Journal Information
Vol. 107. Issue 2.
Pages 107-115 (March 2016)
Visits
18896
Vol. 107. Issue 2.
Pages 107-115 (March 2016)
Revisión
Full text access
Hypersensitivity Reactions to Corticosteroids
Reacciones de hipersensibilidad a corticoides
Visits
18896
L. Berbegal
Corresponding author
lauraberbegal@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, F.J. DeLeon, J.F. Silvestre
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
This item has received
Article information
Abstract
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (6)
Show moreShow less
Tables (3)
Table 1. Allergy to Corticosteroids: Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions.
Table 2. Classification of Corticosteroids According to Baeck et al.26 and Baeck and Goossens27
Table 3. Criteria for Suspicion of Corticosteroid-Induced Allergic Contact Dermatitis.
Show moreShow less
Abstract

Corticosteroids are widely used in clinical practice. In dermatology, their application is generally topical. These substances may act as allergens and produce immediate and delayed hypersensitivity reactions. Allergic contact dermatitis is the most frequent presentation of corticosteroid allergy and it should be studied by patch testing in specific units. The corticosteroids included in the Spanish standard battery are good markers but not ideal. Therefore, if those makers are positive, it is useful to apply a specific battery of corticosteroids and the drugs provided by patients. Immediate reactions are relatively rare but potentially severe, and it is important to confirm the sensitization profile and to guide the use of alternative corticosteroids, because they are often necessary in several diseases. In this article we review the main concepts regarding these two types of hypersensitivity reactions in corticosteroid allergy, as well as their approach in the clinical practice.

Keywords:
Allergic contact dermatitis
Hypersensitivity reactions
Patch test
Standard battery
Corticosteroids
Resumen

Los corticoides son fármacos ampliamente utilizados en la práctica clínica, especialmente de forma tópica en dermatología. Estas sustancias pueden actuar como alérgenos y producir tanto reacciones de hipersensibilidad inmediata como retardada. La alergia en forma de dermatitis de contacto es la reacción más frecuente, y debe estudiarse mediante pruebas epicutáneas en unidades especializadas. Actualmente la batería estándar española tiene buenos marcadores para su detección, pero no ideales. Por ello, es rentable aplicar una batería específica de corticoides si dichos marcadores son positivos, así como los corticoides propios aportados por los pacientes. En cuanto a las reacciones de hipersensibilidad inmediata, son mucho menos habituales, pero potencialmente más graves. Debido a que estos fármacos son necesarios en múltiples enfermedades, es importante confirmar la sensibilización a estas sustancias, y orientar el uso de corticoides alternativos. En el presente artículo pretendemos revisar los principales conceptos respecto a estos 2 tipos de reacciones de hipersensibilidad en la alergia a corticoides, así como su abordaje en la práctica clínica.

Palabras clave:
Dermatitis de contacto alérgica
Reacciones de hipersensibilidad
Pruebas epicutáneas
Batería estándar
Corticoides
Full Text
Introduction

Corticosteroids are widely used in dermatology, especially as topical drugs. In 1952, Sulzberger and Witten1 synthesized a topically active compound called substance F, which was later known as hydrocortisone or cortisol. Since their introduction, corticosteroids have proven highly efficacious as anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory drugs, although, paradoxically, they can behave as allergens, leading to hypersensitivity reactions. This effect was first reported in the 1950s,2–5 and, since then, many more cases have been reported. Type IV (delayed) hypersensitivity reactions, which occur with symptoms of allergic contact dermatitis (ACD), are more common than type I (immediate) reactions, which are less well-known.6

Given that corticosteroids share a similar structure, cross-reactions between them are not uncommon. Consequently, it is difficult to study sensitization to these substances. Several authors have tried to classify the drugs into different groups. A current classification applied in ACD divides corticosteroids into 3 groups and patients into 2 groups, thus providing us with a more practical means of assessment. However, no ideal classification has been designed to date, and disagreement is common in daily clinical practice. Furthermore, this classification does not enable us to group the cross-reactions observed in immediate hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids.

Despite the fact that corticosteroids were named contact allergen of the year in 2005,7 corticosteroid allergy has received little attention and constitutes a challenge in clinical practice. The presentation and diagnostic test results are often difficult to interpret and subject to peculiarities that are worthy of analysis. In suspected allergic reactions to corticosteroids, it is important to identify both the culprit drug and drugs that can be used as alternatives, since corticosteroids may become almost indispensable for the control or treatment of specific diseases.

The present article reviews key concepts in both types of hypersensitivity reaction to corticosteroids and examines their management in clinical practice.

Types of Allergy

Corticosteroids can give rise to type I hypersensitivity reactions (immunoglobulin [IgE]–mediated), which occur only minutes after exposure, and type IV hypersensitivity reactions (T cell–mediated), which occur hours or days after exposure. In the latter, the characteristics of T cells have been studied, and analysis of skin biopsy specimens has revealed an inflammatory infiltrate composed of CD3+ T cells with a predominantly type 2 helper T-cell cytokine profile.8Table 1 shows the main characteristics of both types of reaction.

Table 1.

Allergy to Corticosteroids: Immediate and Delayed Hypersensitivity Reactions.

Type of Reaction  Immediate  Delayed 
Frequency  Exceptional  ACD: frequent
Generalized reactions: infrequent 
Main route of sensitization  Intravenous  Topical/skin (also airborne) 
Predisposing factors  Asthma
Transplant recipients 
Chronic dermatological diseases
Self-medication with corticosteroids 
Clinical presentation  Minutes after exposure to corticosteroids
Urticaria, angioedema, anaphylaxis 
Hours or days after exposure to corticosteroids
No response or worsening of symptoms after treatment with corticosteroids
ACD (edge effect)
Generalized eruption 
Diagnostic procedures  In vivo:
Skin prick test or intradermal reaction
(early reading)
In vitro:
Specific IgE, basophil activation test 
In vivo:
Patch tests or intradermal tests (delayed reading)
In vitro:
Lymphocyte transformation test 
Most commonly involved drugs  Methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone  Hydrocortisone, methylprednisolone, budesonide (drugs with no C16 methylation or halogenation) 
Cross-reactions and classification  Mechanism unclear
Cross-reactions are common between methylprednisolone and hydrocortisone 
Groups 1, 2, and 3
Profile 1: Patients allergic to 1 group of corticosteroids
Profile 2: Patients allergic to the molecule of the corticosteroid 
Therapy  Individualized evaluation of the sensitivity/tolerance profile
Betamethasone and dexamethasone tolerated in many cases 
Profile 1: Use of corticosteroids from the groups the patient is not sensitized to
Profile 2: Individualized evaluation of the sensitivity/tolerance profile 

Abbreviations: ACD, allergic contact dermatitis; Ig, immunoglobulin.

Delayed Hypersensitivity ReactionsEpidemiology

The frequency of ACD to corticosteroids reported in the literature ranges from 0.2% to 5%.9 In Spain, the prevalence of sensitization to corticosteroids is 1.1% in patients analyzed using patch tests,10 which is lower than those reported in Europe (2.6%)11 and the United States (4.6%).12 The main allergen in Spanish series is budesonide,13,14 whereas in the United States it is tixocortol.15 The sensitization rates for budesonide, tixocortol, and hydrocortisone 17-butyrate seem to be similar in Europe.16

Variations in the prevalence of ACD to corticosteroids resulting from delayed hypersensitivity reactions could be due to a series of factors, such as the frequency of corticosteroid use in each country, prescription habits, knowledge of allergy to corticosteroids, and the diagnostic tests used.17 In this sense, the concentrations of corticosteroids used in patch tests in Europe are lower than in the United States.

Delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids is more common in women. The patients who are most predisposed to ACD to corticosteroids are those with chronic skin diseases (eg, chronic eczema, atopic dermatitis, stasis dermatitis, chronic ulcers), owing mainly to alteration of the skin barrier and the proinflammatory nature of the drugs. Corticosteroid-based self-medication without medical supervision is another predisposing factor. Genetic predisposition has also been postulated.18

Etiology and PathogenesisRoutes of Sensitization/Sources of Exposure

The most common route of sensitization to corticosteroids is direct contact with the skin, although there have also been reports of indirect contact via airborne mechanisms, for example, in the case of patients with relatives who use a budesonide inhaler.19,20 Other routes of sensitization include the conjunctival mucosa, nasal mucosa, respiratory tract, and gastrointestinal tract, although these are less common.21–23

Cross-Reactions and Classification

The basic structure of corticosteroids is the cyclopentanoperhydrophenanthrene ring. Modification of this ring through halogenation and/or esterification improves the drug's therapeutic properties, thus enabling it to better penetrate the skin and increasing its effectiveness and potency. However, this chemical similarity leads to frequent cross-reactions, which are difficult to interpret. Several authors have tried to classify corticosteroids into groups in order to better understand sensitization to them.

In 1989, Coopman et al.24 classified corticosteroids into 4 groups, namely, A, B, C, and D, depending on chemical structure and cross-reactivity patterns. In 2000, Matura and Goossens25 divided group D into 2 subgroups, D1 and D2. It was later observed that cross-reactions were occasionally not as predicted or expected according to the classification, which was then modified. In 2009, Baeck et al.9 studied molecular models of corticosteroids and the skin test results of 315 corticosteroid-sensitive patients. In 2011, they proposed a new, simpler classification that divided the drugs into 3 groups based on cross-reactions and according to molecular structure (Table 2).26,27

Table 2.

Classification of Corticosteroids According to Baeck et al.26 and Baeck and Goossens27

Group 1  Group 2  Group 3 
Nonmethylated nonhalogenated molecules  Halogenated molecules with a cis-ketal or diol structure at C16/C17  Halogenated methylated molecules at C16 
Correspond to budesonide and group A and group D2 of the classification of Coopman et al.24  Correspond to group B of the classification of Coopman et al.  Correspond to group C and group D1 of the classification of Coopman et al. 
 
 
 
Budesonide
Cloprednol
Cortisone acetate
Dichlorisone acetate
Difluprednate
Fludrocortisone acetate
Fluorometholone
Fluprednisolone acetate
Hydrocortisone
Hydrocortisone aceponate
Hydrocortisone acetate
Hydrocortisone 17-butyrate
Hydrocortisone 21-butyrate
Hydrocortisone hemisuccinate
Isoflupredone acetate
Mazipredone
Medrysone
Methylprednisolone acetate
Methylprednisolone aceponate
Methylprednisolone hemisuccinate
Prednicarbate
Prednisolone
Prednisolone caproate
Prednisolone pivalate
Prednisolone sodium metasulfobenzoate
Prednisolone succinate
Prednisone
Tixocortol pivalate 
Triamcinolone
Amcinonide
Desonidea
Flucloronide
Flumoxonide
Flunisolide
Fluocinolone acetonide
Fluocinonide
Halcinonidea
Triamcinolone acetonide
Triamcinolone benetonide
Triamcinolone diacetate
Triamcinolone hexacetonide 
Alclometasone dipropionate
Beclomethasone dipropionate
Betamethasone
Betamethasone 17-valerate
Betamethasone dipropionate
Betamethasone sodium phosphate
Clobetasol propionate
Clobetasone butyrate
Desoximetasone
Dexamethasone
Dexamethasone acetate
Dexamethasone sodium phosphate
Diflucortolone valerate
Diflorasone diacetate
Flumethasone pivalate
Fluocortin butyl
Fluocortolone
Fluocortolone caprylate
Fluocortolone pivalate
Fluocortolone acetate
Fluprednidene acetate
Halometasone
Meprednisone
Fluticasone propionate
Mometasone furoate 

aNonhalogenated molecules.

Group 1 corticosteroids produced allergic reactions more frequently, whereas group 3 drugs had the lowest sensitizing capacity and produced the fewest cross-reactions,28 probably because the metabolites resulting from the degradation process are determinants in cross-reactions. The formation of degradation products (steroid-glyoxal) has been observed in vitro on the C17 side chain. These products cause alterations on C21. The resulting complex, which can bind to most amino acids, binds irreversibly to arginine guanidine groups in serum proteins to become an antigen.29 Thus, the most allergenic corticosteroids are those whose degradation products bind more easily to arginine (eg, budesonide).30,31 Halogenation of the molecule seems to diminish this ability to bind to arginine, thus providing a potential explanation for the fact that betamethasone-type halogenated corticosteroids are less allergenic.

In addition to this new classification into 3 groups, the authors proposed dividing patients into 2 profiles depending on whether they were sensitized to 1 or more groups, so that profile 1 patients would react only to a single group and profile 2 patients would react to the whole spectrum of corticosteroids by recognizing the skeleton of the substances involved (Fig. 1). The latter profile includes patients who seem to be at greater risk of generalized skin reactions after administration of systemic corticosteroids.

Figure 1.

Example of a profile 2 patient who reacted to the complete spectrum of corticosteroids. The patient was diagnosed with inverse psoriasis and was found to be sensitized to all 3 groups of corticosteroids. Reading at 96hours with the modified standard series revealed positive results for budesonide (++) and hydrocortisone 17-butyrate (+) (group 1). Testing with the corticosteroid series revealed positive results to triamcinolone acetonide (+) (group 2). Testing with the patient's own corticosteroids revealed allergy to group 3 drugs, with positive results for the commercially available creams Diproderm (+), Elocom (+), Fucibet (+), Nasonex (+), Peitel (+), and Suniderma (+).

(0.23MB).
Symptoms

Most delayed hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids present as chronic eczema. These reactions are often difficult to recognize because the onset of symptoms is slow and the chronology atypical; therefore, the information provided by the patient is essential. We should suspect ACD to corticosteroids when eczema occurs at the site where the drug was applied or when chronic skin complaints do not improve after application of the drug.32 Also noteworthy are a more intense reaction at the edges of the lesion than in the center of the area treated owing to the anti-inflammatory effect and the presence of signs resulting from prolonged use of corticosteroids (eg, atrophy, rosacea, and perioral dermatitis) due to diagnostic delay. However, presentation of the reaction in the form of hand eczema is less frequent than in the remaining patients studied using patch tests.9 Reactions should also be taken into account in people who work in hospitals and in the pharmaceutical industry, although the literature contains few cases of occupational dermatitis (Table 3).33

Table 3.

Criteria for Suspicion of Corticosteroid-Induced Allergic Contact Dermatitis.

Persistent chronic eczematous dermatitis 
Eruption more intense at the edges 
No improvement in symptoms despite appropriate treatment with corticosteroids 
Worsening of skin disease after treatment with corticosteroids 
Occupational exposure to corticosteroids (persons working in hospitals and the pharmaceutical industry) 

Patients sensitized to corticosteroid eyedrops can experience periocular eczema and/or edema, conjunctivitis, itching, burning pain, and/or tearing.21 Therapy with inhaled corticosteroids can lead to periorificial eczematous eruptions (perioral, perinasal) that could extend to the mucosa and cause nasal congestion, rhinitis, stomatitis, and even bronchospasm.22,34

In patients who are sensitized to topical corticosteroids, generalized eruptions have been reported after oral, inhaled, parenteral, and transmucosal administration of corticosteroids.35–38 These delayed systemic reactions can present as maculopapular or eczematous eruptions, or even as blisters and purpura. Eruptions have also been reported in corticosteroid-allergic patients after administration of steroid hormones.39–41

Furthermore, there have been isolated reports of the reaction presenting as delayed angioedema/urticaria,42 fixed drug eruption,43 erythema multiforme,44,45 and acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis.46

Diagnosis

The most commonly used methods for the diagnosis of hypersensitivity reactions are in vivo tests such as patch tests and delayed reading of intradermal tests. Patch tests are the approach of choice, whereas delayed reading of intradermal tests is not carried out routinely owing to the associated risk of cutaneous atrophy.47 In vitro testing of delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids is based on the lymphocyte transformation test, which tends to be restricted to specialized centers.48–51

A series of points should be taken into account when reading and interpreting the results of patch tests with corticosteroids. In early readings, corticosteroids can produce a doughnut-type reaction or edge effect, which consists of a reaction at the edges of the patch and not in the middle area, probably because of the anti-inflammatory effect in the central area, where the concentration is higher (Fig. 2). Whitening of the skin has also been reported at the site of application of the patch after 48hours owing to a vasoconstriction effect. Furthermore, it is important to draw attention to delayed erythema, since corticosteroids can suppress or delay a positive response as a result of their anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory effect.52 Consequently, the current guidelines of the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group include the possibility of a third reading 7 days after the patches have been applied in order to avoid potential false negatives.

Figure 2.

Example of the edge effect (“doughnut-type” reaction) in a reading of corticosteroid patches at 96hours. The reaction appears at the edge of the patch and not in the middle area, probably because of the predominant anti-inflammatory effect in the central area, where the concentration is higher.

(0.27MB).

Patch tests are based on markers such as budesonide, tixocortol-pivalate, and hydrocortisone 17-butyrate. Budesonide and tixocortol-pivalate are included in the European and Spanish standard series,47 and hydrocortisone 17-butyrate is included in the TRUE test and the standard series of the North American Contact Dermatitis Group.

In Spain, the standard series of the Spanish Contact Dermatitis and Skin Allergy Research Group includes budesonide 0.01% in petrolatum (pet) and tixocortol 21-pivalate 0.1% pet. Although petrolatum is a good vehicle for the study of corticosteroids, some authors have postulated that the best method for detecting delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids is by using the active ingredients diluted in ethanol.53 Both markers can identify sensitization in most patients, since both belong to group 1 of the classification; however, sensitization may go undetected in patients who are allergic to groups 2 and/or 3. Therefore, it is important to assess patients using specific series and their own products. It could also prove useful to add a corticosteroid from groups 2 and/or 3 to the standard series, at least temporarily, to better determine the prevalence of sensitization to these groups.

In patients with positive results to corticosteroid markers from the standard series and in patients with a high clinical suspicion of allergy to corticosteroids but no positive results to markers of corticosteroid allergy, the study should be extended by applying a specific corticosteroid series and the patient's own products.54 One example of a corticosteroid-specific series is that supplied by Chemotechnique Diagnostics AB, which, in addition to corticosteroids from the standard series, includes triamcinolone acetonide (1.0% pet), dexamethasone 21-phosphate (1.0% pet), clobetasol 17-propionate (1.0% pet), betamethasone 17-valerate (1.0% pet), and alclometasone 17-21-dipropionate (1.0% pet).

In our experience, it is common to encounter patients with a positive result to a marker who do not have positive results when tested with corticosteroids from the same group or with their own products containing corticosteroids from the same group. If we obtain a positive result to one of the patient's own products, we must rule out the possibility of allergy to an excipient, since this condition often manifests as ACD to corticosteroids. Allergenic excipients used in corticosteroid formulas include chlorocresol,55 benzyl alcohol, ethylenediamine hydrochloride, isopropyl palmitate, parabens, polysorbate 60, propylene glycol, stearyl alcohol, sodium dioctyl sulfosuccinate, sodium metabisulfite, and 1,2-hexanetriol.17,56–59

Cosensitization, or sensitization to multiple allergens, in corticosteroid-allergic patients is well documented.60 In their series of 315 patients, Baeck et al.9 found positive reactions to other allergens—mainly metals and fragrances—in up to 84% of cases. Other allergens that have traditionally been involved in cosensitization to corticosteroids are neomycin sulfate and ethylenediamine dihydrochloride (Fig. 3). Cosensitization was attributed to the presence of these allergens in the same pharmaceutical cream.

Figure 3.

Patch test in a patient sensitized to allergens other than corticosteroids, such as ethylenediamine and palladium.

(0.13MB).
Therapy

Management of corticosteroid-allergic patients continues to be complicated. The recent classification of Baeck et al.26 and Baeck and Goosens27has made it possible to reclassify corticosteroids according to their chemical structure and patients according to their allergy to 1 or more groups. However, this classification is not ideal, since, during follow-up, some patients do not experience a reaction after application of topical corticosteroids from the group they were sensitized to. Similarly, it does not seem useful to recommend inhaled or systemic corticosteroids, since the cross-reaction pattern after inhaled or systemic administration is not well-known.

Although there is some doubt when recommending a specific drug, it is prudent to recommend that profile 1 patients avoid all topical corticosteroids from the group they are sensitized to according to the current classification, which serves as a guideline. In order to recommend a specific drug, it would be appropriate for the patient to undergo patch testing or a use test with the drug and thus rule out sensitization. The option that can be proposed to profile 2 patients is to recommend other measures, such as calcineurin inhibitors, and reserve corticosteroids only for emergency situations, when no alternative is available.

Immediate Hypersensitivity ReactionsEpidemiology

Immediate hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids are relatively uncommon, although they should be recognized, since they carry a greater risk than delayed reactions and are more difficult to manage, irrespective of the department they occur in. Their prevalence is estimated to be 0.1%-0.3%.61,62

Etiology and PathogenesisRoutes of Sensitization/Sources of Exposure

Sensitization in immediate hypersensitivity reactions is mainly through the intravenous route, although sensitization can also occur via the oral, intramuscular, intra-articular, and subcutaneous routes. The incidence of sensitization via these routes seems to be higher in patients with asthma63 and in patients receiving regular treatment with corticosteroids, for example, transplant recipients. However, in such cases, it is difficult to determine whether the increase in incidence is due to greater susceptibility or extensive exposure to corticosteroids.

Cross-reactions and Classification

The drugs most commonly involved in immediate hypersensitivity reactions are hydrocortisone and methylprednisolone. Although cross-reactions between them have been identified, we do not have sufficient data to demonstrate cross-reaction patterns and draw up classifications, as is the case with delayed hypersensitivity reactions. In fact, there have been reports of allergy to hydrocortisone/methylprednisolone in which the patient subsequently tolerated systemic administration of other group 1 corticosteroids, such as prednisone, and corticosteroids from other groups, such as betamethasone and dexamethasone.63–65

Furthermore, there are reports of hypersensitivity due not to corticosteroids themselves, but to the succinates added to the drugs to make them more soluble for intravenous administration.66–68

Symptoms

The various clinical pictures described for immediate hypersensitivity reactions to corticosteroids include angioedema, urticaria,69–71 and anaphylaxis.61 Although uncommon, contact urticaria can also be triggered by corticosteroids.

Diagnosis

Diagnosis can be made using in vivo tests, which include mainly the skin prick test and early reading of intradermal tests. Challenge tests can be used when the results are negative, although the risk-benefit ratio should always be taken into consideration. In vitro tests include specific IgE determination69,70 and the basophil activation test.72

When interpreting test results, it is important to rule out the possibility that the reaction is caused by preservatives or additives used in medications, such as carboxymethylcellulose or macrogol.73,74

Therapy

Systemic corticosteroids are necessary for the treatment of many diseases. The finding that immediate reaction to a specific corticosteroid does not necessarily imply a reaction to others indicates the need for an allergy workup to confirm the patient's sensitization/intolerance. As when studying any drug, it is important to take a detailed clinical history in order to determine the reason the corticosteroid was indicated, the type and kinetics of the reaction, and possible concomitant factors. Excipients should also be taken into account. Most authors use skin tests and controlled exposure tests to demonstrate the involvement of the drug. In addition, controlled exposure tests must be performed with succinate-free corticosteroids from a group other than the one causing the reaction in order to offer the patient alternative treatment. In emergency cases, betamethasone and deflazacort are recommended when the patient is allergic to other corticosteroids.63

Conclusions

Allergy to corticosteroids, especially ACD, is increasingly common. Prevalence ranges from 0.2% to 5%, and the most common allergen varies according to the country. In Spain, the most common allergen is budesonide, followed by tixocortol, with a prevalence of 0.95% and 0.63%, respectively.75

Corticosteroid-induced hypersensitivity reactions are a major restriction for the patient and a therapeutic challenge for the dermatologist in daily clinical practice. Given that the presentation of corticosteroid allergy and diagnostic test results are often difficult to interpret, a thorough knowledge of this condition is essential.

The recent classification by Baeck et al.26,27 has made it possible to reclassify corticosteroids according to their chemical structure and patients according to whether they are allergic to corticosteroids from 1 or more groups, thus improving treatment options and recommendations on the corticosteroids that can be prescribed.

The markers available in the Spanish standard series for detection of allergy to corticosteroids belong to group 1; therefore, patients allergic to group 2 and 3 markers may go undiagnosed. Studies based on the specific corticosteroid series and the patient's own commercially available creams could help to identify the individual sensitization profile.

Nevertheless, discordance continues to be observed between the results of patch tests and the patient's tolerance to various commercial preparations. In order to provide alternative treatments, it is advisable to perform exposure tests with corticosteroids from a group other than the one the patient is sensitized to or to recommend other options such as calcineurin inhibitors.

Although immediate hypersensitivity reactions are rarer than delayed reactions, they can be potentially severe. These reactions are problematic for various types of specialist, since the drugs are often indispensable; therefore, an allergy workup should be performed to confirm sensitization. As when studying any type of drug, a detailed clinical history is necessary to ascertain why the corticosteroid was indicated. Furthermore, it is important to take into account not only the active ingredient, but also the excipients used. Once the culprit drug has been identified, the patient should be advised about alternative corticosteroids. Betamethasone and deflazacort are recommended in emergency cases.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
M.B. Sulzberger, V.H. Witten.
The effect of topically applied compound F in selected dermatoses.
J Invest Dermatol, 19 (1952), pp. 101-102
[2]
W.M. Sams, G.J. Smith.
Contact dermatitis due to hydrocortisone ointment.
JAMA, 164 (1957), pp. 1212
[3]
R. Kooiji.
Hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone.
Br J Dermatol, 71 (1959), pp. 392-394
[4]
W. Burckhardt.
Contact eczema caused by hydrocortisone.
Hautarzt, 10 (1959), pp. 42-43
[5]
P.H. Kendall.
Untowards effects following local hydrocortisone injection.
Ann Phys Med, 4 (1958), pp. 170-175
[6]
M. Baeck, A. Goossens.
New insights about delayed allergic hypersensitivity to corticosteroids.
Ital Dermatol Venereol, 147 (2012), pp. 65-69
[7]
I. Marléne, B. Magnus.
Contact allergen of the year: Corticosteroids.
Dermatitis, 16 (2005), pp. 3-5
[8]
M. Baeck, A. Soria, L. Marot, I. Theate, E. Hendrickx, A. Van Belle, et al.
Characterization of the T cell response in allergic contact dermatitis caused by corticosteroids.
Contact Dermatitis, 68 (2013), pp. 357-368
[9]
M. Baeck, J. Drieghe, J.A. Chemelle, R. Terreux, A. Goossens.
Delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids in a series of 315 patients: Clinical data and patch-test results.
Contact Dermatitis, 61 (2009), pp. 163-175
[10]
M. Jones, M.D. Guimaraens, C. Villegas, P. Fernandez, L. Conde-Salazar.
Dermatitis de contacto por corticoides tópicos.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 84 (1993), pp. 641-644
[11]
A. Dooms-Goossens, K.E. Andersen, F.M. Brandao, D. Bruynzeel, D. Burrows, J. Camarasa, et al.
Corticosteroid contact allergy: An EECDRG multicentre study.
Contact Dermatitis, 35 (1996), pp. 40-44
[12]
S.E. Jacob, T. Steele.
Corticosteroid classes: A quick reference guide including patch test substances and cross-reactivity.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 54 (2006), pp. 723-727
[13]
M. Pérez-Crespo, J.F. Silvestre, A. Lucas, J. Mataix, I. Ballester.
Allergic contact dermatitis due to corticosteroids: A 3-year retrospective study in a hospital skin allergy unit.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 100 (2009), pp. 291-297
[14]
B. García-Bravo, L. Conde-Salazar, J. de la Cuadra, V. Fernández-Redondo, J.M. Fernández-Vozmediano, D. Guimaraens, et al.
Estudio epidemiológico de la dermatitis alérgica de contacto en España (2001).
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 95 (2004), pp. 14-24
[15]
M.D. Davis, R.A. el-Azhary, S.A. Farmer.
Results of patch testing to a corticosteroid series: a retrospective review of 1,188 patients during 6 years at Mayo Clinic.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 56 (2007), pp. 921-927
[16]
D. Vind-Kezunovic, J.D. Johansen, B.C. Carlsen.
Prevalence of and factors influencing sensitization to corticosteroids in a Danish patch test population.
Contact Dermatitis, 64 (2011), pp. 325-329
[17]
R.L. Rietschel, J.L. Fowler.
Topical corticosteroids.
Fisher's contact dermatitis., pp. 254-265
[18]
S.M. Wilkinson, K. Morrey, K. Hollowood, A.H. Heagerty, J.S.C. English.
HLA-A B and DR antigens in hydrocortisone contact hypersensitivity.
Contact Dermatitis, 28 (1993), pp. 295-297
[19]
M. Baeck, A. Goossens.
Patients with airborne sensitization/contact dermatitis from budesonide-containing aerosols ‘by proxy’.
Contact Dermatitis, 1 (2009), pp. 1-8
[20]
N. Raison-Peyron, H.B. Co Minh, A. Vidal-Mazuy, J.J. Guilhou, B. Guillot.
Connubial contact dermatitis to an inhaled corticosteroid.
Ann Dermatol Venereol, 132 (2005), pp. 143-146
[21]
M. Baeck, P. de Potter, A. Goossens.
Allergic contact dermatitis following ocular use of corticosteroids.
J Ocul Pharmacol Ther, 27 (2011), pp. 83-92
[22]
M. Baeck, C. Pilette, J. Drieghe, A. Goossens.
Allergic contact dermatitis to inhalation corticosteroids.
Eur J Dermatol, 20 (2010), pp. 102-108
[23]
M. Malik, A.M. Tobin, F. Shanahan, C. O’Morain, B. Kirby, J. Bourke.
Steroid allergy in patients with inflammatory bowel disease.
Br J Dermatol, 157 (2007), pp. 967-969
[24]
S. Coopman, H. Degreef, A. Dooms-Goossens.
Identification of cross-reaction patterns in allergic contact dermatitis from topical corticosteroids.
Br J Dermatol, 121 (1989), pp. 27-34
[25]
M. Matura, A. Goossens.
Contact allergy to corticosteroids.
Allergy, 55 (2000), pp. 698-704
[26]
M. Baeck, J.A. Chamelle, A. Goossens, J.F. Nicolas, R. Terreux.
Corticosteroid cross-reactivity: Clinical and molecular modelling tools.
[27]
M. Baeck, A. Goossens.
Immediate, delayed allergic hypersensitivity to corticosteroids: Practical guidelines.
Contact Dermatitis, 66 (2011), pp. 38-45
[28]
M. Baeck, J.A. Chemelle, C. Rasse, R. Terreux, A. Goossens.
C(16)-methyl corticosteroids are far less allergenic than the non-methylated molecules.
Contact Dermatitis, 64 (2011), pp. 305-312
[29]
Corominas M, García-Robaina JC, Rodríguez V, Delgado J, Gacía-Ortega G. Reacciones alérgicas inducidas por fármacos poco habituales (II): de masa molecular alta u orgánicos. In: Peláez A, Dávila IJ, editors. Tratado de alergología de la SEAIC. Majadahonda, Madrid: Ergon; 2007. p. 1557-62.
[30]
A. Saraswat.
Contact allergy to topical corticosteroids and sunscreens.
Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol, 78 (2012), pp. 552-559
[31]
S.M. Wilkinson, S.F. Jones.
Corticosteroid usage and binding to arginine: Determinants of corticosteroid hypersensitivity.
Br J Dermatol, 135 (1996), pp. 225-230
[32]
M. Gonul, U. Gül.
Detection of contact hypersensitivity to corticosteroids in allergic contact dermatitis patients who do not respond to topical corticosteroids.
Contact Dermatitis, 53 (2005), pp. 67
[33]
A.I. Lauerma.
Occupational contact sensitization to corticosteroids.
Contact Dermatitis, 39 (1998), pp. 328-329
[34]
O’Hagan AH, Corbett JR. Contact allergy to budesonide in a breath-actuated inhaler. Contact Dermatitis.1999;41:53.
[35]
L. Fernandez de Corres, G. Bernaola, I. Urrutia, D. Muñoz.
Allergic dermatitis from systemic treatment with corticosteroids.
Contact Dermatitis, 22 (1990), pp. 104-106
[36]
S. Quirce, M.J. Alvarez, J.M. Olaguibel, A.I. Tabar.
Systemic contact dermatitis from oral prednisone.
Contact Dermatitis, 30 (1994), pp. 53
[37]
A. Miranda, C. Bajo, P. Sanchez, M. Martínez, M. García.
Delayed contact allergic reaction to intralesional paramethasone acetate.
Contact Dermatitis, 39 (1998), pp. 31-32
[38]
A. Kulberg, S. Schliemann, P. Elsner.
Contact dermatitis as a systemic disease.
Clin Dermatol, 32 (2014), pp. 414-419
[39]
A. Lauerma, S. Reitamo, H.I. Maibach.
Systemic hydrocortisone/cortisol induces allergic skin reactions in presensitized subjects.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 24 (1991), pp. 182-185
[40]
A. Schoenmakers, A. Vermorken, H. Degreef, A. Dooms-Goossens.
Corticosteroid or steroid allergy?.
Contact Dermatitis, 26 (1992), pp. 159
[41]
S.R. Lamb, S.M. Wilkinson.
Contact allergy to progesterone and estradiol in a patient with multiple corticosteroid allergies.
Dermatitis, 15 (2004), pp. 78-81
[42]
C. Pirker, A. Misic’, P.J. Frosch.
Angioedema and dysphagia caused by contact allergy to inhaled budesonide.
Contact Dermatitis, 49 (2003), pp. 77-79
[43]
M.T. Ventura, G.F. Calogiuri, L. Muratore, E. Di Leo, R. Buquicchio, A. Ferrannini, et al.
Cross-reactivity in cell-mediated and IgE-mediated hypersensitivity to corticosteroids.
Curr Pharm Des, 12 (2006), pp. 3383-3391
[44]
L. Stingeni, S. Caraffini, D. Assalve, V. Lapomarda, P. Lisi.
Erythema-multiforme-like contact dermatitis from budesonide.
Contact Dermatitis, 34 (1996), pp. 154-155
[45]
L. Stingeni, K. Hansel, P. Lisi.
Morbiliform erythema-multiforme-like eruption from desoxymethasone.
Contact Dermatitis, 35 (1996), pp. 363-364
[46]
E. Chavarria, M. González-Carrascosa, R. Suárez, C. Bueno.
Generalized exanthematous reaction with pustulosis induced by topical corticosteroids.
Contact Dermatitis, 52 (2005), pp. 114-115
[47]
M. Isaksson, F.M. Brandao, M. Bruze, A. Goossens.
Recommendation to include budesonide and tixocortol pivalate in the European standard series.
Contact Dermatitis, 43 (2000), pp. 41-63
[48]
A. Lauerma.
Contact hypersensitivity to glucocorticosteroids.
Am J Contact Dermat, 31 (1992), pp. 112-132
[49]
U. Buettiker, M. Keller, W.J. Picheler, L.R. Braathen, N. Yamalkar.
Oral prednisolone induced acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis due to corticosteroids of group A confirmed by epicutaneous testing and lymphocyte transformation tests.
Dermatology, 213 (2006), pp. 40-43
[50]
S. Comaish.
A case of hypersensitivity to corticosteroids.
Br J Dermatol, 81 (1969), pp. 919-925
[51]
S.M. Wilkinson, J.S.C. English, D.L. Mattey.
In vitro evidence of delayed-type hypersensitivity to hydrocortisone.
Contact Dermatitis, 29 (1993), pp. 241-245
[52]
M. Alcántara Villara, J. Martínez Escribano, J.D. López Sánchez, J. Frías Iniesta, A. Pagán Alemán.
Dermatitis de contacto por corticoides. Manejo clínico.
Alergol Inmunol Clin, 14 (1999), pp. 152-155
[53]
A. Soria, M. Baeck, A. Goossens, L. Marot, V. Duveille, A.S. Derouaux, et al.
Patch, prick or intradermal tests to detect delayed hypersensitivity to corticosteroids?.
Contact Dermatitis, 64 (2011), pp. 313-324
[54]
S. Freeman.
Corticoisteroid allergy.
Contact Dermatitis, 25 (1995), pp. 132
[55]
C.B. Archer, D.M. MacDonald.
Chlorocresol sensitivity induced by treatment of allergic contact dermatitis with steroid creams.
Contact Dermatitis, 11 (1984), pp. 144-145
[56]
S. Lazzarinni.
Contact allergy to benzyl alcohol and isopropyl palmitate, ingredients of topical corticosteroids.
Contact Dermatitis, 8 (1982), pp. 349
[57]
H. Black.
Contact dermatitis from stearyl alcohol in Metosyn (fluocinolone) cream.
Contact Dermatitis, 1 (1975), pp. 125
[58]
J.A. Oleffe, A. Blondeel, A. Deconinch.
Allergy to chlorecresol and propylene glicol in a steroide cream.
Contact Dermatitis, 5 (1979), pp. 53
[59]
J. Coloe, M. Zirwas.
Allergens in corticosteroid vehicles.
Dermatitis, 19 (2008), pp. 38-42
[60]
H. Degreef, A. Dooms-Goossens.
The new corticosteroids: Are they effective and safe?.
Dermatol Ther, 11 (1993), pp. 155-160
[61]
H. Nakamura, H. Matsude, Y. Obase, K. Mitsuda, S. Tomari, S. Saeki, et al.
Clinical evaluation of anaphylactic reactions to intravenous corticosteroids in adult asthmatics.
Respiration, 69 (2002), pp. 309-313
[62]
A.S. Klein-Gitelman, L.M. Pachman.
Intravenous corticosteroids: Adverse reactions variable than expected in children.
J Rheumatol, 25 (1998), pp. 1995-2002
[63]
N. Freymond, A. Catelain, E. Queille, F. Augey, J.F. Nicolas.
Allergic reaction to methylprednisolone.
Rev Med Interne, 24 (2003), pp. 698-700
[64]
M.T. Ventura, G.F. Calogiuri, M.G. Matino, M. Dagnello, R. Buquicchio, C. Foti, et al.
Alternative glucocorticoids for use in case of adverse reaction to systemic glucocorticoids: A study on 10 patients.
Br J Dermatol, 148 (2003), pp. 139-141
[65]
M.M. Escribano-Rodriguez, J. Gonzalez-Pol, F. Muñoz-Bellido, A. de la Calle Toral, E. Velazquez-Amor, J. Conde-Hernandez.
Immediate reaction to methylprednisolone with tolerance of other corticoteroids.
Allergy, 52 (1997), pp. 677-678
[66]
R. Peces, M. Gorostidi, J. Azofra, L. Sanchez, K. Alvarez.
Anaphylaxis after intravenous methylprednisolone sodium succinate in a renal transplant recipient.
Nephron, 59 (1991), pp. 497-498
[67]
S. Caimmi, D. Caimmi, P.J. Bousquet, P. Demoly.
Succinate as opposed to glucocorticoid itself allergy.
[68]
T. Burgdorff, L. Venelmalm, T. Vogt, M. Landthaler, W. Stolz.
IgE mediated. Anaphylactic reaction induced by succinate ester of methylprednisolone.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 89 (2002), pp. 425-428
[69]
L. Rasanen, K. Tarvainen, S. Makinen-Kijunen.
Urticaria to hydrocortisone.
Allergy, 56 (2001), pp. 352-353
[70]
C. Vidal, S. Tomé, V. Fernandex-Redondo, F. Tato.
Systemic allergic reaction to corticosteroids.
Contact Dermatitis, 31 (1994), pp. 273-274
[71]
W.E.M. Pryse-Phillips, R.K. Chandra, B. Rose.
Anaphylactoid reaction to methylprednisolone pulsed therapy for multiple sclerosis.
Neurology, 34 (1984), pp. 1119-1121
[72]
B. Ben Said, V. Leray, J.F. Nicolas, A. Rozieres, F. Berard.
Methylprednisolone-induced anaphylaxis: Diagnosis by skin test and basophil activation test.
[73]
D. Patterson, J. Yunginger, W. Dunn, R. Jones, L. Hunt.
Anaphylaxis induced by the carboxymethylcellulose component of injectable triamcinolone acetonide suspension (Kenalog).
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol, 74 (1995), pp. 163-166
[74]
P. Dewachter, C. Mouton-Faivre.
Anaphylaxis to macrogol 4,000 after a parenteral corticoid injection.
[75]
J. García-Gavin, J.C. Armario-Hita, V. Fernández-Redondo, J.M. Fernández-Vozmediano, J. Sánchez-Pérez, J.F. Silvestre, et al.
Epidemiología del eczema de contacto en España. Resultados de la Red Española de Vigilancia en Alergia de Contacto (REVAC) durante el año 2008.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 102 (2011), pp. 98-105

Please cite this article as: Berbegal L, DeLeon FJ, Silvestre JF. Reacciones de hipersensibilidad a corticoides. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2016;107:107–115.

Copyright © 2015. AEDV
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?