Journal Information
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Case and Research Letter
Full text access
Available online 28 February 2024
Risankizumab in the Management of Psoriasis in Solid Organ Transplant Recipients
Risankizumab en el tratamiento de la psoriasis en pacientes trasplantados
Visits
2256
M. Luza, A.M. Léa, T. Torresa,b,
Corresponding author
tiagotorres2002@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
a Department of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
b Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Related content
M. Luz, A.M. Lé, T. Torres
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Clinical characteristics of solid organ transplant recipients with severe plaque psoriasis on risankizumab.
Full Text
To the Editor:

Biological therapies have changed the management and treatment of several immune-mediated disorders, including psoriasis. These therapies include tumor necrosis factor inhibitors, and monoclonal antibodies targeting the IL-23/IL-17 axis, known for its role in the disease pathogenesis.1

Risankizumab is a selective IL-23 inhibitor with a proven high efficacy and a favorable safety profile.2 However, its use in severely immunocompromised patients is limited, as these patients are often excluded from clinical trials.

We report 2 case reports of patients with severe plaque psoriasis who were immunosuppressed due to solid organ transplantation. In both patients risankizumab therapy was started due to its efficacy and safety profile.

Case report #1 is a 49-year-old man with untreated chronic hepatitis B (HepB) infection who developed severe toxic hepatitis after treatment for latent pulmonary tuberculosis with isoniazid, which eventually led to liver transplantation. Immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus and mycophenolate mofetil (MMF) was initiated, along with suppressive therapy for HepB infection. The patient was referred to our center due to severe psoriasis, with a baseline Psoriasis Area Severity Index (PASI) of 14. Risankizumab was started.

Complete skin clearance (PASI100) was achieved on week 16 without any adverse events being reported. Due to sustained clinical remission, the intervals between the different administrations of risankizumab were spaced out 20 weeks. Currently, on week 58, the patient remains in clinical remission and no adverse events or increased HepB viral load have been reported.

Case report #2 is a 55-year-old man with plaque psoriasis, type 2 diabetes, coronary heart disease, and progressive chronic kidney disease. In 2014, the patient underwent renal transplantation due to end-stage renal disease and began immunosuppressive therapy with tacrolimus, MMF, and prednisone. One year after transplantation there was a noticeable flare-up of his psoriasis, baseline PASI of 14, and the patient was eventually referred to our center. A course of cyclosporine was attempted, but since no significant clinical improvement was observed risankizumab was initiated.

On week 16, PASI100 was achieved with no recorded adverse reactions, or an impaired renal function. Currently, on week 42, and due to the sustained clinical remission, the patient is on risankizumab every 20 weeks and continues to be monitored on a routine basis.

Further clinical data is shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Clinical characteristics of solid organ transplant recipients with severe plaque psoriasis on risankizumab.

  Patient #1  Patient #2 
Demographics
Age (years)/sex  49/M  55/M 
Race  Caucasian  Caucasian 
Clinical setting
Dermatologic disease  Psoriasis; non-psoriatic arthritis  Psoriasis; non-psoriatic arthritis 
Comorbidities  Chronic HepB infection  T2DM, CHD 
Previous psoriasis treatment  Topical therapy (Vitamin D analog and corticosteroid), phototherapy  Topical therapy (Vitamin D analog and corticosteroid), cyclosporine 
Immunosuppressive setting
Transplanted organ  Liver  Kidney 
Current immunosuppression  Tacrolimus, MMF  Tacrolimus, MMF, prednisone 
Risankizumab treatment
Clinical outcome  PASI 100 on week 16  PASI 100 on week 16 
Follow-up time and current clinical outcome  58 weeksPASI 100  42 weeksPASI 100 
Current dosing interval (weeks)  20  20 
Adverse events  No  No 
Graft dysfunction  No  No 

CHD, coronary heart disease; HepB, hepatitis B; M, male; MMF, mycophenolate mofetil; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; T2DM, type 2 diabetes mellitus.

IL-23 plays a crucial role in sustaining chronic inflammation through activation and differentiation of Th17 cells, which in turn, produce pro-inflammatory cytokines such as IL-17. Risankizumab selectively targets IL-23, by binding to the p19 subunit, thus interrupting the inflammatory process.3

The immunosuppressive potential of biological therapies has long raised safety concerns, limiting their use in cases of increased risk of infection and malignancy, such as immunocompromised patients due to solid organ transplantation. However, evidence has confirmed the favorable safety profile of biological agents selectively targeting IL-23. This is likely attributed to the IL-23 regulatory function rather than a suppressive role.1

In fact, risankizumab has not shown an increased risk of severe opportunistic infection development. For example, risankizumab appears to be safe in patients with latent tuberculosis (TB) infection, with no evidence suggesting an increased risk of disease reactivation, even in patients naïve to TB prophylaxis.4 Additionally, a recent retrospective trial that assessed the safety profile of risankizumab in patients with chronic viral hepatitis confirmed the absence of a reduced liver function or elevated viral loads; instead, treated patients experienced a reduced progression of liver fibrosis. This positive outcome is likely attributed to the involvement of IL-23 in this pathological process.5

Also, the risk of malignancies does not seem to increase with the long-term use of IL-23 inhibitors.6 Preclinical studies have shown that IL-23 levels correlate with a poor prognosis in many human neoplasms. Due to the observed tumor-promoting effects of IL-23 it has been suggested that the inhibition of this cytokine, and its downstream pathways, may have protective effects vs tumorigenesis and metastasis.7

Finally, the possibility of increasing the interval between risankizumab doses may be relevant for complex patients such as the ones reported earlier. In the phase III clinical trial IMMhance, a significant durability of response following risankizumab withdrawal was seen, and a similar finding was noted with guselkumab, another IL-23 inhibitor.8 Additionally, the GUIDE study is currently evaluating the possibility of increasing the dose interval in patients on guselkumab, and preliminary data have shown the feasibility of extending it to every 16 weeks in a subgroup of patients.9 Recently it was shown that administering risankizumab “as needed”, once clinical remission is achieved, could be a feasible maintenance scheme for patients with psoriasis. This clinical phenomenon is likely related to the effects of IL-23 inhibition on tissue resident memory cells and T-regulatory cells.10

In conclusion, due to its mechanism of action, efficacy, and safety profile, risankizumab can be considered a safe option for complex patients with psoriasis and concomitant immunosuppression, such as solid organ transplant recipients.

Conflict of interests

M.L. and A.M.L. have no conflicts of interest. T.T. declares the following conflicts of interest: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biocad, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Fresenius Kabi, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung-Bioepis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sandoz, and UCB.

References
[1]
J.E. Hawkes, T.C. Chan, J.G. Krueger.
Psoriasis pathogenesis and the development of novel targeted immune therapies.
J Allergy Clin Immunol, 140 (2017), pp. 645-653
[2]
A.W. Armstrong, A.M. Soliman, K.A. Betts, Y. Wang, Y. Gao, V. Stakias, et al.
Long-term benefit-risk profiles of treatments for moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis: a network meta-analysis.
Dermatol Ther (Heidelb), 12 (2022), pp. 167-184
[3]
T. Torres.
Selective interleukin-23 p19 inhibition: another game changer in psoriasis? Focus on risankizumab.
Drugs, 77 (2017), pp. 1493-1503
[4]
M. Nogueira, R.B. Warren, T. Torres.
Risk of tuberculosis reactivation with interleukin (IL)-17 and IL-23 inhibitors in psoriasis – time for a paradigm change.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 35 (2021), pp. 824-834
[5]
C. Ciolfi, R. Balestri, F. Bardazzi, M. Burlando, K. Chersi, A. Costanzo, et al.
Safety profile of risankizumab in the treatment of psoriasis patients with concomitant hepatitis B or C infection: a multicentric retrospective cohort study of 49 patients.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, (2023),
[6]
K.B. Gordon, M. Lebwohl, K.A. Papp, H. Bachelez, J.J. Wu, R.G. Langley, et al.
Long-term safety of risankizumab from 17 clinical trials in patients with moderate-to-severe plaque psoriasis.
Br J Dermatol, 186 (2022), pp. 466-475
[7]
J.L. Langowski, X. Zhang, L. Wu, J.D. Mattson, T. Chen, K. Smith, et al.
IL-23 promotes tumour incidence and growth.
Nature, 442 (2006), pp. 461-465
[8]
A. Blauvelt, C.L. Leonardi, M. Gooderham, K.A. Papp, S. Philipp, J.J. Wu, et al.
Efficacy and safety of continuous risankizumab therapy vs treatment withdrawal in patients with moderate to severe plaque psoriasis: a phase 3 randomized clinical trial.
JAMA Dermatol, 156 (2020), pp. 649-658
[9]
K. Schäkel, K. Asadullah, A. Pinter, C. Paul, P. Weisenseel, M. Gomez, et al.
16-Week treatment interval of guselkumab is non-inferior to 8-week dosing for maintaining psoriasis control in super responders: GUIDE study primary result.
Presented at EADV,
[10]
H. Mehta, S. Mashiko, J. Angsana, M. Rubio, Y.M. Hsieh, C. Maari, et al.
Differential changes in inflammatory mononuclear phagocyte and T-cell profiles within psoriatic skin during treatment with guselkumab vs. secukinumab.
J Invest Dermatol, 141 (2021),
Copyright © 2024. AEDV
Download PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?