically significant, with a fall from 9.24 (8.76) at baseline to 4.88 (6.66) at the second visit (P<.001). The results of the HRQoL questionnaires are summarized in Table 3.

The results of the multivariate analysis reveal that disease severity and extent (measured by the PASI score) (b=0.405; P<.001) and gender (b=0.075; P=.048) were the most significant factors in determining a patient's quality of life. A summary of the results of the multivariate linear regression is shown in Table 4. The residual plots are shown in Figs. 1 and 2. These plots show that the linear model provides a suitable fit to the data.

Table 4.

Multivariate linear regression analysis.

Model summary  R2  Adjusted R2  P value 
PDIa=PASIb+Genderc  0.168  0.165  <.001 
Variables summary  Beta (standardized coefficients)  P value 
PASIb  0.405  <.001 
Genderc  0.075  .048 
a

PDI: PDI second visitPDI first visit.

b

PASI: PASI second visitPASI first visit.

c

Gender coded as 0: female and 1: male.

Figure 1.

Standardized residual histograma. (aPsoriasis Disability Index scores: visit 2visit 1).

(0.1MB).
Figure 2.

Normal probability–probability plot of regression standardized residuals. aPsoriasis Disability Index scores: visit 2visit 1.

(0.1MB).
DiscussionDemographic and clinical profile

The demographic characteristics of the patients in the VACAP study are similar to those reported in other studies on psoriasis patients. The mean age at disease onset was also similar to the age reported in other studies from Spain.3,5,26,27 According to the results obtained in several European countries, psoriasis is most likely to appear between 15 and 30 years of age,4 a finding supported by the results of our study, in which disease onset occurred in this age range in 55.2% of the patients.

Henseler et al.28 proposed that there are 2 different types of psoriasis, based on the age of onset: type I develops before 40 years and type II in patients older than 40 years. Those authors observed that type I psoriasis was associated with HLA-Cw6 and a positive family history of the disease. However, in the current study, only 23.3% of the patients were over 40 years of age at the time of disease onset, and the distribution did not follow the proposed bimodal pattern. We were thus unable to confirm Hensler et al.’s hypothesis.

Several studies report the importance of genetics in the onset of psoriasis.29–33 In the current study, half of the patients stated that they had relatives with psoriasis and, of these, 65.4% were first-degree relatives. This is similar to the findings of other studies5,26 and confirms the importance of genetic factors in an individual's susceptibility to psoriasis.2

Psoriasis treatment effect

The percentage of patients treated with biological therapies was higher than has been observed in other studies, which have reported the use of biologics in approximately 5% of their overall study populations.4,5 In the VACAP study, the prevalence of biological therapies was much higher, at around 36%. These results are a reflection of the major advances that have taken place in the treatment of psoriasis—these therapies, which are indicated for the treatment of patients with moderate-to-severe psoriasis, are associated with a reduction in disease severity and an improvement in the HRQoL.

Impact of psoriasis on quality of life

Assessment by generic HRQoL questionnaires (SF-36, EQ-5D) shows the dimensions most affected in psoriasis patients to be those related to pain and psychological disturbances. Pain is the most common complaint, followed by itching.7 The results of this study confirm that psoriasis impairs the mental health of affected patients.9,34–36 Scores in the disease-specific HRQoL questionnaires (DLQI, PDI) had improved by the second visit, although these scores were already relatively low at baseline. A similar change was detected during the PDI validation study in Spain.25 Those authors observed that their patients had low PDI scores, and highlighted potential, culturally specific issues with the administration of the PDI questionnaire to a Spanish population. In our study, the DLQI also yielded a low mean score at baseline. Ferrandiz et al.27 proposed the need for a new HRQoL questionnaire to improve the sensitivity of quality-of-life assessments in patients with psoriasis. Despite these limitations, the results of the disease-specific questionnaires showed that psoriasis had a significant effect on quality of life, and multivariate analysis confirmed that there was a directly proportional linear relationship between the severity of psoriasis and the degree of impairment of the HRQoL. Patients with severe psoriasis had psychological distress,37,38 a negative body self-image,39 feelings of stigmatization,40 and poorer social interactions39; these factors explained the impairment in the HRQoL.

Independently of the severity of psoriasis, HRQoL was poorer in women than in men. This gender-specific effect has not only been reported in previous publications on psoriasis38,40 but has also been observed in other dermatological diseases such as hand eczema.41 Finzo et al.38 reported that a possible reason for this effect could be that women usually tend report more psychological disturbances than men. The VACAP study confirmed the main findings of other studies, specifically, that psoriasis leads to an impairment in the health-related quality of life. Our results show that a significant improvement in the severity index of the disease is related to an improvement in the health-related quality of life of affected patients.

Ethical disclosuresProtection of human and animal subjects

The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the responsible Ethics Committee and in accordance with those of the World Medical Association and the Helsinki Declaration.

Confidentiality of data

The authors declare that they have followed the protocols of their work centre on the publication of patient data and that no private patient data are disclosed in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent

All the patients included in the study have received sufficient information and have given their informed consent in writing to participate in that study. The author for correspondence is in possession of this documentation.

Conflicts of interest

This study received an unconditional grant from Schering-Plough. The funding institution exerted no control over the authors in terms of study design, analysis and interpretation of the data, elaboration of the report, and submission for publication.

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Covadonga Torres of Pharmacoeconomics and Outcomes Research Iberia (PORIB) for her assistance with the statistical analysis and writing of the manuscript.

Appendix A
Supplementary data

The following is the supplementary data to this article:

References
[1]
E.M. Farber, L. Nall.
Epidemiology: natural history and genetics.
Psoriasis, pp. 107-157
[2]
J.E. Gudjonsson, J.T. Elder.
Psoriasis: epidemiology.
Clin Dermatol, 25 (2007), pp. 535-546
[3]
C. Ferrándiz, X. Bordas, V. García-Patos, S. Puig, R. Pujol, A. Smandía.
Prevalence of psoriasis in Spain (Epiderma Project: phase I).
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 15 (2001), pp. 20-23
[4]
L. Dubertret, U. Mrowietz, A. Ranki, P.C. van de Kerkhof, S. Chimenti, T. Lotti, et al.
European patient perspectives on the impact of psoriasis: the EUROPSO patient membership survey.
Br J Dermatol, 155 (2006), pp. 729-736
[5]
A. García-Diez, C.F. Foraster, F.V. Sebastián, L.L. Tudela, X.B. Llach, G.S. Fernández.
What characterizes the severity of Psoriasis?.
Dermatology, 216 (2007), pp. 137-151
[6]
J. Hong, B. Koo, J. Koo.
The psychosocial and occupational impact of chronic skin disease.
Dermatol Ther, 21 (2008), pp. 54-59
[7]
D.H. Ciocon, E.J. Horn, A.B. Kimball.
Patients with psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis and patients with psoriasis only. Results of the 2005 Spring US National Psoriasis Foundation Survey.
Am J Clin Dermatol, 9 (2008), pp. 111-117
[8]
M.B. Nichol, J.E. Margolies, E. Lippa, M. Rowe, J. Quell.
The application of multiple quality-of-life instruments in individuals with mild-to-moderate psoriasis.
Pharmacoeconomics, 10 (1996), pp. 644-653
[9]
S.R. Rapp, S.R. Feldman, M.L. Exum, A.B. Fleischer Jr., D.M. Reboussin.
Psoriasis causes as much disability as other major medical diseases.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 41 (1999), pp. 401-407
[10]
A. Wahl, B.R. Hanestad, I. Wiklund, T. Moum.
Coping and quality of life in patients with psoriasis.
Qual Life Res, 8 (1999), pp. 427-433
[11]
A. Wahl, J.H. Loge, I. Wiklund, B.R. Hanestad.
The burden of psoriasis: a study concerning health-related quality of life among Norwegian adult patients with psoriasis compared with general population norms.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 43 (2000), pp. 803-808
[12]
J.A. Husted, D.D. Gladman, V.T. Farewell, J.A. Long, R.J. Cook.
Validating the SF-36 health survey questionnaire in patients with psoriatic arthritis.
J Rheumatol, 24 (1997), pp. 511-517
[13]
C.A. McHorney, J.E. Ware Jr., A.E. Raczek.
The MOS 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): II. Psychometric and clinical tests of validity in measuring physical and mental health constructs.
Med Care, 31 (1993), pp. 247-263
[14]
C.A. McHorney, J.E. Ware Jr., J.F. Lu, C.D. Sherbourne.
The MOS 36-item Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36): III. Tests of data quality, scaling assumptions, and reliability across diverse patient groups.
Med Care, 32 (1994), pp. 40-66
[15]
J. Alonso, L. Prieto, J.M. Antón.
La versión española del SF-36 Health Survey (Cuestionario de Salud SF-36): un instrumento para la medida de los resultados clínicos.
Med Clin (Barc), 104 (1995), pp. 771-776
[16]
J. Alonso, E. Regidor, G. Barrio, L. Prieto, C. Rodríguez, L. de la Fuente.
Population reference values of the Spanish version of the Health Questionnaire SF-36.
Med Clin (Barc), 111 (1998), pp. 410-416
[17]
EuroQol Group.
EuroQol—a new facility for the measurement of health-related quality of life.
Health Policy, 16 (1990), pp. 199-208
[18]
X. Badía, S. Montserrat, M. Roset, M. Herdman.
Feasibility, validity and test-retest reliability of scaling methods for health states: the visual analogue scale and the time trade-off.
Qual Life Res, 8 (1999), pp. 303-310
[19]
X. Badia, M. Roset, S. Monserrat, M. Herdman, A. Segura.
La versión española del EuroQol: descripción y aplicaciones.
Med Clin (Barc), 112 (1999), pp. 79-85
[20]
X. Badía, J.M. Mascaró, R. Lozano.
Measuring health-related quality of life in patients with mild to moderate eczema and psoriasis: clinical validity, reliability and sensitivity to change of the DLQI.
The Cavide Research Group Br J Dermatol, 141 (1999), pp. 698-702
[21]
A.Y. Finlay, G.K. Khan.
Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI)-A simple practical measure for routine clinical use.
Clin Exp Dermatol, 19 (1994), pp. 210-216
[22]
A.Y. Finlay, E.C. Coles.
The effect of severe psoriasis on the quality of life of 369 patients.
Br J Dermatol, 132 (1995), pp. 236-244
[23]
A.Y. Finlay, G.K. Khan, D.K. Luscombe, M.S. Salek.
Validation of sickness impact profile and psoriasis disability index in psoriasis.
Br J Dermatol, 123 (1990), pp. 751-756
[24]
T. Nijsten, D. Whalley, J. Gelfand, D. Margolis, S.P. McKenna, R.S. Stern.
The psychometric properties of the psoriasis disability index in United States patients.
J Invest Dermatol, 125 (2005), pp. 665-672
[25]
F. Vanaclocha, L. Puig, E. Daudén, J. Escudero, J.M. Hernanz, C. Ferrándiz, et al.
Validación de la versión española del cuestionario Psoriasis Disability Index en la evaluación de la calidad de vida en pacientes con psoriasis moderada-grave.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 96 (2005), pp. 659-668
[26]
C. Ferrándiz, R.M. Pujol, V. García-Patos, X. Bordas, J.A. Smandía.
Psoriasis of early and late onset: a clinical and epidemiologic study from Spain.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 46 (2002), pp. 867-873
[27]
C. Ferrándiz Foraster, A. García-Díez, L. Lizán Tudela, L. Bermúdez-Rey, X. Badia Llach.
Impact of psoriasis in health-related quality of life.
Med Clin (Barc), 128 (2007), pp. 325-329
[28]
T. Henseler, E. Christophers.
Psoriasis of early and the late onset: characterization of two types of psoriasis vulgaris.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 13 (1985), pp. 450-456
[29]
H. Valdimarsson.
The genetic basis of psoriasis.
Clin Dermatol, 25 (2007), pp. 563-567
[30]
E.M. Farber, M.L. Nail, W. Watson.
Natural history of psoriasis in 61 twin pairs.
Arch Dermatol, 109 (1974), pp. 207-211
[31]
D.L. Duffy, Spelman Ls, N.G. Martin.
Psoriasis in Australian twins.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 29 (1993), pp. 428-434
[32]
J.T. Elder, T. Heneseler, E. Christophers, J.J. Voorhees, R.P. Nair.
Of genes and antigens: the inheritance of psoriasis.
J Invest Dermatol, 103 (1994), pp. 150S-153S
[33]
J. Barker.
Genetic aspects of psoriasis.
Clin Exp Dermatol, 26 (2001), pp. 321-325
[34]
K.E. McKenna, R.S. Stern.
The impact of psoriasis on the quality of life of patients from 16-center PUVA follow-up cohort.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 36 (1997), pp. 388-394
[35]
G. Krueger, J. Koo, M. Lebwohl, A. Menter, R.S. Stern, T. Rolstad.
The impact of psoriasis on quality of life: results of a 1998 National Psoriasis Foundation patient-membership survey.
Arch Dermatol, 137 (2001), pp. 280-284
[36]
V.M. Heydendael, C.A. de Borgie, P.I. Spuls, P.M. Bossuyt, J.D. Bos, M.A. de Rie.
The burden of psoriasis is not determined by disease severity only.
J Investig Dermatol Symp Proc, 9 (2004), pp. 131-135
[37]
D.G. Fortune, H.L. Richards, C.E.M. Griffiths, J.C. Main.
Psychological stress, distress and disability in patients with psoriasis. Consensus and variation in the contribution of illness perceptions, coping and alexithymia.
Br J Clin Psychol, 41 (2002), pp. 157-174
[38]
A. Finzi, D. Colombo, A. Caputo, L. Andreassi, S. Chimenti, G. Vena, PSYCHAE Study Group, et al.
Psychological distress and coping strategies in patients with psoriasis: the PSYCHAE Study.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, (2007), pp. 1161-1169
[39]
S.M. Skevington, J. Bradshaw, A. Hepplewhite, K. Dawkes, C.R. Lovell.
How does psoriasis affect quality of life? Assessing an Ingram-regimen outpatient programme and validating the WHOQOL-100.
Br J Dermatol, 154 (2006), pp. 680-691
[40]
G. Schmid-Ott, H.W. Künsebeck, B. Jäger, U. Sittig, N. Hofste, R. Ott, et al.
Significance of the stigmatization experience of psoriasis patients: a 1-year follow-up of the illness and its psychosocial consequences in men and women.
Acta Derm Venereol, 85 (2005), pp. 27-32
[41]
C. Moberg, M. Alderling, B. Meding.
Hand eczema and quality of life: a population-based study.
Br J Dermatol, 161 (2009), pp. 397-403

See Appendix for listing.

Copyright © 2012. Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
Material suplementario
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?