Información de la revista
Vol. 113. Núm. 9.
Páginas T900-T904 (Octubre 2022)
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 113. Núm. 9.
Páginas T900-T904 (Octubre 2022)
Case and Research Letter
Open Access
[Translated article] Acquired Nonfamilial Vibratory Angioedema
Angioedema vibratorio adquirido (no familiar)
M.A. Pastor-Nietoa,b,
Autor para correspondencia

Corresponding author.
, L. Vergara-de-la-Campac, M.E. Gatica-Ortegac, A. Giménez-Arnaud
a Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario de Guadalajara, Guadalajara, Spain
b Departamento de Medicina y Especialidades Médicas, Facultad de Medicina y Ciencias de la Salud, Universidad de Alcalá, Alcalá de Henares, Madrid, Spain
c Servicio de Dermatología, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain
d Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital del Mar, IMIM, Universitat Autònoma, Barcelona, Spain
Contenido relaccionado
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2022;113:900-410.1016/
M.A. Pastor-Nieto, L. Vergara-de-la-Campa, M.E. Gatica-Ortega, A. Giménez-Arnau
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Descargar PDF
Figuras (1)
Texto completo
To the Editor:

Vibratory angioedema is defined as a pruriginous inflammatory reaction that occurs a few minutes after exposure to vibration.1 An autosomal dominant variant, hereditary type of vibratory angioedema has been reported, manifesting as prolonged angioedema (hours to days) resulting from exposure to a vibratory stimulus.2 The more frequent sporadic form, acquired (nonfamilial) vibratory angioedema, is characterized by similar symptoms.3–13 Boyden et al.14,15 reported another autosomal dominant variant, which is characterized by mutations in adhesion G protein-coupled receptor E2 (ADGRE-2) and wheals instead of angioedema. This form is known as ADGRE-2-linked hereditary vibratory urticaria.2,16

Diagnosis is based on the clinical history and the vortex provocation test (Fig. 1). Dermographism should be ruled out. Elevated serum histamine and mast cell degranulation mediators have been reported during episodes.3–5,14,17,18 Treatment involves avoiding exposure to vibratory stimuli or, if this is not feasible (e.g., owing to occupational settings), administration of antihistamines (anti-H1) (level of evidence C).1

Figure 1.

The volar surface of the forearm should be exposed to the vibration for 5minutes. This should be induced by a laboratory vortex mixer (780–1380rpm), with readings taken at 10minutes once the stimulus has stopped. The result is considered positive when inflammation resulting the vibratory stimulus induced by the movement of the vortex. According to recommendations from consensus guidelines (EAACI/GA(2)LEN/EDF/UNEV), inflammation can be quantified by measuring the circumference of the forearm at 3 points (cubital fossa, wrist, and midpoint between the two). This measurement should be made with a measuring tape before application of the vibratory stimulus and 5minutes afterwards.


We performed a literature review on acquired (nonfamilial) vibratory angioedema in September 2020. The search terms applied were “vibratory” or “vibrational” or “vibration-induced” and “angioedema” or “urticaria”. We searched for articles in English, French, and Spanish, without time restrictions, in MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, and Web of Science.

We identified 21 articles between 1982 and 2016. Ten were ruled out owing to insufficient information and/or hereditary cases. We recorded 12 cases of acquired disease (Table 1), including 7 males (58%), and 6 occupational cases (50%). The mean age at diagnosis was 35 (16–70) years, and the mean age at onset of symptoms was 31years. The latency period between onset of symptoms and consultation ranged from 3months to 20years.

Table 1.

Review of the Literature on Acquired Vibratory Angioedema.

Author/year of publication  Sex/age, y  Triggers: findings, symptoms, and duration  Systemic symptoms  Vortex test performed/oscillation frequency  Measurement of forearm circumference/results  Symptoms and latency (time to onset after initiation of the vortex test)  Diagnostic tests for other CIndU/results  Treatment 
Alpern et al.13/2016  F/53  Massage bed: onset in the form of anaphylaxis; 2 additional episodes of edema affecting hands and feet, pruritus, and mild dizziness. No further episodes of anaphylaxis in the following 3Anaphylaxis (generalized pruritus, flushing, nausea, vomiting, hypotension, presyncope)  No  –  –  No  Avoidance of vibratory stimulus 
Kalathoor12/2015  F/70  Snoring: lingual and pharyngeal edema with difficulty swallowing (every 3mo for 3y); driving; some episodes of pruritus and hand edema  No  No  –  –  No  CPAP 
Guarneri et al.11/2014  M/20  Horn: labial angioedema (for 5months, although he had been playing it for 6y)  No  No  –  –  No  – 
Sarmast et al.10/2014  M/38  Trumpet: pain, edema, and erythema affecting the upper lip (3y); lawnmower: hand edema  No  Yes/NS  NS  Burning sensation, edema, erythema, and mild pain in forearm (5min after test)  Negative (DPU)  Prednisone 
Pressler et al.9/2012  F/36  Exercise (running, walking quickly, cycling over rough ground, skiing): angioedema (20y with worsening of systemic symptoms during recent months)  Dizziness, tachycardia, and hypotension  Yes/2400rpm  NS  Angioedema affecting the area of contact (5–10min after test)  Negative (heat, cold, DPU, SD)  Ketotifen 
Patruno et al.8/2009  M/28  Saxophone: lower lip edema (6mo)  No  Yes/NS  NS  Angioedema (5min after test)  Negative (heat, cold, DPU, CholU, SD)  Prednisone 
Mathelier-Fusade et al.7/2001  F/34  Mountain bike for 10min: forearm edema (4y)  No  Yes/NS  NS  Erythema, pruritus, and circumferential edema (5min after test)  Negative (DPU, CholU, SD)   
Lawlor et al.6/1989  F/28  Applauding for 5min, and/or electric lawnmower or garden shears: tingling, pruritus, and erythema on wrists and forearms lasting minutes; walking for <10min: pruritus followed by erythema on the anterior aspect of the thighs (10y)  Facial flushing, chest tightness, and generalized sensation of heat  Yes/780rpm  Yes/4-mm increase in circumference at the mid forearm  Tingling (2min after test) and pruritus (4min after test)  Positive (DPU, SD)Negative (CholU, cold)  Terfenadine 
Keahey5/1987  M/37  Machinist (pressure and/or friction): pruriginous and painful lesions (3y)  No  Yes/1380rpm  NS  Pruritus and erythema (immediate); localized angioedema (4 to 6h after the test)  Negative (SD, DPU: several occasions)   
  M/28  Carpenter (pressure and/or friction): pruriginous and painful lesions (5y)  No  Yes/1380rpm  NS  Urticarial reaction (minutes after the test); localized angioedema (4 to 6h after test)  Negative (SD, DPU: several occasions)SCU   
Wener4/1983  M/32  Grinding machine: erythema and edema affecting the left hand, and wrist affected by secondary carpal tunnel syndrome (1y)  No  Yes/NS  Yes/12-mm increase in wrist circumference  Edema, pruritus, paresthesia, and pain affecting the wrist, hand, forearm, and arm (1min after test); inability to flex fingers (4min after test); slowed nerve conduction velocity (5min after test)  Negative (cold, SD)  Surgery (carpal tunnel release) 
Ting3/1982  M/16  Motorcycle or lawnmower: hand edema (3mo)  No  Yes/6000rpm    Prolonged angioedema at various sites (arm, leg, and trunk) lasting 12h (onset seconds after test)  Negative (SD)  Desensitization to vibration 

Abbreviations: CPAP, continuous positive airway pressure; CIndU, chronic inducible urticaria; CholU, cholinergic urticaria; DPU, delayed pressure urticaria; F, female; M, male; NS, not specified; SCU, spontaneous chronic urticaria; SD, symptomatic dermographism.

The most frequent triggers were lawnmowers3,6,10 and musical instruments.8,10,11 All of the affected patients had localized lesions, although none had generalized wheals. One patient reported chronic spontaneous urticaria5 and another, carpal tunnel syndrome caused by severe edema of the wrist after occupational exposure to vibration.4 Three patients (25%) had systemic symptoms (flushing, chest tightness, generalized heat, dizziness, tachycardia, and hypertension), and 1 fulfilled the criteria for anaphylaxis.6,9,13

The vortex test was used in 9/12 cases (75%), with the type and frequency (rpm) reported in 5/9. The frequency recommended in guidelines (780–1380rpm) was applied in 3 cases.5,6 The forearm circumference (before and after testing) was specified in only 2 patients (increases of 4 and 12mm, respectively).4,6 Symptoms triggered by the vortex appeared between 0.5 and 10minutes once the oscillation had stopped. Only 1 patient developed wheals with the vortex (i.e., the patient with concomitant spontaneous urticaria). Median nerve conduction velocity slowed after the vortex was applied in the patient with carpal tunnel syndrome.4

Controls were included in 6 articles. Ting et al.3 studied 17 controls; of these, 4/7 relatives of the patient with acquired vibratory angioedema and 5/10 healthy volunteers developed edema that extended beyond the area in contact with the vortex.

Provocation tests for other types of inducible urticaria were carried out in 9 patients. These were positive in only 1 patient, who had delayed pressure urticaria and dermographism.6

There have also been 2 reports of acquired vibratory urticaria secondary to identifiable causes: a patient with Candida glabrata infection who experienced urticaria on the fingers when using a typewriter,19 and another with anaphylaxis after using a sewing machine 17hours after being stung by a wasp.20 These cases were not included in the present review owing to the fact that the clinical findings differed from those of acquired angioedema (wheals and no angioedema), the need for a previous condition that triggered symptoms when co-occurring with the vibration, and the subacute course that resolved after control of the previous condition.

The factors involved in acquired vibratory angioedema are unclear. While serum levels of histamine and other mast cell degranulation mediators are elevated during episodes, we do not know why patients present with angioedema and no wheals, generally no systemic symptoms, and no association with spontaneous urticaria.

Similarly, there is considerable heterogeneity in the practice, methodology, and interpretation of the vortex test, thus making it difficult to define response patterns or ranges of intensity and revealing the need for the method to be standardized.

A high percentage of the general population experiences symptoms when exposed to a vibratory stimulus (7%–41.3%),18,21 thus suggesting that some cases could involve physiological responses. In order to distinguish between physiological and pathological responses, it would be interesting to set a threshold, as is the case in other types of inducible urticaria (e.g., simple dermographism and symptomatic dermographism). In our opinion, considering this phenomenon as pathological should also be based on functional compromise and on impairment of quality of life owing to the individual's obligation to be exposed to vibratory stimuli in both professional and nonprofessional settings.


The present study was not supported by funding from the public sector, commercial sector, or not-for-profit entities.

Conflicts of Interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

M. Magerl, S. Altrichter, E. Borzova, A. Giménez-Arnau, C.E. Grattan, F. Lawlor, et al.
The definition, diagnostic testing, and management of chronic inducible urticarias – the EAACI/GA(2) LEN/EDF/UNEV consensus recommendations 2016 update and revision.
Allergy, 71 (2016), pp. 780-802
R. Patterson, C.J. Mellies, M.L. Blankenship, J.J. Pruzanski.
Vibratory angioedema: a hereditary type of physical hypersensitivity.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 50 (1972), pp. 174-182
S. Ting, B.E. Reimann, D.O. Rauls, L.E. Mansfield.
Nonfamilial, vibration-induced angioedema.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 71 (1983), pp. 546-551
M.H. Wener, W.J. Metzger, R.A. Simon.
Occupationally acquired vibratory angioedema with secondary carpal tunnel syndrome.
Ann Intern Med, 98 (1983), pp. 44-46
T.M. Keahey, J. Indrisano, R.M. Lavker, M.A. Kaliner.
Delayed vibratory angioedema: insights into pathophysiologic mechanisms.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 80 (1987), pp. 831-838
F. Lawlor, A.K. Black, A.S. Breathnach, M.W. Greaves.
Vibratory angioedema: lesion induction, clinical features, laboratory and ultrastructural findings and response to therapy.
Br J Dermatol, 120 (1989), pp. 93-99
P. Mathelier-Fusade, C. Vermeulen, F. Leynadier.
Vibratory angioedema.
Ann Dermatol Venereol, 128 (2001), pp. 750-752
C. Patruno, F. Ayala, G. Cimmino, I. Mordente, N. Balato.
Vibratory angioedema in a saxophonist.
Dermat Contact Atopic Occup Drug, 20 (2009), pp. 346-347
A. Pressler, M. Grosber, M. Halle, J. Ring, K. Brockow.
Failure of omalizumab and successful control with ketotifen in a patient with vibratory angio-oedema.
Clin Exp Dermatol, 38 (2013), pp. 151-153
S.A. Sarmast, F. Fang, J. Zic.
Vibratory angioedema in a trumpet professor.
Cutis, 93 (2014), pp. 10-11
F. Guarneri, C. Guarneri, H.R. Marini.
Amitriptyline and bromazepam in the treatment of vibratory angioedema: which role for neuroinflammation?.
Dermatol Ther, 27 (2014), pp. 361-364
I. Kalathoor.
Snoring-induced vibratory angioedema.
Am J Case Rep, 16 (2015), pp. 700-702
M.L. Alpern, R.L. Campbell, M.A. Rank, M.A. Park, J.B. Hagan.
A case of vibratory anaphylaxis.
Ann Allergy Asthma Immunol Off Publ Am Coll Allergy Asthma Immunol, 116 (2016), pp. 588-589
S.E. Boyden, A. Desai, G. Cruse, M.L. Young, H.C. Bolan, L.M. Scott, et al.
Vibratory urticaria associated with a missense variant in ADGRE2.
N Engl J Med, 374 (2016), pp. 656-663
S.E. Boyden, D.D. Metcalfe, H.D. Komarow.
Vibratory urticaria and ADGRE2.
N Engl J Med, 375 (2016), pp. 95
A.P. Kaplan, P.A. Greenberger, M. Geller.
Vibratory urticaria and ADGRE2.
N Engl J Med, 375 (2016), pp. 94-95
W.J. Metzger, A.P. Kaplan, M.A. Beaven, J.S. Irons, R. Patterson.
Hereditary vibratory angioedema: confirmation of histamine release in a type of physical hypersensitivity.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 57 (1976), pp. 605-608
Z. Zhao, S. Reimann, S. Wang, Y. Wang, T. Zuberbier.
Ordinary vibratory angioedema is not generally associated with ADGRE2 mutation.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 143 (2019), pp. 1246-1248
M.H. Rose.
Vibratory urticaria associated with bladder-wall infection with the yeast Torulopsis glabrata.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 84 (1989), pp. 408
C. Astarita, A. Savoia, F. De Bartolomeis.
Venom-dependent vibration-induced anaphylaxis: a new hazard following large local reactions from hymenoptera stings.
J Investig Allergol Clin Immunol, 24 (2014), pp. 282-283
L. Vergara-de-la-Campa, M.E. Gatica-Ortega, M.A. Pastor-Nieto, E. Molina-Figueras, R. Pérez-Mesonero, L. Luna-Bastante, et al.
Vibratory urticaria-angioedema: further insights into the response patterns to vortex provocation test.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 34 (2020), pp. e699-e701
Copyright © 2021. AEDV
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas

Suscríbase a la newsletter

Opciones de artículo

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?