Polymorphous light eruption: A clinical, photobiologic, and follow-up study of 110 patients,☆☆

https://doi.org/10.1016/S0190-9622(00)90126-9Get rights and content

Abstract

Background: Polymorphous light eruption is a common chronic idiopathic photodermatosis. The action spectrum and therapy are under debate. Objective: The aim of the study was to analyze the clinical aspects of this dermatosis, the photodiagnostic tests, and the results of therapy in an academic center. Methods: To obtain a reasonable follow-up period, we examined all available data of the patients who underwent diagnostic phototests in the period 1985 through 1991. Our procedure of phototesting included determination of minimal erythema doses, photoprovocation tests, and photopatch tests. The evaluation of the effect of the therapy was based on the patients’ experiences, time spent outdoors, and amount of sun exposure. Results: Our collection included data on 35 men and 75 women. The age at onset differed significantly between men and women (averages 46 and 28 years, respectively; P < .01). The minimal erythema doses for UVB were lowered in 43% of the men and in 4% of the women (P < .01); the minimal erythema doses for UVA were lowered in 37% of the men and in 11% of the women (P < .01). The photoprovocation tests showed a pathologic reaction to both UVB and UVA in 88% of the men and in 52% of the women (P < .01). In the remaining patients we found pathologic reactions to UVB alone (for men 9%, for women 24%; P > .05) or UVA alone (for men 3%, for women 24%; P < .01). The abnormal reactions to visible light were almost exclusively observed in those patients who reacted pathologically to both UVB and UVA (43% of the male patients, 11% of the female patients; P < .01). The photopatch tests showed a large number of positive test results, mainly to skin care products or sunscreens (75% of all patients). The 70 most sensitive patients (64%) were treated with prophylactic UVB therapy 2 or 3 times a week at home or initially in the outpatient department. This treatment was normally done from February to June, but in severe cases throughout the whole year. Conclusion: Phototests revealed abnormal reactions to UVB as well as UVA and to some extent also to visible light. Prophylactic UVB therapy is a successful treatment for polymorphous light eruption. (J Am Acad Dermatol 2000;42:199-207.)

Section snippets

PATIENTS AND METHODS

We selected for analysis all 110 patients with PMLE who underwent diagnostic phototests in the period 1985 through 1991. This period was chosen to allow for a possible follow-up period of at least 5 years. The diagnosis of PMLE was based on the clinical and, if necessary, histologic features, including the results of the phototests. We excluded those patients with a concomitant dermatosis that can be provoked by sunlight, such as Jessner’s lymphocytic infiltration of the skin,30 lupus

RESULTS

In this study 110 patients were included (35 men and 75 women). The mean duration of complaints before they came to our photodermatology unit was 9.2 years (men 8.2; women 9.7 years). The course of the disease activity during that period was progressive in 86 patients, stationary in 19, and unknown in 5. We found a significant difference between men and women with regard to the age at onset (P < .01; the significance tests35 were based on the normal distribution). The mean age at onset was 34

DISCUSSION

In this retrospective study of 110 patients (35 men, 75 women) with PMLE, we analyzed the clinical aspects, the photodiagnostic test results, and the results of our therapy. We examined the data of the patients who underwent diagnostic phototests in the period of 1985 through 1991.

The age at onset differed significantly between men and women (46 vs 28 years). According to the historical data, the clinical picture showed papular lesions (61 patients), papulovesicular lesions (27 patients, almost

Acknowledgements

We thank Professor J. C. van der Leun for his comment on the manuscript.

References (36)

  • W Frain-Bell et al.

    Chronic polymorphic light eruption (a study of 25 cases)

    Br J Dermatol

    (1969)
  • E Hölzle et al.

    Polymorphous light eruption

    J Invest Dermatol

    (1987)
  • A Ros et al.

    Current aspects of polymorphous light eruptions in Sweden

    Photodermatology

    (1986)
  • T Bergner et al.

    Polymorphe Lichtdermatose. Klinische Daten und Testbefunde

    Hautarzt

    (1993)
  • PG Norris et al.

    Polymorphic light eruption

    Photodermatol

    (1990)
  • C Jansen

    The polymorphic phototest reaction

    Arch Dermatol

    (1982)
  • E Hölzle et al.

    Photodermatoses: diagnostic procedures and their interpretation

    Photodermatology

    (1987)
  • H Hönigsman et al.

    Die Polymorphe Lichtdermatose - Photobiologische Diagnostik und Therapie

    Z Hautkr

    (1988)
  • Cited by (68)

    • Turn the light on photosensitivity

      2021, Journal of Photochemistry and Photobiology
    • Visible light. Part I: Properties and cutaneous effects of visible light

      2021, Journal of the American Academy of Dermatology
    • Skin and Adnexal Structures

      2021, Gattuso’s Differential Diagnosis in Surgical Pathology
    View all citing articles on Scopus

    Reprint requests: H. van Weelden, MSc, Department of Dermatology, University Hospital Utrecht, Heidelberglaan 100, 3584 CX Utrecht, The Netherlands.

    ☆☆

    0190-9622/2000/$12.00 + 0  16/1/100950

    View full text