Elsevier

Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease

Volume 24, July–August 2018, Pages 31-36
Travel Medicine and Infectious Disease

Use of the intramuscular route to administer pentamidine isethionate in Leishmania guyanensis cutaneous leishmaniasis increases the risk of treatment failure

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tmaid.2018.02.010Get rights and content

Abstract

Background

New world cutaneous leishmaniasis (NWCL) can be found in French Guiana as well as in several other parts of Central and South America. Leishmania guyanensis accounts for nearly 90% of cases in French Guiana and is treated with pentamidine isethionate, given by either intramuscular or intravenous injection. The military population is particularly exposed due to repeated missions in the rainforest. The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors associated with pentamidine isethionate treatment failure in a series of service members with L. guyanensis NWCL acquired in French Guiana.

Method

All the French service members reported as having acquired leishmaniasis in French Guiana from December 2013 to June 2016 were included.

Results

Seventy-three patients infected with L. guyanensis were included in the final analysis. Patients treated with IV pentamidine isethionate had better response rates than those treated with IM pentamidine isethionate (p = 0.002, adjusted odds ratio (AOR) = 0.15, 95% CI [0.04–0.50]). The rate of treatment success was 85.3% (95% CI [68.9–95.0]) for IV pentamidine isethionate and 51.3% (95% CI [34.8–67.6]) for IM pentamidine isethionate.

Conclusions

The use of intramuscular pentamidine isethionate in the treatment of Leishmania guyanensis cutaneous leishmaniasis is associated with more treatment failures than intravenous pentamidine isethionate.

Introduction

Cutaneous leishmaniasis seems to be a growing concern in endemic countries [1] and among travelers [2]. New world cutaneous leishmaniasis (NWCL), also called American tegumentary leishmaniasis, is endemic in several parts of Central and South America. In French Guiana, a French overseas entity in South America located between Suriname and Brazil, five species of parasite are known to infect humans: Leishmania guyanensis, L. braziliensis, L. amazonensis, L. lainsoni, and L. naiffi [3]. L. guyanensis, a species of the Viannia subgenus, is restricted to the rainforests of Brazil, Colombia, Guyana, Suriname, and French Guiana. It is the predominant species in French Guiana, accounting for nearly 90% of cases [3,4]. It is transmitted by a sand fly vector, Lutzomyia umbratilis. The main reservoir is the two-toed sloth (Choleopus didactylus) [5].

In French Guiana, the military population is particularly exposed to the parasite's life cycle during repeated missions in the rainforest to control illegal gold mining [6], and even more during training periods at the Tropical Forest Training Center (Global Positioning System decimal degrees: 4.281285, −52.157639), a historical focus of NWCL [[7], [8], [9]]. Service members are trained there for several weeks and are exposed to the sand flies through various physical activities (including tree felling), occasionally at night.

Each year, fluctuations in incidence depend on the occurrence of military activities during seasonal peaks in the parasite's life cycle, which usually occur during the first semester, and on occasional outbreaks when preventive measures are misapplied [[7], [8], [9], [10]]. Since each service member diagnosed with NWCL becomes unavailable until cured, the disease can strongly impact military operational capabilities. Therefore, the French Military Health Service is looking for the most effective and simple treatment to limit the period of unavailability.

Only a few studies have addressed improvement following treatment for NWCL in French Guiana [[9], [10], [11]]. The reported rates of treatment success vary widely. It was 89% in a study by Nacher et al., in 2001 [12] and 58% in a study by Neves et al., in 2011 after one round of treatment [13]. The current French treatment recommendations for L. guyanensis are to use intravenous (IV) or intramuscular (IM) pentamidine isethionate [5]. The choice of route of administration is left to the judgment of the physician. In fact, IM treatment is chosen in a large majority of cases [14]. In French Guiana, the habitual procedure is to use IM treatment because the most exposed populations in the forest are migrants, illegal gold miners who are usually poorly compliant and can be reluctant to be hospitalized. The IV route of administration for pentamidine isethionate is the preferred one in the United States and Canada according to the recent Infectious Diseases Society of America and American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene guidelines, but without any study to support this choice [15]. Thus, evidence about the effect of the route of pentamidine isethionate administration on the treatment of NWCL due to L. guyanensis is needed.

Several factors are associated with treatment failure: geographic distribution [15], Leishmania species [15,16], meteorological parameters [17], dissemination [12], higher number of lesions [14,18], younger age [18], early or delayed treatment [18,19], shorter duration of exposure in an endemic region [18], intralesional interleukin-10 and Foxp3 mRNA expression [20], and HIV co-infection [21]. Some of these factors may appear paradoxical and could account for a poor immune response [22].

In addition, Leishmania guyanensis, L. braziliensis, L. amazonensis, and L. lainsoni can be infected by a virus belonging to the Totiviridae family: Leishmania RNA virus type 1 (LRV). It was discovered in 1988 in a sample originally isolated from a visitor to Suriname [23]. The presence of this virus in the parasites seems to influence the cure rate [14,18,24,25]. The infected parasites tend to spread, and Bourreau et al. have shown that the presence of the virus increases the risk of treatment failure and relapse [14].

The purpose of the present study was to identify the factors associated with pentamidine isethionate treatment failure in a series of service members with L. guyanensis NWCL acquired in French Guiana.

Section snippets

Study design

This study is a case series. Diagnostic samples and treatment were performed in the context of routine care. Data were then collected with patient consent. The end-point was defined as patient recovery, confirmed by the epithelialization of the lesion, measured six weeks after the beginning of treatment.

Diagnosis and case definition

A complete diagnostic strategy was used for all patients in French Guiana: direct smear examination and two intra-lesional punch biopsies for species diagnosis (culture, PCR) and LRV diagnosis

Results

Ninety-seven patients were included (Fig. 1), 50 in French Guiana and 47 in continental France. Five were included in 2013, 53 in 2014, 22 in 2015, and 17 in 2016.

Among the 91 patients for whom species identification was available, 78 (86%) were infected with L. guyanensis, 12 (13%) with L. braziliensis, and 1 (1%) with L. naiffi.

The suspected areas of contamination are shown in Fig. 2. The main area of contamination, with 46 cases, was Régina, where the Tropical Forest Training Center is

Discussion

The present study shows that use of the IM route of administration for pentamidine isethionate in the treatment of Leishmania guyanensis cutaneous leishmaniasis was associated with more treatment failures at six weeks. The advantage of the IV strategy for the patient is obvious, as it led to a faster cure, of particular importance for a disease that can be an esthetic challenge. It is also beneficial for military forces, since it enables them to be maintained in a better operational condition:

Funding

This work was supported by the French Military Health Service. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.

Conflicts of interest

The authors declare that there are no conflicts of interest.

Acknowledgments

The opinions or assertions expressed here are the personal views of the authors and should not be considered official or as a reflection of the views of the French Military Health Service.

References (36)

  • C. Karimkhani et al.

    Global burden of cutaneous leishmaniasis: a cross-sectional analysis from the Global Burden of Disease Study 2013

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2016)
  • E. Schwartz et al.

    New world cutaneous leishmaniasis in travellers

    Lancet Infect Dis

    (2006)
  • J.-P. Dedet et al.

    Epidemiology of autochthonous leishmaniasis in France

    Presse Med

    (2013)
  • S. Simon et al.

    Cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana: revising epidemiology with PCR-RFLP

    Trop Med Health

    (2017)
  • P.A. Buffet et al.

    Therapy of leishmaniasis in France: consensus on proposed guidelines

    Presse Med

    (2011)
  • B. Rotureau et al.

    Leishmaniasis among gold miners, French Guiana

    Emerg Infect Dis

    (2006)
  • F. Berger et al.

    Outbreak of cutaneous leishmaniasis in military population coming back from French Guiana

    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique

    (2006)
  • S. Banzet

    Epidemics of cutaneous leishmaniasis in military personnel working in French Guiana

    Med Trop

    (2000)
  • E. Lightburn et al.

    Epidemiologic surveillance of cutaneous leishmaniasis in Guiana. Summary of military data collected over 10 years

    Med Trop

    (2002)
  • M. Nacher et al.

    Seasonal fluctuations of incubation, healing delays, and clinical presentation of cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana

    J Parasitol

    (2001)
  • S. Simon et al.

    Leishmania spp. identification by polymerase chain reaction-restriction fragment length polymorphism analysis and its applications in French Guiana

    Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis

    (2010)
  • M. Nacher et al.

    Influence of clinical presentation on the efficacy of a short course of pentamidine in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol

    (2001)
  • L.O. Neves et al.

    A randomized clinical trial comparing meglumine antimoniate, pentamidine and amphotericin B for the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis by Leishmania guyanensis

    An Bras Dermatol

    (2011)
  • E. Bourreau et al.

    Presence of Leishmania RNA Virus 1 in Leishmania guyanensis increases the risk of first-line treatment failure and symptomatic relapse

    J Infect Dis

    (2016)
  • N. Aronson et al.

    Diagnosis and treatment of leishmaniasis: clinical practice guidelines by the infectious diseases society of America (IDSA) and the american society of tropical medicine and Hygiene (ASTMH)

    Clin Infect Dis

    (2016)
  • G.A. Romero et al.

    Comparison of cutaneous leishmaniasis due to Leishmania (Viannia) braziliensis and L. (V.) guyanensis in Brazil: therapeutic response to meglumine antimoniate

    Am J Trop Med Hyg

    (2001)
  • M. Nacher et al.

    Influence of meteorological parameters on the clinical presentation of cutaneous leishmaniasis in French Guiana and on the efficacy of pentamidine treatment of the disease

    Ann Trop Med Parasitol

    (2002)
  • V. Adaui et al.

    Association of the endobiont double-stranded RNA Virus LRV1 with treatment failure for human leishmaniasis caused by Leishmania braziliensis in Peru and Bolivia

    J Infect Dis

    (2016)
  • Cited by (24)

    • Amphotericin-B-loaded polymer-functionalized reduced graphene oxides for Leishmania amazonensis chemo-photothermal therapy

      2022, Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces
      Citation Excerpt :

      Pentavalent antimonials have been the mainstay of antileishmanial treatment for decades, but they are very toxic, and their systemic administration for long periods can be a risk to patients. Other therapeutic options include intramuscular or intralesional local injection of meglumine antimoniate, pentamidine, amphotericin B, and miltefosine, but the treatment is very painful, and some patients give up before they are healed [6–9]. Topical treatment associated with photodynamic therapy [10], thermotherapy (by radiofrequency, ultrasound or infrared heat) [11–13] and antileishmanial drug delivery systems [14–17], is attractive and less painful choices.

    • An appraisal of the scientific current situation and new perspectives in the treatment of cutaneous leishmaniasis

      2021, Acta Tropica
      Citation Excerpt :

      Probably for this reason there are only two publications based on this drug. One of the studies is aimed at identifying the main factors associated with the PMD treatment failure in patients with L. guyanensis (Christen et al., 2018), while the other one evaluated the efficacy and safety of a single, two or three doses of PMD with intervals of a week between doses (Gadelha et al., 2018). These authors found that the cure rates were significantly higher when the patients received two or three PMD doses.

    • Cutaneous and Mucocutaneous Leishmaniasis

      2021, Actas Dermo-Sifiliograficas
    • Leishmaniavirus genetic diversity is not related to leishmaniasis treatment failure

      2021, Clinical Microbiology and Infection
      Citation Excerpt :

      In humans, LRV1 appears to be a predictive factor of first-line treatment failure and symptomatic relapses [9]. However, a recent study has suggested otherwise [10]. Here, we aim to determine whether the presence of LRV1 or one of its genotypes correlates with treatment failure.

    • Drug resistance and repurposing of existing drugs in Leishmaniasis

      2021, Pathogenesis, Treatment and Prevention of Leishmaniasis
    View all citing articles on Scopus
    1

    Dr. Pommier de Santi and Dr. Briolant contributed equally to this work.

    View full text