Elsevier

Journal of Autoimmunity

Volume 93, September 2018, Pages 1-15
Journal of Autoimmunity

A comprehensive review of immune-mediated dermatopathology in systemic lupus erythematosus

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaut.2018.07.007Get rights and content

Highlights

  • In the part of epidemiology, we compare the differences between CLE and SLE, which will give a better understanding of lupus.

  • We make a review about lupus-associated risk gene and epigenetic dysregulation, some of which are considered potential biomarkers for the diagnosis and monitoring of lupus.

  • Then we comprehensively describe clinical manifestations, pathological changes, diagnosis and treatment of the various sub-types of LE with skin lesions.

  • We provide an update on certain cell distributions, such as keratinocytes, neutrophils, dendritic cells, T cells and B cells, in skin and peripheral blood.

Abstract

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is an autoimmune disease with a broad clinical spectrum ranging from cutaneous lesions to severe systemic manifestations. The pathogenesis of the disease and the immunological mechanisms for the heterogeneities in lupus remain unclear. The LE-specific cutaneous manifestations are generally divided into three categories: acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE). Clinically, lupus patients with skin lesions can be divided into two subsets based on the organs involved: cutaneous LE, such as DLE and SCLE, which appears only as a skin manifestation, and systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), e.g., ACLE, which involves other organs, such as kidneys, joints, and the hematopoietic system. However, lupus is an aggressive disease, and cutaneous lupus and systemic lupus partially overlap. Fewer than 5% of DLE patients and approximately 50% of SCLE patients might develop major organ damage and then develop SLE in subsequent years. Furthermore, there are no predictive biomarkers in clinical use. To the best of our knowledge, increasing evidence from clinical trials has revealed that early intervention can either reduce or delay the onset of severe manifestations. Therefore, identification of certain biomarkers in skin lesions or circulation from patients with skin lesions to predict future flares and advise treatment is an unmet need. In this review, we comprehensively describe the subtypes of LE with pathological criteria and clinical manifestations; summarize the up-to-date evidence on certain cell distributions, such as keratinocytes, neutrophils, dendritic cells, T cells and B cells, in skin and peripheral blood; and discuss their pathogenic roles and their potential roles in predictive diagnosis and as therapeutic targets.

Introduction

Lupus erythematosus (LE) is a highly heterogeneous autoimmune disease characterized by abnormal immune cells and abundant autoantibodies. LE has a broad clinical spectrum. On the one hand, there is cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CLE), showing primarily cutaneous lesions, while on the other hand, there is systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE), characterized by severe systemic manifestations (Table 1) [1]. Generally, LE-specific cutaneous lesions are subdivided into three different categories: acute cutaneous LE (ACLE), subacute cutaneous LE (SCLE) and chronic cutaneous lupus erythematosus (CCLE) [2,3]. CCLE mainly includes five different forms of disease: discoid LE (DLE), verrucous/hypertrophic LE, LE profundus/panniculitis (LEP), LE tumidus (LET) and chilblain LE (CHLE). ACLE is usually the acute cutaneous manifestations performed by SLE patients. Moreover, these SLE patients likely have more severe systemic disease over time when compared with those SLE patients without skin involvement [4]. For this reason, clinically CCLE and SCLE are traditionally classified as CLE, while ACLE is usually included in SLE. Indeed, there is no clear line between CLE and SLE. DLE, the most typical type of CLE, rarely shows a progression from DLE to SLE (fewer than 5%). Another example is SCLE, in which 50% of patients might develop systemic damage several years after diagnosis [5]. However, even if CLE patients progress to systemic involvement, a lower prevalence of renal involvement and mild disease activity have been found in these patients [6]. These variants with different organ-involvements in LE are still unidentified. However, accumulating evidence has shown the unignorable role of dysregulated immune cells in skin biopsy and circulation in diseases. Therefore, we attempt to make a systems review about the clinical features, histological changes and laboratory abnormalities of LE with cutaneous lesions, then discuss the current findings on dysregulated immune cells involving the dermatopathology of LE, which may give us a better understanding of the immune-mediated dermatopathology in LE.

Section snippets

Epidemiology and history

Biett, a French dermatologist, was the first person to describe lupus, in 1828. In the initial decades of the history of lupus, studies showed nothing more than descriptions emphasizing skin lesions. The discoid lesions were described in 1833 by Cazenave, while the butterfly-shaped rash was noted by Hebra in 1846. More severe pathological changes besides skin lesions were first described by Kaposi in 1872, and the existence of systemic form of lupus was firmly established in 1904 by Osler.

Genetic associations

The first-degree relatives of LE patients have a significantly higher prevalence of LE, indicating the close association of LE in first-degree relatives [28]. Genetic association studies have identified a number of genes that may confer susceptibility to CLE and SLE, including HLA, complement pathway genes, TNF-α, IRF5 and TREX1. Numerous studies have been done on the association between HLA variants and LE. Among these HLA variants, the HLA B8, HLA-DR and HLA-DQ alleles appear to play more

Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE)

Acute cutaneous lupus erythematosus (ACLE) is frequently defined as a cutaneous manifestation associated with active SLE and can be divided into localized ACLE and generalized ACLE [54]. The localized form is characterized by the ‘butterfly’ rash, which occurs over both cheeks, extends over the nasal bridge and forms the shape of butterfly (Fig. 1A). These lesions are frequently sun-induced and non-scarring and can cause dyspigmentation [55,56]. Butterfly rashes occur in up to 52% of SLE

Histopathology

The various clinical subtypes of LE (with the exception of LE profundus) often show an extensive overlap in their histological features, with degeneration of the basal layer, dermal edema, superficial or deep perivascular and periadnexal lymphocytic infiltrate and interface dermatitis. The differences in histopathology between the groups of LE mainly lie in the extent of development and are associated with the stage of cutaneous lesions. Typically, fully developed DLE exhibits most of the

Assessment of serologic autoantibodies

Auto-antibodies are frequently used as biomarkers for diagnosis and disease monitoring in LE, which is especially important in SLE. Some 95% of ACLE patients show a positive ANA, as well as a high incidence of anti-dsDNA and anti-Sm antibodies. Typically, anti-dsDNA antibodies are highly specific for SLE, and the levels of anti-dsDNA antibodies in serum tend to reflect disease activity, especially for the development of renal disease [90,91]. Anti-Ro/SSA and anti-La/SSB antibodies may play a

The aberrant distribution and function of immune cells in LE skin

Skin barrier function is the responsibility of different types of cells, including keratinocytes (KCs), endothelial cells (ECs), dendritic cells (DCs) and lymphocytes, such as T lymphocytes (T cells) and B lymphocytes (B cells). Which type of cell plays the predominant role in lupus has not been answered. However, accumulating evidence has shown that the infiltrating T and B cells in dermis might play a critical role. The majority of T cells in peripheral blood (95%) express the αβ T-cell

Prevention

Some lifestyle habits of LE patients can be a motivating or exacerbating factor of disease activity. Hence, it is necessary to give detailed health guidance for patients, especially the risks of sun exposure and the importance of sun protection. To avoid direct sun exposure, patients should be prepared for the outdoors with sunglasses, a high-sun-protection factor (>30) sunscreen, sun-blocking clothing and a wide-brimmed hat. For long-time sun-avoiding patients, the risk of vitamin D deficiency

Conclusions

Although some similarities exist at the beginning of lesion formation, the pathogenesis of skin damage in CLE and SLE patients might still have fundamental differences. The mechanisms of skin damage in LE are multifactorial, and the distribution of immune cells in lesions may vary with as the disease progresses. Different stages and severities of disease, diverse subtypes of LE, and individual variation may affect the observed results when we study the pathogenesis of LE skin damage. The

Author contributions

Qianwen Li conducted the manuscript writing. Haijing Wu, Wei Liao, Ming Zhao, Vera Chan, Linfeng Li, Min Zheng, Genhui Chen conducted editing, and Jianzhong Zhang, Chak-sing Lau and Qianjin Lu revised the manuscript.

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflicts of interests.

Acknowledgement

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No.81220108017, No. 81522038, No. 81602767 and No. 81430074), the Programs of Science-Technology Commission of Human province (2013F J4202), the Natural Science Foundation of Hunan Province (2017JJ3453), the Fundamental Research Funds for Central Universities of Central South University (NO. 2017zzts842) and the Natural Key Clinical Specialty Construction Project of National Health and Family Planning Commission of the

References (205)

  • L.G. Okon et al.

    Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: diagnosis and treatment

    Best Pract. Res. Clin. Rheumatol.

    (2013)
  • A. Kuhn et al.

    The classification and diagnosis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

    J. Autoimmun.

    (2014)
  • M.S. Peters et al.

    Lupus erythematosus panniculitis

    Med. Clin. N.Am.

    (1989)
  • A. Kuhn et al.

    Histopathologic findings in lupus erythematosus tumidus: review of 80 patients

    J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.

    (2003)
  • M. Elqatni et al.

    Bullous systemic lupus erythematosus

    Presse Med.

    (2018)
  • W.R. Gammon et al.

    Epidermolysis bullosa acquisita and bullous systemic lupus erythematosus. Diseases of autoimmunity to type VII collagen

    Dermatol. Clin.

    (1993)
  • W. Ray Gammon et al.

    Bullous SLE: a phenotypically distinctive but immunologically heterogeneous bullous disorder

    J. Investig. Dermatol.

    (1993)
  • R.D. Sontheimer

    Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: 25-year evolution of a prototypic subset (subphenotype) of lupus erythematosus defined by characteristic cutaneous, pathological, immunological, and genetic findings

    Autoimmun. Rev.

    (2005)
  • K.M. David-Bajar et al.

    Clinical, histologic, and immunofluorescent distinctions between subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus and discoid lupus erythematosus

    J. Investig. Dermatol.

    (1992)
  • P. Patel et al.

    Cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a review

    Dermatol. Clin.

    (2002)
  • N.P. Sanchez et al.

    The histopathology of lupus erythematosus panniculitis

    J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.

    (1981)
  • A. Kuhn et al.

    The 100th anniversary of lupus erythematosus tumidus

    Autoimmun. Rev.

    (2009)
  • J.F. Meilof et al.

    Production of anti-Ro/SS-A and anti-La/SS-B autoantibodies is closely coordinated in systemic lupus erythematosus and independent of anti-dsDNA production

    J. Autoimmun.

    (1997)
  • C. Yu et al.

    Diagnostic criteria for systemic lupus erythematosus: a critical review

    J. Autoimmun.

    (2014)
  • C. Tani et al.

    The diagnosis and classification of mixed connective tissue disease

    J. Autoimmun.

    (2014)
  • S.A. Elman et al.

    Development of classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus: results of a Delphi exercise

    J. Am. Acad. Dermatol.

    (2017)
  • S.A. Elman et al.

    Developing classification criteria for discoid lupus erythematosus: an update from the World Congress of Dermatology 2015 meeting

    Int. J. wom.'s Dermatol.

    (2016)
  • T. Nomura et al.

    The panoply of alphabetaT cells in the skin

    J. Dermatol. Sci.

    (2014)
  • C. Frances et al.

    Classification of dermatologic manifestations in lupus erythematosus

    Ann. Med. Interne

    (2003)
  • I.T. Wieczorek et al.

    Systemic symptoms in the progression of cutaneous to systemic lupus erythematosus

    JAMA Dermatol.

    (2014)
  • A. Kuhn et al.

    Clinical manifestations of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

    Journal der Deutschen Dermatologischen Gesellschaft J. German Soc. Dermatol. JDDG

    (2007)
  • B. Tebbe et al.

    Epidemiology and socioeconomic impact of skin disease in lupus erythematosus

    Lupus

    (1997)
  • C.M. Gronhagen et al.

    Cutaneous lupus erythematosus and the association with systemic lupus erythematosus: a population-based cohort of 1088 patients in Sweden

    Br. J. Dermatol.

    (2011)
  • S.S. Lim et al.

    The incidence and prevalence of systemic lupus erythematosus, 2002-2004: the georgia lupus registry

    Arthritis Rheumatol.

    (2014)
  • D.J. McCarty et al.

    Incidence of systemic lupus erythematosus. Race and gender differences

    Arthritis Rheum.

    (1995)
  • C. Flower et al.

    Systemic lupus erythematosus in an African Caribbean population: incidence, clinical manifestations, and survival in the barbados national lupus registry

    Arthritis Care Res.

    (2012)
  • Y.M. Chiu et al.

    Nationwide population-based epidemiologic study of systemic lupus erythematosus in Taiwan

    Lupus

    (2010)
  • A. Samanta et al.

    High prevalence of systemic disease and mortality in Asian subjects with systemic lupus erythematosus

    Ann. Rheum. Dis.

    (1991)
  • S. Jarukitsopa et al.

    Epidemiology of systemic lupus erythematosus and cutaneous lupus erythematosus in a predominantly white population in the United States

    Arthritis Care Res.

    (2015)
  • P. Harle et al.

    Possible role of leptin in hypoandrogenicity in patients with systemic lupus erythematosus and rheumatoid arthritis

    Ann. Rheum. Dis.

    (2004)
  • O. Durosaro et al.

    Incidence of cutaneous lupus erythematosus, 1965-2005: a population-based study

    Arch. Dermatol.

    (2009)
  • R.D. Sontheimer et al.

    Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: a paradigm for bedside-to-bench patient-oriented translational clinical investigation

    Arch. Dermatol. Res.

    (2009)
  • J.P. Callen

    Drug-induced subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus

    Lupus

    (2010)
  • A.V. Marzano et al.

    Drug-induced lupus erythematosus. Giornale italiano di dermatologia e venereologia: organo ufficiale

    Soc. Ital. Dermatol. Sifilogr.

    (2014)
  • A.V. Marzano et al.

    Drug-induced lupus: an update on its dermatologic aspects

    Lupus

    (2009)
  • T.D. Golan et al.

    Enhanced membrane binding of autoantibodies to cultured keratinocytes of systemic lupus erythematosus patients after ultraviolet B/ultraviolet A irradiation

    J. Clin. Investig.

    (1992)
  • F. Furukawa et al.

    Keratinocytes from patients with lupus erythematosus show enhanced cytotoxicity to ultraviolet radiation and to antibody-mediated cytotoxicity

    Clin. Exp. Immunol.

    (1999)
  • K.H. Costenbader et al.

    Cigarette smoking and the risk of systemic lupus erythematosus: a meta-analysis

    Arthritis Rheum.

    (2004)
  • E.W. Costenbader et al.

    Cigarette smoking and systemic lupus erythematosus: a smoking gun?

    Autoimmunity

    (2005)
  • B.C. Bockle et al.

    Smoking is highly associated with discoid lupus erythematosus and lupus erythematosus tumidus: analysis of 405 patients

    Lupus

    (2015)
  • Cited by (33)

    • Circulating and skin biopsy-present cytokines related to the pathogenesis of cutaneous lupus erythematosus

      2023, Autoimmunity Reviews
      Citation Excerpt :

      ACLE is a common manifestation of SLE, as almost half of SLE patients present with this subtype of CLE, and nearly all patients with ACLE have SLE (80–90% of cases). It commonly manifests as localized facial eruption with a sun-induced malar/butterfly rash, or less typically, with a generalized eruption that is pruritic, photosensitive, and symmetric [7]. SCLE is often present in sun-exposed areas, with two main forms (annular or papulosquamous rash).

    • Subacute cutaneous lupus erythematosus: A facultative paraneoplastic dermatosis

      2022, Clinics in Dermatology
      Citation Excerpt :

      The SCLE subtype of cutaneous lupus erythematosus is an autoimmune disease that primarily affects the skin.2 Up to 50% of the SCLE patients manifest criteria for systemic LE (SLE) but with a mild systemic disease evolution.3 The SCLE patients manifesting SLE features show a lower incidence of renal disease, and the central nervous system disease is identified in only 10% of the cases.4

    View all citing articles on Scopus
    View full text