Información de la revista
Vol. 115. Núm. 10.
Páginas T1094-T1096 (noviembre - diciembre 2024)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 115. Núm. 10.
Páginas T1094-T1096 (noviembre - diciembre 2024)
Scientific-clinical letter
Acceso a texto completo
Fixed Food Eruption in a Pediatric Patient: Both a Diagnostic and Therapeutic Challenge
Eritema fijo por alimentos en un paciente pediátrico: reto diagnóstico y terapéutico
Visitas
513
L.M. Arango Bedoyaa,
Autor para correspondencia
laura.arangob@upb.edu.co

Corresponding author.
, D. Zuluaga Loteroa, L.M. Tamayo Quijanob
a Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
b Universidad Pontificia Bolivariana, Universidad de Antioquia, Clínica Universitaria Bolivariana, Medellín, Antioquia, Colombia
Contenido relacionado
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024;115:1094-610.1016/j.ad.2023.06.022
L.M. Arango Bedoya, D. Zuluaga Lotero, L.M. Tamayo Quijano
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (3)
Mostrar másMostrar menos
Texto completo
To the Editor,

Food allergy (FA) is an adverse reaction caused by immune mechanisms mediated by cellular immunity and immunoglobulin E, with cutaneous, respiratory, or GI signs. Atopic dermatitis and acute urticaria are often the most common skin signs. Fixed food erythema is an uncommon manifestation of FA, with immune mechanisms that are not yet well established.

An 11-month-old infant was evaluated due to a 4-month history of erythematous plaques on both cheeks and chin, and well-demarcated borders, serous vesicles, and yellow crusts (fig. 1).1 The patient had a history of a generalized rash associated with GI symptoms at 4 months old, attributed to milk consumption, and was on extensively hydrolyzed milk. Specific IgE tests for cow's milk and egg tested negative.

Figure 1.

Compromised cheeks and chin, an irregular, well-demarcated, infiltrated, lichenified plaque with scaling and serohematic crusts.

(0.13MB).

With a diagnosis of impetiginized eczema, the patient received topical treatment with antibiotics, hydrocortisone, and tacrolimus without improvement, leading to hospitalization and systemic treatment with cephalosporin and clindamycin, which were discontinued due to an adverse reaction. Treatment was switched to trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole and the patient was discharged for outpatient follow-up. Initially, the patient showed clinical improvement. However, days after completing outpatient treatment, the plaques recurred with the same morphology on the face, predominantly on the cheeks. Lab test results, including a blood count, serum zinc levels, and direct fungal examination, showed no pathological findings. Bacterial culture tested positive for Streptococcus oralis (interpreted as a contaminant), and a biopsy of the affected skin reported eczema.

Due to the persistence of symptoms, patch tests were performed with the Latin American standard battery and the patient's own products, without testing a healthy control group, as this is not routinely done in this population; results tested negative at 48 and 96hours but positive a week later for fragrances and tixocortol pivalate. However, the clinical relevance of this result was doubtful as, by this time, the patient was only using fragrance-free dermatological products and tacrolimus as anti-inflammatory therapy due to the chronicity of the condition. A patch test with foods was performed, starting with cow's milk and egg, as they are the most common food allergens, as well as Nutribén® H, the extensively hydrolyzed formula the patient was receiving at the time. The test was positive at 48 and 96hours for whole milk, egg white, egg yolk, and Nutribén® H (extensively hydrolyzed milk) (fig. 2).2 Based on these results, the diagnosis of fixed food erythema was established, and the patient was advised to continue an elemental diet and topical tacrolimus, which resulted in significant clinical improvement 1 week after starting the avoidance measures (fig. 3). Once the patient's lesions stabilized, a new patch test was conducted to assess FA to cereals, which tested positive for soy, corn, and wheat, explaining the positive patch test for the Nutribén® H formula, as these cereals are part of its main components.

Figure 2.

Patch test positive at 48 and 72hours: ++ positive to Nutribén® H.

(0.07MB).
Figure 3.

Post-treatment follow-up photos, resolved lesions, patient completely healthy.

(0.08MB).

FA is considered an adverse reaction originating from an abnormal immune response due to sensitization to protein antigens.1–4 Its prevalence is increasing, and it has been observed in 4% up to 8% of children in Western countries.1 It is more common in boys younger than 2 years and children with atopic parents. Cow's milk protein and egg allergies are the most common and tend to be transient, with improvement in 50% up to 60% of cases during school age.1,4

Sensitization to allergens typically occurs when they cross the intestinal mucosa and are processed by antigen-presenting cells, triggering a Th2-type response where regulatory mechanisms fail.1–4 FA can be categorized into IgE-mediated, which shows as acute urticaria, angioedema, asthma, or anaphylaxis; non-IgE-mediated or cellular, which is associated with celiac disease or enterocolitis; and mixed mechanisms, which are linked to atopic dermatitis and eosinophilic esophagitis, among others.1,2 Atopic dermatitis and acute urticaria are often the most common skin signs.2

Fixed food erythema is a rare form of FA, characterized by the appearance of eczematous plaques days after food ingestion that resolve when the food is avoided and reappear in the same location upon re-exposure. Therefore, in our patient, lesions were always located on the face, although fixed food erythema can affect other locations. The immune mechanism is yet to be elucidated. Cases in children have been reported in the literature in relation to the consumption of crab, corn, nuts, and fruits.5–7

Diagnosis is based on a detailed medical history, correlating the timing of food ingestion with symptom onset. In cases of doubt or severity, patch tests, biopsies, or oral food challenges can be performed.1,2 The cornerstone of treatment is the avoidance of the implicated allergen. Symptomatic treatment includes topical steroids and/or topical calcineurin inhibitors, and, if necessary, non-sedating H1 antihistamines to control itching. Systemic steroids are recommended for generalized cases.1

References
[1]
Comité Nacional de Alergia.
Food allergy in children: recommendations for diagnosis and treatment [Article in Spanish].
Arch Argent Pediatr., 116 (2018), pp. S1-S9
[2]
W. Burks.
Skin manifestations of food allergy.
Pediatrics, 111 (2003), pp. 1617-1624
[3]
T. Werfel.
Skin manifestations in food allergy.
[4]
J.M. Devdas, C. Mckie, A.T. Fox, V.H. Ratageri.
Food Allergy in Children: An Overview.
Indian J Pediatr, 85 (2018), pp. 369-374
[5]
P. Gil-Pallares, O. Alvarez-Garcia, C. González-Moure, M. Castro-Murga, B. Monteagudo-Sánchez.
Fixed food eruption caused by Maja squinado (European spider crab) in a child.
Contact Dermatitis, 83 (2020), pp. 510-512
[6]
D. Loli-Ausejo, F. Vílchez-Sánchez, C. Gómez-Traseira, M. Tomás-Pérez, M. González-Muñoz.
Fixed food eruption caused by peanut confirmed by open oral food challenge and in vitro cellular testing.
Contact Dermatitis, 83 (2020), pp. 227-229
[7]
N.K. Devaraj.
A recurrent cutaneous eruption.
Copyright © 2023. AEDV
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?