Información de la revista
Vol. 107. Núm. 9.
Páginas 797-798 (Noviembre 2016)
Compartir
Compartir
Descargar PDF
Más opciones de artículo
Vol. 107. Núm. 9.
Páginas 797-798 (Noviembre 2016)
Case and Research Letter
Acceso a texto completo
Father-to-Newborn Transmission of Herpes Simplex Virus Infection: A Sweet but Bitter Kiss
Herpes neonatal tras contacto con herpes labial paterno: dulce y amargo beso
Visitas
4754
O. Guergué Diaz de Cerio
Autor para correspondencia
, M. Rubio Lombraña, A. Barrutia Borque, M.R. González Hermosa
Servicio de Dermatología del Hospital Universitario Cruces, Vizcaya, Spain
Este artículo ha recibido
Información del artículo
Texto completo
Bibliografía
Descargar PDF
Estadísticas
Figuras (1)
Texto completo
Dear Editor,

While rare, neonatal herpes simplex virus (HSV) infection is one of the most severe perinatal infections. Only 10% of cases are acquired after birth. The disease is classified according to clinical presentation as follows: skin, eye, and mouth (SEM) disease (prevalence of ≈45%); central nervous system (CNS) disease (≈30%), and disseminated disease (≈25%), which has the worst prognosis.1 No deaths have been reported for SEM disease, but 2% of those affected may develop some degree of impairment by the age of 12 years.2 Early recognition and treatment with high-dose acyclovir (60mg/kg/d) reduces mortality and may improve long-term outcomes.3

We present the case of a 10-day-old newborn female admitted to the hospital with generalized skin lesions that had appeared 5h previously. The lesions consisted of groups of vesicles and pustules overlying erythematous skin, affecting the trunk and tongue (Fig. 1). The infant did not have fever or neurologic symptoms and was systemically well. There had been no complications during the pregnancy, vaginal delivery, or immediate postpartum period. The mother had had systemic lupus erythematous for the past 6 years, but this was clinically stable. She had had chickenpox during her childhood but had no genital lesions suggestive of herpes infection. The father, however, had active herpes simplex labialis and admitted to having repeatedly kissed his baby while he had active lesions. HSV type 1 was isolated from vesicular lesions in the neonate by real-time polymerase chain reaction (PCR). The rest of the tests were normal or negative, and included biochemical analysis, blood cell count, coagulation studies, blood culture, PCR for varicella-zoster virus from the newborn's vesicles, and culture and PCR for HSV, enterovirus, and varicella-zoster virus in cerebrospinal fluid. The fundus of the eye and ultrasound imaging of the brain were also normal. Due to the high suspicion of HSV infection, high-dose intravenous acyclovir was administered empirically while awaiting the PCR test results. Once the diagnosis had been confirmed, acyclovir was continued to complete 14 days of treatment. Contact isolation was also established. The girl's condition gradually improved over the next few days, and no sequelae were observed in the follow-up period.

Figure 1.

Groups of vesicles and pustules overlying erythematous skin.

(0,15MB).

HSV is a common human pathogen. Between 30% and 100% of adults have serologic evidence of the virus. It has been shown that oral HSV excretion is episodic and may occur in the presence or absence of herpes labialis. Importantly and contrary to general belief, reactivation of HSV leads more frequently to asymptomatic viral shedding than to recurrence of mucocutaneous lesions.1

HSV infection in neonates typically presents within the first 4 weeks of life. Skin lesions are an important diagnostic clue, but they are absent in 39% of cases of disseminated disease, 32% of cases of CNS disease, and 17% of cases of SEM disease.4 The proportion of neonatal infections due to HSV type 1 has increased in the last decade, possibly as a consequence of changing sexual habits among parents. An early diagnosis is mandatory and the method of choice is detection of HSV DNA by PCR or virus culture.

Our findings led to a diagnosis of neonatal HSV type 1 infection (SEM disease). We believe that the most likely source of transmission was the father's herpes simplex labialis, although we cannot be entirely certain because virus isolation was not performed. We initiated early empirical treatment about 8h after onset of the lesions, and may, therefore, have prevented progression to CNS involvement.

The aim of this article is to alert dermatologists to the possibility of postnatally acquired HSV infection in newborns. We emphasize the importance of establishing an early diagnosis and initiating empirical treatment upon the first suspicion. Based on our case, we strongly recommend separation of the newborn from any person with active HSV lesions (mothers with herpes labialis should wear a mask). We also recommend offering anticipatory guidance for parents.

Conflict of interests

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Acknowledgments

We thank the patient's parents for providing the photographs used in this article and for authorizing their publication. We would also like to thank Rabia Sofia Rashid for correcting the manuscript.

References
[1]
S. Gantt, W.J. Muller.
The immunologic basis for severe neonatal herpes disease and potential strategies for therapeutic intervention.
Clin Dev Immunol, 2013 (2013), pp. 369172
[2]
D.W. Kimberlin, C.Y. Lin, R.F. Jacobs, D.A. Powell, L.M. Frenkel, W.C. Gruber, et al.
Natural history of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections in the acyclovir era.
Pediatrics, 108 (2001), pp. 223-229
[3]
S.H. James, R.J. Whitley.
Treatment of herpes simplex virus infections in pediatric patients: current status and future needs.
Clin Pharmacol Ther, 88 (2010), pp. 720-724
[4]
U.D. Allen, J.L. Robinson.
Prevention and management of neonatal herpes simplex virus infections.
Paediatr Child Health, 19 (2014), pp. 201-206
Copyright © 2016. AEDV
Idiomas
Actas Dermo-Sifiliográficas
Opciones de artículo
Herramientas
es en

¿Es usted profesional sanitario apto para prescribir o dispensar medicamentos?

Are you a health professional able to prescribe or dispense drugs?