Información de la revista
Sección. revisión
Acceso a texto completo
Pruebas previas, online el 5 de diciembre de 2025
A systematic review of treatments for cutaneous chronic graft-versus-host disease
Visitas
30
Michael Zhou1, Miguel Mansilla-Polo2,3,4,5,
Autor para correspondencia
miguel_yecla96@hotmail.com

Corresponding author:
, Pablo Fernandez-Peñas1,2
1 School of Medicine, The University of Sydney, Camperdown, NSW, 2050, Australia
2 Department of Dermatology, Westmead Hospital, Westmead, NSW, 2145, Australia
3 Departmento de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Quatre Carreres, 46026, Valencia, Spain
4 Departmento de Dermatología, Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe, Quatre Carreres, 46026, Valencia, Spain
5 Facultad de Medicina, Universitat de Valencia, Av. de Blasco Ibáñez, 46010 Valencia, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
ABSTRACT

Chronic graft-versus-host disease (cGVHD) is a major multiple organ complication of allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation, and skin involvement is associated with substantial mortality, morbidity and reduction in quality of life. However, more than half of patients are refractory to current first-line therapy and there is till a lack of high-level evidence regarding alternative therapeutic agents. This systematic review was conducted by two independent reviewers who searched and screened records published from database inception to May 2024 in PubMed, Embase, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, using prespecified inclusion and exclusion criteria aligned with the study objective. Two reviewers assessed the risk of bias and quality of evidence of trials eligible for review. Seven randomized controlled trials of extracorporeal photopheresis (ECP) with standard therapy, imatinib, entospletinib with prednisone, ruxolitinib, and ibrutinib with prednisone were eligible for inclusion. Ruxolitinib demonstrated superiority vs standard therapy and placebo with an overall response rate of 41.5% and a reduction in body surface area affected from 14.5% down to 6.2%. No other treatments conferred a statistically significant benefit vs standard therapy or placebo. Entospletinib was markedly inferior to placebo. Although all 7 trials demonstrated some risk of bias, they were found to have a moderate-to-high quality of evidence. In conclusion, of all therapeutic agents reviewed, only ruxolitinib demonstrated high-level evidence of a modest efficacy in treating cutaneous cGVHD and should be considered as a line of therapy in addition to current first-line therapy. Further high-level studies are needed to identify alternative therapeutic agents and validate their efficacy profile.

Keywords:
Graft-versus-host disease
Dermatology
Ruxolitinib
El Texto completo está disponible en PDF
Copyright © 2025. AEDV
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas