se ha leído el artículo
array:24 [ "pii" => "S1578219014000511" "issn" => "15782190" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2012.07.040" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-04-01" "aid" => "735" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV" "copyrightAnyo" => "2012" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:233-42" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3220 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 39 "HTML" => 2591 "PDF" => 590 ] ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0001731012004528" "issn" => "00017310" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ad.2012.07.024" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-04-01" "aid" => "735" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:233-42" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 4996 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 2 "HTML" => 3617 "PDF" => 1377 ] ] "es" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Revisión</span>" "titulo" => "Estudio de las fotodermatosis idiopáticas y exógenas. Parte II: el estudio fotobiológico" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "233" "paginaFinal" => "242" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Study of Idiopathic, Exogenous Photodermatoses, Part II: Photobiologic Testing" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figura 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1204 "Ancho" => 900 "Tamanyo" => 123225 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "es" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Dosis urticariana mínima en una urticaria solar.</p> <p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Respuesta habonosa. DUM obtenida mediante una lámpara fluorescente con 5 spots y un filtro que permite determinar la dosis de exposición según el tiempo de contacto con la piel (Gigatest UVB, Medisun, Francia). (Fotografía cedida por el Dr. Diego de Argila. Hospital La Princesa, Madrid.)</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "D. De Argila, J. Aguilera, J. Sánchez, A. García-Díez" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "D." "apellidos" => "De Argila" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Aguilera" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Sánchez" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "García-Díez" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1578219014000511" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2012.07.040" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219014000511?idApp=UINPBA000044" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0001731012004528?idApp=UINPBA000044" "url" => "/00017310/0000010500000003/v1_201404040105/S0001731012004528/v1_201404040105/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1578219014000377" "issn" => "15782190" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2012.10.021" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-04-01" "aid" => "749" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:243-52" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 7024 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 39 "HTML" => 5015 "PDF" => 1970 ] ] "en" => array:12 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review</span>" "titulo" => "Antimalarials in Dermatology: Mechanism of Action, Indications, and Side Effects" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "243" "paginaFinal" => "252" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Antipalúdicos en dermatología: mecanismo de acción, indicaciones y efectos secundarios" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "C. Rodriguez-Caruncho, I. Bielsa Marsol" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Rodriguez-Caruncho" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "I." "apellidos" => "Bielsa Marsol" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0001731012004796" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ad.2012.10.005" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0001731012004796?idApp=UINPBA000044" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219014000377?idApp=UINPBA000044" "url" => "/15782190/0000010500000003/v1_201404030048/S1578219014000377/v1_201404030048/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1578219014000742" "issn" => "15782190" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2013.07.003" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2014-04-01" "aid" => "874" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L. and AEDV" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 0 "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:216-32" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 4527 "formatos" => array:3 [ "EPUB" => 52 "HTML" => 3627 "PDF" => 848 ] ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Special article</span>" "titulo" => "Recommendations for the Coordinated Management of Psoriatic Arthritis by Rheumatologists and Dermatologists: A Delphi Study" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "216" "paginaFinal" => "232" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Elaboración mediante el método Delphi de recomendaciones para el manejo coordinado" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 2018 "Ancho" => 3337 "Tamanyo" => 470141 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Screening for psoriatic arthritis in the rheumatology office. PsA indicates psoriatic arthritis; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; BSA, % of body surface area affected; MRI, magnetic resonance imaging; Rx, radiography.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J.D. Cañete, E. Daudén, R. Queiro, M.D. Aguilar, J.L. Sánchez-Carazo, J.M. Carrascosa, G. Carretero, M.L. García-Vivar, P. Lázaro, J.L. López-Estebaranz, C. Montilla, J. Ramírez, J. Rodríguez-Moreno, L. Puig" "autores" => array:14 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.D." "apellidos" => "Cañete" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "E." "apellidos" => "Daudén" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "R." "apellidos" => "Queiro" ] 3 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.D." "apellidos" => "Aguilar" ] 4 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.L." "apellidos" => "Sánchez-Carazo" ] 5 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.M." "apellidos" => "Carrascosa" ] 6 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "G." "apellidos" => "Carretero" ] 7 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M.L." "apellidos" => "García-Vivar" ] 8 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "P." "apellidos" => "Lázaro" ] 9 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J.L." "apellidos" => "López-Estebaranz" ] 10 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "C." "apellidos" => "Montilla" ] 11 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Ramírez" ] 12 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Rodríguez-Moreno" ] 13 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Puig" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0001731013002640" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ad.2013.07.001" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0001731013002640?idApp=UINPBA000044" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219014000742?idApp=UINPBA000044" "url" => "/15782190/0000010500000003/v1_201404030048/S1578219014000742/v1_201404030048/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:20 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review</span>" "titulo" => "Study of Idiopathic, Exogenous Photodermatoses, Part II: Photobiologic Testing" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "233" "paginaFinal" => "242" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "D. De Argila, J. Aguilera, J. Sánchez, A. García-Díez" "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "D." "apellidos" => "De Argila" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "dargilad@hotmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">¿</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Aguilera" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">b</span>" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Sánchez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "García-Díez" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span>" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Universitario La Princesa, Madrid, Spain" "etiqueta" => "a" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] 1 => array:3 [ "entidad" => "Laboratorio de Fotobiología Dermatológica, Centro de Investigaciones Médico-Sanitarias, Departamento de Dermatología, Facultad de Medicina, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain" "etiqueta" => "b" "identificador" => "aff0010" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Estudio de las fotodermatosis idiopáticas y exógenas. Parte II: el estudio fotobiológico" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1244 "Ancho" => 930 "Tamanyo" => 129444 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Minimal urticaria dose (MUD) in a patient with solar urticaria.</p> <p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Whealing response. MUD determined using a fluorescent lamp with 5 test fields and a filter to determine the exposure dose according to skin contact time (Gigatest UVB, Medisun). (Photograph courtesy of Dr Diego de Argila, Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain).</p>" ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photobiologic studies are skin tests performed to determine a person's degree of photosensitivity and assess abnormal cutaneous responses to light. In the second part of this review, we will look at the different types of tests performed in clinical practice and focus on the interpretation of results in idiopathic and exogenous photodermatoses.</p><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0025">Types of Photobiologic Studies</span><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Phototest</span><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Phototesting involves exposing an area of skin to a known dose of UV or visible light and then observing, recording, and interpreting the response (erythema, whealing, or pigmentary changes) at the irradiated site after a pre-established time (generally 24 hours).</p><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The threshold above which different biologic responses are triggered is established by exposing the individual to incremental doses of light radiation. Measures include minimal erythema dose (MED), minimal urticaria dose (MUD), immediate pigment darkening, and minimal tanning dose. These last 2 measures are not widely used in clinical practice, but they do have experimental value and are also used to determine the sun protection factor of sunscreens.</p><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Phototesting has a range of clinical applications.<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0005"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0005"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">-</span><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Diagnosis. The phototest is used to confirm a diagnosis of solar urticaria, systemic phototoxicity, or photosensitivity (reduced sensitivity threshold to light) in certain idiopathic photodermatoses, such as chronic actinic dermatitis (CAD). It can also help to characterize certain secondary photodermatoses induced by endogenous agents, such as erythropoietic protoporphyria or photosensitive forms of lupus erythematosus (lupus tumidus and subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus).</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0010"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">-</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Therapy. The phototest is used to calculate the starting dose (30%-70% of MED) for desensitization therapy in photodermatoses.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">-</span><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Prognosis and response monitoring. The phototest can also be conducted at different points throughout the course of a disease to monitor response to treatment, for example, to assess changes in photosensitivity in patients with solar urticaria undergoing phototherapy or immunomodulator therapy.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Phototests should preferably be performed on parts of the body that are not usually exposed to the sun. The test site recommended by the Spanish Photobiology Group (GEF) is the lower back and buttock area, although some authors consider the abdomen or the inner aspect of the arm or forearm to be acceptable. Antihistamines and nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) must be withdrawn at least 2 days before the test; corticosteroids, psoralens, chlorpromazine, and high-dose vitamins a week beforehand; and chloroquine and immunosuppressive medication at least a month beforehand.</p><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The MED for a given wavelength in the UV spectrum is the minimum dose of radiation (J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) needed to induce erythema (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>). Because UV-B radiation provokes erythema, the MED always refers to the erythemal response to UV-B unless otherwise specified. Clinical skin abnormalities induced by UV-A radiation are considered to be abnormal responses to UV-A light. Erythematous reactions are generally evaluated by the naked eye, but more objective methods, such as laser Doppler perfusion imaging, may be needed in lesions with diffuse or indistinct borders.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Because practically 100% of effective erythema-producing radiation is UV-B radiation, broadband fluorescent UV-B lamps are generally used for phototesting. However, while these lamps offer stable output, are simple to use, and are relatively cheap, their spectral region is far from that of natural sunlight. Solar simulators offer the best spectral match in this respect because, when fitted with appropriate interference filters, they closely approximate natural light. The erythemogenic effect of solar UV-A radiation can also be measured with filters that block wavelengths under 315 to 320 nm. Fluorescent light kits that emit UV-A light do not generally produce sufficient radiation to provoke erythema, unless the patient has a considerably reduced threshold to this portion of the spectrum, as occurs in certain phototoxic reactions. It is therefore advisable to use a monochromator, if available, to test sensitivity to UV-A light. Note that any skin reaction to visible light from any source is abnormal.</p><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The MUD is the minimum dose of radiation needed to produce a wheal located exclusively or predominantly in the irradiated field. It must be accompanied by a reference to the action spectrum: UV-B, UV-A, visible, or infrared light, or a combination of these (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>). Irradiation doses from visible or infrared light sources cannot be measured in J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>. Unlike MED responses, MUD-provoked reactions generally appear several minutes after exposure and last for between 30 and 90 minutes. Inhibition spectra can result in delayed reactions, with wheals sometimes appearing after several hours.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The phototest in patients with solar urticaria is in the strictest sense a photoprovocation test. Standardization is difficult because of the variability of individual factors (phototype, tanning ability, test site, or food-related factors such as colorants). To determine the action spectrum, the European Dermatology Forum recommends using a solar simulator or a monochromator to irradiate 3 different sites in the buttock area with 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> of UV-A light, 60 mJ/cm<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> of UV-B light, and visible light from a slide projector for 10 minutes. The reaction is scored on a 6-point scale, where 0 indicates no response; (+), just perceptible erythema (corresponding to the MUD); +, erythema in the irradiated area; ++, erythema outside the irradiated area; +++, wheal in part of the irradiated area; and ++++, wheal in the entire irradiated area. The MUD is determined by irradiation with incremental doses of radiation.</p></span><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Photoprovocation</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photoprovocation consists of repeatedly exposing an area of skin to a pre-established dose of radiation of a shorter or longer wavelength with the aim of reproducing the clinical lesions being investigated. The test should be performed on a part of the body that is generally not exposed to sunlight. The test field should be larger than that used in phototesting, as photoprovocation sometimes induces separate papules and the response could be underestimated if smaller fields are used. The recommended size is 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm.</p><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The following photoprovocation protocol has been proposed for polymorphic light eruption (PLE): irradiation of a previously exposed area of skin measuring 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm for 3 consecutive days with polychromatic UV-A light at a dose of 60 to 100<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>) and polychromatic UV-B light at a dose of 1.5 times the UV-B MED, with reading of results at 24 and 72 hours.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> Other authors have successfully provoked lesions on the arms of patients with PLE using lower UV-A doses (10-20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> for 4 days) and narrowband (NB) UV-B therapy (0.4 and 0.8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> for 2-4 days). They used fluorescent UV lamps fitted in a cylindrical device into which the patients’ arms were placed.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> It is important to distinguish between PLE lesions and erythema when using UV-B radiation. The best time of the year for photoprovocation in PLE is early spring, before patients are exposed to the intense summer sun.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The recommended protocol for CAD is irradiation of an unexposed area of skin (5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>×<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>cm) for 3 consecutive days with UV-A light (doses of 0.5, 1, 5, 10, 20, and 30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) and UV-B light (doses of 0.5, 1, and 1.5 times the UV-B MED); results should be read at 24, 48, and 72 hours and after a week.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> Photoprovocation tests should preferably precede any photopatch tests. It should be noted, however, that photoprovocation is often not necessary in CAD, as phototests generally produce clear results: very low MEDs and abnormal UV-A responses.</p><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photoprovocation results vary greatly from one series to the next. This variability, combined with the fact that the test is laborious and time-consuming, means that photoprovocation is of limited clinical value. It can, however, be useful in cases of PLE with an unclear clinical history or in photosensitive forms of lupus erythematosus.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0020"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Photopatch Testing</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photopatch testing is performed when the patient's history and the physical examination suggest a photosensitivity disorder in which various exogenous chemical substances may be involved. This test is indicated in the diagnosis of photoallergic contact dermatitis and the evaluation of certain idiopathic photodermatoses (e.g., CAD) or photodermatoses that cannot be explained by the patient's history.</p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photopatch tests are generally used in photobiology and contact dermatology units.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> The methods employed vary considerably between centers, with variations in allergens, vehicles, concentration, occlusion time, dose and type of radiation, time of readings, and interpretation of results. In 2002, a panel of European dermatologists and photobiologists met with the aim of standardizing most of these variables to facilitate the comparison of results between centers.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> However, the allergens and allergen concentrations used in different photopatch series vary with the geographical area and their inclusion depends on the frequency of sensitization in the population. Numerous photopatch studies have been undertaken in recent years to identify and determine the frequency of photoallergens.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0030"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6–12</span></a> In a publication reporting the results of a photoallergen study in Spain, the Spanish Photobiology Group agreed to add most NSAIDs and UV filters marketed in Spain to the next baseline photopatch series.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> A subsequent European multicenter study confirmed that the European baseline photopatch series should also include UV filters and NSAIDs.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a></p><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Currently, the phototest technique consists of the occlusive application of duplicate sets of allergens on the patient's back (normally the upper back, next to the spine) for 2 days. The allergens can be attached using a range of patch devices. On day 2 (48<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours), the patches are removed and any skin reactions observed are noted. One of the allergen sets is then covered with an occlusive dressing and the other is irradiated with 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> of UV-A radiation, measured using a radiometer. In patients with CAD, it may be necessary to irradiate the area with a suberythemal UV-A dose to avoid confusion with abnormal reactions to UV-A radiation. The results are read for a second time on day 4 (2 days after irradiation) and scored using the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group scoring system (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0005">Table 1</a>). If the results are unclear on day 4, another reading is made on day 7.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Important factors in photopatch testing are irradiation dose, occlusion time, and type of lamp. This last factor has been shown to affect results.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> An ideal light source should have a continuous emission spectrum in the UV-A range (320-400<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>nm) and sufficient irradiance to generate 5 to 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> in a reasonable time (several minutes).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0080"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">16</span></a> One study that analyzed 3 light sources with different emission spectra used in photopatch testing showed that the broadband UV-A lamp had the highest sensitivity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0085"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">17</span></a> A later study confirmed that UV-A irradiation results in more positive reactions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0075"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15</span></a></p><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photopatches have traditionally been irradiated 48 hours after occlusion in contact dermatitis units and 24 hours after occlusion in photobiology units. An occlusion time of 48 hours has been shown to be associated with a higher rate of detection of photoallergy cases.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">18</span></a></p><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Most studies use an irradiation dose of between 1 and 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>, although some authors have recommended 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> for photopatch testing.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">19,20</span></a> In 2004, following the recommendations of the European Task Force for Photopatch Testing, the Spanish Photobiology Unit established an irradiation dose of 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> In a recent study, Kerr et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0070"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14,59</span></a> obtained a much higher percentage of positive results with 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> than with 2.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>. Accordingly, in the absence of contraindications, a dose of 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> should be used.</p><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The optimum concentration for UV filters in photopatch testing has been established in recent years. Most filters are tested at a concentration of 10% in petrolatum. Benzophenone-4 should not be used at a concentration of more than 2% in petrolatum because of the risk of false positives.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">21</span></a> However, studies of sunscreens have shown that most skin reactions are elicited by the irritant effects of filters and excipients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">22,23</span></a></p></span></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">Proposed System for a Photobiology Study</span><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">There are no established guidelines or protocols for performing a photobiology study. As mentioned above, it is difficult to guarantee reliability and reproducibility due to the difficulty of controlling for all possible individual and contextual factors.</p><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One group of authors proposed the following system based on their experience<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a>:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0010"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0020"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">-</span><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Day 1: Conduct phototests with UV-B, UV-A, and visible light and read the results immediately to check for wheals. Apply a duplicate set of photopatches.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0025"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">-</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Day 2: Determine the UV-B MED and irradiate one set of patches with a dose of 5 to 10 <span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> of UV-A or with 50% of the UV-A MED.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0030"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">-</span><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Days 3 and 5: Read the results of the irradiated and nonirradiated photopatch sets.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Not all tests are appropriate for all patients. A thorough medical history should generally lead to a suspicion of a particular photodermatosis, thereby guiding the selection of appropriate tests.</p></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Clinical Application of Photobiologic Studies</span><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Utility and Results of Photobiology Tests in Different Photodermatoses</span><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tbl0010">Table 2</a> shows the expected results of photobiologic tests for a range of idiopathic photodermatoses.</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="tbl0010"></elsevierMultimedia><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Polymorphic Light Eruption</span><p id="par0155" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The best way of diagnosing PLE is through a detailed medical history, with attention to the relationship between the skin reaction, light exposure, and the course of the lesions. Evaluation becomes problematic, however, when the patient's history is inconclusive, and furthermore patients often visit the dermatologist weeks or even months after the eruption. In such cases, phototesting and photoprovocation can provide valuable information that will guide the diagnosis and help to predict the severity of the condition.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3,25–27</span></a></p><p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Patients with PLE tend to have a normal photosensitivity threshold. In other words, they generally have normal sensitivity to UV-A light and a normal UV-B MED, although these may be lower than normal in more severe forms of the disease. In a retrospective study of 110 cases of PLE, the UV-B MED was reduced in a significantly higher proportion of men (43%) than women.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a></p><p id="par0165" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The results of photoprovocation tests are highly variable across different series of patients with PLE.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a> In some cases, tests failed to provoke PLE lesions in the majority of patients tested,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">26</span></a> while in others, they elicited positive reactions in up to 93% of patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25,27</span></a> In most cases, the lesions were triggered by UV-A radiation or UV-A and UV-B radiation; few cases were triggered by UV-B radiation alone. In one series of 68 patients, PLE lesions were provoked by UV-A fluorescent lamps in 56% of cases, by NB–UV-B lamps in 50% of cases, by both types of lamps in 80.9% of cases, and by broadband UV-B lamps in just 18% of cases.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> The likelihood of a positive reaction with UV-A light was associated with young age and lower MEDs.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0015"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a></p><p id="par0170" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The action spectrum and dose required to provoke lesions can vary over time in the same patient, probably due to seasonal factors.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">27</span></a> It has even been suggested that this dose can vary between different types of PLE lesions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">28</span></a></p><p id="par0175" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The higher component of UV-A and UV-B radiation in the springtime in countries with a temperate climate could explain why PLE is more common in these countries than in tropical areas.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> Furthermore, the use of sunscreens that protect against erythema but not against the effects of UV-A radiation could lead to higher sun exposure, possibly explaining, at least partly, why these sunscreens fail to prevent PLE lesions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0145"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">29</span></a> Nevertheless, one open, placebo-controlled, intraindividual photoprovocation trial showed that both UV-A and UV-B absorbing filters were effective at preventing PLE.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">30</span></a></p><p id="par0180" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photoprovoked reactions are useful for evaluating the predominant type of lesion in PLE (papule, plaque, vesicle, or erythema) and for performing biopsies to facilitate the correlation of clinical and pathological findings.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> However, some authors have found that provocation with artificial light or with suberythemal doses of natural sunlight produces contradictory and difficult-to-interpret results due to the large number of variables (irradiation dose, exposure site, tolerance of the patient at the time of testing, etc.).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a></p><p id="par0185" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">According to one group of authors, the high proportion of positive photopatch test reactions to fragrances and UV filters in PLE patients might be due to higher exposure to these products.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">25</span></a> However, it is also possible that these reactions were actually contact photodermatitis reactions, as patients with this disorder do not generally attribute their lesions to the use of sun creams.</p></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">Hydroa Vacciniforme</span><p id="par0190" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The action spectrum in most cases of hydroa vacciniforme lies in the UV-A range, with very few cases caused by UV-B light.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> Patients may or may not have a low sensitivity threshold to UV-A radiation.</p><p id="par0195" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Repetitive broadband UV-A irradiation with doses of 30, 50, and 75<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> in affected and unaffected areas (back or arms) of patients with hydroa vacciniforme can cause erythematous vesicles that are histologically identical to those caused by sunlight; the healing process is also similar.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">24</span></a> Photoprovocation with doses of 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> has also triggered lesions on the oral mucosa.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0010"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Solar Urticaria</span><p id="par0200" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Phototesting in patients with solar urticaria can identify the action spectrum (UV-B, UV-A, visible light, or a combination) and the degree of photosensitivity (via MUD determination). Immediate whealing following exposure to UV-B, UV-A, or visible light should be considered a positive reaction.</p><p id="par0205" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Most cases (up to 57%) of solar urticaria are caused by visible light, with or without a UV-A component.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> Up to 20% of cases have a wide action spectrum that includes UV-B, UV-A, and visible light, but few cases are caused by UV light alone.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">32</span></a> The action spectrum also varies between different geographical areas and races. European patients, for instance, appear to be more sensitive to UV or broadband light (UV-visible light) than Japanese patients, who appear to be sensitive to visible light alone.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0165"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">33</span></a> There have also been reports of solar urticaria with an action spectrum in the infrared range.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a> The action spectrum tends to remain unchanged over the course of years, as the disease develops, although it can occasionally shift to longer wavelengths.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">34</span></a></p><p id="par0210" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Re-irradiation with longer wavelengths (500-630<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>nm) immediately after exposure to the action spectrum has been seen to inhibit wheal formation in some patients.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0175"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">35</span></a> This inhibitory phenomenon—known as the inhibition spectrum—has been demonstrated in up to 68% of Japanese patients and is probably the result of light interfering with binding between the photoproduct and immunoglobulin (Ig) E or mast cells.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0180"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">36</span></a> The inhibition spectrum could explain why in some cases provocation tests with natural sunlight trigger lesions in patients who do not react to artificial light<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0185"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">37,38</span></a> and it may also explain delayed responses (sometimes occurring hours after exposure). The inhibition spectrum may also have a role in the induction of light tolerance in patients receiving phototherapy.</p><p id="par0215" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Some patients with solar urticaria and an action spectrum in the UV-A range may also develop more intense and larger wheals when exposed to light with a longer wavelength (visible light) before, at the same time, or immediately afterwards.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0195"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">39,40</span></a> This phenomenon is known as the augmentation spectrum. It is augmentative rather than additive as the same effect is not achieved when the order is reversed. Preirradiation with visible light probably activates the chromophore, enabling it to absorb a wider range of light within the action spectrum. The augmentation spectrum (present in up to 29% of patients) could explain small—sometimes daily—changes in photosensitivity (measured by the MUD) observed in some patients, although these tend to have little clinical relevance.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0170"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">34</span></a> Interaction between the action spectrum and the augmentation spectrum might also explain why short exposures to sunlight cause solar urticaria in patients who only react to high doses of radiation from artificial sources.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">31</span></a></p><p id="par0220" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">A negative phototest result for a single source of light, or even several sources, does not rule out a diagnosis of solar urticaria. In such cases, provocation with natural sunlight (exposure of the upper chest to midday sun for 15-30 minutes, preferably in the spring or autumn) is essential.</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Chronic Actinic Dermatitis</span><p id="par0225" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The phototest (performed with a solar simulator or an other source of broadband light) is nearly always positive in patients with CAD, except in very early phases of the disease when there are few symptoms.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0205"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">41</span></a> Most patients are sensitive to UV-B radiation, but there have been reports of cases triggered by broadband UV radiation and even UV-A radiation alone. Very few cases are induced exclusively by visible light (around 600<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>nm), and while these patients do not meet the diagnostic criteria for CAD, some authors believe that they might be special cases with different chromophores.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0210"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">42</span></a></p><p id="par0230" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The UV-B MED is almost always reduced at 24 hours, but in addition to erythema, patients also develop papules or eczema and intense itching. The reaction peaks 7 to 24 hours after the phototest. In some patients, involvement of extensive areas of skin makes it difficult to choose a test site. In very severe cases, the patient may need to be admitted to a dark room for several days so that topical or systemic corticosteroids or immunosuppressive drugs can be suspended without causing an unwanted flare-up. In patients with a negative phototest, additional tests must be performed to rule out similar conditions such as atopic dermatitis, photoaggravated seborrheic dermatitis, and even cutaneous T-cell lymphoma.</p><p id="par0235" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Patch and photopatch tests should also be performed in patients with CAD because a range of allergens and photoallergens, many of which are airborne, can trigger and perpetuate the condition. Up to 80% of patients test positive to 1 or more allergens in these tests.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0215"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">43–48</span></a> A large panel of allergens should be tested, including the national baseline series, topical medications, UV filters, and plants. Based on reports in the literature, the most common contact allergens implicated in CAD are Compositae oleoresin extracts, metals, fragrances, colophony, rubber antioxidants, phosphorus sesquisulfide, and UV filters.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0215"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">43–48</span></a></p><p id="par0240" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It may not always be possible to irradiate the photopatch test site with a 5-J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> dose of UV-A radiation, because this can trigger an abnormal erythematous response in some patients. In such cases, suberythemal doses—determined by the patient's UV-A MED—are necessary. It is important to perform the tests when the disease is controlled to avoid false positives encountered in patients with angry back syndrome.</p><p id="par0245" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">CAD is a chronic condition. Based on the results of a cohort study at a tertiary referral centre, abnormal photosensitivity is resolved in 20% of patients over a 10-year period.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49</span></a> Few cases of contact allergy have been resolved in the series studied to date,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49,50</span></a> and in such cases, allergen avoidance and adequate sun protection are essential for achieving gradual clinical improvement.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49</span></a> Prognosis is worse in patients with severe photosensitivity or patients sensitized to multiple unrelated allergens.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0245"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">49</span></a></p></span></span></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Actinic Prurigo</span><p id="par0250" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">UV-A and UV-B MEDs are generally normal in patients with actinic prurigo.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">51</span></a></p><p id="par0255" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Abnormal sensitivity to monochromatic UV-B light at a dose of 50 to 60<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mJ/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> has been detected in up to two-thirds of Mexican patients with actinic prurigo.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">51</span></a> The administration of daily doses of 3 to 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mJ/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> of UV-B radiation for 15 days and of 2.5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mJ/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span> of UV-A radiation for 10 days has provoked actinic prurigo lesions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0255"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">51</span></a> Photoprovoked lesions are similar to those seen in PLE.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0260"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">52</span></a></p><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Exogenous Photosensitivity Induced by Drugs and Other Chemical Agents: Phototoxicity and Photoallergy</span><p id="par0260" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Phototoxic reactions can be diagnosed by phototesting both during and after the use of the causative agent. The normalization of a low MED on withdrawal of a suspected drug confirms a diagnosis of phototoxicity and enables identification of the cause in patients taking multiple drugs. The tests should be performed in a lesion-free (unexposed) area. Patients typically have very high sensitivity to UV-A radiation (and much less frequently to UV-B radiation) while taking the drug, but this normalizes several days after withdrawal.</p><p id="par0265" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Photopatch tests should be performed in patients with suspected phototoxic and photoallergic reactions (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a>). The results should be interpreted as follows<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8,10</span></a>:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0015"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0035"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">1.</span><p id="par0270" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Positive patch test on irradiated side and no reaction on nonirradiated side: contact photoallergy</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0040"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">2.</span><p id="par0275" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Positive patch test on irradiated and nonirradiated sides: contact allergy</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0045"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">3.</span><p id="par0280" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No reaction on either side: negative result</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0050"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">4.</span><p id="par0285" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Stronger reaction on irradiated side than on nonirradiated side: photoaggravated contact allergy</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0055"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">5.</span><p id="par0290" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Weaker reaction on nonirradiated side than on irradiated side: photoinhibited contact allergy</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0060"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">6.</span><p id="par0295" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Reaction with a morphologic pattern and time course typically seen in skin irritation: irritant reaction</p></li></ul></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0300" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">One group of authors described 4 morphologic phototest patterns to aid in the distinction between photoallergic and phototoxic reactions. The patterns were a classic photoallergic crescendo pattern, an immediate reaction with a decrescendo pattern (phototoxicity), a plateau pattern, and a combined pattern with an immediate and delayed reaction of unknown origin.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0265"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">53</span></a></p><p id="par0305" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Finally, it is essential to determine the relevance of all positive photopatch test results within the context of the patient's history, the presence of the allergen, and the existence of a temporal relationship between UV exposure and onset of photosensitivity. The most common photoallergens identified in the 1960s and 1970s were halogenated salicylanilides and chlorinated phenols (fenticlor), used as antibacterial agents in soaps<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">.</span> Musk ambrette was withdrawn from the market several years ago, but this fragrance is still an ingredient in products imported from Asia<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0270"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">54</span></a> and therefore might be relevant in cases of contact photoallergy.</p><p id="par0310" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The prevalence of positive photopatch test results is currently low.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0025"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,13,53</span></a> UV filters<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0040"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a> and NSAIDs<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0045"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a> are the most common allergens involved in photoallergic contact dermatitis, followed by fragrances,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0050"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> promethazine,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0055"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a> and certain plants.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0240"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">48,55</span></a> Ketoprofen tops the list of photoallergens in Spain, followed at quite a distance by benzydamine and etofenamate.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0065"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a> Fragrance mixes tend to cause contact rather than photoallergic reactions. Photoallergy to ketoprofen is also common in other countries, such as Belgium<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0280"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">56</span></a> and Sweden<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0285"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">57</span></a>; the prevalence of this photoallergen has been attributed, at least in part, to prescribing habits and the drug's photosensitizing capacity.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0290"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">58</span></a> Ketoprofen cross-reacts with benzophenone-3, cinnamic aldehyde (fragrance mix component), and phenofibrate.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0280"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">56,57</span></a> According to a European multicenter study published in 2012, ketoprofen, etofenamate, octocrylene, and butyl methoxydibenzoylmethane were the most common chemical substances involved in contact photoallergy.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0070"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">Light Tolerance or UV Hardening</span><p id="par0315" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Exposure to small doses of UV radiation induces a certain degree of natural sun protection. Photoadaptation, or UV hardening, is also used as prophylactic treatment in photodermatoses and photosensitivity. Its use in PLE and solar urticaria is well established.</p><p id="par0320" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The mechanism underlying UV hardening is unknown, but it is thought to possibly involve increased melanin synthesis, a thickening of the stratum corneum, a decrease in the hypothetical antigen, or a combination of these factors. However, immunologic mechanisms certainly also have a role. UV radiation has been shown to induce changes in Langerhans cells and other inflammatory skin cells such as lymphocytes, macrophages, and neutrophils.</p><p id="par0325" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In patients about to start UV hardening therapy, photobiologic studies are necessary in order to establish the starting dose and subsequent increments (by determining degree of photosensitivity).</p><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Polymorphic Light Eruption</span><p id="par0330" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Skin alterations in patients with PLE can be resolved by repeated exposure to UV-B radiation, which enhances UV-induced cell migratory responses, particularly in patients with a positive photoprovocation test.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0300"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">60</span></a></p><p id="par0335" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The higher component of UV-B and UV-A radiation during the summer months could explain why PLE lesions reduce in number in late summer (inhibitory effect of UV-B-induced immunosuppression on the skin).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">61</span></a> NB–UV-B and psoralen-UV-A (PUVA) therapy in the spring can induce light tolerance and reduce the number and intensity of flares in certain photodermatoses; the 2 types of treatment have shown similar effectiveness.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0305"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">61,62</span></a> NB–UV-B can even increase the UV-A threshold in patients with a low threshold. In other words, in addition to preventing PLE lesions, NB–UV-B improves sensitivity to UV-A light. The therapy generally consists of short periods of daily exposure to natural sunlight or artificial light during the summer. The success of this desensitization process is independent of a history of tolerance or intolerance to natural sunlight.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0310"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">62</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Solar Urticaria</span><p id="par0340" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The induction of light tolerance in patients with solar urticaria could be related to the inhibition of responses observed before or after irradiation with longer wavelengths than those of the action spectrum. These wavelengths might inactivate the endogenous allergen or stabilize the membrane of mast cells, which are the main effector cells. However, the fact that the inhibitory effect occurs after preirradiation with light from the action spectrum suggests that the mechanism behind tolerance induction somehow involves blockage of the photoallergen's ability to bind to IgE and mast cells, or a reduction of specific IgE production.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0315"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">63</span></a></p><p id="par0345" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Tolerance has been induced in patients with solar urticaria with UV-A phototherapy,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0320"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">64</span></a> multiple incremental doses of UV-A radiation for 2 to 3 days,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0325"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">65</span></a> a combination of PUVA and UV-A therapy (used as induction and maintenance treatments, respectively),<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0330"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">66</span></a> and NB–UV-B.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0335"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">67</span></a> The regimen consisted of between 8 and 15 sessions and in all cases the patients were advised to continue with short periods of daily sun exposure during the summer months. Induction of tolerance does not seem to depend on the action spectrum, but UV-A and UV-B MUDs must be determined so that the starting and subsequent doses can be established. Tolerance, however, tends to last for just a few days so treatment should continue with regular exposure to sunlight or light from phototherapy booths.</p></span></span></span><span id="sec0085" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Ethical Disclosures</span><span id="sec0090" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Protection of humans and animals</span><p id="par0350" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that the procedures followed complied with the ethical standards of the corresponding human experimentation committee and the World Medical Association and with the principles of the Declaration of Helsinki.</p></span><span id="sec0095" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Confidentiality of data</span><p id="par0355" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have followed their hospital's protocol on the publication of data concerning patients and that all patients included in the study have received sufficient information and have given their written informed consent to participate in the study.</p></span><span id="sec0100" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Right to privacy and informed consent</span><p id="par0360" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors obtained informed consent from the patients and/or subjects referred to in this article. This document is held by the corresponding author.</p></span></span><span id="sec0105" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Funding</span><p id="par0365" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">No funding was received for this study.</p></span><span id="sec0110" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0130">Conflicts of Interest</span><p id="par0370" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:12 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres327184" "titulo" => "Abstract" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec308853" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xres327183" "titulo" => "Resumen" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec308854" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Types of Photobiologic Studies" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Phototest" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Photoprovocation" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "Photopatch Testing" ] ] ] 5 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Proposed System for a Photobiology Study" ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Clinical Application of Photobiologic Studies" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Utility and Results of Photobiology Tests in Different Photodermatoses" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "Polymorphic Light Eruption" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Hydroa Vacciniforme" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Solar Urticaria" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Chronic Actinic Dermatitis" ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Actinic Prurigo" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "Exogenous Photosensitivity Induced by Drugs and Other Chemical Agents: Phototoxicity and Photoallergy" ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Light Tolerance or UV Hardening" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Polymorphic Light Eruption" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Solar Urticaria" ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0085" "titulo" => "Ethical Disclosures" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0090" "titulo" => "Protection of humans and animals" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0095" "titulo" => "Confidentiality of data" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0100" "titulo" => "Right to privacy and informed consent" ] ] ] 9 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0105" "titulo" => "Funding" ] 10 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0110" "titulo" => "Conflicts of Interest" ] 11 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2012-05-10" "fechaAceptado" => "2012-07-29" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec308853" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Photobiologic testing" 1 => "Phototesting" 2 => "Photochallenge" 3 => "Photopatch test" 4 => "Photodermatoses" 5 => "Light tolerance" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec308854" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Estudio fotobiológico" 1 => "Fototest" 2 => "Fotoprovocación" 3 => "Fotoparche" 4 => "Fotodermatosis" 5 => "Fototolerancia" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The second of this series describes the characteristics of 3 types of photobiologic studies: the light test, the photochallenge test, and the photopatch test. We explain how the tests are carried out, the expected results, and their clinical usefulness in various photodermatoses. These tests are needed before attempting to induce adaptation (skin hardening or light tolerance) in the most debilitating cases.</p>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">En esta segunda parte se describen las características de los 3 tipos de estudios fotobiológicos: el fototest, la fotoprovocación y la prueba del fotoparche. Se detalla la metodología, los resultados esperados y la utilidad clínica de estos métodos en las distintas fotodermatosis estudiadas. Estos estudios son esenciales para la inducción de fotoadaptación o fototolerancia que se emplea para los casos más invalidantes.</p>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0010">Please cite this article as: De Argila D, Aguilera J, Sánchez J, García-Díez A. Estudio de las fotodermatosis idiopáticas y exógenas. Parte II: el estudio fotobiológico. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2014;105:233–242.</p>" ] ] "multimedia" => array:6 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 694 "Ancho" => 930 "Tamanyo" => 77902 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Phototest. Minimal erythema dose (MED) for UV-B radiation.</p> <p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Erythematous response. MED determined using a fluorescent lamp with 5 test fields and a filter to determine the exposure dose according to skin contact time (Gigatest UVB, Medisun).</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 1244 "Ancho" => 930 "Tamanyo" => 129444 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Minimal urticaria dose (MUD) in a patient with solar urticaria.</p> <p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Whealing response. MUD determined using a fluorescent lamp with 5 test fields and a filter to determine the exposure dose according to skin contact time (Gigatest UVB, Medisun). (Photograph courtesy of Dr Diego de Argila, Hospital La Princesa, Madrid, Spain).</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 595 "Ancho" => 930 "Tamanyo" => 74611 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Photoprovocation.</p> <p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Photoprovocation with repeated doses of UV-A radiation applied to the back of a patient with polymorphic light eruption. (Photograph courtesy of Dr. José Aguilera, Faculty of Medicine, Universidad de Málaga, Málaga, Spain).</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1237 "Ancho" => 930 "Tamanyo" => 115274 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Photopatch test.</p> <p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Panel of UV filters and fragrance mix I components. Allergic contact photodermatitis due to nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug: positive photopatch test to ketoprofen. The reaction to octocrylene (UV filter series) in the nonirradiated patch set is probably an irritant reaction and the negative result in the irradiated patch set might be due to an inhibitory UV-A effect.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0005" "etiqueta" => "Table 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:1 [ "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">- \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">No reaction \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">+/- \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Doubtful reaction (erythema only) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">+ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Weak positive reaction (erythema, infiltration, papules) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">++ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Strong positive reaction (erythema, infiltration, papules, vesicles) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">+++ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Very strong positive reaction (erythema, infiltration, vesicles, blisters) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab478874.png" ] ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0055" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Intensity of Photopatch Skin Reactions According to the International Contact Dermatitis Research Group Scoring System.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "tbl0010" "etiqueta" => "Table 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIATABLA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "tabla" => array:3 [ "leyenda" => "<p id="spar0065" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Abbreviations: AP, actinic prurigo; CAD, chronic actinic dermatitis; HV, hydroa vacciniforme; PLE, polymorphic light eruption; SU, solar urticaria.</p><p id="spar0070" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Adapted from Bylaite et al. 2009 (Br J Dermatol. 2009;161 Suppl 3: 61-8).</p>" "tablatextoimagen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "tabla" => array:1 [ 0 => """ <table border="0" frame="\n \t\t\t\t\tvoid\n \t\t\t\t" class=""><thead title="thead"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black"> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">UV-A MED \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">UV-B MED \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Photoprovocation<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#tblfn0005"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">a</span></a> \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-head\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t" style="border-bottom: 2px solid black">Photopatch \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></thead><tbody title="tbody"><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">PLE \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal (or low) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal or low \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">UV-A (80%), UV-B/UV-A (12%), UV-B (8%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">− \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">HV \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Low (or normal) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Possible \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">− \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">CAD \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Low (or normal) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Low \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">UV-A or UV-B \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">+ \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">SU \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Wheal (immediate response) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">− \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">AP \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">UV-B and UV-A (70%-100%) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">− \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Photoallergy \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal or low \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Exogenous agent required \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">++ (see text) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr><tr title="table-row"><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Phototoxicity \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Low \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Normal or low \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">Exogenous agent required \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td><td class="td" title="\n \t\t\t\t\ttable-entry\n \t\t\t\t " align="left" valign="\n \t\t\t\t\ttop\n \t\t\t\t">+/– (see text) \t\t\t\t\t\t\n \t\t\t\t</td></tr></tbody></table> """ ] "imagenFichero" => array:1 [ 0 => "xTab478875.png" ] ] ] "notaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "tblfn0005" "etiqueta" => "a" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">The rate of positive photoprovocation results varies considerably between series (see text).</p>" ] ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0060" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Expected Phototest and Photopatch Results in Idiopathic Photodermatoses.</p>" ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0005" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:67 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0005" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Inter-observer variability in reading of phototest reactions with sharply or diffusely delineated borders" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Falk" 1 => "M. Ilias" 2 => "C. Anderson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-0846.2008.00305.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Skin Res Technol" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "14" "paginaInicial" => "397" "paginaFinal" => "402" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18937773" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0010" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photodiagnostic modalities" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "N.J. Neumann" 1 => "P. Lehmann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:5 [ "titulo" => "Dermatological phototherapy and photodiagnostic methods" "paginaInicial" => "367" "paginaFinal" => "376" "edicion" => "2nd ed." "serieFecha" => "2009" ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0015" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Provocation testing in polymorphic light eruption using fluorescent ultraviolet (UV) A and UVB lamps" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "S. Das" 1 => "J. Lloyd" 2 => "D.W. Walshaw" 3 => "P.M. Farr" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1365-2133.2004.06235.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "151" "paginaInicial" => "1066" "paginaFinal" => "1070" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15541086" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0020" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photodermatoses: classification, evaluation and management" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Bylaite" 1 => "J. Grigaitiene" 2 => "G.S. Lapinskaite" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1365-2133.2009.09451.x" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "161" "numero" => "Suppl 3" "paginaInicial" => "61" "paginaFinal" => "68" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19775359" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0025" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch testing: a consensus methodology for Europe" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "European Taskforce for Photopatch Testing" "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "D.P. Bruynzeel" 1 => "J. Ferguson" 2 => "K. Andersen" 3 => "M. Gonçalo" 4 => "J. English" 5 => "A. Goossens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1468-3083.2004.01053.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "679" "paginaFinal" => "682" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15482294" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0030" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Results of evaluation of 203 patients for photosensitivity in a 7.3-year period" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J. Fotiades" 1 => "N.A. Soter" 2 => "H.W. Lim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "33" "paginaInicial" => "597" "paginaFinal" => "602" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7673491" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0035" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch testing: the 12-year experience of the German, Austrian, and Swiss photopatch test group" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "N.J. Neumann" 1 => "E. Hölzle" 2 => "G. Plewig" 3 => "T. Schwarz" 4 => "R.G. Panizzon" 5 => "R. Breit" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "42" "numero" => "2 Pt 1" "paginaInicial" => "183" "paginaFinal" => "192" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10642671" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0040" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch testing of 1155 patients: results of the U.K. multicentre photopatch study group" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.M. Bryden" 1 => "H. Moseley" 2 => "S.H. Ibbotson" 3 => "M.M. Chowdhury" 4 => "M.H. Beck" 5 => "J. Bourke" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1365-2133.2006.07458.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "155" "paginaInicial" => "737" "paginaFinal" => "747" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16965423" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0045" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch tests: any news under the sun?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "T. Zeeli" 1 => "M. David" 2 => "A. Trattner" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-0536.2006.00787.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "55" "paginaInicial" => "305" "paginaFinal" => "307" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17026701" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0050" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch test: an Italian multicentre study from 2004 to 2006" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P.D. Pigatto" 1 => "G. Guzzi" 2 => "D. Schena" 3 => "M. Guarrera" 4 => "C. Foti" 5 => "S. Francalanci" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-0536.2008.01374.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "59" "paginaInicial" => "103" "paginaFinal" => "108" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18759877" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0055" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch testing with an extended series of photoallergens: a 5-year study" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "J.C. Cardoso" 1 => "M.M. Canelas" 2 => "M. Gonçalo" 3 => "A. Figueiredo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01550.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "325" "paginaFinal" => "329" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19489967" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0060" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch testing of 182 patients: a 6-year experience at the Mayo Clinic" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "L.A. Scalf" 1 => "M.D. Davis" 2 => "A.L. Rohlinger" 3 => "S.M. Connolly" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "20" "paginaInicial" => "44" "paginaFinal" => "52" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19321120" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0065" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resultados y evaluación del fotoparche en España: hacia una nueva batería estándar de fotoalergenos" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "J. Cuadra-Oyanguren" 1 => "A. Pérez-Ferriols" 2 => "M. Lecha-Carrelero" 3 => "A.M. Giménez-Arnau" 4 => "V. Fernández Redondo" 5 => "F.J. Ortiz de Frutos" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr" "fecha" => "2007" "volumen" => "98" "paginaInicial" => "96" "paginaFinal" => "101" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/17397595" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0070" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A European Multi-Center Photopatch Test Study (EMCPPTS)" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.C. Kerr" 1 => "J. Ferguson" 2 => "A.K. Havlett" 3 => "L.E. Rhodes" 4 => "H. Adamski" 5 => "A. Alomar" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1365-2133.2012.10857.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "166" "paginaInicial" => "1002" "paginaFinal" => "1009" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22283432" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0075" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch test method: influence of type of irradiation and value of day-7 reading" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "B. Pollock" 1 => "S.M. Wilkinson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "270" "paginaFinal" => "272" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11298690" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0080" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Mechanisms and detection of photoallergy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "V.A. DeLeo" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Curr Opin Dermatol" "fecha" => "1996" "volumen" => "3" "paginaInicial" => "177" "paginaFinal" => "184" ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0085" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch testing with different ultraviolet A sources can yield discrepant test results" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "B. Przybilla" 1 => "E. Hölzle" 2 => "F. Enders" 3 => "R. Gollhausen" 4 => "J. Ring" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed" "fecha" => "1991" "volumen" => "8" "paginaInicial" => "57" "paginaFinal" => "61" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1756113" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 17 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "18" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch testing--a retrospective review using the day and 2 day irradiation protocols" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R.J. Batchelor" 1 => "S.M. Wilkinson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00760.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "54" "paginaInicial" => "75" "paginaFinal" => "78" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16487278" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 18 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "19" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Determination of threshold UV-A elicitation dose in photopatch testing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C. Duguid" 1 => "D. O'Sullivan" 2 => "G.M. Murphy" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "29" "paginaInicial" => "192" "paginaFinal" => "194" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8281782" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 19 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "20" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photopatch test reactivity: effect of photoallergen concentration and UVA dosaging" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "T. Hasan" 1 => "C.T. Jansen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "1996" "volumen" => "34" "paginaInicial" => "383" "paginaFinal" => "386" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8879921" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 20 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "21" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A double-blind, randomized assessment of the irritant potential of sunscreen chemical dilutions used in photopatch testing" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A.C. Kerr" 1 => "B. Niklasson" 2 => "R.S. Dawe" 3 => "A.M. Escoffier" 4 => "M. Krasteva" 5 => "B. Sanderson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-0536.2009.01516.x" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "60" "paginaInicial" => "203" "paginaFinal" => "209" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19338588" "web" => "Medline" ] ] "itemHostRev" => array:3 [ "pii" => "S0091674912013085" "estado" => "S300" "issn" => "00916749" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 21 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "22" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluation of customers’ complaints about sunscreen cosmetics sold by the Swedish pharmaceutical company" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "T. Fischer" 1 => "K. Bergstrom" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "1991" "volumen" => "25" "paginaInicial" => "319" "paginaFinal" => "322" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1809534" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 22 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "23" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The frequency of reactions to sunscreens: results of a longitudinal population-based study on the regular use of sunscreens in Australia" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "P. Foley" 1 => "R. Nixon" 2 => "R. Marks" 3 => "K. Frowen" 4 => "S. Thompson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "128" "paginaInicial" => "512" "paginaFinal" => "518" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8504041" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 23 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "24" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Evaluation of the photosensitive patient" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "H.W. Lim" 1 => "H.L. Hawk" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Photodermatology" "paginaInicial" => "139" "paginaFinal" => "148" "serieFecha" => "2007" ] ] ] ] ] ] 24 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "25" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Polymorphous light eruption: a clinical, photobiologic, and follow-up study of 110 patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "H.E. Boonstra" 1 => "H. van Weelden" 2 => "J. Toonstra" 3 => "W.A. van Vloten" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/S0190-9622(00)90126-9" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "42" "paginaInicial" => "199" "paginaFinal" => "207" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10642673" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 25 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "26" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Polymorphous light eruption" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "L. Naleway" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "41" "paginaInicial" => "377" "paginaFinal" => "383" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12121545" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 26 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "27" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The polymorphous light eruption-severity assessment score does not reliably predict the results of phototesting" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "I.J. Schornagel" 1 => "K.L. Guikers" 2 => "H. van Weelden" 3 => "C.A. Brijnzeel-Koomen" 4 => "V. Sigurdsson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1468-3083.2008.02633.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "22" "paginaInicial" => "675" "paginaFinal" => "680" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18393963" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 27 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "28" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Polymorphous light eruption" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "E. Hölzle" 1 => "G. Plewig" 2 => "R. von Kries" 3 => "P. Lehmann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Invest Dermatol" "fecha" => "1987" "volumen" => "88" "numero" => "3 Suppl" "paginaInicial" => "32s" "paginaFinal" => "38s" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3819473" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 28 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "29" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Adverse effects of sunscreen in photosensitive patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P.M. Farr" 1 => "B.L. Diffey" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/S2213-2600(13)70124-3" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Lancet" "fecha" => "1989" "volumen" => "1" "paginaInicial" => "429" "paginaFinal" => "431" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24429230" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 29 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "30" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prevention of polymorphic light eruption with a sunscreen of a very high protection level against UVB and UVA radiation under standardized photodiagnostic conditions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "V. Schleyer" 1 => "O. Weber" 2 => "A. Yazdi" 3 => "F. Benedix" 4 => "K. Dietz" 5 => "M. Röcken" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.2340/00015555-0509" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Acta Derm Venereol" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "88" "paginaInicial" => "555" "paginaFinal" => "560" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19002338" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 30 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "31" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Polymorphous light eruption, Hydroa vacciniforme, and Actinic prurigo" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "H. Hönigsmann" 1 => "M.T. Hojyo-Tomoka" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Photodermatology" "paginaInicial" => "149" "paginaFinal" => "167" "serieFecha" => "2007" ] ] ] ] ] ] 31 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "32" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "N.C. Botto" 1 => "E.M. Warshaw" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jaad.2008.08.020" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "59" "paginaInicial" => "909" "paginaFinal" => "920" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19022098" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 32 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "33" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "T. Horio" 1 => "E. Hölzle" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Photodermatology" "paginaInicial" => "185" "paginaFinal" => "197" "serieFecha" => "2007" ] ] ] ] ] ] 33 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "34" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Changes of photosensitivity and action spectrum with time in solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "J.C. Ng" 1 => "P.A. Foley" 2 => "R.B. Crouch" 3 => "C.S. Baker" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed" "fecha" => "2002" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "191" "paginaFinal" => "195" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12390674" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 34 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0175" "etiqueta" => "35" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Production and inhibition of solar urticaria by visible light exposure" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "T. Horio" 1 => "A. Yoshioka" 2 => "H. Okamoto" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "1984" "volumen" => "11" "paginaInicial" => "1094" "paginaFinal" => "1099" ] ] ] ] ] ] 35 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0180" "etiqueta" => "36" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The clinical and photobiological characteristics of solar urticaria in 40 patients" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "N. Uetsu" 1 => "H. Miyauchi-Hashimoto" 2 => "H. Okamoto" 3 => "T. Horio" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "142" "paginaInicial" => "32" "paginaFinal" => "38" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10651691" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 36 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0185" "etiqueta" => "37" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Solar urticaria. A report of 25 cases with difficulties in phototesting" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "S. Ryckaert" 1 => "R. Roetlands" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Dermatol" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "134" ] ] ] ] ] ] 37 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0190" "etiqueta" => "38" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Urticaria solar: dificultades en el diagnóstico mediante el fototest" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "I. Allende" 1 => "J. Gardeazábal" 2 => "M. Lázaro" 3 => "J.L. Díaz-Pérez" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:3 [ "tituloSerie" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "100" ] ] ] ] ] ] 38 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0195" "etiqueta" => "39" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Augmentation spectrum in solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "T. Horio" 1 => "K. Fujigaki" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "1988" "volumen" => "18" "paginaInicial" => "1188" "paginaFinal" => "1193" ] ] ] ] ] ] 39 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0200" "etiqueta" => "40" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Solar urticaria: report of two cases with augmentation spectrum" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K. Danno" 1 => "N. Mori" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "30" "paginaFinal" => "33" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10721862" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 40 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0205" "etiqueta" => "41" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Solar urticaria-idiopathic?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "T. Horio" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "19" "paginaInicial" => "147" "paginaFinal" => "154" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12914600" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 41 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0210" "etiqueta" => "42" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Chronic actinic dermatitis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "H.L. Hawk" 1 => "H.W. Lim" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "LibroEditado" => array:4 [ "titulo" => "Photodermatology" "paginaInicial" => "169" "paginaFinal" => "183" "serieFecha" => "2007" ] ] ] ] ] ] 42 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0215" "etiqueta" => "43" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Patch and photopatch testing in chronic actinic dermatitis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K.A. Barber" 1 => "E. Cronin" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "1984" "volumen" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "69" "paginaFinal" => "73" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/6713843" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 43 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0220" "etiqueta" => "44" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photosensitivity dermatitis/actinic reticuloid syndrome in an Irish population: a review and some unusual features" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "E. Healy" 1 => "S. Rogers" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Acta Derm Venereol Suppl (Stockh)" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "75" "paginaInicial" => "72" "paginaFinal" => "74" ] ] ] ] ] ] 44 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0225" "etiqueta" => "45" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Chronic actinic dermatitis: results of patch and photopatch tests with Compositae, fragrances and pesticides" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "H.W. Lim" 1 => "D. Cohn" 2 => "N. Soter" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "1998" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "108" "paginaFinal" => "111" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9448216" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 45 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0230" "etiqueta" => "46" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Contact and photocontact sensitization in chronic actinic dermatitis: sesquiterpene lactone mix is an important allergen" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "H. Menagé" 1 => "J.S. Ross" 2 => "P.G. Norris" 3 => "J.L. Hawk" 4 => "I.R. White" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "132" "paginaInicial" => "543" "paginaFinal" => "547" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7748743" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 46 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0235" "etiqueta" => "47" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A Korean experience with chronic actinic dermatitis during an 18-year period: meteorological and photoimmunological aspects" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "C. Kyu-Won" 1 => "L. Chae-Young" 2 => "L. Yeong-Kyu" 3 => "K. Young-Hun" 4 => "K. Ki-Ho" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-0781.2009.00464.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "25" "paginaInicial" => "286" "paginaFinal" => "292" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19906162" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 47 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0240" "etiqueta" => "48" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Occurrence of plant sensitivity among patients of photodermatoses: a control-matched study of 156 cases from New Delhi" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "H.K. Kar" 1 => "S. Langar" 2 => "T.C. Arora" 3 => "P. Sharma" 4 => "A. Raina" 5 => "M. Bhardwaj" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.4103/0378-6323.55391" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Indian J Dermatol Venereol Leprol" "fecha" => "2009" "volumen" => "75" "paginaInicial" => "483" "paginaFinal" => "487" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19736427" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 48 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0245" "etiqueta" => "49" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The natural history of chronic actinic dermatitis" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "R.S. Dawe" 1 => "I.K. Crombie" 2 => "J. Ferguson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Dermatol" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "136" "paginaInicial" => "1215" "paginaFinal" => "1220" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11030767" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 49 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0250" "etiqueta" => "50" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Persistence of allergic contact sensitivity in subjects with photosensitivity dermatitis and actinic reticuloid syndrome" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "H.A. Addo" 1 => "W. Frain-Bell" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "1987" "volumen" => "117" "paginaInicial" => "555" "paginaFinal" => "559" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3689677" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 50 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0255" "etiqueta" => "51" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Diagnosis and treatment of actinic prurigo" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "M.T. Hojyo-Tomoka" 1 => "M.E. Vega-Memije" 2 => "R. Cortes-Franco" 3 => "L. Domínguez-Soto" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Dermatol Ther" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "40" "paginaFinal" => "44" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12919125" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 51 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0260" "etiqueta" => "52" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Mechanisms of phototherapy and photochemotherapy for photodermatoses" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "H. Honigsmann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Dermatol Ther" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "16" "paginaInicial" => "23" "paginaFinal" => "27" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/12919123" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 52 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0265" "etiqueta" => "53" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pattern analysis of photopatch test reactions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "N.J. Neumann" 1 => "E. Hölzle" 2 => "P. Lehmann" 3 => "S. Benedikter" 4 => "B. Tapernoux" 5 => "G. Plewig" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed" "fecha" => "1994" "volumen" => "10" "paginaInicial" => "65" "paginaFinal" => "73" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8043387" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 53 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0270" "etiqueta" => "54" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photoallergic contact dermatitis is uncommon" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Darvay" 1 => "I.R. White" 2 => "R.J. Ryocroft" 3 => "A.B. Jones" 4 => "J.L. Hawk" 5 => "J.P. McFadden" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "145" "paginaInicial" => "597" "paginaFinal" => "601" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11703286" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 54 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0275" "etiqueta" => "55" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Allergic contact and photoallergic contact dermatitis to plant and pesticide allergens" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "K.A. Mark" 1 => "R.R. Brancaccio" 2 => "N.A. Soter" 3 => "D.E. Cohen" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Arch Dermatol" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "135" "paginaInicial" => "67" "paginaFinal" => "70" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9923784" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 55 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0280" "etiqueta" => "56" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Allergic and photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen: results of (photo) patch testing and follow-up of 42 patient" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "V. Devleeschouwer" 1 => "R. Roelandts" 2 => "M. Garmyn" 3 => "A. Goossens" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1600-0536.2007.01296.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2008" "volumen" => "58" "paginaInicial" => "159" "paginaFinal" => "166" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/18279154" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 56 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0285" "etiqueta" => "57" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Photoallergic contact dermatitis from ketoprofen in southern Sweden" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Hindsén" 1 => "E. Zimerson" 2 => "M. Bruze" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.0105-1873.2005.00778.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "54" "paginaInicial" => "150" "paginaFinal" => "157" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16524438" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 57 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0290" "etiqueta" => "58" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Greater allergenicity of topical ketoprofen in contact dermatitis confirmed by use" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "R.L. Diaz" 1 => "J. Gardeazábal" 2 => "P. Manrique" 3 => "J.A. Ratón" 4 => "J. Urrutia" 5 => "J.M. Rodríguez-Sasiain" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.0105-1873.2006.00797.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2006" "volumen" => "54" "paginaInicial" => "239" "paginaFinal" => "243" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16689806" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 58 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0295" "etiqueta" => "59" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Narrow-band UVB (TL-01) phototherapy: an effective preventative treatment for the photodermatoses" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "P. Collins" 1 => "J. Ferguson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "1995" "volumen" => "132" "paginaInicial" => "956" "paginaFinal" => "963" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7662575" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 59 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0300" "etiqueta" => "60" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Artificial hardening for polymorphic light eruption: practical points from ten years’ experience" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "I. Man" 1 => "R.S. Dawe" 2 => "J. Ferguson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol Photoimmunol Photomed" "fecha" => "1999" "volumen" => "15" "paginaInicial" => "96" "paginaFinal" => "99" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10404717" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 60 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0305" "etiqueta" => "61" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Normalized ultraviolet (UV) induction of Langerhans cell depletion and neutrophil infiltrates after artificial UVB hardening of patients with polymorphic light eruption" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "A.S. Janssens" 1 => "S. Pavel" 2 => "J.J. Out-Luiting" 3 => "R. Willemze" 4 => "F.R. de Gruijl" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/j.1365-2133.2005.06690.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2005" "volumen" => "152" "paginaInicial" => "1268" "paginaFinal" => "1274" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15948992" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 61 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0310" "etiqueta" => "62" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ultraviolet-radiation-induced erythema and suppression of contact hypersensitivity responses in patients with polymorphic light eruption" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C.B. Van de Pas" 1 => "D.A. Kelly" 2 => "P.T. Seed" 3 => "A.R. Young" 4 => "J.L. Hawk" 5 => "S.L. Walker" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1046/j.0022-202X.2004.22201.x" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Invest Dermatol" "fecha" => "2004" "volumen" => "122" "paginaInicial" => "295" "paginaFinal" => "299" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/15009708" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 62 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0315" "etiqueta" => "63" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A comparison of narrow band phototherapy (TL-01) and photochemotherapy (PUVA) in the management of polymorphic light eruption" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "D. Bildsland" 1 => "S.A. George" 2 => "N.K. Gibbs" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "1993" "volumen" => "129" "paginaInicial" => "708" "paginaFinal" => "712" ] ] ] ] ] ] 63 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0320" "etiqueta" => "64" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Prolonged benefit following ultraviolet A phototherapy for solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "R.S. Dawe" 1 => "J. Ferguson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "1997" "volumen" => "137" "paginaInicial" => "144" "paginaFinal" => "148" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9274644" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 64 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0325" "etiqueta" => "65" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "UVA rush hardening for the treatment of solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "S. Beissert" 1 => "H. Ständer" 2 => "T. Schwartz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "42" "paginaInicial" => "1030" "paginaFinal" => "1032" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10827409" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 65 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0330" "etiqueta" => "66" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Pre-PUVA UVA desensitization for solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "R. Roetlandts" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Photodermatol" "fecha" => "1985" "volumen" => "2" "paginaInicial" => "174" "paginaFinal" => "176" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/4022816" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 66 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0335" "etiqueta" => "67" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Narrowband ultraviolet B phototherapy is suitable treatment option for solar urticaria" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "P. Calzavara-Pinton" 1 => "C. Zane" 2 => "M. Rossi" 3 => "R. Sala" 4 => "M. Venturini" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jaad.2011.01.030" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "67" "paginaInicial" => "e5" "paginaFinal" => "e9" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21620516" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/15782190/0000010500000003/v1_201404030048/S1578219014000511/v1_201404030048/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "6177" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Reviews" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/15782190/0000010500000003/v1_201404030048/S1578219014000511/v1_201404030048/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA000044&text.app=https://actasdermo.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219014000511?idApp=UINPBA000044" ]
año/Mes | Html | Total | |
---|---|---|---|
2024 Noviembre | 16 | 10 | 26 |
2024 Octubre | 117 | 43 | 160 |
2024 Septiembre | 117 | 22 | 139 |
2024 Agosto | 182 | 68 | 250 |
2024 Julio | 151 | 34 | 185 |
2024 Junio | 157 | 92 | 249 |
2024 Mayo | 134 | 44 | 178 |
2024 Abril | 107 | 44 | 151 |
2024 Marzo | 115 | 39 | 154 |
2024 Febrero | 99 | 30 | 129 |
2024 Enero | 92 | 38 | 130 |
2023 Diciembre | 92 | 21 | 113 |
2023 Noviembre | 104 | 25 | 129 |
2023 Octubre | 109 | 45 | 154 |
2023 Septiembre | 102 | 35 | 137 |
2023 Agosto | 81 | 16 | 97 |
2023 Julio | 95 | 41 | 136 |
2023 Junio | 88 | 30 | 118 |
2023 Mayo | 105 | 25 | 130 |
2023 Abril | 82 | 29 | 111 |
2023 Marzo | 76 | 28 | 104 |
2023 Febrero | 76 | 34 | 110 |
2023 Enero | 64 | 35 | 99 |
2022 Diciembre | 80 | 33 | 113 |
2022 Noviembre | 51 | 27 | 78 |
2022 Octubre | 59 | 24 | 83 |
2022 Septiembre | 58 | 44 | 102 |
2022 Agosto | 52 | 56 | 108 |
2022 Julio | 40 | 32 | 72 |
2022 Junio | 68 | 24 | 92 |
2022 Mayo | 58 | 50 | 108 |
2022 Abril | 80 | 30 | 110 |
2022 Marzo | 105 | 68 | 173 |
2022 Febrero | 53 | 44 | 97 |
2022 Enero | 89 | 49 | 138 |
2021 Diciembre | 63 | 41 | 104 |
2021 Noviembre | 65 | 52 | 117 |
2021 Octubre | 79 | 69 | 148 |
2021 Septiembre | 53 | 47 | 100 |
2021 Agosto | 59 | 33 | 92 |
2021 Julio | 43 | 44 | 87 |
2021 Junio | 63 | 43 | 106 |
2021 Mayo | 47 | 39 | 86 |
2021 Abril | 140 | 70 | 210 |
2021 Marzo | 88 | 33 | 121 |
2021 Febrero | 56 | 26 | 82 |
2021 Enero | 51 | 29 | 80 |
2020 Diciembre | 43 | 16 | 59 |
2020 Noviembre | 28 | 24 | 52 |
2020 Octubre | 42 | 17 | 59 |
2020 Septiembre | 57 | 23 | 80 |
2020 Agosto | 19 | 16 | 35 |
2020 Julio | 34 | 14 | 48 |
2020 Junio | 40 | 26 | 66 |
2020 Mayo | 30 | 34 | 64 |
2020 Abril | 50 | 20 | 70 |
2020 Marzo | 36 | 13 | 49 |
2020 Febrero | 7 | 4 | 11 |
2020 Enero | 4 | 3 | 7 |
2019 Diciembre | 4 | 5 | 9 |
2019 Noviembre | 5 | 9 | 14 |
2019 Octubre | 1 | 15 | 16 |
2019 Septiembre | 6 | 13 | 19 |
2019 Agosto | 4 | 9 | 13 |
2019 Julio | 2 | 15 | 17 |
2019 Junio | 4 | 14 | 18 |
2019 Mayo | 2 | 20 | 22 |
2019 Abril | 0 | 17 | 17 |
2019 Marzo | 0 | 6 | 6 |
2019 Febrero | 0 | 6 | 6 |
2019 Enero | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2018 Diciembre | 0 | 5 | 5 |
2018 Noviembre | 1 | 0 | 1 |
2018 Octubre | 2 | 1 | 3 |
2018 Septiembre | 3 | 0 | 3 |
2018 Junio | 0 | 4 | 4 |
2018 Mayo | 1 | 2 | 3 |
2018 Abril | 0 | 1 | 1 |
2018 Marzo | 3 | 1 | 4 |
2018 Febrero | 44 | 4 | 48 |
2018 Enero | 54 | 4 | 58 |
2017 Diciembre | 63 | 7 | 70 |
2017 Noviembre | 54 | 6 | 60 |
2017 Octubre | 62 | 8 | 70 |
2017 Septiembre | 48 | 9 | 57 |
2017 Agosto | 56 | 9 | 65 |
2017 Julio | 52 | 10 | 62 |
2017 Junio | 70 | 29 | 99 |
2017 Mayo | 54 | 20 | 74 |
2017 Abril | 37 | 10 | 47 |
2017 Marzo | 38 | 15 | 53 |
2017 Febrero | 145 | 14 | 159 |
2017 Enero | 47 | 12 | 59 |
2016 Diciembre | 63 | 14 | 77 |
2016 Noviembre | 83 | 14 | 97 |
2016 Octubre | 115 | 13 | 128 |
2016 Septiembre | 193 | 14 | 207 |
2016 Agosto | 156 | 16 | 172 |
2016 Julio | 82 | 16 | 98 |
2016 Junio | 9 | 9 | 18 |
2016 Mayo | 7 | 8 | 15 |
2016 Abril | 9 | 4 | 13 |
2016 Marzo | 8 | 2 | 10 |
2016 Febrero | 9 | 2 | 11 |
2016 Enero | 9 | 2 | 11 |
2015 Diciembre | 9 | 6 | 15 |
2015 Noviembre | 8 | 2 | 10 |
2015 Octubre | 9 | 14 | 23 |
2015 Septiembre | 5 | 0 | 5 |
2015 Agosto | 8 | 2 | 10 |
2015 Julio | 134 | 9 | 143 |
2015 Junio | 75 | 9 | 84 |
2015 Mayo | 88 | 13 | 101 |
2015 Abril | 63 | 12 | 75 |
2015 Marzo | 58 | 3 | 61 |
2015 Febrero | 55 | 9 | 64 |
2015 Enero | 48 | 5 | 53 |
2014 Diciembre | 54 | 10 | 64 |
2014 Noviembre | 56 | 5 | 61 |
2014 Octubre | 44 | 5 | 49 |
2014 Septiembre | 46 | 6 | 52 |
2014 Agosto | 33 | 5 | 38 |
2014 Julio | 42 | 11 | 53 |
2014 Junio | 50 | 17 | 67 |
2014 Mayo | 64 | 20 | 84 |
2014 Abril | 29 | 6 | 35 |