Sugerencias
Idioma
Información de la revista
Cita
Cita
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Visitas
1349
Original Article
Acceso a texto completo

Analysis of the Influence of Sex in 507 Patients With Moderate-to-Severe Atopic Dermatitis: Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP)

Análisis de la influencia del sexo en 507 pacientes con dermatitis atópica moderada grave. Registro Español de Dermatitis Atópica (BIOBADATOP)
Visitas
1349
A. Navarro-Bielsaa,b,
Autor para correspondencia
albanavarrobielsa@hotmail.com

Corresponding author.
, Y. Gilaberteb, J.M. Carrascosac, R. Ruiz-Villaverded, I. Betlloch Mase, M. Espasandín-Ariasf, M.A. Lasheras-Pérezg, A. González Quesadah, P. de la Cueva Dobaoi, P. Chicharroj, J.J. Pereyra Rodríguezk, E. Herrera Acostal, T. Montero-Vilchezm, M. Elosua-Gonzálezn, L. Curto-Barredoo, M. Munera-Camposc, F.J. Navarro-Triviñod, A. Batallaf, M. Rodríguez Sernag, I. Castaño-Gonzálezh..., J. Alonsol, S. Arias-Santiagom, G. Roustan Gullónn, M. Bertolín-Colillao, J.C. Ruiz Carrascosad, C. Couselo-Rodríguezf, R. Sanabria de la Torrem, A. Rosell-Díazn, A.M. Giménez-Arnauo, S. Martínez-Fernándezf, I. García-Dovalp,q, M.Á. Descalzo-Gallegoq, J.F. Silvestre SalvadoreVer más
a Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario San Pedro, Logroño, Spain
b Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Miguel Servet, IIS Aragón, Zaragoza, Spain
c Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitari Germans Trias i Pujol, Badalona, Spain
d Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario San Cecilio, Instituto Biosanitario de Granada IBS, Granada, Spain
e Department of Dermatology, Hospital General Universitario Dr. Balmis, Alicante, Spain
f Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario de Pontevedra, Pontevedra, Spain
g Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario y Politécnico La Fe, Valencia, Spain
h Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario de Gran Canaria Doctor Negrín, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain
i Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain
j Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario de la Princesa, Madrid, Spain
k Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Virgen del Rocío, Sevilla, Spain
l Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de la Victoria, Málaga, Spain
m Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Virgen de las Nieves, Instituto de Investigación IBS, Granada, Spain
n Department of Dermatology, Hospital Universitario Puerta de Hierro Majadahonda, Madrid, Spain
o Department of Dermatology, Hospital del Mar Research Institute, Barcelona, Spain
p Department of Dermatology, Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Vigo, Vigo, Spain
q Research Unit, Fundación Piel Sana AEDV, Madrid, Spain
Ver más
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Resumen
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
fig0005
Tablas (3)
Table 1. Characteristics of the population according to sex.
Tablas
Table 2. Prevalence of comorbidities according to sex.
Tablas
Table 4. Rates of adverse events according to sex.
Tablas
Abstract
Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a common chronic inflammatory disease that presents differences in clinical expression according to sex. The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of sex on disease severity, comorbidities, treatments, and adverse events in patients with moderate-to-severe AD included in the Spanish BIOBADATOP registry.

Methods

We conducted a prospective observational study using data from the BIOBADATOP registry from March 2020 to February 2025. Demographic variables, severity scales (EASI, DLQI, POEM, pruritus VAS), comorbidities, treatments, and adverse events were collected. Statistical analysis was performed using Chi-square, Student's t-test, and Mann–Whitney tests, considering statistical significance at P<.05.

Results

A total of 507 adult patients on systemic treatment were included (53.1% men, 46.9% women). Men showed greater disease severity according to EASI (21.7 vs 21.0) and higher serum IgE levels (1323 vs 638KU/L). Women reported greater pruritus intensity and worse POEM scores. Anxiety (26% vs 13%) and depression (15% vs 5%) were more frequent among women. No differences were observed in family history or atopic comorbidities. Similarly, no relevant differences were found in treatments received, treatment duration, or clinical response at 3, 6, and 12 months. However, women showed a higher rate of GI adverse events (97/1000 vs 19/1000 patient-years).

Conclusions

Clinical and comorbidity differences according to sex exist in moderate-to-severe AD. Men show greater disease severity and higher IgE levels, whereas women experience a greater perceived disease burden, pruritus, psychiatric comorbidities, and more GI adverse events. These findings support the need to consider sex as a factor in the evaluation and comprehensive management of AD.

Keywords:
Atopic dermatitis
Sex
Comorbidities
Treatments
Adverse events
Resumen
Introducción

La dermatitis atópica (DA) es una enfermedad inflamatoria crónica frecuente que presenta diferencias de expresión clínica según el sexo. El objetivo del estudio fue evaluar la influencia del sexo en la gravedad, comorbilidades, tratamientos y eventos adversos en pacientes con DA moderada-grave incluidos en el registro español BIOBADATOP.

Método

Se realizó un estudio observacional prospectivo con datos del registro BIOBADATOP desde marzo de 2020 hasta febrero de 2025. Se recogieron variables demográficas, escalas de gravedad (EASI, DLQI, POEM, EVA prurito), comorbilidades, tratamientos y eventos adversos. El análisis estadístico se efectuó con pruebas de chi cuadrado, t de Student y Mann-Whitney, considerando significación en p<0,05.

Resultados

Se incluyeron 507 pacientes adultos (53,1% hombres, 46,9% mujeres) en tratamiento sistémico. Los hombres presentaron mayor gravedad en EASI (21,7 vs 21,0) y niveles séricos de IgE (1323 vs 638 KU/L). Las mujeres refirieron mayor prurito y peor puntuación en POEM. La ansiedad (26% vs 13%) y depresión (15% vs 5%) fueron más frecuentes en mujeres. No se observaron diferencias en antecedentes familiares ni en comorbilidades atópicas. Tampoco hubo diferencias relevantes en tratamientos recibidos, duración, ni respuesta clínica a los 3, 6 y 12 meses. Sin embargo, las mujeres presentaron mayor tasa de efectos adversos gastrointestinales (97/1000 vs 19/1000 pacientes-año).

Conclusiones

Existen diferencias clínicas y de comorbilidad según el sexo en la DA moderada-grave. Los hombres muestran mayor gravedad y niveles de IgE más altos, mientras que las mujeres experimentan un mayor impacto percibido de la enfermedad, prurito y comorbilidades psiquiátricas, además de más efectos adversos digestivos. Estos hallazgos apoyan la necesidad de considerar el sexo como un factor en la evaluación y manejo integral de la DA.

Palabras clave:
Dermatitis atópica
Sexo
Comorbilidades
Tratamientos
Eventos adversos
Texto completo
Introduction

Atopic dermatitis (AD) is a chronic inflammatory skin disease characterized by eczematous lesions with a relapsing course that affects millions of people worldwide. The estimated prevalence of AD varies according to age and, based on studies conducted in developed countries, is approximately 15% in the pediatric population1 and around 7% in the adult population.2

Whereas during childhood the disease affects both sexes equally, AD and other atopic disorders have been observed to show a female predominance, especially during adolescence and adulthood.2–5 In addition, women may present a different risk of developing associated comorbidities, such as asthma, allergic rhinitis, and psychiatric disorders including anxiety and depression.5–7 Differences between sexes have also been observed regarding administered treatments and treatment adherence, as well as in the frequency of adverse events, highlighting the importance of considering sex as a key factor in the management of AD.8,9

There are few studies evaluating sex differences in patients with AD, and given the growing evidence that sex plays an important role in AD, the aim of this study was to evaluate and describe the influence of sex on disease severity, the presence of comorbidities, treatments used, and the occurrence of adverse events, in order to obtain an overall view of sex differences in patients with AD receiving systemic therapy in Spain.

Materials and methods

For this study, patients from the Spanish Atopic Dermatitis Registry (BIOBADATOP) were used, which has been previously described.10 This study is a prospective, multicenter observational cohort that, since its initiation in March 2020, has included pediatric, adolescent, and adult patients with AD, mainly with moderate-to-severe disease, who initiated systemic immunomodulatory treatment. At baseline visits, demographic data, diagnosis-related information, and baseline severity data measured using the Eczema Area and Severity Index (EASI), Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI), Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure (POEM), and pruritus during the previous week assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS) were collected. Similarly, information regarding comorbidities and previous treatments used was also recorded. During follow-up visits, changes in AD severity and changes to systemic treatments, along with the reasons for treatment discontinuation, were documented. In addition, adverse events (AEs) occurring during follow-up were collected using the MedDRA dictionary.

We carried out patient data collection in the registry through assignment of a unique pseudonymized identification code using the online data capture system Research Electronic Data Capture (REDCap).

We conducted a descriptive analysis of adult patients included from study initiation (March 2020) to the latest available cutoff date (February 2025) according to sex, defined as biological sex at birth.

Statistical analysis was performed using Stata software (version 17.0, Statacorp, Texas, United States). Data were described using conventional statistics (means and standard deviations, medians and quartiles, or absolute and relative frequencies). Subsequently, differences between groups were compared using the Chi-square test, Student's t test, or the Mann–Whitney U test, as appropriate. Visual presentations using boxplots of the different parameters throughout follow-up according to sex were also performed. P values<.05 were considered statistically significant.

The BIOBADATOP registry received approval from the Aragón Clinical Research Ethics Committee (PA18/051). All patients gave their written informed consent prior to inclusion in the study.

ResultsPopulation characteristics according to sex

A total of 507 adult patients with AD on systemic therapies from the BIOBADATOP registry were included, 53.1% (N=269) men and 46.9% (N=238) women, with a median age of 33.4 years and an IQR of 25.4–48.0 years. Regarding baseline scales, there were slight statistically significant differences between men and women in median EASI (P=.003), which was slightly more severe in men (EASI 21.7 vs 21.0 in women), pruritus VAS (P=.014), with higher scores in women, POEM (P=.032), with greater impairment in women (POEM 21 vs 18 in men), and serum IgE levels (P=.022), which were higher in men, with a median of 1323KU/L vs 638KU/L in women. No differences were found for DLQI.

The clinical characteristics of the patients included in the study are shown in Table 1.

Table 1.

Characteristics of the population according to sex.

Characteristics  Sex
  MenWomenTotal
  Median  p25–p75  Median  p25–p75  Median  p25–p75  P value 
Total patients, N (%)  269  53.1  238  46.9  507  100  – 
Age at diagnosis, years  10.0  (1–30.5)  8.0  (1–32)  8.5  (1–32)  .983 
Age, years  33.3  (25.1–47.3)  33.6  (26–48.4)  33.4  (25.4–48)  .833 
Disease duration, years  20.0  (5–28)  20.0  (6–26)  20.0  (5–27)  .751 
No. of previous systemic treatments  1.0  (1–2)  1.0  (1–2)  1.0  (1–2)  .923 
Baseline pruritus VAS  8.0  (6–9)  8.0  (7–10)  8.0  (7–9)  .014 
Baseline EASI  21.7  (14.2–27.3)  21.0  (10.2–24.8)  21.0  (12–26)  .003 
Baseline POEM  18.0  (15–24)  21.0  (17–24)  20.0  (15–24)  .032 
DLQI  14.0  (7–18)  14.0  (9–20)  14.0  (8–20)  .104 
BMI  25.0  (22.7–28.4)  24.6  (21.5–27.6)  24.8  (22.2–27.99)  .050 
Total IgE, KU/L  1323  (300–5000)  638  (140–2441)  816  (194–3901)  .022 
Disease severity according to EASI, N (%).004 
Mild  21  37  17  58  12  – 
Moderate  101  39  96  43  197  41  – 
Severe  134  52  90  40  224  47  – 

DLQI: Dermatology Life Quality Index; EASI: Eczema Area and Severity Index; VAS: Visual Analog Scale; POEM: Patient-Oriented Eczema Measure; p25: 1st quartile; p75: 3rd quartile.

Atopic and non-atopic comorbidities according to sex

Statistically significant differences were found in psychiatric-related comorbidities, with women showing higher percentages vs men for anxiety (26% vs 13% in men; P<.001) and depression (15% vs 5% in men; P<.001). However, no differences were found regarding family history or atopic comorbidities. Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis was the most frequent comorbidity, affecting 55% of the total population, followed by asthma (44%), atopic ocular disease (15%), and the Charlson comorbidity index (Table 2).

Table 2.

Prevalence of comorbidities according to sex.

  Sex
  Men  Women N  Total N  P value 
  N (%)  N (%)  N (%)   
Family history of atopic dermatitis.980 
Yes  99 (46)  86 (46)  185 (46)   
Any atopic comorbidity (asthma, allergic rhinoconjunctivitis, atopic ocular disease).487 
Yes  168 (64)  155 (67)  323 (66)   
Asthma.536 
Yes  119 (45)  99 (42)  218 (44)   
Allergic rhinoconjunctivitis.589 
Yes  125 (49)  117 (51)  242 (50)   
Atopic ocular disease.580 
Yes  36 (14)  36 (16)  72 (15)   
Charlson comorbidity indexa.252 
None  181 (67)  165 (69)  346 (68)   
One  42 (16)  44 (18)  86 (17)   
Two or more  46 (17)  29 (12)  75 (15)   
Contact allergy.214 
Yes  44 (20)  52 (25)  96 (23)   
Anxiety<.001 
Yes  33 (13)  56 (26)  89 (19)   
Depression<.001 
Yes  12 (5)  33 (15)  45 (10)   
a

Charlson comorbidities: myocardial infarction, heart failure, peripheral arterial disease, cerebrovascular disease, dementia, chronic respiratory disease, connective tissue disease, peptic ulcer disease, mild chronic liver disease, moderate/severe chronic liver disease, diabetes, diabetes with target organ damage, hemiplegia, moderate/severe chronic kidney disease, solid tumor or malignancy, metastatic solid tumor, leukemia, lymphoma, and defined AIDS.

Treatments received according to sex

No differences were observed between both groups for the treatment-related variables evaluated, neither regarding the treatment received (conventional systemic therapy, anti-JAK therapy, or biologic therapy), nor regarding drug exposure time. Additionally, no differences were found in response to systemic treatments at 3, 6, and 12 months (Fig. 1), nor in the reasons for treatment discontinuation (Table 3).

Fig. 1.

Box plots of the response to systemic treatments at 3, 6, and 12 months according to sex. Responses were evaluated using severity measurement scales for atopic dermatitis, including EASI, the quality-of-life scales DLQI and POEM, and Pruritus VAS. No significant differences were observed between patients according to sex.

Table 3.

Treatments received according to sex (first treatment).

  MenWomen     
        Systemic treatment     
  Classic systemic  Anti-JAK  Biologic  Classic systemic  Anti-JAK  Biologic  P value Classic systemic  P value anti-JAK  P value Biologic 
  N (%)  N (%)  N (%)  N (%)  N (%)  N (%)       
Total patients
Initial N  86  45  138  84  35  119  –  –  – 
N at 3 months  54  36  106  57  25  96  –  –  – 
N at 6 months  63  36  124  60  27  102  –  –  – 
N at 12 months  31  25  86  28  17  74  –  –  – 
Total person-years of exposure (drug)  60  48  204  66  29  163  –  –  – 
Drug duration, years, median (p25–p75)  0.5 (0.3–1.0)  0.9 (0.5–1.3)  1.0 (0.6–2.1)  0.5 (0.3–1.0)  0.6 (0.3–1.1)  1.0 (0.5–1.9)  –  –  – 
Mean reduction in pruritus VAS, mean (SD)
3 months  4.2 (3.6)  4.8 (3.3)  3.9 (3.2)  3.6 (3.3)  4.8 (3.7)  4.0 (3.4)  .405  .924  .784 
6 months  3.0 (3.8)  5.5 (3.0)  4.2 (3.2)  3.7 (4.1)  4.4 (4.7)  4.0 (3.7)  .461  .545  .728 
12 months  3.1 (3.8)  4.2 (4.1)  4.5 (3.4)  2.9 (3.8)  4.9 (3.2)  5.0 (3.4)  .589  .725  .352 
Mean reduction in EASI, mean (SD)
3 months  15.2 (13.6)  16.0 (10.8)  17.4 (13.0)  11.7 (12.3)  13.3 (11.8)  15.7 (11.9)  .152  .435  .449 
6 months  12.9 (13.0)  16.3 (8.9)  18.5 (12.8)  9.4 (9.7)  15.8 (11.5)  16.5 (11.4)  .077  .901  .066 
12 months  9.5 (15.7)  15.4 (8.4)  20.3 (14.3)  4.2 (13.3)  11.2 (8.8)  19.3 (12.0)  .096  .120  .287 
Mean reduction in POEM, mean (SD)
3 months  10.6 (8.4)  11.6 (8.6)  12.0 (8.5)  8.7 (9.6)  13.1 (10.5)  11.8 (8.1)  .343  .520  .969 
6 months  7.8 (9.1)  10.6 (8.5)  13.1 (8.4)  10.6 (8.9)  12.3 (8.6)  13.4 (8.6)  .241  .638  .825 
12 months  8.1 (7.2)  12.0 (7.0)  15.0 (8.4)  2.9 (9.1)  13.3 (4.8)  14.7 (8.1)  .103  .541  .880 
Mean reduction in DLQI, mean (SD)
3 months  7.6 (10.5)  8.9 (7.9)  9.0 (7.1)  7.3 (9.2)  7.9 (7.3)  10.0 (10.3)  .692  .516  .279 
6 months  6.4 (8.1)  9.6 (7.7)  10.5 (8.3)  7.3 (8.4)  8.5 (9.7)  10.0 (9.0)  .631  .698  .861 
12 months  8.6 (7.3)  8.9 (8.0)  13.2 (8.0)  7.6 (13.5)  10.2 (6.7)  13.2 (8.2)  .582  .660  .906 
Reason for discontinuation.614  .940  .478 
Lack of efficacy  32 (45)  8 (67)  13 (42)  30 (44)  7 (58)  15 (45)  –  –  – 
Adverse event  12 (17)  1 (8)  3 (10)  18 (26)  2 (17)  6 (18)  –  –  – 
Disease remission  2 (3)  0 (0)  2 (6)  2 (3)  0 (0)  0 (0)  –  –  – 
Other  19 (27)  1 (8)  6 (19)  15 (22)  1 (8)  7 (21)  –  –  – 
Adverse events according to sex

Regarding adverse events according to sex, shown in Table 4, statistically significant differences were found in the rate of GI disorders, which was higher in women (97/1000 vs 19/1000 in men; P<.001). No differences were found for the remaining adverse events or adverse outcomes.

Table 4.

Rates of adverse events according to sex.

  Events  P-Y  Rate ×1000 (95%CI)  P value 
All adverse events.430 
Men  180  312  576 (498–667)   
Women  162  258  628 (538–732)   
Serious adverse events.174 
Men  312  19 (9–43)   
Women  10  258  39 (21–72)   
Infections and infestations.464 
Men  55  312  176 (135–229)   
Women  39  258  151 (110–207)   
Skin and subcutaneous tissue disorders.330 
Men  26  312  83 (57–122)   
Women  28  258  108 (75–157)   
Eye disorders.697 
Men  22  312  70 (46–107)   
Women  16  258  62 (38–101)   
GI disorders<.001 
Men  312  19 (9–43)   
Women  25  258  97 (65–143)   
Nervous system disorders.393 
Men  17  312  54 (34–88)   
Women  10  258  39 (21–72)   
General disorders and administration site conditions.405 
Men  14  312  45 (27–76)   
Women  258  31 (15–62)   
Vascular disorders.069 
Men  312  16 (7–38)   
Women  11  258  43 (24–77)   
Other.578 
Men  35  312  112 (80–156)   
Women  25  258  97 (65–143)   

P-Y: patient-years; 95%CI: 95% confidence interval.

Discussion

In this study, sex distribution was similar (53.1% men and 46.9% women), with men presenting higher EASI scores and serum IgE levels, whereas women showed greater impairment in POEM scores and higher pruritus intensity according to the VAS scale. Furthermore, psychiatric comorbidities were more frequent in women, with a higher prevalence of anxiety (26% vs 13%) and depression (15% vs 5%). However, no differences were found between sexes regarding the type of systemic treatment received, treatment duration, or clinical response at 3, 6, and 12 months. Finally, a higher rate of gastrointestinal adverse events was reported in women, representing the only significant difference in terms of treatment safety.

Unlike studies conducted in other developed countries, such as that by Chiesa et al.2 carried out in the United States, where 62.4% of patients with AD were women and female sex was associated with a 70% increased likelihood of developing AD vs men, or the study by Pesce et al.4 in Italy, where the prevalence of eczema and AD was higher among older women vs men, no sex-related differences in the prevalence of AD were observed in the present study, although only patients with moderate-to-severe disease requiring systemic treatment were included.

Regarding disease severity and quality-of-life scales, men had higher EASI values, as reported in the study by Salava et al.,11 whereas women obtained higher POEM scores and depression and anxiety were more frequent as comorbidities, which is consistent with findings from former studies. Vinnik et al.7 observed that depression scale scores in women with AD were significantly higher than those in men (46% increase; F(3, 192)=28.17; P<.001), suggesting that this could be explained by higher cortisol levels in women with depression, proposing that differences in cortisol levels according to sex and AD subtype could be related to variations in immune regulation in the context of the disease. Furthermore, Silverberg et al.,12 in a cross-sectional study involving 2893 adults in the United States, demonstrated higher levels and prevalence of anxiety and depression in patients with AD, which increased according to disease severity measured by POEM. These findings reinforce the importance of considering psychological management as an essential component of comprehensive treatment, especially in women, who may require greater emotional and psychological support.

On the other hand, IgE levels were higher in men. Elevated serum IgE levels have been associated with higher EASI scores, although patients with severe AD may occasionally present normal IgE levels.11 Although AD is an immune-mediated disease, it is known that certain changes to the metabolism and balance of sex hormones may play a predisposing role. Testosterone may influence the balance between type 1 and type 2 helper T lymphocytes, IgE synthesis, and eosinophil proliferation. Plasma levels of dehydroepiandrosterone (DHEA) are decreased in patients with AD, and animal models have shown that DHEA administration significantly suppresses the spontaneous increase in both serum IgE and interleukin-6 levels, since DHEA promotes a shift in the Th1/Th2 balance toward Th1-predominant immunity.13,14

Finally, no differences were found regarding treatment selection or response according to sex; however, differences were observed in the rate of gastrointestinal adverse events, which was higher in women. Women have been reported to have a greater predisposition to functional GI disorders, such as irritable bowel syndrome and dyspepsia. Estradiol, the main female sex hormone, has been involved in increased visceral sensitivity and modulation of GI motility. In addition, higher testosterone levels have been associated with a lower risk of irritable bowel syndrome, which could partly explain the observed differences and should be considered when selecting treatments in which GI disorders are a frequent adverse effect.15,16

In conclusion, significant differences exist in the clinical signs and comorbidities of AD according to sex. Men presented greater disease severity measured by EASI and higher IgE levels, whereas women showed greater impairment in POEM scores, higher pruritus intensity, a higher frequency of anxiety and depression, and a higher rate of GI adverse events. These findings underscore the need to consider sex as a relevant factor in the progression and comprehensive management of AD.

Use of generative artificial intelligence in scientific writing

No artificial intelligence was used in the writing of this manuscript.

Funding

This study is promoted by the Fundación Piel Sana of the AEDV, which in turn receives financial support from pharmaceutical companies (such as Sanofi, AbbVie, Pfizer, and Almirall). Study planning and execution were conducted independently. The collaborating pharmaceutical companies were not involved whatsoever in the design, collection, management, analysis, or interpretation of data, nor in the preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript. The decision to submit the manuscript for publication was also made independently, without intervention from the collaborating pharmaceutical companies.

Conflicts of interest

I. Castaño-González declared no conflicts of interest whatsoever.

A. Navarro-Bielsa has participated as advisor and/or investigator and/or speaker for: AbbVie, Almirall, Janssen, LEO Pharma, Sanofi, and Galderma.

Y. Gilaberte-Calzada has participated as advisor for Isdin, Roche Posay, and Galderma; as speaker for Almirall, Sanofi, Avène, Rilastil, Lilly, Uriage, Novartis, and Cantabria Labs; and has participated in research projects for Almirall, Sanofi, Pfizer, AbbVie, and LEO Pharma.

J.M. Carrascosa has participated as principal investigator/subinvestigator and/or received honoraria as speaker and/or member of expert committees or steering committees for AbbVie, Novartis, Janssen, Lilly, Sandoz, Amgen, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Biogen, and UCB.

M. Espasandín has participated in educational activities, courses, congress attendance, and lectures sponsored by AbbVie, Leo Pharma, Pfizer, Lilly, Almirall, and Sanofi.

A. González-Quesada has participated as consultant, speaker, and clinical trial investigator for AbbVie, Pfizer, Novartis, Sanofi, Boehringer, Bristol-Meyer, Leo-Pharma, and Janssen.

P. de la Cueva Dobao has acted as advisor and/or investigator and/or speaker for: AbbVie, Almirall, BMS, Boehringer, Celgene, Janssen, LEO Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, and UCB.

P. Chicharro has participated in consultancies, advisory boards, and clinical trials organized by the following companies: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Almirall, Sanofi Genzyme, Lilly, AbbVie, Novartis, Leo-Pharma, and Pfizer-Wyeth.

M. Elosua-González has participated as investigator and/or speaker for AbbVie, Lilly, Galderma, LEO Pharma, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, and Sanofi Genzyme.

L. Curto-Barredo has received honoraria for lectures and/or advisory activities from Sanofi, AbbVie, Leo Pharma, Almirall, Lilly, Novartis, and Uriach.

M. Munera-Campos has participated as investigator in clinical trials sponsored by Sanofi, AbbVie, Lilly, Leo-Pharma, Pfizer, Almirall, Galderma, and Novartis, and has received honoraria as speaker and consultant from Sanofi, Lilly, Leo Pharma, AbbVie, and Galderma.

A. Batalla has received honoraria and/or collaborated in educational activities, consultancy, or participation in clinical trials for AbbVie, Celgene, Faes Pharma, Isdin, Janssen, Leo Pharma, LETI Pharma, Lilly, Mylan, Novartis, Pfizer, Pierre Fabre, and Sanofi.

G. Roustan Gullón has received honoraria for lectures and/or advisory activities from Sanofi, AbbVie, Leo Pharma, Lilly, and Novartis.

C. Couselo-Rodríguez has participated as subinvestigator or speaker in projects sponsored by: AbbVie, Sanofi, Almirall, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, UCB, Novartis, Pierre Fabre, and Janssen.

M. Rodríguez Serna has participated in advisory activities for Sanofi, Pfizer, Leo, Novartis, and AbbVie.

M. Bertolín-Colilla has received honoraria for lectures and/or advisory activities from Sanofi and Leo Pharma.

A. Rosell-Díaz has received honoraria for lectures and/or advisory activities from Sanofi, AbbVie, and Leo Pharma.

A.M. Giménez-Arnau is or has recently been a speaker and/or advisor and/or has received research funding from Almirall, Amgen, AstraZeneca, Avène, Blue-Print, Celltrion, Celldex, Escient Pharmaceuticals, Genentech, GSK, Harmonic Bio, Incyte, Instituto Carlos III-FEDER, Jaspers, Leo Pharma, Menarini, Mitsubishi Tanabe Pharma, Noucor, Novartis, OVOIMMUNE, Pfizer, RAPT Therapeutics, Sanofi-Regeneron, Septerna, Servier, Thermo Fisher Scientific, and Uriach Pharma.

S. Martínez-Fernández has participated in educational activities and attended courses and congresses sponsored by Almirall, AbbVie, Janssen, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, Novartis, Sanofi, AstraZeneca, UCB, La Roche-Posay, and Pierre Fabre, and has participated as subinvestigator in clinical trials promoted by AbbVie, Pfizer, Sanofi, and Novartis.

J.F. Silvestre Salvador has collaborated as speaker, advisor, and/or investigator for: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Astra Zeneca, Bristol Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galderma, Incyte, Leo Pharma, Novartis, Pfizer, Regeneron, and Sanofi Genzyme.

Acknowledgments

We express our appreciation to all BIOBADATOP investigators for their commitment and for the rigorous collection of adverse events and other relevant clinical data.

References
[1]
Y. Gilaberte, J.B. Pérez-Gilaberte, B. Poblador-Plou, K. Bliek-Bueno, A. Gimeno-Miguel, A. Prados-Torres.
Prevalence and comorbidity of atopic dermatitis in children: a large-scale population study based on real-world data.
J Clin Med, 9 (2020), pp. 1632
[2]
Z.C. Chiesa Fuxench, J.K. Block, M. Boguniewicz, et al.
Atopic dermatitis in America study: a cross-sectional study examining the prevalence and disease burden of atopic dermatitis in the US adult population.
J Invest Dermatol, 139 (2019), pp. 583-590
[3]
R. Sacotte, J.I. Silverberg.
Epidemiology of adult atopic dermatitis.
Clin Dermatol, 36 (2018), pp. 595-605
[4]
G. Pesce, A. Marcon, A. Carosso, et al.
Adult eczema in Italy: prevalence and associations with environmental factors.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 29 (2015), pp. 1180-1187
[5]
M. Osman.
Therapeutic implications of sex differences in asthma and atopy.
Arch Dis Child, 88 (2003), pp. 587-590
[6]
N. Kanda, T. Hoashi, H. Saeki.
The roles of sex hormones in the course of atopic dermatitis.
Int J Mol Sci, 20 (2019), pp. 4660
[7]
T. Vinnik, A. Kreinin, G. Abildinova, G. Batpenova, M. Kirby, A. Pinhasov.
Biological sex and IgE sensitization influence severity of depression and cortisol levels in atopic dermatitis.
Dermatology, 236 (2020), pp. 336-344
[8]
P.L. Carmanius, S. Lundin, M. Ödling, et al.
Drug utilization among young adults with atopic dermatitis: influence of sex, socio-economic status and disease severity.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 39 (2025), pp. 145-153
[9]
M.L. Schaarschmidt, D. Kromer, P. Wellmann, W.K. Peitsch, C. Kromer.
Patients’ preferences for systemic treatment of atopic dermatitis: safety and efficacy count the most.
J Dermatolog Treat, 35 (2024), pp. 2308682
[10]
M. Munera-Campos, P. Chicharro, A. Gonzalez Quesada, et al.
BIOBADATOP Spanish atopic dermatitis registry: description and early findings.
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 114 (2023), pp. T479-T487
[11]
A. Salava, V. Salo, J. Leppänen, A. Lauerma, A. Remitz.
Factors associated with severity of atopic dermatitis – a Finnish cross-sectional study.
J Eur Acad Dermatol Venereol, 36 (2022), pp. 2130-2139
[12]
J.I. Silverberg, J.M. Gelfand, D.J. Margolis, et al.
Symptoms and diagnosis of anxiety and depression in atopic dermatitis in U.S. adults.
Br J Dermatol, 181 (2019), pp. 554-565
[13]
J. Mihály, D. Sonntag, G. Krebiehl, A. Szegedi, D. Töröcsik, R. Rühl.
Steroid concentrations in patients with atopic dermatitis: reduced plasma dehydroepiandrosterone sulfate and increased cortisone levels.
Br J Dermatol, 172 (2015), pp. 285-288
[14]
N. Sudo, X.N. Yu, C. Kubo.
Dehydroepiandrosterone attenuates the spontaneous elevation of serum IgE level in NC/Nga mice.
Immunol Lett, 79 (2001), pp. 177-179
[15]
J. Chen, Q. Li, G. Saliuk, S. Bazhanov, J.H. Winston.
Estrogen and serotonin enhance stress-induced visceral hypersensitivity in female rats by up-regulating brain-derived neurotrophic factor in spinal cord.
Neurogastroenterol Motil, 33 (2021), pp. e14117
[16]
Z. Fan, C. Shao, Z. Kou, et al.
The role of sex hormones and sex hormone-binding globulin in functional gatrointestinal disorders: a bidirectional two-sample Mendelian randomization study.
J Gastrointestin Liver Dis, 33 (2024), pp. 474-481
Copyright © 2026. AEDV
Descargar PDF
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas