Invasive extramammary Paget’s disease and the risk for secondary tumours in Europe
Introduction
Extramammary Paget’s Disease (EMPD) is a rare tumour whose precise incidence is not clear1 because of the non specific clinical findings of EMPD, which easily lead to wrong diagnoses.2 EMPD mostly affects individuals between the ages 50 and 80 years and is more frequently diagnosed in women than men.2
In 1874, James Paget described Mammary Paget’s Disease (MPD) as a chronic disease of the skin of the nipple and areola only.3 In 1888, during a meeting of the Pathological Society of London, Crocker presented a special case of MPD, which was located on the scrotum and penis in a goldsmith, aged sixty years old.4 In 1889, Crocker officially described EMPD as a special form of ductal carcinoma involving other parts of the body than the breast, as first described by James Paget.3 The clinical symptoms, eczema-like lesions, had clinical and histological features similar to those of MPD.4 Histological EMPD is described as a cutaneous adenocarcinoma with typical Paget cells,5, 6, 7 i.e. large cells with large nuclei and abundant cytoplasm which usually stain pale. It occurs with preference in skin zones rich of apocrine glands, but can occur anywhere on the skin or mucosa. Its most common visible symptom of EMPD is signs of pruritus,6 and it occurs mainly among the elderly, with a higher risk seen in Caucasian women in their 60s and 70s.8
Since a possible association with other malignancies, before or after diagnosis of EMPD, has been described,7, 9 a thorough physical examination with a 5-year follow-up after diagnosis has been recommended for patients being diagnosed with EMPD, to discover other regional rectal, urothelial or vulvar malignancies at time of diagnoses or during follow-up.7, 10 The location of the underlying internal malignancy is often linked to the location of the EMPD: a perianal location may signify a malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract and a penile, scrotal or groin location may be associated with an adenocarcinoma of the genitourinary tract.5
As it is a rare cancer, no clear guidelines have been established for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients, presenting a challenge for clinical practice, and research is often confined to case reports or small retrospective studies.
The RARECARE database, a European database that contains data from a large group of European cancer registries (CRs), has been developed to describe the burden of rare cancers and allows comparison of different European regions. Furthermore, it allows comparison between countries with different Gross Domestic Products (GDP) and Total National Expenditure on Health (TNEH), which could influence the survival.
The aim of this population-based study was to describe the incidence, survival and risk of developing other malignancies in patients with EMPD within Europe based on the RARECARE database.
Section snippets
Patients
Data on patients diagnosed with invasive EMPD were provided by European population-based CRs which participated in the RARECARE project. Only registries with detailed data on morphology available were included, resulting in 63 population-based CRs from 16 different European countries. Period coverage of the different registries participating in the RARECARE project is described in Table 1. These were divided into four regions following the EUROCARE project11; Northern Europe (Sweden, Norway and
Incidence
In the 13-year period, 871 cases of EMPD were registered as primary malignancy (male to female ratio 1:2.8; Table 2). The median age at diagnosis for EMPD for females (n = 640) was 74 years (range 36–96 years) which is similar to the median age for males (n = 231) (range 16–95 years).
The most frequent parts of the body in which EMPD occurred were the anus and anal canal (n = 40), extragenital skin (n = 178), vulva(n = 533) and other and unspecified male genital organs (n = 72) (Table 2) For
Discussion
This study compiles a unique large number of patients diagnosed with EMPD using the data of the RARECARE database, enabling coverage of a mean population of 90,163,609 people over 13 years. Siesling et al. and Pierie et al. presented data on invasive EMPD as well EMPD in situ, reporting a distribution of 1:3.7 and 1:1.8 respectively.7, 18 We had to exclude the EMPD in situ for analyses as we have no information on how the different cancer CRs distinguished the EMPD in situ from invasive EMPD;
Conflict of interest
None.
Acknowledgements
The authors want to thank the European Commission for their financial contribution to the RARECARE project. Also we want to thank the RARECARE workgroup for their contribution of data.
References (21)
Extramammary Paget’s disease: prognosis and relationship to internal malignancy
J Am Acad Dermatol
(1985)- et al.
Epidemiology and treatment of extramammary Paget disease in the Netherlands
Eur J Surg Oncol
(2007) - et al.
The EUROCARE-4 database on cancer survival in Europe: data standardisation, quality control and methods of statistical analysis
Eur J Cancer
(2009) - et al.
Prognosis and management of extramammary Paget’s disease and the association with secondary malignancies
J Am Coll Surg
(2003) - et al.
Extramammary Paget’s disease
BJOG
(2005) - et al.
The Roswell Park Cancer Institute experience with extramammary Paget’s disease
Br J Dermatol
(2000) On disease of mammary areola preceding cancer of the mammary gland
St Barth Hosp Rep
(1874)Paget’s disease affecting the scrotum and penis
Trans Pathol Soc Lond
(1889)- et al.
Mammary and extramammary Paget’s disease
J Clin Pathol
(2000) - et al.
Extramammary Paget’s disease: a report of 22 cases in Chinese males
J Dermatol
(1996)
Cited by (59)
British Gynaecological Cancer Society (BGCS) vulval cancer guidelines: An update on recommendations for practice 2023
2024, European Journal of Obstetrics and Gynecology and Reproductive BiologyInvasive extramammary Paget's disease with lymph node metastases and high-grade B-cell lymphoma
2023, Anais Brasileiros de DermatologiaExtramammary paget disease of the penoscrotal region
2023, Pathology Research and PracticeExtramammary Paget's disease: Updates in the workup and management
2022, Asian Journal of UrologyInterdisciplinary Management of Extramammary Paget's Disease Using Mohs Micrographic Surgery With Frozen Section Cytokeratin-7 Immunostains
2022, UrologyCitation Excerpt :Invasive EMPD can be challenging to diagnose and can histologically mirror carcinomas with apocrine immunophenotypes.23 Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines21 recommend screening for internal malignancies that may be contiguous (7.9%-23.9%) or discontiguous (8.6%-46.1%)2,24-28 with cutaneous EMPD. Genital EMPD has been associated with urogenital malignancy and perianal EMPD with gastrointestinal and/or colorectal cancer.21