Practical Dermatology
Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: How to Identify the Trigger
Reacciones cutáneas adversas a medicamentos: cómo identificar el desencadenante
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina
Read
9837
Timeswas read the article
2811
Total PDF
7026
Total HTML
Share statistics
array:24 [ "pii" => "S1578219018302634" "issn" => "15782190" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2018.07.010" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2018-10-01" "aid" => "1982" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and AEDV" "copyrightAnyo" => "2018" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018;109:699-707" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 2 "HTML" => 2 ] "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S0001731018302461" "issn" => "00017310" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ad.2018.02.017" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2018-10-01" "aid" => "1982" "copyright" => "AEDV" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "fla" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018;109:699-707" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 957 "formatos" => array:2 [ "HTML" => 667 "PDF" => 290 ] ] "es" => array:14 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Dermatología Práctica</span>" "titulo" => "Reacciones cutáneas adversas a medicamentos: cómo identificar el desencadenante" "tienePdf" => "es" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "es" "tieneResumen" => array:3 [ 0 => "es" 1 => "es" 2 => "en" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "699" "paginaFinal" => "707" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "en" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: How to Identify the Trigger" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "es" => true "en" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "es" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 1 "multimedia" => array:5 [ "identificador" => "fig0055" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "fx1.jpeg" "Alto" => 541 "Ancho" => 1333 "Tamanyo" => 56839 ] ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "A. Zambernardi, M. Label" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Zambernardi" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Label" ] ] ] ] "resumen" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "titulo" => "Graphical abstract" "clase" => "graphical" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0005" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall"><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0055"></elsevierMultimedia></p></span>" ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "en" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S1578219018302634" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2018.07.010" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219018302634?idApp=UINPBA000044" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0001731018302461?idApp=UINPBA000044" "url" => "/00017310/0000010900000008/v1_201810020614/S0001731018302461/v1_201810020614/es/main.assets" ] ] "itemSiguiente" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1578219018302646" "issn" => "15782190" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2018.07.011" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2018-10-01" "aid" => "1973" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and AEDV" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018;109:708-11" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 1 "HTML" => 1 ] "en" => array:11 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">History and Humanities in Dermatology</span>" "titulo" => "The Library of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV)" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "708" "paginaFinal" => "711" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Biblioteca de la Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología" ] ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 953 "Ancho" => 1250 "Tamanyo" => 234586 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">The library of the Spanish Academy of Dermatology and Venereology (AEDV) when it was at housed at the Olavide Dispensary, until 1993, at Calle Sandoval, number 7, in Madrid.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "L. Conde Salazar, D. Aranda, A. Maruri" "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "L." "apellidos" => "Conde Salazar" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "D." "apellidos" => "Aranda" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Maruri" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S0001731018302114" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ad.2018.03.018" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S0001731018302114?idApp=UINPBA000044" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219018302646?idApp=UINPBA000044" "url" => "/15782190/0000010900000008/v1_201810020631/S1578219018302646/v1_201810020631/en/main.assets" ] "itemAnterior" => array:19 [ "pii" => "S1578219018302737" "issn" => "15782190" "doi" => "10.1016/j.adengl.2018.07.020" "estado" => "S300" "fechaPublicacion" => "2018-10-01" "aid" => "1995" "copyright" => "Elsevier España, S.L.U. and AEDV" "documento" => "article" "crossmark" => 1 "subdocumento" => "ssu" "cita" => "Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018;109:687-98" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:2 [ "total" => 3 "HTML" => 3 ] "en" => array:13 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Review</span>" "titulo" => "Epidermal Nevi and Related Syndromes —Part 2: Nevi Derived from Adnexal Structures" "tienePdf" => "en" "tieneTextoCompleto" => "en" "tieneResumen" => array:2 [ 0 => "en" 1 => "es" ] "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "687" "paginaFinal" => "698" ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Nevus epidérmicos y síndromes relacionados. Parte 2: Nevus derivados de estructuras anexiales" ] ] "contieneResumen" => array:2 [ "en" => true "es" => true ] "contieneTextoCompleto" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "contienePdf" => array:1 [ "en" => true ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 0 "multimedia" => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 1146 "Ancho" => 750 "Tamanyo" => 158572 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Linear nevus sebaceus in a 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>year old patient. Note the papillomatous appearance and the yellowish color.</p>" ] ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "autoresLista" => "J. Garcias-Ladaria, M. Cuadrado Rosón, M. Pascual-López" "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "J." "apellidos" => "Garcias-Ladaria" ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Cuadrado Rosón" ] 2 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Pascual-López" ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "Traduccion" => array:1 [ "es" => array:9 [ "pii" => "S000173101830259X" "doi" => "10.1016/j.ad.2018.05.004" "estado" => "S300" "subdocumento" => "" "abierto" => array:3 [ "ES" => true "ES2" => true "LATM" => true ] "gratuito" => true "lecturas" => array:1 [ "total" => 0 ] "idiomaDefecto" => "es" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S000173101830259X?idApp=UINPBA000044" ] ] "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219018302737?idApp=UINPBA000044" "url" => "/15782190/0000010900000008/v1_201810020631/S1578219018302737/v1_201810020631/en/main.assets" ] "en" => array:21 [ "idiomaDefecto" => true "cabecera" => "<span class="elsevierStyleTextfn">Practical Dermatology</span>" "titulo" => "Cutaneous Adverse Drug Reactions: How to Identify the Trigger" "tieneTextoCompleto" => true "paginas" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "paginaInicial" => "699" "paginaFinal" => "707" ] ] "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "autoresLista" => "A. Zambernardi, M. Label" "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => array:4 [ "nombre" => "A." "apellidos" => "Zambernardi" "email" => array:1 [ 0 => "ma.zambernardi@gmail.com" ] "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSup">*</span>" "identificador" => "cor0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:2 [ "nombre" => "M." "apellidos" => "Label" ] ] "afiliaciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "entidad" => "Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital Ramos Mejía, Ciudad de Buenos Aires, Argentina" "identificador" => "aff0005" ] ] "correspondencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "cor0005" "etiqueta" => "⁎" "correspondencia" => "Corresponding author." ] ] ] ] "titulosAlternativos" => array:1 [ "es" => array:1 [ "titulo" => "Reacciones cutáneas adversas a medicamentos: cómo identificar el desencadenante" ] ] "resumenGrafico" => array:2 [ "original" => 1 "multimedia" => array:5 [ "identificador" => "fig0040" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "fx1.jpeg" "Alto" => 541 "Ancho" => 1333 "Tamanyo" => 56850 ] ] ] ] "textoCompleto" => "<span class="elsevierStyleSections"><span id="sec0005" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0030">Introduction</span><p id="par0005" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The World Health Organization (WHO) defines an adverse drug reaction (ADR) as a response to a drug that is noxious and unintended and that occurs at doses normally used in man for the prophylaxis, diagnosis, or therapy of disease, or for the modification of physiological function.</p><p id="par0010" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The WHO classifies ADRs according to their pathophysiological mechanism from A to F. Type B reactions cannot be predicted by the drug's mechanism of action and depend on patient susceptibility. They are known as idiosyncratic reactions and may be immune-mediated or non–immune-mediated (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0005">Fig. 1</a>).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0090"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">1</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0005"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0015" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The manifestations of ADRs are very varied, and skin involvement is the most frequent. A cutaneous ADR (cADR) is defined as one that affects the skin and/or mucous membrane or adnexa.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0095"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span></a> cADRs are classified in different ways. <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Figure 2</a> shows the various entities according to their clinical severity (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0010">Fig. 2</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0010"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0020" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">It is estimated that 10% to 15% of medicated patients develop ADRs,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0100"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">3</span></a> which account for 3.5% of admissions in Europe.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0105"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">4</span></a> In the United States of America, it is calculated that 197 000 people die of ADRs every year. Despite the high prevalence of ADRs, identification of the causal agent continues to hamper diagnosis.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a></p><p id="par0025" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Our objective was to update the tools used to identify the trigger of type B cADRs that compromise the skin and/or mucous membranes in order to optimize follow-up and patient quality of life (see additional material in <a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#sec0110">Appendix 1</a>).</p><span id="sec0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0035">Pathophysiology of adverse drug reactions: immunological aspects</span><p id="par0030" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Some pathophysiological mechanisms, such as drug hypersensitivity reactions (DHRs) are well described.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a> Others, such as induction of drug-induced autoimmune syndromes (lupus erythematosus, bullous pemphigoid, and immunoglobulin [Ig] A bullous dermatosis), fixed pigmented eruption, and nonimmune anaphylaxis, are not known in detail.</p><p id="par0035" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Immune-mediated type B ADRs are currently classified into 3 groups<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a>: DHRs or allergies, pharmacological interaction of drugs with immune receptor (P-i) reactions (independent of antigen presentation), and pseudoallergies (non–IgE-mediated anaphylaxis-type reactions).</p><span id="sec0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0040">Drug hypersensitivity reactions (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>)</span><p id="par0040" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">DHRs affect more than 6% of the population.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a><a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0015"></elsevierMultimedia><p id="par0045" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">All hypersensitivity reactions commence with a sensitization stage involving the antigen, the cell that processes it and presents in its HLA (presenting cell), and the T lymphocyte that recognizes it via the T-cell receptor (TCR). The initial link between these 3 elements constitutes a trimolecular complex (HLA-antigen-TCR), which is known as the “first signal”. This interaction leads to a series of molecular changes known as the “second signal”. These changes determine a cellular or humoral effector response (mediated by T or B lymphocytes) and the generation of antigen-specific immunological memory. When drugs behave as antigens (or haptens), they can trigger ADRs. There are different types of hypersensitivity reactions. The Gell and Coombs classification, which was modified by Pichler,<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0120"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">7</span></a> summarizes the pathophysiological mechanisms of DHRs (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0020">Fig. 4</a>). The type of reaction triggered is determined mainly by the nature of the antigen and the cytokine environment. The latter varies depending on the functional profile of the organ involved in the reaction, the route of administration of the drug, and the immunological activation status of the individual. For example, drugs with antigenic properties that are administered via the skin or mucous membrane come into contact—in both cases—with interface or border tissues that are very rich in immune cells but physiologically adapted to fulfill various functions (different functional profile). Activation of intraepithelial lymphocytes in the skin is associated with opsonization and inflammatory defense profiles, whereas the mucous membrane of the digestive tract is associated with the development of neutralization and tolerance responses via activation of type 3 helper T cells, regulatory T cells, and abundant IgA (neutralizing globulin). However, when the mucous barrier is altered and becomes inflammatory (individual immune activation status) or the patient's modulatory mechanisms fail, the patient is prone to lose peripheral tolerance and develop hypersensitivity responses. This is how an antigen that has entered the body via the digestive tract can become an allergen and induce symptoms locally or at a distance. The same occurs with the skin, for example, when the skin barrier is altered, as is the case in atopic dermatitis, and becomes more susceptible to allergic contact dermatitis (type IV-A hypersensitivity reaction).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0125"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">8</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0020"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0020" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0045">P-i concept: independence from antigen presentation (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>)</span><p id="par0050" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">This concept can be used to explain type B ADRs that lack a sensitization stage. In these cases, it is postulated that the first signal is given by the direct interaction between HLA and the drug or between the TCR and the drug, regardless of processing and presentation by a presenting cell, thus constituting a reversible biomolecular complex, in contrast with the classic trimolecular presentation of ADRs. In P-i reactions, several theories have been put forward in the absence of an effect of the presenting cell for development of the second signal, as follows: (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">1</span>) P-i reactions only occur in T cells stimulated by another antigen (chronic infections, autoimmune diseases); (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">2</span>) the drug binds to HLA and leads to a change in the conformation, thus generating new HLA for which the individual does not present tolerance (e.g., in the response to alloantigens in organ transplantation)<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a>; and (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">3</span>) the second signal is given by the interaction between the drug itself and the target receptor, when this acts on presenting cells.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0135"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">10</span></a> The effector cell can be activated by any of these 3 mechanisms. Unlike hypersensitivity reactions, P-i reactions only activate cellular T lymphocyte–mediated but not humoral responses. Clinically, these can present as any cellular immunity–mediated ADRs such as maculopapular rash, Stevens-Johnson syndrome (SJS), toxic epidermal necrolysis (TEN), and drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0115"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">6</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0025" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0050">Pseudoallergies (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0015">Fig. 3</a>)</span><p id="par0055" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Pseudoallergies are similar to type 1 ADRs and are caused by degranulation of mast cells and basophils, although via IgE-independent mechanisms. These reactions include red man syndrome caused by rapid infusion of vancomycin and are associated with drugs classed as histamine releasers, such as plasma expanders, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and pyrazolones. Little is known about the pathophysiology of these reactions, and there are no specific tests for studying them.</p></span></span><span id="sec0030" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0055">Clinical approach to adverse drug reactions</span><p id="par0060" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">While this article is not aimed at addressing treatment of cADRs, it is important to remember that severe cADRs make it necessary to act based on clinical suspicion. Administration of the suspect agent should be stopped immediately, without waiting for confirmation.</p><span id="sec0035" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0060">Appropriate clinical history</span><p id="par0065" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The clinical history should be aimed at identifying the drug.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5</span></a> The main information to be included is as follows:<ul class="elsevierStyleList" id="lis0005"><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0005"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0070" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Exhaustive information on the event.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0010"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0075" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Possible trigger(s). Drug, herb, or homeopathic formulation, exposure to chemicals at work or with hobbies.</p></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0015"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0080" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">For each suspect drug, it is essential to determine the causal relationship with the reaction (Naranjo scale [<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0025">Fig. 5</a>]).<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0140"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">11</span></a></p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0025"></elsevierMultimedia></li><li class="elsevierStyleListItem" id="lsti0020"><span class="elsevierStyleLabel">•</span><p id="par0085" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The clinical presentation of the episode and the temporal link with the suspect drug make it possible to assume the pathogenic mechanism involved.</p></li></ul></p><p id="par0090" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">If the analysis of causality remains unclear with respect to identification of the trigger agent, we can turn to diagnostic tests. These are used only when there is no equally effective pharmacological alternative to the drug and the risk-benefit ratio is favorable. We should wait 4 to 6 weeks to ensure complete resolution, and the patient should be totally stable and free from immunosuppressive medication or cardiovascular modulators (ß-blockers) for immediate reactions. No study will be carried out in the following cases: (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">a</span>) error in determining a causal or etiological relationship (in time, with postreaction tolerance, reaction without exposure); (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">b</span>) when an alternative diagnosis can explain the reaction (viral eruption); and (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">c</span>) in the case of a possible uncontrollable and potentially life-threatening severe reaction; (<span class="elsevierStyleItalic">d</span>) DHR testing is never carried out before exposure.</p></span><span id="sec0040" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0065">In vivo studies for identification of the drug triggering a hypersensitivity reaction<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0110"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">5,12,13</span></a></span><span id="sec0045" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0070">Prick test</span><p id="par0095" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Prick test is the approach of choice for type 1 DHRs. The injectable drug is applied on the volar aspect of the forearm by means of a superficial puncture. The test can be performed with the suspect agent, although the most suitable approach is to use the active ingredient and the excipients separately. In the case of urticarial reactions, the test should start with serial dilutions (10<span class="elsevierStyleSup">-3</span>, 10<span class="elsevierStyleSup">-2</span>, 10<span class="elsevierStyleSup">-1</span>). Controls should be applied, as follows: negative (with physiological saline 0.9%) and positive (with histamine at 10<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mg/mL). A positive response is defined as a wheal at the puncture site that is 3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm in diameter after 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>minutes and no reaction with the negative control. This result confirms a type 1 DHR; the presence of specific IgE is shown in vivo. If the drug is a histamine releaser, then the result could be a false positive caused by pseudoallergy. A negative result in the prick test never rules out a causal relationship (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0030">Fig. 6</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0030"></elsevierMultimedia></span><span id="sec0050" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0075">Intradermal test</span><p id="par0100" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Intradermal testing is performed if the result of the prick test is negative and there is strong clinical suspicion of a type 1 DHR. The drug should be applied at the concentrations stipulated in international guidelines. Dilutions should be prepared with physiological saline 0.9% within 2<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours before application and under aseptic conditions with a laminar flow hood. If the test dilution is not described, then the test should start with a concentration of 10<span class="elsevierStyleSup">-4</span>, which should gradually be decreased by 1 decimal place to no more than 0.04<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mL of solution injected by puncture. This generates an intradermal wheal measuring 4 to 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>mm in diameter. The reading is at 30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>minutes, 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours, and 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours. The patient remains under observation during the first 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours, with specific monitoring of heart rate and blood pressure. The test should be performed using a peripheral venous access and infusion of glucose solution. If a 10-mm wheal is generated at 30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>minutes, the result is considered positive. If there is no reaction after 30<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>minutes, the concentration can be increased until the pure concentration is reached. A reaction during the first 6<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours confirms a type 1 DHR. It is also important to take into account the possibility of false positives caused by pseudoallergy. When the reaction is late, then the DHR is delayed, the size of the wheal should be recorded in the clinical history, and the patient should be followed up at 1 week. If an early reaction is negative, then the patient should be contacted at 1 week to confirm the negative result. A negative result does not rule out a causal relationship (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0030">Fig. 6</a>).</p></span><span id="sec0055" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0080">Patch test</span><p id="par0105" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The patch test is the approach of choice when a delayed reaction is suspected. Although less sensitive than the previous 2 options, it can be an alternative if no injectable formulation is available. Ideally, the active ingredient should be tested separately from the excipients. The concentration to be tested is standardized. If this is not known, the pure drug is formulated at 5% or 10%. If the pure drug is not available (active ingredient), the suspect pharmaceutical formulation can be tested at a maximum of 30%, and the formulation cannot be stored for more than 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours. If the capsule is available, it should be hydrated and dissolved so that it can be tested separately from its content. In this case, if the suspect pharmaceutical formulation is used in the case of a positive result, we cannot determine whether the allergen is an excipient or the active ingredient. In order to reduce the risk of false positives caused by irritation, the drugs should be formulated in petrolatum and/or distilled water. If a commercial system is not used, then the in-house product should be prepared with care (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0030">Fig. 6</a>). The formulation should be applied on healthy skin of the forearm or back, and the first reading should be taken after 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>minutes. This rules out the possibility of immediate allergy or irritant reaction. The patch is occluded for 48<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours, after which time it is uncovered, the residue is removed without rubbing, the skin is left open to the air for 20<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>minutes, and the first late reading is made. Readings are then taken at 72 or 96<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours and at 1 week. If drug-induced photoallergy is suspected, the drug should be tested in a patch and with photostimulation at 48<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours (UV-A 5<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>J/cm<span class="elsevierStyleSup">2</span>) in a separate patch. In the case of fixed pigmented erythema, one patch should be placed over healthy skin and another in the area of the fixed eruption. A positive response indicates a reaction ranging from a mild reaction with erythema and edema to an intense reaction with vesicles-blisters or erosions. Irrespective of the grade of the reaction, a positive patch test result confirms DHR. However, a negative result does not rule out a causal relationship. The patch test is useful for proving reactions such as maculopapular rash, acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic symptoms, and symmetrical drug-related intertriginous and flexural exanthema. Sensitivity varies with the drug and the clinical presentation of the reaction. In a series of 134 patients, Barbaud et al.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a> demonstrated that the overall sensitivity of the test was close to 60%. Sensitivity decreases in the case of macular exanthema (fixed pigmented erythema), urticarial reactions, and exfoliative forms (SSJ-TEN). Patch testing is not useful in organ-specific reactions.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0155"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">14</span></a></p></span><span id="sec0060" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0085">Controlled exposure testing</span><p id="par0110" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Controlled exposure testing is contraindicated in cases of severe cADR and should only be applied when it seems clinically improbable that the suspect drug is the trigger. In most cases, this exposure test occurs accidentally (ie, not under controlled conditions), when the patient is re-exposed to the drug inadvertently and reports recurrence of the symptoms. Controlled exposure is the only test in which a negative result rules out a causal relationship with the suspect drug. The drug is administered at increasing doses under the supervision of an allergologist or trained physician. Controlled exposure testing is the gold standard for establishing a causal relationship, despite the difficulties involved in performing it.</p></span></span><span id="sec0065" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0090">In vitro studies for identification of the triggering drug in drug hypersensitivity reactions<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0150"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">13</span></a></span><span id="sec0070" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0095">Basophil activation test</span><p id="par0115" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The basophil activation test is useful when the pharmaceutical formulation is not available in injectable solution and we need to test for a type 1 DHR. This test involves placing the patient's basophils in culture against the drug and measuring the expression of activation receptors (CD63, CD203) using flow cytometry. The probability of a causal relationship is expressed as positive or negative according to the percentage of cells that are activated.</p></span><span id="sec0075" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0100">Measurement of serum tryptase in peripheral blood</span><p id="par0120" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Measurement of serum tryptase is useful for type 1 DHRs. Tryptase is found in mast cell granules and is released after activation. The curve of the measurements is plotted at 15<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>minutes, 3<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours, and late at 24<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours after initiation of symptoms.</p></span><span id="sec0080" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0105">Measurement of specific immunoglobulin E</span><p id="par0125" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Specific IgE panels are more frequently used for foods or environmental allergens based on techniques such as radioimmunoassay or enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay. The panel for diagnosing drug allergy is fairly limited. In fact, a type 1 DHR does not always progress with increased IgE; therefore, a negative result does not always rule out a causal relationship.</p></span><span id="sec0085" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0110">Lymphocyte transformation test</span><p id="par0130" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The lymphocyte transformation test is useful in the case of suspected delayed reaction. It consists of the incubation of lymphocytes extracted from peripheral blood and the suspect drug after 48<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>hours to 7 days. The result is positive if there is proliferation of lymphoblasts. This is the test of choice for severe exfoliative delayed DHRs (SSJ/TEN) or specific organ reactions, since controlled exposure testing is contraindicated.</p></span></span><span id="sec0090" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0115">Genetic susceptibility studies</span><p id="par0135" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The association between specific HLAs and the risk of severe cADRs was demonstrated for some drugs in Asians. The presence of allele HLAB*5701 confirmed a positive predictive value of 100% and a negative predictive value of 97% for hypersensitivity reaction to abacavir, even in different ethnic groups, similar to the case of allopurinol and HLAB*5801. However, other associations are weaker when populations with different ancestries are compared.<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#bib0130"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">9</span></a></p><p id="par0140" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">In the first place, we should identify the real need to use a laboratory test to confirm the causal relationship after having applied the imputability analysis. Given this situation, and in accordance with the pathophysiological mechanism and the pharmaceutical formulation, the most appropriate test should be selected. It is important to take the patient's underlying conditions into account in order to avoid false negatives. It is worth noting that any positive test result is confirmatory, although negative results do not rule out a causal relationship, with the exception of controlled exposure tests<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRefs" href="#bib0160"><span class="elsevierStyleSup">15-17</span></a> (<a class="elsevierStyleCrossRef" href="#fig0035">Fig. 7</a>).</p><elsevierMultimedia ident="fig0035"></elsevierMultimedia></span></span></span><span id="sec0095" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0120">Conclusion</span><p id="par0145" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">Despite the high prevalence of cADRs and the importance of identifying the causal agent, reactions continue to be a challenge, especially in polymedicated patients. Unfortunately, no test is 100% sensitive and safe for the detection of the triggering drug. Therefore, all of the results recorded, ranging from the analysis of imputability to additional testing, are useful tools that enable us to verify a causal relationship with the suspect drug.</p><span id="sec0100" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><span class="elsevierStyleSectionTitle" id="sect0125">Conflicts of Interest</span><p id="par0150" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall">The authors declare that they have no conflicts of interest.</p></span></span></span>" "textoCompletoSecciones" => array:1 [ "secciones" => array:8 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1089640" "titulo" => "Graphical abstract" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0005" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1089639" "titulo" => "Abstract" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0010" ] ] ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1033043" "titulo" => "Keywords" ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "xres1089638" "titulo" => "Resumen" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "identificador" => "abst0015" ] ] ] 4 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1033042" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0005" "titulo" => "Introduction" "secciones" => array:2 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0010" "titulo" => "Pathophysiology of adverse drug reactions: immunological aspects" "secciones" => array:3 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0015" "titulo" => "Drug hypersensitivity reactions (Fig. 3)" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0020" "titulo" => "P-i concept: independence from antigen presentation (Fig. 3)" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0025" "titulo" => "Pseudoallergies (Fig. 3)" ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0030" "titulo" => "Clinical approach to adverse drug reactions" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0035" "titulo" => "Appropriate clinical history" ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0040" "titulo" => "In vivo studies for identification of the drug triggering a hypersensitivity reaction" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0045" "titulo" => "Prick test" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0050" "titulo" => "Intradermal test" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0055" "titulo" => "Patch test" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0060" "titulo" => "Controlled exposure testing" ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0065" "titulo" => "In vitro studies for identification of the triggering drug in drug hypersensitivity reactions" "secciones" => array:4 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0070" "titulo" => "Basophil activation test" ] 1 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0075" "titulo" => "Measurement of serum tryptase in peripheral blood" ] 2 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0080" "titulo" => "Measurement of specific immunoglobulin E" ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0085" "titulo" => "Lymphocyte transformation test" ] ] ] 3 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0090" "titulo" => "Genetic susceptibility studies" ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "sec0095" "titulo" => "Conclusion" "secciones" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "sec0100" "titulo" => "Conflicts of Interest" ] ] ] 7 => array:1 [ "titulo" => "References" ] ] ] "pdfFichero" => "main.pdf" "tienePdf" => true "fechaRecibido" => "2017-08-16" "fechaAceptado" => "2018-02-07" "PalabrasClave" => array:2 [ "en" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Keywords" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1033043" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Adverse drug reactions" 1 => "Drug-induced skin disorders" 2 => "Diagnostic methods" 3 => "Pharmacological Interaction of Drugs With Immune Receptors (P-i CONCEPT)" 4 => "Pseudoallergies" 5 => "Hypersensitivity reactions" ] ] ] "es" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "clase" => "keyword" "titulo" => "Palabras clave" "identificador" => "xpalclavsec1033042" "palabras" => array:6 [ 0 => "Reacciones adversas a medicamentos" 1 => "Farmacodermias" 2 => "Métodos de diagnósticos" 3 => "Interacción farmacológica de medicamentos con receptores inmunes (CONCEPTO P-I)" 4 => "Pseudoalergias" 5 => "Reacciones de hipersensibilidad" ] ] ] ] "tieneResumen" => true "resumen" => array:2 [ "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Abstract" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0010" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0010" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">It is estimated that 10% to 15% of medicated patients develop adverse drug reactions (ADR). Despite the high prevalence of ADR, the identification of the trigger drugs remains a medical challenge, mainly in polymedicated patients. Our goal is to update the diagnostic tools to identify enhancer drugs of type B-ADR that compromise the skin and/or mucous membranes, in order to optimize patients’ follow-up and improve their quality of life. We develop the review in two stages: I- we review the pathophysiological mechanisms of the ADR; II- we developed the clinical approach for the identification of the triggering drug.</p></span>" ] "es" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Resumen" "resumen" => "<span id="abst0015" class="elsevierStyleSection elsevierViewall"><p id="spar0015" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Entre el 10 al 15% de los pacientes medicados desarrollan reacciones adversas a medicamentos (RAM). A pesar de la alta prevalencia de RAM, la identificación del agente causal es un desafío diagnóstico y terapéutico, principalmente en pacientes que reciben múltiples medicamentos. Nuestro objetivo es actualizar los métodos de diagnóstico para identificar el fármaco desencadenante de RAM de tipo B que comprometa piel y/o mucosas, a fin de optimizar el seguimiento y la calidad de vida del paciente. Desarrollamos la revisión en dos etapas: I- repasamos los mecanismos fisiopatológicos de las RAM; II- desarrollamos el abordaje clínico para la identificación del desencadenante.</p></span>" ] ] "NotaPie" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etiqueta" => "☆" "nota" => "<p class="elsevierStyleNotepara" id="npar0005">Please cite this article as: Zambernardi A, Label M. Reacciones cutáneas adversas a medicamentos: cómo identificar el desencadenante. Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2018;109:699–707.</p>" ] ] "apendice" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "apendice" => "<p id="par0160" class="elsevierStylePara elsevierViewall"><elsevierMultimedia ident="upi0005"></elsevierMultimedia></p>" "etiqueta" => "Appendix A" "titulo" => "Supplementary data" "identificador" => "sec0110" ] ] ] ] "multimedia" => array:9 [ 0 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0005" "etiqueta" => "Figure 1" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr1.jpeg" "Alto" => 811 "Ancho" => 2081 "Tamanyo" => 108005 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0020" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">World Health Organization classification of the different types of adverse drug reactions. ADR indicates adverse drug reaction; DHR, drug hypersensitivity reaction.</p>" ] ] 1 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0010" "etiqueta" => "Figure 2" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr2.jpeg" "Alto" => 614 "Ancho" => 2083 "Tamanyo" => 129804 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0025" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Clinical classification of adverse drug reactions compromising the skin according to their severity.</p>" ] ] 2 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0015" "etiqueta" => "Figure 3" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr3.jpeg" "Alto" => 3932 "Ancho" => 2833 "Tamanyo" => 836512 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0030" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Pathophysiological model of adverse drug reactions. 1. Drug hypersensitivity reaction (DHR). 2. P-i concept. 3. Pseudoallergies. Ag indicates antigen; BL, B lymphocyte; CL, cytotoxic lymphocyte; CLA, cutaneous lymphocyte antigen; DC, dendritic cell; IEL, intraepithelial lymphocyte; IFN, interferon; Ig, immunoglobulin; IL, interleukin; PC, plasmocyte; T<span class="elsevierStyleInf">H</span>, helper T cell; TGF, transforming growth factor; TNF, tumor necrosis factor.</p>" ] ] 3 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0020" "etiqueta" => "Figure 4" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr4.jpeg" "Alto" => 1493 "Ancho" => 2500 "Tamanyo" => 362761 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0035" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Classification of hypersensitivity reactions according to the pathophysiology of adverse drug reactions. A, type I hypersensitivity reactions; B, type II hypersensitivity reactions; C, type III hypersensitivity reactions; D, type IVA, IVB, IVC, and IVD hypersensitivity reactions; Ab indicates antibody; Ag, antigen; AGEP<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis; CBZ, carbamazepine; DRESS, drug reaction with eosinophilia and systemic reactions; Ig, immunoglobulin; MC, monoclonal; MPR, maculopapular rash; NMB, neuromuscular blockers; NSAID, nonsteroidal anti-inflammatory drug; SJS-TEN, Stevens Johnson syndrome-toxic epidermal necrolysis; SS, serum sickness; U-V, urticaria-vasculitis.</p>" ] ] 4 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0025" "etiqueta" => "Figure 5" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr5.jpeg" "Alto" => 1503 "Ancho" => 2500 "Tamanyo" => 308840 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0040" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Naranjo scale for determination of the causal relationship between the suspect drug and the adverse reaction to the drug. Result: definite<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≥<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>9; probable<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≤<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>8<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>to<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≥<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>5; possible<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≤4<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>to<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>≥<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>1; improbable<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>=<span class="elsevierStyleHsp" style=""></span>0.</p>" ] ] 5 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0030" "etiqueta" => "Figure 6" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr6.jpeg" "Alto" => 2611 "Ancho" => 3000 "Tamanyo" => 409433 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0045" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Additional tests for the identification of the triggering drug in hypersensitivity reactions. Abbreviations: BAT, basophil activation test; IDT, intradermal testing; Ig, immunoglobulin; LTT, lymphocyte transformation test.</p>" ] ] 6 => array:7 [ "identificador" => "fig0035" "etiqueta" => "Figure 7" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => true "mostrarDisplay" => false "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "gr7.jpeg" "Alto" => 4011 "Ancho" => 2400 "Tamanyo" => 511152 ] ] "descripcion" => array:1 [ "en" => "<p id="spar0050" class="elsevierStyleSimplePara elsevierViewall">Algorithm for hypersensitivity testing for adverse drug reactions. Abbreviations: BAT indicates basophil activation test; IDR, intradermal reaction; CET, controlled exposure test; cADR, cutaneous adverse drug reaction; DHR, drug hypersensitivity reaction; IDT, intradermal test; LTT, lymphocyte transformation test.</p>" ] ] 7 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "upi0005" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAECOMPONENTE" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "Ecomponente" => array:2 [ "fichero" => "mmc1.docx" "ficheroTamanyo" => 324976 ] ] 8 => array:5 [ "identificador" => "fig0040" "tipo" => "MULTIMEDIAFIGURA" "mostrarFloat" => false "mostrarDisplay" => true "figura" => array:1 [ 0 => array:4 [ "imagen" => "fx1.jpeg" "Alto" => 541 "Ancho" => 1333 "Tamanyo" => 56850 ] ] ] ] "bibliografia" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "References" "seccion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "identificador" => "bibs0015" "bibliografiaReferencia" => array:17 [ 0 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0090" "etiqueta" => "1" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Adverse drug reactions: definitions, diagnosis, and management" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "I.R. Edwards" 1 => "J.K. Aronson" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02799-9" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Lancet." "fecha" => "2000" "volumen" => "356" "paginaInicial" => "1255" "paginaFinal" => "1259" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11072960" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 1 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0095" "etiqueta" => "2" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cutaneous adverse drug reaction profile in a tertiary care out patient setting in eastern India" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Saha" 1 => "N.K. Das" 2 => "A. Hazra" 3 => "R.C. Gharami" 4 => "S.N. Chowdhury" 5 => "P.K. Datta" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.4103/0253-7613.103304" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Indian J Pharmacol" "fecha" => "2012" "volumen" => "44" "paginaInicial" => "792" "paginaFinal" => "797" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23248414" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 2 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0100" "etiqueta" => "3" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Danger signs in drug hypersensitivity" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "K. Scherer" 1 => "A.J. Bircher" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.mcna.2010.04.007" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Med Clin North Am" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "94" "paginaInicial" => "681" "paginaFinal" => "689" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20609857" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 3 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0105" "etiqueta" => "4" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Epidemiology of adverse drug reactions in Europe: A review of recent observational studies" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "J.C. Bouvy" 1 => "M.L. de Bruin" 2 => "M.A. Koopmanschap" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s40264-015-0281-0" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Drug Safety" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "38" "paginaInicial" => "437" "paginaFinal" => "453" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25822400" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 4 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0110" "etiqueta" => "5" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "International consensus on drug allergy" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "P. Demoly" 1 => "N.F. Adkinson" 2 => "K. Brockow" 3 => "M. Castells" 4 => "A.M. Chiriac" 5 => "P.A. Greenberger" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/all.12350" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Allergy" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "69" "paginaInicial" => "420" "paginaFinal" => "437" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24697291" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 5 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0115" "etiqueta" => "6" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Classification of drug hypersensitivity into allergic, p-i, and pseudo-allergic forms" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "W.J. Pichler" 1 => "O. Hausmann" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1159/000453265" "Revista" => array:7 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int Arch Allergy Immunol" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "171" "numero" => "3–4" "paginaInicial" => "166" "paginaFinal" => "179" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27960170" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 6 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0120" "etiqueta" => "7" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Delayed drug hypersensitivity reactions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => "W.J. Pichler" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Ann Intern Med" "fecha" => "2003" "volumen" => "139" "paginaInicial" => "683" "paginaFinal" => "693" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14568857" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 7 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0125" "etiqueta" => "8" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Cutaneous delayed-type hypersensitivity in patients with atopic dermatitis: Reactivity to surfactants" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "C.N. Shaughnessy" 1 => "D. Malajian" 2 => "D.V. Belsito" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jaad.2013.12.009" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "2014" "volumen" => "70" "paginaInicial" => "704" "paginaFinal" => "708" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24507163" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 8 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0130" "etiqueta" => "9" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Drug hypersensitivity: Pharmacogenetics and clinical syndromes" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:5 [ 0 => "E.J. Phillips" 1 => "W.H. Chung" 2 => "M. Mockenhaupt" 3 => "J.C. Roujeau" 4 => "S.A. Mallal" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Allergy Clin Immunol" "fecha" => "2011" "volumen" => "127" "numero" => "3 Suppl" "paginaInicial" => "60" "paginaFinal" => "66" ] ] ] ] ] ] 9 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0135" "etiqueta" => "10" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Drug hypersensitivity reactions: pathomechanism and clinical symptoms" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "W.J. Pichler" 1 => "J. Adam" 2 => "B. Daubner" 3 => "T. Gentinetta" 4 => "M. Keller" 5 => "D. Yerly" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Medical Clin North Am" "fecha" => "2010" "volumen" => "94" "paginaInicial" => "645" "paginaFinal" => "664" ] ] ] ] ] ] 10 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0140" "etiqueta" => "11" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A method for estimating the probability of adverse drug reactions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "C.A. Naranjo" 1 => "U. Busto" 2 => "E.M. Sellers" 3 => "P. Sandor" 4 => "I. Ruiz" 5 => "E.A. Roberts" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:5 [ "tituloSerie" => "Clinical Pharmacol Ther" "fecha" => "1981" "volumen" => "30" "paginaInicial" => "239" "paginaFinal" => "245" ] ] ] ] ] ] 11 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0145" "etiqueta" => "12" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Guidelines for performing skin tests with drugs in the investigation of cutaneous adverse drug reactions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:4 [ 0 => "A. Barbaud" 1 => "M. Goncalo" 2 => "D. Bruynzeel" 3 => "A. Bircher" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Contact Dermatitis" "fecha" => "2001" "volumen" => "45" "paginaInicial" => "321" "paginaFinal" => "328" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11846746" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 12 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0150" "etiqueta" => "13" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:1 [ "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:3 [ "colaboracion" => "Guideline for the diagnosis of drug hypersensitivity reactions: S2K-Guideline of the German Society for Allergology and Clinical Immunology (DGAKI) and the German Dermatological Society (DDG) in collaboration with the Association of German Allergologists (AeDA), the German Society for Pediatric Allergology and Environmental Medicine (GPA), the German Contact Dermatitis Research Group (DKG), the Swiss Society for Allergy and Immunology (SGAI), the Austrian Society for Allergology and Immunology (OGAI), the German Academy of Allergology and Environmental Medicine (DAAU), the German Center for Documentation of Severe Skin Reactions and the German Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Products (BfArM)" "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "K. Brockow" 1 => "B. Przybilla" 2 => "W. Aberer" 3 => "A.J. Bircher" 4 => "R. Brehler" 5 => "H. Dickel" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s40629-015-0052-6" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Allergo J Int" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "24" "paginaInicial" => "94" "paginaFinal" => "105" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26120552" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 13 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0155" "etiqueta" => "14" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "A multicentre study to determine the value and safety of drug patch tests for the three main classes of severe cutaneous adverse drug reactions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => true "autores" => array:6 [ 0 => "A. Barbaud" 1 => "E. Collet" 2 => "B. Milpied" 3 => "H. Assier" 4 => "D. Staumont" 5 => "M. Avenel-Audran" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/bjd.12125" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Br J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2013" "volumen" => "168" "paginaInicial" => "555" "paginaFinal" => "562" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23136927" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 14 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0160" "etiqueta" => "15" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Ausloser von Arzneiexanthemen: Absetzen, durchbehandeln oder desensibilisieren?" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "M. Absmaier" 1 => "T. Biedermann" 2 => "K. Brockow" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1007/s00105-016-3907-y" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Hautarzt" "fecha" => "2017" "volumen" => "68" "paginaInicial" => "29" "paginaFinal" => "35" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27986978" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 15 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0165" "etiqueta" => "16" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Acute generalized exanthematous pustulosis (AGEP): A review and update" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:2 [ 0 => "J. Szatkowski" 1 => "R.A. Schwartz" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1016/j.jaad.2015.07.017" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "J Am Acad Dermatol" "fecha" => "2015" "volumen" => "73" "paginaInicial" => "843" "paginaFinal" => "848" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26354880" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] 16 => array:3 [ "identificador" => "bib0170" "etiqueta" => "17" "referencia" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "contribucion" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "titulo" => "The use of patch tests in the diagnosis of delayed hypersensitivity drug eruptions" "autores" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "etal" => false "autores" => array:3 [ 0 => "N. Hassoun-Kheir" 1 => "R. Bergman" 2 => "S. Weltfriend" ] ] ] ] ] "host" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "doi" => "10.1111/ijd.13306" "Revista" => array:6 [ "tituloSerie" => "Int J Dermatol" "fecha" => "2016" "volumen" => "55" "paginaInicial" => "1219" "paginaFinal" => "1224" "link" => array:1 [ 0 => array:2 [ "url" => "https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27368159" "web" => "Medline" ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" "url" => "/15782190/0000010900000008/v1_201810020631/S1578219018302634/v1_201810020631/en/main.assets" "Apartado" => array:4 [ "identificador" => "6151" "tipo" => "SECCION" "en" => array:2 [ "titulo" => "Practical Dermatology" "idiomaDefecto" => true ] "idiomaDefecto" => "en" ] "PDF" => "https://static.elsevier.es/multimedia/15782190/0000010900000008/v1_201810020631/S1578219018302634/v1_201810020631/en/main.pdf?idApp=UINPBA000044&text.app=https://actasdermo.org/" "EPUB" => "https://multimedia.elsevier.es/PublicationsMultimediaV1/item/epub/S1578219018302634?idApp=UINPBA000044" ]
| Year/Month | Html | Total | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 November | 15 | 8 | 23 |
| 2024 October | 139 | 70 | 209 |
| 2024 September | 186 | 49 | 235 |
| 2024 August | 160 | 75 | 235 |
| 2024 July | 136 | 49 | 185 |
| 2024 June | 174 | 56 | 230 |
| 2024 May | 137 | 65 | 202 |
| 2024 April | 137 | 38 | 175 |
| 2024 March | 116 | 34 | 150 |
| 2024 February | 149 | 49 | 198 |
| 2024 January | 147 | 64 | 211 |
| 2023 December | 161 | 33 | 194 |
| 2023 November | 202 | 52 | 254 |
| 2023 October | 168 | 41 | 209 |
| 2023 September | 149 | 49 | 198 |
| 2023 August | 135 | 43 | 178 |
| 2023 July | 160 | 51 | 211 |
| 2023 June | 109 | 55 | 164 |
| 2023 May | 145 | 44 | 189 |
| 2023 April | 102 | 36 | 138 |
| 2023 March | 164 | 31 | 195 |
| 2023 February | 147 | 43 | 190 |
| 2023 January | 144 | 45 | 189 |
| 2022 December | 193 | 43 | 236 |
| 2022 November | 152 | 35 | 187 |
| 2022 October | 128 | 51 | 179 |
| 2022 September | 138 | 52 | 190 |
| 2022 August | 70 | 45 | 115 |
| 2022 July | 73 | 56 | 129 |
| 2022 June | 75 | 47 | 122 |
| 2022 May | 157 | 59 | 216 |
| 2022 April | 160 | 59 | 219 |
| 2022 March | 163 | 80 | 243 |
| 2022 February | 174 | 78 | 252 |
| 2022 January | 200 | 63 | 263 |
| 2021 December | 126 | 58 | 184 |
| 2021 November | 117 | 76 | 193 |
| 2021 October | 152 | 79 | 231 |
| 2021 September | 120 | 64 | 184 |
| 2021 August | 119 | 52 | 171 |
| 2021 July | 189 | 53 | 242 |
| 2021 June | 118 | 58 | 176 |
| 2021 May | 132 | 59 | 191 |
| 2021 April | 280 | 104 | 384 |
| 2021 March | 138 | 73 | 211 |
| 2021 February | 87 | 64 | 151 |
| 2021 January | 82 | 39 | 121 |
| 2020 December | 53 | 38 | 91 |
| 2020 November | 63 | 47 | 110 |
| 2020 October | 49 | 27 | 76 |
| 2020 September | 51 | 34 | 85 |
| 2020 August | 54 | 27 | 81 |
| 2020 July | 36 | 32 | 68 |
| 2020 June | 37 | 33 | 70 |
| 2020 May | 22 | 22 | 44 |
| 2020 April | 16 | 12 | 28 |
| 2020 March | 16 | 12 | 28 |
| 2020 February | 2 | 0 | 2 |
| 2019 April | 1 | 0 | 1 |
| 2019 March | 1 | 0 | 1 |
Show all
