Journal Information
Vol. 112. Issue 10.
Pages 954-958 (November - December 2021)
Vol. 112. Issue 10.
Pages 954-958 (November - December 2021)
Case and Research Letters
Open Access
Hereditary Epidermolysis Bullosa: A Case Series
Epidermólisis ampollosa hereditaria: serie de casos
Visits
4831
S. Guillen-Climenta,
Corresponding author
santigc85@gmail.com

Corresponding author.
, L. Fernández Garcíab, A. García-Vázqueza, J.M. Martína,c
a Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Clínico Universitario, Valencia, Spain
b Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
c Departamento de Medicina, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Valencia, Valencia, Spain
This item has received

Under a Creative Commons license
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Figures (1)
Tables (1)
Table 1. Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with EB.
Full Text
To the Editor,

Hereditary epidermolysis bullosa (EB) comprises a heterogeneous group of genodermatoses characterized by mechanical skin fragility.1,2

We conducted a descriptive, retrospective study of all patients genetically diagnosed with EB at Hospital Clínico Universitario de Valencia between 1968 and 2018. There were no cases on record that had been assessed without a molecular diagnosis. In 2018, the corresponding health district, La Malvarrosa, offered coverage to a population of 344 019 people.3

The following variables were analyzed: age at diagnosis, current age, family history of EB, clinical manifestations, location of lesions, dermoepidermal cleavage plane, histologic features, mutated gene, mutation, mode of inheritance, zygosity, type of EB, treatment, and complications (Table 1). Presence of the following complications was assessed: oral cavities, oral erosions and ulcers, gastroesophageal reflux, constipation, growth retardation, anemia, kidney disease, syndactyly, cutaneous squamous cell carcinoma (SCC), and depression.

Table 1.

Clinical and epidemiological characteristics of patients with EB.

  Patient 1  Patient 2  Patient 3  Patient 4  Patient 5  Patient 6  Patient 7  Patient 8 
Sex  Male  Male  Female  Female  Female  Female  Female  Female 
Age at clinical diagnosis/current age, y  Newborn/11  Newborn/6  Newborn/14  School-going age/13  Infant/9  Newborn/2  Preschool age/51  New born/died at 37 y 
Family history  Yes  Yes  No  Yes  Noa  No  Yes  Yes 
Clinical Manifestations  Blisters  Blisters  Blisters  Prurigo nodularis–type papules and nodules  Blisters  Blisters  Blisters  Blisters 
  Milium cysts  Milium cysts  PPK  Milium cysts  Milium cysts  Milium cysts  Milium cysts  Tooth loss 
  Nail dystrophy  Nail dystrophy  Sparse hair  Pruritus  Sparse hair    Anonychia  No nails 
  Pruritus  Pruritus  Hair casts    Nail dystrophy    Pruritus  Flexion contractures 
      Nail dystrophy    Pruritus      Pruritus 
      Pruritus           
Lesion site  Face  Extremities  Trunk  Trunk  Face  Face  Trunk  Trunk 
  Extremities  Acral location  Buttocks  Extremities  Trunk  Trunk  Extremities  Extremities 
  Acral    Extremities  Acral location  Buttocks  Buttock  Acral location  Acral location 
      Acral    Extremities  Extremities     
      Oral mucosa    Acral location  Acral location     
            Oral mucosa     
Histologyb  Intraepidermal/EM  Intraepidermal/ EM  Intraepidermal/EM  Sublamina densa/antigen mapping  Sublamina densa/antigen mapping  Sublamina densa/antigen mapping  Not performedc  Not performedc 
Mutated gene/mutation/age at molecular diagnosis, y  KRT5/p.Gly12rg/1  KRT5/p.Gly12rg/1  KRT5/p.Glu477Lys/1  COL7A1/p.Arg1814_Gly1815delinsLeuHis/7  COL7A1/p.Gly1377Aspfs*22/5  COL7A1/Gly2177Trpfs*113/1  COL7A1/Gly2177Trpfs*113/48  COL7A1/Gly2177Trpfs*113/34 
Inheritance/zygosity  AD  AD  AD Heterozygosity  AD Heterozygosity  AR  AD  AD  AD 
  Heterozygosity  Heterozygosity      Homozygosity  Heterozygosity  Heterozygosity  Heterozygosity 
EB subtype  Localized EBS  Localized EBS  Severe generalized EBS  Pruritic DEB  Severe generalized DEB  Generalized DEB  Generalized DEB  Generalized DEB 
Treatment  Topical antiseptic  Topical antiseptic  Topical antibiotic  Topical antiseptic  Topical antibiotic  Topical antibiotic  Topical antibiotic  Topical antibiotic 
  Antihistamines  Antihistamines  Antihistamines  Topical antibiotic  Systemic antibiotic  Proper hygiene  Antihistamines  Silicone dressings 
  Proper wound care and hygiene  Proper wound care and hygiene  Silicone dressings  Antihistamines  Antihistamines    Proper wound care and hygiene  Tubular netting 
      Tubular netting  Proper wound care and hygiene  Silicone dressings      Oral iron supplements 
      Proper wound care and hygiene    Tubular netting      Amputation 
          Nutrition      Lymph node dissection 
          Oral iron supplements      Radiotherapy 
          Proper wound care and hygiene      Proper wound care and hygiene 
Complications  Anemia  None  Oral erosions  None  Anemia  Oral erosions  Anemia  Anemia 
          Superinfection    SCC  Depression 
          Constipation      SCC 
          Malnutrition      Metastasis 
                Death 

Abbreviations: AD, autosomal dominant; AR, autosomal recessive; COL7A1, collagen 7 gene; DEB, Dystrophic epydermolysis bullosa; EB, epidermolysis bullosa; EBS, epidermolysis bullosa simplex; EM, electron microscopy; KRT5, keratin 5 gene; PPK, palmoplantar keratoderma; SSC, squamous cell carcinoma.

a

Parents: asymptomatic carriers of the mutation.

b

Dermoepidermal junction cleavage plane and histologic study (EM or antigen mapping).

c

Genetic study ordered directly.

Eight patients diagnosed with EB during the study period were identified: 3 had EB simplex (EBS) and 5 had dystrophic EB (DEB). The most common subtypes were localized EBS and generalized DEB; 6 of the patients (75%) were women and 5 (62.5%) had been diagnosed at birth and had a family history of EB. Patients 1 and 2 and 7 and 8 were siblings. Blisters were the most common clinical manifestation (87.5%) and were mainly located on the extremities. All patients received topical treatments and 6 required symptomatic treatment with hydroxyzine for pruritus. Topical treatments consisted of antibiotics, local therapy with antiseptics and primary dressings (silicone), and/or secondary dressings (cotton dressings with or without tubular netting). All the patients were instructed on proper wound care and hygiene and were advised to wear cotton fabrics, shower without soap, apply moisturizing creams, pat their body dry, drain their blisters with a sterile needle without breaking the skin, and apply antiseptic chlorhexidine 0.5%. The patient with severe generalized DEB required gabapentin for refractory pruritus and nutritional support for malnutrition. One patient with generalized DEB developed metastatic SCC on her right leg. She was treated with amputation, inguinal lymph node dissection, and palliative radiotherapy. Anemia was the most common complication (50%) and 2 patients with a hemoglobin level of less than 10 g/dL required oral iron supplementation. The clinical course was variable and ranged from improvement of lesions to death due to metastatic SCC (Fig. 1).

Figure 1.

Patient 1: 10-year-old boy with localized epidermolysis bullosa simplex. A, Blister on his palm. B, Nail dystrophy. C, Scarring with milium cysts at sites of trauma. Patient 3: Newborn with severe generalized epidermolysis bullosa simplex. D, Generalized skin blisters and erosions; controlled in childhood. E, H, Herpetiform blistering in lumbar, buttock, and thigh areas together with signs of atrophic scarring; controlled in adolescence. F, Nail dystrophy. G,I, Palmoplantar keratoderma; J, Hair casts (pseudonits). Patient 4: 7-year-old girl with pruritic dystrophic epidermolysis bullosa. K,L,M, Pruritic papules and nodules on the surface of the extremities.

(0.25MB).

EB is caused by mutations in genes encoding the structural proteins in the dermoepidermal junction. EB type and subtype are defined by the mutation involved and the level of skin cleavage on histology. There are 4 types of EB: EBS, junctional EB (JEB), DEB, and Kindler syndrome.1,2,4 Blisters form in the epidermis in EBS, the lamina lucida in JEB, and the sublamina densa in DEB. JEB and DEB are usually more severe as they can affect other organs with an epithelial lining.4–6

EBS usually manifests in the neonatal period. Scars, milium cysts, and nail dystrophy are less common than in JEB or DEB. The most common subtype of EB is localized EBS, which is characterized by palmoplantar blisters. Severe generalized EBS is characterized by generalized blistering in the neonatal period, herpetiform blistering in childhood, and palmoplantar keratoderma.1,2,4

Enamel hypoplasia is the most consistent form of JEB and patients with severe disease can develop exuberant granulation tissue in the periorificial regions and skin folds.1,2,4 Autosomal recessive DEB is the most severe subtype of EB and causes bullous, erosive, mutilating disease with involvement of the skin, mucous membranes, and internal organs. SSC is the main cause of death in EB and is more common—and aggressive—in patients with dystrophic forms.1,2,4–7 Contrasting with findings by Feinstein et al.,8 autosomal dominant DEB was more common than recessive DEB in our series. Also of note in our series was the presence of SCC in the 2 women with generalized DEB.

The diagnostic work-up in EB should include skin biopsy of a friction-induced lesion to enable immunofluorescence antigen mapping, which will show the level of cleavage in the dermoepidermal junction, helping to classify the type of EB and guide molecular testing.1,2 Molecular diagnosis is essential, as it provides key prognostic information and guides management. It also enables clinicians to offer genetic counseling to patients and parents of affected individuals.2,4

Treatment is symptomatic and multidisciplinary, and several protein-, cell-, and gene-based therapies are currently under development for DEB.1,2,4,9

In conclusion, the prevalence of AD in our health care setting is similar to that described in previous studies.10 Most of the patients were female and had been diagnosed at birth. The clinical manifestations were variable, but the most common findings were blisters, nail dystrophy, and pruritus. The main complication was anemia, possibly because of the higher prevalence of DEB. Treatment was largely symptomatic.

Funding

No funding was received for this study.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References
[1]
C. Has, J.W. Bauer, C. Bodemer, M.C. Bolling, L. Bruckner-Tuderman, A. Diem, et al.
Consensus reclassification of inherited epidermolysis bullosa and other disorders with skin fragility.
Br J Dermatol, 183 (2020), pp. 614-627
[2]
C. Sánchez-Jimeno, M.J. Escámez, C. Ayuso, M.J. Trujillo-Tiebas, M. Del Río.
Diagnóstico genético de la epidermólisis bullosa: recomendaciones de un grupo español de expertos.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 109 (2018), pp. 104-122
[3]
Clínic La Malva-Rosa [Internet]. España; Departamento Clínico-Malvarrosa. [actualizado 9 de julio 2020, citado 11 de julio 2020]. Available from: http://clinicomalvarrosa.san.gva.es/memorias-departamento.
[4]
A. Hernández-Martín, A. Torrelo.
Epidermólisis ampollosas hereditarias: del diagnóstico a la realidad.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 101 (2010), pp. 495-505
[5]
J.D. Fine, J.E. Mellerio.
Extracutaneous manifestations and complications of inherited epidermolysis bullosa: part I. Epithelial associated tissues.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 61 (2009), pp. 367-384
[6]
J.D. Fine, J.E. Mellerio.
Extracutaneous manifestations and complications of inherited epidermolysis bullosa: part II. Other organs.
J Am Acad Dermatol, 61 (2009), pp. 387-402
[7]
J. Cañueto, A. Tejera-Vaquerizo, P. Redondo, R. Botella-Estrada, S. Puig, O. Sanmartin.
Revisión de los términos que definen un carcinoma epidermoide cutáneo asociado a mal pronóstico.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 111 (2020), pp. 281-290
[8]
J.A. Feinstein, P. Jambal, K. Peoples, A.W. Lucky, P. Khuu, J.Y. Tang, et al.
Assessment of the timing of milestone clinical events in patients with epidermolysis bullosa from North America.
JAMA Dermatol, 155 (2019), pp. 196-203
[9]
F. Larcher, M. Del Río.
Estrategias terapéuticas innovadoras para la epidermólisis bullosa distrófica recesiva.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 106 (2015), pp. 376-382
[10]
A. Hernández-Martin, R. de Lucas, A. Vicente, E. Baselga, E. Morcillo-Makow, M.I. Arroyo Manzanal, et al.
Unidades de referencia para epidermólisis ampollosas e ictiosis: una necesidad urgente en España.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 104 (2013), pp. 363-366

Please cite this article as: Guillen-Climent S, Fernández García L, García-Vázquez A, Martín JM. Epidermólisis ampollosa hereditaria: serie de casos. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2021;112:954–958.

Copyright © 2021. AEDV
Download PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?