Invasive extramammary Paget’s disease and the risk for secondary tumours in Europe

https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejso.2011.12.008Get rights and content

Abstract

The aim of this study was to determine the incidence and survival of Extramammary Paget’s disease (EMPD) and to describe the possible increased risk of tumours after EMPD.

All invasive cases diagnosed between 1990 and 2002 were selected from the RARECARE database. Incidence was expressed in European standardized rates. Relative survival was calculated for the period 1995–1999, with a follow-up until 31st December 2003. Standardized incidence ratios of second primary tumours were calculated to reveal possible increased risk after EMPD.

European age standardized Incidence of EMPD within Europe is 0.6 per 1000,000 person years. Five-year relative survival for invasive EMPD was 91.2% (95%CI; 83.5–95.4), 8.6 percent of the EMPD patients developed other malignancies. The highest increased risk of developing a second primary tumour was found in the first year of follow-up (SIR:2.0 95%CI; 1.3–2.9), living in the South European region (SIR:2.3 95%CI; 1.5–3.5) or being female (SIR:1.5 95%CI; 1.1–1.9). Female genital organs displayed greatest increased risk of developing a second primary tumour after EMPD (SIR:15,1 95%CI; 0.38–84.23).

Due to the increased risk of a second primary tumour after EMPD a thorough search for other tumours during their follow-up is recommended.

Introduction

Extramammary Paget’s Disease (EMPD) is a rare tumour whose precise incidence is not clear1 because of the non specific clinical findings of EMPD, which easily lead to wrong diagnoses.2 EMPD mostly affects individuals between the ages 50 and 80 years and is more frequently diagnosed in women than men.2

In 1874, James Paget described Mammary Paget’s Disease (MPD) as a chronic disease of the skin of the nipple and areola only.3 In 1888, during a meeting of the Pathological Society of London, Crocker presented a special case of MPD, which was located on the scrotum and penis in a goldsmith, aged sixty years old.4 In 1889, Crocker officially described EMPD as a special form of ductal carcinoma involving other parts of the body than the breast, as first described by James Paget.3 The clinical symptoms, eczema-like lesions, had clinical and histological features similar to those of MPD.4 Histological EMPD is described as a cutaneous adenocarcinoma with typical Paget cells,5, 6, 7 i.e. large cells with large nuclei and abundant cytoplasm which usually stain pale. It occurs with preference in skin zones rich of apocrine glands, but can occur anywhere on the skin or mucosa. Its most common visible symptom of EMPD is signs of pruritus,6 and it occurs mainly among the elderly, with a higher risk seen in Caucasian women in their 60s and 70s.8

Since a possible association with other malignancies, before or after diagnosis of EMPD, has been described,7, 9 a thorough physical examination with a 5-year follow-up after diagnosis has been recommended for patients being diagnosed with EMPD, to discover other regional rectal, urothelial or vulvar malignancies at time of diagnoses or during follow-up.7, 10 The location of the underlying internal malignancy is often linked to the location of the EMPD: a perianal location may signify a malignancy of the gastrointestinal tract and a penile, scrotal or groin location may be associated with an adenocarcinoma of the genitourinary tract.5

As it is a rare cancer, no clear guidelines have been established for diagnosis, treatment and follow-up of patients, presenting a challenge for clinical practice, and research is often confined to case reports or small retrospective studies.

The RARECARE database, a European database that contains data from a large group of European cancer registries (CRs), has been developed to describe the burden of rare cancers and allows comparison of different European regions. Furthermore, it allows comparison between countries with different Gross Domestic Products (GDP) and Total National Expenditure on Health (TNEH), which could influence the survival.

The aim of this population-based study was to describe the incidence, survival and risk of developing other malignancies in patients with EMPD within Europe based on the RARECARE database.

Section snippets

Patients

Data on patients diagnosed with invasive EMPD were provided by European population-based CRs which participated in the RARECARE project. Only registries with detailed data on morphology available were included, resulting in 63 population-based CRs from 16 different European countries. Period coverage of the different registries participating in the RARECARE project is described in Table 1. These were divided into four regions following the EUROCARE project11; Northern Europe (Sweden, Norway and

Incidence

In the 13-year period, 871 cases of EMPD were registered as primary malignancy (male to female ratio 1:2.8; Table 2). The median age at diagnosis for EMPD for females (n = 640) was 74 years (range 36–96 years) which is similar to the median age for males (n = 231) (range 16–95 years).

The most frequent parts of the body in which EMPD occurred were the anus and anal canal (n = 40), extragenital skin (n = 178), vulva(n = 533) and other and unspecified male genital organs (n = 72) (Table 2) For

Discussion

This study compiles a unique large number of patients diagnosed with EMPD using the data of the RARECARE database, enabling coverage of a mean population of 90,163,609 people over 13 years. Siesling et al. and Pierie et al. presented data on invasive EMPD as well EMPD in situ, reporting a distribution of 1:3.7 and 1:1.8 respectively.7, 18 We had to exclude the EMPD in situ for analyses as we have no information on how the different cancer CRs distinguished the EMPD in situ from invasive EMPD;

Conflict of interest

None.

Acknowledgements

The authors want to thank the European Commission for their financial contribution to the RARECARE project. Also we want to thank the RARECARE workgroup for their contribution of data.

References (21)

There are more references available in the full text version of this article.

Cited by (59)

  • Extramammary paget disease of the penoscrotal region

    2023, Pathology Research and Practice
  • Interdisciplinary Management of Extramammary Paget's Disease Using Mohs Micrographic Surgery With Frozen Section Cytokeratin-7 Immunostains

    2022, Urology
    Citation Excerpt :

    Invasive EMPD can be challenging to diagnose and can histologically mirror carcinomas with apocrine immunophenotypes.23 Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines21 recommend screening for internal malignancies that may be contiguous (7.9%-23.9%) or discontiguous (8.6%-46.1%)2,24-28 with cutaneous EMPD. Genital EMPD has been associated with urogenital malignancy and perianal EMPD with gastrointestinal and/or colorectal cancer.21

View all citing articles on Scopus
f

On behalf of the RARECARE Working Group (Members of the RARECARE working group can be seen in Appendix).

View full text