Journal Information
Vol. 100. Issue 7.
Pages 635-636 (September 2009)
Vol. 100. Issue 7.
Pages 635-636 (September 2009)
Letter to the Editor
Full text access
Should Scientific Quality of a National Conference Be Measured by the Percentage of Abstracts That Are Published?
Visits
4977
I. Betlloch-Mas, J.F. Silvestre-Salvador, I. Belinchón-Romero
Servicio de Dermatología, Hospital General Universitario de Alicante, Alicante, Spain
Related content
Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2009;100:636-710.1016/S1578-2190(09)70143-X
M.P. García-Muret, R.M. Pujol-Vallverdu
This item has received
Article information
Full text is only aviable in PDF
References
[1.]
M.P. García-Muret, R.M. Pujol.
Valoración del impacto científico de las comunicaciones presentadas en el Congreso Nacional de Dermatología y Venereología (años 2000-2003).
Actas Dermosifiliogr, 100 (2009), pp. 38-45
[2.]
C. Bolac, A. Orosco, G. Guillet, D. Quist, C. Derancourt.
Publication rate for oral presentations made at the Journées Dermatologiques de Paris meeting.
Ann Dermatol Venereol, 136 (2009), pp. 21-27
[3.]
G. Dahllöf, B. Wondimu, M.C. Maniere.
Subsequent publication of abstracts presented at the International Association of Paediatric Dentistry meetings.
Int J Paediatr Dent, 18 (2008), pp. 91-97
[4.]
F.A. Riordan.
Do presenters to paediatric meetings get their work published?.
Arch Dis Child, 83 (2000), pp. 524-526
[5.]
R. Aleixandre Benavent, S. Doménech Vidal, A. Yegros Yegros.
Fuentes de información en dermatología (II). Bases de datos de información bibliográfica.
Piel, 19 (2004), pp. 16-24
Copyright © 2009. Academia Española de Dermatología y Venereología and Elsevier España, S.L.