Journal Information
Vol. 115. Issue 10.
Pages 1100-1102 (November - December 2024)
Share
Share
Download PDF
More article options
Vol. 115. Issue 10.
Pages 1100-1102 (November - December 2024)
Case and Research Letter
Full text access
Dupilumab for Atopic Dermatitis During Pregnancy and Breastfeeding: A Case Report
Dupilumab para la dermatitis atópica durante el embarazo y la lactancia: reporte de un caso
Visits
3729
J.M. Alvarengaa, A. Maria Léa, T. Torresa,b,
Corresponding author
torres.tiago@outlook.com

Corresponding author.
a Department of Dermatology, Centro Hospitalar Universitário de Santo António, Porto, Portugal
b Instituto de Ciências Biomédicas Abel Salazar, University of Porto, Porto, Portugal
Related content
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2024;115:T1100-T110210.1016/j.ad.2024.10.026
J.M. Alvarenga, A. Maria Lé, T. Torres
This item has received
Article information
Full Text
Bibliography
Download PDF
Statistics
Tables (1)
Table 1. Summary of reported cases of use of dupilumab to treat Atopic Dermatitis in pregnancy.
Full Text
To the Editor:

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic, relapsing inflammatory skin disorder with an enormous impact on the quality of life. Flares of AD are very common during pregnancy, presumably due to a shift from T helper (Th) 1 response to Th2 response during this period.1 Evidence on the efficacy and safety of systemic therapies for AD during pregnancy is very limited, and the European Task Force on Atopic Dermatitis (ETFAD) recommends that they should be restricted to corticosteroids, cyclosporine, and azathioprine.2 Dupilumab is an IgG4 antibody that specifically binds to the shared α chain subunit of the interleukin-4 (IL-4) and interleukin-13 (IL-13) receptors, thereby blocking the signaling of these two cytokines secreted by Th2 lymphocytes.3 This drug is expected to cross the placenta, similar to other IgG antibodies.1 We report a case of AD that was safely treated with dupilumab during pregnancy and breastfeeding.

We describe a 37-year-old woman who attended our hospital with an AD flare three years before pregnancy, with AD diagnosed since her first months of life. Her disease was mild until the age of 30 years. Previous flares were treated with topical corticosteroids (TCS), systemic corticosteroids (SCS), cyclosporine, and phototherapy. Her past medical history was significant for allergic rhinoconjunctivitis and an episode of eczema herpeticum two years before. At the time she began treatment with dupilumab, she had AD lesions affecting 22% of her body surface area (BSA), with an Eczema Area and Severity (EASI) score of 19.1, a SCORAD of 54.4, an Investigator Global Assessment (IGA) of 4 and an NRS pruritus of 7, resulting in a significant impact on her quality of life. The patient started dupilumab and experienced significant improvement, achieving EASI90 and a significant reduction of pruritus (NRS pruritus = 0) and IGA (IGA=1) after 12 weeks of treatment. The only reported adverse effect was mild arthralgias. After three years of treatment, the patient opted to conceive. Following consultations with both Dermatology and Obstetrician physicians, it was collectively decided to continue her treatment. There were no pregnancy complications, and AD remained controlled throughout the entire gestation period. She delivered a healthy full-term newborn. The patient continued the treatment during the 8-month breastfeeding period without experiencing any complications.

Managing of AD during pregnancy and breastfeeding can be challenging. Data on the safety of novel systemic medications is very limited. The European Medicines Agency (EMA) considered that the rate of spontaneous abortion registered during dupilumab studies did not seem to exceed the general rate.3 Data on the safety of the use of dupilumab for treating AD during pregnancy is limited to case reports and case series. We conducted a systematic review of all such reported cases in the literature to summarize existing evidence in Table 1.4–10 The MEDLINE database search was performed on 8 June 2023, with no filters applied. In a total of eighteen pregnancies (one patient had two pregnancies), there is one reported case of intrauterine growth restriction (IUGR). In this case, there were no anatomical or histological abnormalities in the placenta, and the infant was born with a mild low birth weight of 2480g. One pregnancy was complicated by a suspected small-for-gestational-age fetus before the patient started dupilumab, but the infant had an appropriate birth weight at delivery. Reported adverse effects include mild eye discomfort in 17% of patients, and one case of transient increase in eosinophils. Regarding lactation, there are eleven published cases of women who breastfeed their infants with different follow-up times, but no adverse events or complication were reported.4,10 Similar to other biologic agents with high molecular weight, the secretion of dupilumab in breast milk is minimal except during the first three days, when wide gaps between the breast alveolar cells allow immunoglobulins to pass through them.1

Table 1.

Summary of reported cases of use of dupilumab to treat Atopic Dermatitis in pregnancy.

Case report/case series  Age (years)  Comorbidities  Dupilumab during pregnancy  Reason for discontinuation  Concomitant therapies  Adverse effects  Pregnancy complications 
Kage, 20204,a  35  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma  Initiated before pregnancy and suspended between weeks 2–20    Unknown  None  None 
Kage, 20214,a  36  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma  Entire pregnancy    Unknown  None  None 
Mian, 20205  28  Hypertension; SGA  Initiated at 24 weeks    Oral prednisone  Eye discomfort  Gestational diabetes 
Lobo, 20216  36  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma  Initiated before pregnancy and suspended at 24 weeks  Risk–benefit assessment  Unknown  Eye discomfort  Gestational diabetes; flare of AD after discontinued dupilumab 
Gracia-Darder, 20217  28  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma; hyper IgE syndrome; ulcerative colitis; anxiety-depression disorder  Entire pregnancy    Intravenous immunoglobulins  Eye discomfort; transient increase of eosinophils  None 
Costley, 20228  N/A  N/A  Entire pregnancy    Unknown  None  None 
Akhtar, 20229  33  Rhinitis  Initiated before pregnancy and suspended between weeks 27–29  Risk–benefit assessment  Lubricant eye drops  None  IUGR 
Escolà, 202310  28  Rhinitis; asthma  Initiated at 16 weeks    Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  36  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma  Initiated before pregnancy and suspended at 5 weeks  Choice of the patient  Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  32  Rhinitis; asthma  Entire pregnancy    Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  33  None  Entire pregnancy    Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  37  Asthma  Initiated at 5 weeks    Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  41  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma  Initiated before pregnancy and suspended at 34 weeks  Choice of the patient  Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  31  Asthma; anaplastic lymphoma  Entire pregnancy    Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  30  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma; ulcerative colitis  Entire pregnancy    Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  28  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma  Entire pregnancy    Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  34  Asthma  Initiated before pregnancy and suspended at 11 weeks  Choice of the patient  Unknown  None  None 
Escolà, 202310  40  Rhinitis; conjunctivitis; asthma; anxiety disorder  Initiated before pregnancy and suspended at 15 weeks  Choice of the patient  Unknown  None  None 

Abbreviations: AD, atopic dermatitis; IUGR, intrauterine growth restriction; SGA, small-for-gestation-age fetus.

a

Same patient with different pregnancies.

In conclusion, our case adds to the existing reports of successful and safe use of dupilumab during pregnancy and lactation. However, due to lack of larger studies, it is not possible to recommend its use as a standard treatment approach. Currently, there are two observational studies registered in ClinicalTrials.gov (NCT03936335 and NCT04173442) that may help address this evidence gap. Considering that the current data suggests the safety of its use, it is reasonable to recommend it in severe cases of AD during pregnancy after a careful risk-benefit assessment and ensuring that these patients have appropriate surveillance by Dermatology and Obstetric physicians for early detection of potential adverse effects or complications.

Conflict of interest

José Miguel Alvarenga and Ana Maria Lé have no conflict of interest. Tiago Torres has received consultancy and/or speaker's honoraria from and/or participated in clinical trials sponsored by AbbVie, Amgen, Almirall, Arena Pharmaceuticals, Biocad, Biogen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol Myers Squibb, Celgene, Fresenius-Kabi, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Eli Lilly, MSD, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Samsung-Bioepis, Sanofi-Genzyme, Sandoz, and UCB.

References
[1]
S.S. Prabhu, P. Suvarna.
Biological agents in pregnancy and lactation – a rational approach.
JSSTD, 1 (2019), pp. 54-60
[2]
A. Wollenberg, M. Kinberger, B. Arents, N. Aszodi, G. Avila Valle, S. Barbarot, et al.
European guideline (EuroGuiDerm) on atopic eczema – Part II: Non-systemic treatments and treatment recommendations for special AE patient populations.
Acad Dermatol Venereol, 36 (2022), pp. 1904-1926
[3]
European Medicines Agency. Dupixent (dupilumab) product information [Internet]. 2023. Available from: https://www.ema.europa.eu/en/documents/variation-report/dupixent-h-c-4390-x-0004-g-epar-assessment-report-extension_en.pdf.
[4]
P. Kage, J. Simon, R. Treudler.
Case of atopic eczema treated with dupilumab throughout conception, pregnancy, and lactation.
J Dermatol, 48 (2021),
[5]
M. Mian, R. Dunlap, E. Simpson.
Dupilumab for the treatment of severe atopic dermatitis in a pregnant patient: a case report.
JAAD Case Rep, 6 (2020), pp. 1051-1052
[6]
Y. Lobo, R.C. Lee, L. Spelman.
Atopic dermatitis treated safely with dupilumab during pregnancy: a case report and review of the literature.
Case Rep Dermatol, 13 (2021), pp. 248-256
[7]
I. Gracia-Darder, J. Pons De Ves, M. Reyero Cortina, A. Martín-Santiago.
Patient with atopic dermatitis, hyper IgE syndrome and ulcerative colitis, treated successfully with dupilumab during pregnancy.
Dermatol Therapy, 35 (2022),
[8]
M. Costley, B. Murphy.
Severe atopic dermatitis treated successfully with dupilumab throughout pregnancy.
Clin Exp Dermatol, 47 (2022), pp. 960-961
[9]
N.H. Akhtar, T. Khosravi-Hafshejani, D. Akhtar, G. Dhadwal, A. Kanani.
The use of dupilumab in severe atopic dermatitis during pregnancy: a case report.
Allergy Asthma Clin Immunol, 18 (2022), pp. 9
[10]
H. Escolà, I. Figueras-Nart, M. Bonfill-Orti, N. Coll Puigserver, A. Martin-Santiago, M. Rodríguez Serna, et al.
Dupilumab for atopic dermatitis during pregnancy and breastfeeding: clinical experience in 13 patients.
Acad Dermatol Venereol, 37 (2023), pp. e1156-e1160
Download PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Article options
Tools
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?